RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Bruce A. Dixon points out that: "Invisible Children is funded by a core of notorious right wing donors including the Discovery Institute, which Bruce Wilson fingered in a March 11 Talk 2 Action piece as the leading funder of efforts to promote the replacement of biological sciences in schools with 'intelligent design,' along with the Caster Foundation and the National Christian Foundation, all prominent backers of anti-gay referenda, politicians and initiatives in the United States and around the world."

Kony 2012 filmmakers pose with members of the  Lord's Resistance Army. (photo: Glenna Gordon/Inewp.com)
Kony 2012 filmmakers pose with members of the Lord's Resistance Army. (photo: Glenna Gordon/Inewp.com)



Top Ten Ways to Tell Kony Is Phony

By Bruce A. Dixon, Black Agenda Report

17 March 12

 

hanks to relentless promotion by corporate media, government, celebrities and politicians of both corporate parties, along with right wing church groups and foundations, the Kony 2012 video has "gone viral."  Viewed on YouTube more than a hundred million times by now, it paints a vivid and simple picture, clear enough, its narrator says, for a five year old. But is it real, or is it propaganda, and for what purpose?

Social Media Scam Alert: Top Ten Ways to Tell Kony is Phony

Joseph Kony, the Invisible Children YouTube video tells us, is a bad guy in Uganda. He's a lawless warlord leading something called the Lord's Resistance Army, which kidnaps, enslaves and murders innocent children by the tens of thousands. We're never told exactly why, as corporate media simply paint Africa as a hellish and inexplicable place where things like that just happen. The Ugandan government, the video tells us, would gladly shut Joseph Kony down and bring him to justice if only the US would provide the advanced weapons, sophisticated tracking gear, military training and the boots on the ground to help get it done. To make this happen, all that Kony 2012's promoters ask of us is to help spread "awareness" of Uganda's "invisible" child soldiers by facebooking, tweeting and repeating the Kony 2012 video, and by emailing influential politicians and the one-name celebrities like Oprah, Bono, Rhianna, Cosby and Lady Gaga (OK, Lady Gaga is two names) to whom they listen. The Kony 2012 video aims to bring this criminal child-enslaving Ugandan warlord to justice by enlisting tens of millions of us little people in making Kony's name an odious household word around the planet, after which Washington DC will stretch forth its military arm to bring Joseph Kony, alive if possible, before the International Criminal Court for trial and punishment.

Almost everything is wrong with this simple picture, from the missing histories and the hidden motives of storytellers and players to false statements of processes and problems real and unreal on both sides of the Atlantic. In fact, Kony 2012 is not a search for justice. Kony 2012 is a corporate-style PR and psy-ops campaign, a cynical hoax engineered to justify US and Western military intervention to control the incredibly lucrative oil, mineral, water and strategic resources of the heart of Africa.  The kind of social media activism the video promotes is calculated to make Americans feel good about themselves for "spreading awareness" of child soldiering when they're really spreading racist ignorance and disinformation, building a disinformed public consent for ongoing, open and direct, as opposed to covert and indirect US military intervention in Africa. "Don't study history" the video's makers tell us - "make history!" But the history that a lied to and disinformed public makes is bound to not be pretty.

Black Agenda Report is far from the first or the only news source to point that Kony 2012 is a warmongering hoax, and we certainly won't be the last.  As our contribution, we here offer our top ten reasons why Kony is phony.

Reason #10: Invisible Children is funded by a core of notorious right wing donors including the Discovery Institute, which Bruce Wilson fingered in a March 11 Talk 2 Action piece as the leading funder of efforts to promote the replacement of biological sciences in schools with "intelligent design,"along with the Caster Foundation and the National Christian Foundation, all prominent backers of anti-gay referenda, politicians and initiatives in the United States and around the world. The Ugandan regime of Yoweri Museveni is a favorite of theirs for having passed legislation making it a criminal offense to be gay, punishable by a life sentence.  Credible African journalists like Keith Harmon Snow have also alleged that Invisible Children's white and male  leaders have direct personal connections to US intelligence agencies.

Reason #9: Invisible Children and Kony 2012 don't tell us that the Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni, one of the "good guys" in the Kony 2012 universe, shot his own way to power using an army that included enslaved child soldiers, of his own according to the same International Criminal Court they want to haul Kony before. Bruce Wilson's excellent March 8 Talk 2 Action article "Invisible Children" Co-founder (KONY 2012) Hints It's About Jesus, and Evangelizing links to numerous sources for this and much else. You'd never know it from Kony 2012, Fox News or the New York Times, but Museveni is a brutal, murderous dictator, kletopcrat and genocidaire whom the International Criminal Court accuses of using thousands of child soldiers during its genocidal plunder of neighboring Congo, where Uganda and six other African nations invaded and killed an estimated 5 to 6 million Congolese in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a larger death toll than anyplace on planet Earth since the second world war.

Like his colleagues in enighboring Burundi and Rwanda, Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni maintains a ridiculously large army for a country so small, which it rents out as "peaceckeepers" for whatever dirty work Washington needs done. Right now ten or twenty thousand Ugandan soldiers are occupying parts of Somalia to keep that country from assembling a central government of its own unfriendly to Western interests.

Reason #8: Invisible Children and the Kony 2012 video also don't tell us that Uganda's Museveni replaced a president and rival general from the Acholi region of northern Uganda, the same ethnic group as Kony's LRA. The Ugandan government has evicted hundreds of thousands of Acholi from their lands and confined them to desperate and squalid refugee camps since 1996. Kony and his LRA did commit monstrous crimes in previous decades, but by now are said to number only a few hundred combatants. Kony may not even have set foot in Uganda in years, but he and the LRA are useful as convenient bogeymen to justify the continued dispossession of Uganda's Acholi, whose chief misfortunes besides the LRA itself, are having produced rivals to Museveni and living at the edge of a resource-rich region that stretches across Uganda's borders for hundreds of miles into Congo and Sudan.

Reason #7: Invisible Children and Kony 2012 are lying when they attribute the disappearance of 30,000 missing northern Ugandan children to the LRA. The truth is that some of the child soldiers the Ugandan government used dto commit genocide in neighboring Congo were abducted in northern Uganda, nobody knows how many, and a large but unknown portion of that region's civilian dead, many of them Acholi, perished at the hands of Uganda's government, which always had far more firepower and resources than the LRA, and just as little regard for the property and lives of innocent civilians and their children.

Reason #6: Threats of massive foreign intervention into civil conflicts never bring adversaries to the table. The threat of foreign intervention prolongs civil conflicts by making it unnecessary for those on whose side the foreigners are expected intervene to negotiate at all, while they leave nothing for the other side to negotiate over. Uganda needs an end to violence, and resources devoted to building its civil society, not more military aid.

Reason #5: The United States, the other "good guy" in Kony 2012's imaginary world invented the modern African child soldier in the late1970s and early 80s, so their commitment to "ending child soldiers" is a bit suspect. Apartheid South Africa was bordered Portuguese ruled Angola and Mozambique, with their own vicious versions of apartheid until 1974. In that year, despite massive US and NATO aid, the Portuguese army rebelled, refused to continue fighting against African independence and overthrew its own government at home. White South Africa was deeply threatened by having independent black regimes now at its borders. So, with US funding it helped create and arm "contra" guerilla forces, UNITA in Angolan and RENAMO in Mozambique to burn schools and clinics, to mine orchards and roads, commit mass rapes, mutilations and murders, terrorizing citizens in their own country. Lacking foreign troops or popular support , but with US aid and plenty of firepower, UNITA and RENAMO hit upon the innovation of kidnapping and enslaving child soldiers to carry out their despicable mission. Both were effusively praised and lavishly funded by Barack Obama's favorite president Ronald Reagan, and their leaders welcomed at the White House

In his chilling 2003 essay, Barefoot,Sick, Hungry and Afraid - The Real US Policy in Africa, my colleague Glen Ford described how the chaos and social demoralization spread by Western financed armies of nihilistic child soldiers made them an ideal tool for use in whenever the West needs to delay or prevent the emergence of African civil societies and central governments which might succumb to popular demands to develop a country's resources for its people rather than to benefit foreign interests. This strategy was employed in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, Rwanda, Uganda and elsewhere. "Failed states" infested by murderous child soldiers in the 80s and 90s proved to be incredibly good business environments for (mostly) Western extraction of hundreds of billions worth of timber, gold, diamonds, coltan and other vital African resources, and ultimately excuses to come in and install Rwandan and Ugandan-style dictatorships.

Reason #4: Depending on movie stars and celebrities to move public policy is the precise opposite of building the backbone and habits of a vibrant and self-aware civic movement. This kind of so-called activism is looked upon so favorably in corporate media because reinforces a slavish worship of celebrity culture, in which we carry out the will of corporate marketers who tell us what to eat, wear, covet, consume or shun and convince us it was our idea, not theirs. The real deal is that FaceBook, Twitter and much of crowd-sourced consumer culture are fundamentally the master's tools, clicktivism, not activism. It's never easy, and may not even be possible for slaves to free themselves with the master's tools. AFter all, that ain't what they were designed for. Most of those forwarding and FaceBooking the Kony 2012 video, including some of the celebrities, as Keith Harmon Snow points out, probably can't find Uganda on a map.

Reason #3: When both corporate parties, the entire corporate media universe, a constellation of celebrities and movie stars, all the right wing and much of the establishment liberal church along with the whole bag of bipartisan foreign policy experts agree on the need for decisive US military action, you can bet the course of wisdom and truth is just about always in the opposite direction. Republicans and Democrats voted to send troops to Vietnam, and only a single congresswoman voted against war in Afghanistan.

Reason #2: Kony 2012 and the campaign to keep US boots on the ground in Central Africa are all about the oil. And the diamonds. And the gold. And the coltan, and the water. Uganda's northern region contains vast oil reserves, and neighboring Congo is the source of most of the planet's coltan, a highly conductive compound used in every cell phone, computer, aircraft, automobile, missile, GPS or other electronic device on earth.

Reason #1: It's all about white people, the white West and their First Black President doing their imperial and colonial thing, running the planet for their benefit at everybody else's expense and feeling good about it, saving hapless & hopeless black Africans from themselves. Such a deal. If they wanted to take Kony down, they could have done it last week, last year, five or ten years ago. If they do take him down it'll be cause their Kony tool has outlived its usefulness, and maybe they need to plant a big wet sloppy kiss on Museveni and his gang, a bigger and more important bag of fools and tools.

The good news about Kony 2012 is that unlike the similar "Save Darfur" scam many voices have been quick to express skepticism, disbelief and flat out ridicule of the Kony 2012 hoax.

The bad news is that US corporate media, Republicans, Democrats, the Obama White House and State Department as well as rabid Tea Party senators and congress creatures are all permanent cheerleaders for war and empire. So few of Kony 2012's many critics will get on the TV stations that caused Invisible Children's video to "go viral." Corporate media don't cover Africa or the actions of the US in Africa. Thus the Pentagon's social media propaganda shops are free to spin and promote whatever fables they require to obtain our disinformed consent for the next oil and resource war - in Africa.

Mark Twain said a hundred years ago - talking about genocidal Western exploitation of the Congo, in fact, that a lie can flash across the world in the time the truth takes to put its boots on. But the boots are on. The truth is out here, and you are responsible for helping it overtake the lie.

So forward the link to this article to your friends. Put it on your FaceBook page. Tweet it and repeat it and send it to as many of your family, friends, colleagues, associates, bosses, employees and acquaintances as you can. Tomorrow, when we record a YouTube video of it, do the same with that. The cure for fake "awareness" campaigns that justify US military intervention in Africa is the truth. Don't be used. Do study history, Africa's and your own. And do make history.

Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and lives in Marietta GA, where he is a member of the state committee of the Georgia Green Party. Contact him at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+76 # SarahM 2012-03-17 09:12
Although Reason #10 got my attention, unfortunately the rest of the article grew progressively less convincing. The writer seems to have a lot of axes to grind, and much of the article makes unsupported accusations and insinuations. It is also not well written and seems incoherent at times. I would be interested in learning more, but from a more balanced proponent. As someone who has worked in Rwanda, I was especially unsure who he was referring to there - the former Hutu regime or the present progressive government of Pres. Paul Kagame? I also think that the African Union's use of peacekeepers from African countries is a good idea -- not perfect, but better than foreign intervention. The motivation for, and dispatch of,American military observers to Uganda is a cause of worry -- but the writer seems to assume nefarious motives without any evidence. I am concerned about Kony 2012's alleged financial backers, because the U.S. Christian right has been shown in Uganda -- and in Kenya -- to be a destabilizing and hate-mongering influence.
 
 
+15 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 09:58
Learn more at

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=8075
Kony 2012 Hides US Support for Repressive Ugandan Regime


http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/mar2012/kony-m14.shtml
Home » World News PrintLeafletFee dbackShare »
FacebookTwitterDiggRedditDeliciousStumbleUponBloggerE-Mail.Kony 2012 promotes US “humanitarian” intervention in Africa
By Bill Van Auken
14 March 2012


http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/14/the_road_to_hell_is_paved_with_viral_videos_kony_2012
For all its goodwill, Invisible Children's Kony 2012 film is dangerous propaganda, pure and simple. It's not a call to make a notorious celebrity out of Joseph Kony -- it's a call to war.
BY DAVID RIEFF | MARCH 14, 2012

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29652
KONY 2012: Merchandising and Branding Support for US Military Intervention in Central Africa
by Nile Bowie
Global Research, March 14, 2012

http://www.accuracy.org/release/kony-2012-video-a-pretext-for-military-intervention/
Kony 2012 Video: A Pretext for Military Intervention?
March 15, 2012
 
 
+17 # SarahM 2012-03-17 11:30
Blue Pilgrim, I checked out all of these sources. There is no question that Kony 2012 is propaganda,and the motivations behind it are murky, but these sources do not necessarily support the broad accusations made by the writer. Also, the sources listed are also sometimes lacking in credibility themselves. For example, the Nile Bowie article claims that the law authorizing U.S. assistance in bringing peace to central Africa was not authorized by Congress, when it clearly was passed by both the House and the Senate. Also, I think it would be helpful for people to read the text of the law itself: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111s1067enr/pdf/BILLS-111s1067enr.pdf. A reading of it will give others a far more nuanced sense of the objectives of the enacted law. Given Sec. Clinton's long demonstrated interest in helping victims, especially women and children, of warlords such as Kony, I believe her objective is peace, not more war.
 
 
+3 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 12:24
everything I've seen of Clinton is that she is just another fascist imperialist with no interest at all in humanitarian concerns. It would seem we have entirely different world views.
 
 
-11 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 13:08
He said "The bill was passed without congressional approval", not that it wasn't authorized. Perhaps he meant it passed on voice vote in the House, and no rollcall was taken in the Senate either.
 
 
+12 # SarahM 2012-03-17 13:59
So they voted for it but didn't approve it? Come on. I believe you are seriously misjudging and maligning Sec. Clinton. She has to work within limitations set by others, but she has consistently shown concern for those without a voice. You might consider the recent Executive Order by Pres. Obama initiating a "National Action Plan on Women, Peace & Security", http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/19/executive-order-instituting-national-action-plan-women-peace-and-securit, as well as as the brand new USAID policy (under her jurisdiction), "Gender Equality and Female Empowerment", http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/policy_planning_and_learning/documents/GEPolicyOnePager.pdf. Both of these demonstrate the Administration' s intent to help victims in the world's conflict zones. We do have different world views -- I try to avoid using labels, i.e. "fascist imperialist", to stereotype individuals.
 
 
+4 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 20:47
Fascist imperialist is not a stereotype but an accurate description of the politicians running this country.

This is the same pattern as seen in invading Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya, maybe Iran soon -- it's naked aggressive war against nations which pose no threat. It's fascist imperialism, and Clinton is as well into it as anyone.

I've spent mostly all day every day looking at all aspects of this for more than 10 years and even if some of details are hard to recall, I know what I'm talking about, and do not use words idly.
 
 
+11 # James38 2012-03-17 14:52
Blue, methinks you protest too much. In this case, your use of "different world views" sounds like excusing or legitimizing your own somewhat exaggerated agenda.

Lets all try to look inward, check out our own stuck attitudes, and quit the opposing "axe grinding" stuff. That gets us nowhere. These issues need to be resolved, not buried in the endless dust supply from axe grinding.

Let us do real discussing, and all be willing to change and upgrade our opinions when a dispassionate look at all of the evidence makes it necessary.
 
 
-2 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 20:55
You don't refute what I've said, but prefer to attack me and my motivations. That's not a new tactic.

Hey, hear the one about the dark and stormy night?

Uncle Sam is seen walking around under a street light seraching the ground.
Citizen: What are you looking for Uncle Sam?
US: There's been a report of murderous terrorists.
Citizen: Wow! Where were reported being spotted?
US: Some 500 yeards down that dark alley.
Citizen: So, why are you looking under this street light?
US: Because there is more oil here.

Yeah -- LRA is gone from Uganda for 6 years, so now the US is going to send military into Uganda? Sure -- there's oil there, and a desire for US domination -- same as in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Iran -- everywhere: total full-spectrum world domination, just as outlined in the PNAC declaration. So don't try to tell me abnout MY inward being or stuch attitudes or axe grinding. I ain't buying any of it!
 
 
+1 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 23:19
Well -- there's a bit of a mystery, but also a solution. I'll guess it was a typo -- not sure why anyone would deliberately edit it.

The article at Nowie's blog (March 8)says
"The bill was passed with congressional approval, and allows the US to deploy military forces in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic and South Sudan (at the consent of those nations) in pursuit of LRA rebels."

**With** congressional approval, not 'without' as is in the article at GlobalResearch (March 14).

That makes more sense since the statement at globalresearch was self-contradict ory just as a sentence.
 
 
+26 # AnastasiaP 2012-03-17 11:38
Agreed. I am deeply uncomfortable with the well-marketed campaign to make Joseph Kony the villain of the moment and I agree that "send more military aid" is almost always the worst solution to regional factionalism and fighting. But by #5, the author lost me completely. He seemed to be dragging in everything and everyone he has a beef with by a slender thread.
 
 
+23 # NOMINAE 2012-03-17 16:06
@SarahM

Thank you for your obviously well informed post.

However, past all of the "sound and fury", on both sides of this argument, I think it germane to ask just who appointed the U.S. as the police force of the world in the fist place?

"A Bad Guy Is At The Gate" was one among many of our weak-kneed excuses for invading Iraq.

There are "bad guys" the world over. The U.S. has no mandate to touch any one of them unless they declare war on the U.S.

We are not the Global Thought Police, we are not the world-wide enforcers of our version of morality. This fact may now be harder to notice in the face of our present foreign (and, increasingly, our domestic) policies.

This appeal to "save the children" could not be more obvious pandering in an effort to launch a "popular" war for change.

We need to have all the facts.

Thanks again to both you and to bluepilgrim for your individual contributions to that effort.
 
 
+10 # SarahM 2012-03-17 16:49
I believe that our war of choice in Iraq was a great and immoral tragedy -- and I believe that Pres. Obama is trying to avoid any more wars of such kind. And I think Kony 2012 is an attempt to use "save the children" for manipulative reasons. I also think that it is the ethical responsibility of the U.S. -- with other nations -- to stop genocide and other war crimes where possible, if a nation itself or its neighbors cannot or will not act to do so itself. But of course, even where the impulse is a good one, there are those in the military-indust rial complex that may try to pervert and exploit it -- which we must always be vigilant about. But not so wary and jaded that we end up doing nothing during severe humanitarian crises.
 
 
+6 # Lowflyin Lolana 2012-03-19 09:40
Sarah---that's when Mrs. Clinton lost me. She voted for that war. She supported that war. It was so obvious in the beginning that there were NO WMD....and that the Niger memo was a fake. And she did it anyway.
 
 
+1 # Smiley 2012-03-20 22:16
Sarah, What we really need to do is stop our government from creating "severe humanitarian crises".
 
 
+8 # Angie 2012-03-17 09:40
This analysis is no doubt basically accurate given the U.S. players. Still, Kony and the Lord's Resistance Army are both real and deadly, with a history of atrocitites to prove their existance.
 
 
+6 # sandyboy 2012-03-17 09:55
Er, okay. The point seems to be that supporters of the film have ulterior motives, and the alternatives to Kony are just as bad. None of that negates the fact that Kony seems to be a murdering, warmongering, child abusing shit that nobody was paying attention to until the video went viral. And that's what matters most, I'd say, not the latest blurb about one of those behind it running in the street in his Calvins.
 
 
+26 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 11:26
I've been hearing about LRA for over a decade, but it was always on the back burner. It's less of a problme now than it was, but now it's on the front burner because the US and Africom are in the process of recolonizing Africa (Libya is part of that -- so is the US interferance in Egypt).

If an imperialist wants to take over a country it's easy to find a bad guy, or create one, as an excuse, and whip up a propaganda campaign about it. Standard operating procedure. Kony 2012 is just part of the 'manufacturing consent' campaign.
 
 
+27 # Richard Raznikov 2012-03-17 13:55
No. What matters most is that the campaign may have been designed by people whose aim is to produce American popular support for sending U.S. troops to Uganda (and Congo, perhaps) ostensibly to chase Kony but actually to assert the power of the empire on the African continent.
 
 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2012-03-18 00:33
People have been paying attention to his guy for a very long time. That the US is just now hearing about it is a reflection on our news, not that this guy hasn't been covered by other news media.
 
 
+12 # Sully747 2012-03-17 10:30
Just like the fake Tibetan saga this Kony 2012 is engineered public opinion.
 
 
+25 # Donkey Hotee 2012-03-17 10:34
@Angie - Shoulda taken the red pill. The locals say that Kony hasn't been seen in Uganda in over 6 years. The current hubbub is a complete fabrication.
 
 
-9 # acohen8919 2012-03-17 19:22
You shouldn't have taken yours. Konya has moved across Africa and is now principally in the Congo. Get your facts straight. While se've no business getting involved militarily and the film
has its issues, this conspiracy theory is utter nonsense.
 
 
+4 # Donkey Hotee 2012-03-18 00:45
The lead sentence of this article states: "Joseph Kony, the Invisible Children YouTube video tells us, is a bad guy in Uganda." My comment was in reference to that, and it is correct. By your statement we should be sending troops to the Congo, which we are not. Now why is that, you might ask? We are not dealing in conspiracy theories here, just the facts. Boots on the ground in Uganda would seemingly make no geostrategic sense, unless it is to thwart the natural resource exploration and development joint venture deals begun with the Chinese.
 
 
+30 # wfalco 2012-03-17 11:17
It is all about who is behind this.Koney a bad person ? No doubt.
Bad people currently running Uganda ? No doubt.
Historically the U.S. could give a royal crap about the human rights of people living in dramatically poor countries.(Also known as "Third World"- a term I dislike profoundly.)

How could anyone doubt this author's top ten list of reasons ?
It is always about the resources. Never be convinced otherwise. Hegemony and control of the world's resources are the policy of U.S. militarism. It is what keeps the wheels behind the military/indust rial complex churning.
Children will die and women will endure unspeakabe crimes. And our policy will not factor that into any action to help. It never has, and never will.

There will always be a Koney...a Noriega, a Quaddafi, a Saddam Hussein, a Castro, a Daniel Ortega, a Hugo Chavez.
Some of these men I listed can be considered heroic (the Latins at least).The point is we love to have bad guys-it simplifies foreign adventures so the Fox watching lowest common denominator can understand. Koney ? I never heard of the guy.
 
 
-4 # acohen8919 2012-03-17 19:24
Good grief! Are you ACTUALLY comparing Kony to Castro???
 
 
+3 # Donkey Hotee 2012-03-18 00:52
Quoting acohen8919:
Good grief! Are you ACTUALLY comparing Kony to Castro???


My goodness, you are certainly a querulous sort. Re-read wfalco's post a bit more carefully. I believe that you have made an incorrect assumption and missed the main point entirely.
 
 
+6 # wfalco 2012-03-18 10:34
Quoting Donkey Hotee:
Quoting acohen8919:
Good grief! Are you ACTUALLY comparing Kony to Castro???


My goodness, you are certainly a querulous sort. Re-read wfalco's post a bit more carefully. I believe that you have made an incorrect assumption and missed the main point entirely.


Ha! Thanks. I thought my point was very clear-anyone can be a bad guy if it meets the U.S.'s foreign policy needs.
 
 
+2 # LJB 2012-03-17 11:34
I don't like anti-intellectu al conspiracy theory any more on the left than on the right, and this article reads like unsupported conspiracy theory to me. Is it true that Kony is on the top of the U.N.'s war criminal list? If so, that part of the video is not a lie. I'd rather see an article that proposes better ways of stopping these atrocities -- what SHOULD those who are outraged by these crimes do? What SHOULD we be arguing for and supporting? -- than something that promotes sitting on your ass and doing nothing by claiming the whole idea of Kony and his LRA is a "hoax."
 
 
+9 # James38 2012-03-17 15:01
We should always look at the obvious facts. One of them is the violently anti-gay policies of the current Ugandan Government.

Another is the history and present condition of the Acholi people. From the Wikipedia article:

During Uganda's colonial period, the British encouraged political and economic development in the south of the country, in particular among the Baganda. In contrast, the Acholi and other northern ethnic groups supplied much of the national manual labor and came to comprise a majority of the military, creating what some have called a "military ethnocracy". This reached its height with the coup d'état of Acholi General Tito Okello in June 1985 (thus terminating the second regime of Milton Obote), and came to a crashing end with the defeat of Okello and the Acholi-dominate d army by the National Resistance Army led by now-President Yoweri Museveni in January 1986.

(Continued)
 
 
+5 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 12:38
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=29798
UGANDAN OIL: US Africa Command a tool to Recolonise the African Continent
by Dr. Motsoko Pheko
Global Research, March 15, 2012
Pambazuka News - 2011-11-17
 
 
+3 # James38 2012-03-17 15:03
(Contiunation of Acholi article)

The Acholi are known to the outside world mainly because of the insurgency of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) led by Joseph Kony, an Acholi from Gulu. The activities of the LRA have been devastating within Acholiland (though they spread also to neighbouring districts and countries). In September 1996 the government of Uganda put in place a policy of forced displacement of the Acholi in the Gulu district into displacement camps. Since 1996 this policy has expanded to encompass the entire rural Acholi population of four districts, one million people. These camps have some of the highest mortality rates in the world with an estimated 1,000 people dying per week.[7] As of September 2009, large numbers of Acholi people remain in camps as internally displaced persons. The majority of elected parliamentarian s in the Acholi sub-region are members of the opposition.
 
 
+2 # shf 2012-03-17 19:13
I am distressed at the ideological fervor with which the Kony video is being trashed. Reasons 1-10, if valid at all, are beside the point. Joseph Kony has been and continues to be a hideous creature as evil as any historical figure has ever been. He is not a myth, and his story is not phony. Simply because you do not like evangelical and right wing organizations (and by the way I don't like them either), does not mean that a monster like Kony should be disregarded as a hoax. He is not a hoax. He is a horror. So, if it's an evangelical that stops him, fine with me.
 
 
+8 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-17 22:56
I don't see anyone dismissing Kony as a hoax -- it's the drive to put military into Ugand, which is not wher Kony is. What is in Uganda is oil:

us-launches-pr-campaign-ugandan-oil-intervention
US Launches PR Campaign for Ugandan Oil Intervention
by grtv
As the scramble for Ugandan oil heats up, a documentary about Joseph Kony's 20 year campaign of terror has become an online cause celebre and is once again energizing the public for military campaigns abroad. But what is the public not being told about the background of US involvement in the region, and what will come of the public's growing support for military intervention? Find out more in this week's GRTV Backgrounder
[...]
 
 
+1 # bluepilgrim 2012-03-18 06:57
Sorry -- omitted the link
http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2012/03/us-launches-pr-campaign-ugandan-oil-intervention
US Launches PR Campaign for Ugandan Oil Intervention
James CorbettPosted on: March 15, 2012
 
 
+3 # SarahM 2012-03-18 07:49
If everyone would just read the actual law (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111s1067enr/pdf/BILLS-111s1067enr.pdf), you will see that Congress recognizes in it that Kony is no longer operating in Uganda. The law talks about Kony having shifted his attacks to northeastern Congo, southern Sudan, and southeastern Central African Republic. Although one aim of the law is that of "providing political, economic, military, and intelligence support for viable multilateral efforts to protect civilians from the Lord’s Resistance Army, to apprehend or remove Joseph Kony and his top commanders from the battlefield in the continued absence of a negotiated solution, and to disarm and demobilize the remaining Lord’s Resistance Army fighters", the majority of the law is centered on the U.S., with other donors, providing humanitarian assistance to people being currently affected by the LRA, and supporting and encouraging "efforts of the Government of Uganda and civil society to promote comprehensive reconstruction, transitional justice, and reconciliation in northern Uganda" . There are a lot of conditions attached to funding -- i.e. it will be withdrawn if the government of Uganda is not serious and transparent about reconstruction efforts. Anyway, this summary doesn't do it justice -- you should read it yourself.
 
 
+8 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-03-18 11:25
Maybe the most important thing for us to keep in mind is that NOTHING happens in Uganda without the knowledge and complicity of Americans, largely members of Congress and also corporate leaders, representing The Family (C Street). For example, this American group instigated Uganda's "kill the gays" law.

It is not at all beyond the group to be complicit in facilitating and covering up something like this. It will be interesting to see how they respond.
 
 
+7 # James38 2012-03-18 16:45
Fiona, I agree that you point out important ideas. One of the real issues is allowing any part of US foreign policy to be controlled or directed by an ultra fanatical religious attitude against gays. There is no way the US should support the persecution of any group, and the present government of Uganda is doing just that. The fact that so-called religious persons are also pushing this murderous inhuman policy is a crime, and shows that they are anything but religious in any way that makes sense. They should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity right along with Kony.

It appears that Kony is operating in the Congo. If any US troops are involved, they should be working with the government of Congo to eliminate or capture Kony.

The US should limit its involvement with Uganda to putting maximum pressure on that government to quit the persecution of gays and to restore normal civil life to the Acholi. These are the important issues.
 
 
+4 # lnason@umassd.edu 2012-03-18 17:43
The article is accurate as to the facts but I think somewhat misjudges the intentions of the filmmakers.

That said, I think the real question is, "Why has Obama sent troops into this maelstrom?" It is a brutal civil war which we should not be involved with.

Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
 
 
+5 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-03-18 22:02
Following the death of Idi Amin, a secretive American cult-like religion including members of Congress and of government set up a parallel international affairs arrangement with them. Whatever the U.S. chooses to do is irrelevant because what The Family wants to do is what happens.
 
 
0 # lisbebrown 2012-03-19 10:39
Kony is a war criminal who has killed and kidnapped members of many of my Ugandan friends' families and done extreme damage to many lives. But the above article is simplistic and not entirely truthful. For example, Museveni can reasonably be called a kleptocrat but I don't believe the argument that he is a genocidaire can be supported. Further, the anti-gay law that is widely cited about Uganda actually never made it out of a legislative committee. Lying to make a point is an unfortunate tactic.
 
 
0 # Polar Bear 2012-04-02 17:46
Sen. Jim Inhofe helped tell story of Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony
Online Article | Published: Apr 1, 2012
BY MIKE SSEGAWA

KAMPALA, Uganda — Jenifer Atim refused to watch “Kony 2012.” She could not watch a film about what she already knows, rather, experienced. At 19, Atim is already a mother of four. Rebels belonging to Joseph Kony's Lord's...

Read more: http://newsok.com/search?query=&index=all&site=newsok&search=Inhofe+Kony&dropdown=newsok&x=19&y=12#ixzz1qvmMAGRY

Sen Inhofe probably helped set this all up Wrye a letter to the editor in the Oklahoman please
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN