RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Jolie writes: "The shots fired on Malala struck the heart of the nation, and as the Taliban refuse to back down, so too do the people of Pakistan."

Angelina Jolie talks to Syrian refugees in Lebanon. (photo: AFP)
Angelina Jolie talks to Syrian refugees in Lebanon. (photo: AFP)


We All Are Malala

By Angelina Jolie, The Daily Beast

18 October 12

 

n Wednesday morning, as we readied the kids for school amidst a few of the usual complaints about not wanting to go, I saw a headline on the cover of The New York Times: Taliban Gun Down a Girl Who Spoke Up for Rights. The Taliban claimed that 14-year-old Malala Yousafzai "ignored their warnings, and she left them no choice." They approached her school bus, asking for her by name, and shot her in the head for promoting girls' education.

After reading the article, I felt compelled to share Malala's story with my children. It was difficult for them to comprehend a world where men would try to kill a child whose only "crime" was the desire that she and others like her be allowed to go to school.

Malala's story stayed with them throughout the day, and that night they were full of questions. We learned about Malala together, watching her interviews and reading her diaries. Malala was just 11 years old when she began blogging for the BBC. She wrote of life under the Taliban, of trading in her school uniform for colorless plain clothes, of hiding books under her shawl, and eventually having to stop going to school entirely.

Our 8-year-old suggested that the world build a statue for Malala, and fittingly create a reading nook near it. Our 6-year-old asked the practical question of whether Malala had any pets, and if so, who would take care of them? She also asked about Malala's parents and if they were crying. We decided that they were, but not only for their daughter, also for children around the world denied this basic human right. Like Malala, her parents are icons of bravery and strength. Malala's father, also a long time champion for girls' education, is a school principal, teacher, and poet.

The following morning, the news showed pictures of children across Pakistan holding up Malala's picture at vigils and demonstrations, and praying in schools. My son worried that girls were going to be shot for standing up for Malala. I told him that they were aware of the danger, but publicly supporting her reflects how much Malala means to them. Malala's courage reminded all Pakistanis how important an education is. Her bravery inspired their own.

Still trying to understand, my children asked, "Why did those men think they needed to kill Malala?" I answered, "because an education is a powerful thing."

The shots fired on Malala struck the heart of the nation, and as the Taliban refuse to back down, so too do the people of Pakistan. This violent and hateful act seems to have accomplished the opposite of its intent, as Pakistanis rally to embrace Malala's principles and reject the tyranny of fear. A spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban said "let this be a lesson." Yes. Let this be a lesson-that an education is a basic human right, a right that Pakistan's daughters will not be denied.

As girls across Pakistan stand up to say "I am Malala," they do not stand alone. Mothers and teachers around the world are telling their children and students about Malala, and encouraging them to be a part of her movement for girls' education. Across Pakistan, a national movement has emerged to rebuild the schools and recommit to educate all children, including girls. This terrible event marks the beginning of a necessary revolution in girls' education.

Malala is proof that it only takes the voice of one brave person to inspire countless men, women, and children. In classrooms and at kitchen tables around the world, mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters are praying for Malala's swift recovery and committing themselves to carry her torch. As the Nobel Committee meets to determine the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, I imagine brave Malala will be given serious consideration.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+43 # RMDC 2012-10-18 15:56
All of these sentiments are good and worthy. Malala and other girls or women around the world are truly victims and deserve our sympathy and support.

But the only way to stop these crimes against women is to point out the source. The Taliban is funded and trained by Saudi Arabia. It has been this way since the mid 1980s. The US government consents to Saudi run madrassas which train young men to believe in a militant and violent Islam. The US will not oppose the Saudi Royal family because they own a huge amount of the US stock market.

The US could shut down the madrassas if it chose to. But it does not. The Taliban serves US interests. So girls like Malala pay the price for US and Saudi imperialism.
 
 
+13 # Scott Galindez 2012-10-18 23:03
The Taliban was created by Pakistan, The Taliban did not fight the Soviets, they were students who filled the vacum when the warlords couldn't decide who should lead. They were funded by Pakistan who didn't want leaders to emerge that would align with iran, or Saudi Arabia.

In the beginning the Taliban numbered in the hundreds, were badly equipped and low on munitions. Within months however 15,000 students arrived from the madrassas in Pakistan. The Taliban's first major military activity was in 1994, when they marched northward from Maiwand and captured Kandahar City and the surrounding provinces, losing only a few dozen men. The Soviets fell in 1992.

The Saudi run madrassas support rivals to the Taliban.
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2012-10-19 00:28
Scott -- The Taliban always fought against the war lords and drug lords the US imposed on Afghanistan, esp. the Northern Alliance. They were always closely allied with Saudi Arabia. When they defeated the Northern Alliance and took control of Kabul and formed a government, Saudi Arabia was the first nation to recognize them as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia still recognizes them.

Taliban means "student." The madrassas were in Pakistan because that is where the CIA training camps of the mujahadeen were. The Taliban were intended to be fresh recruits for the mujahadeen who would fight the soviets.

Iran has nothing to do with any of this. The US and CIA have a very mixed relationship with the Taliban. If the Taliban would just allow the CIA to produce all the heroin it wants in Afghanistan, I'm pretty sure the CIA would recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government.
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 07:49
Wrong.......... ...the source of this bs is the male monotheism religion that Malala and others like her belong to. The women of the Islamic religion should get some guts and take off those rags on their heads. That would be a true tribute to Malala.....not empty words on posters.
 
 
-8 # colvictoria 2012-10-19 09:34
@RMDC Excellent points you bring up. If the media were able to get into Saudi Arabia and expose the horrors women experience there we would all be outraged like we are with Malala's shooting.
The Taliban serves US corporate media interests in that news like this encourages the American public to see them as the real evil. The US looks like the good guy and Jolie's stardom is used to score political points for Obama's campaign. Interesting that all of this is coming up just days before the next debate on US foreign policy.
 
 
-62 # RMDC 2012-10-18 15:57
I meant to add that Angelina Jolie is part of the problem. She distracts the world from the real problem.She should use her fame to really go after the causes. But she never does that.
 
 
-33 # Mickeyfilm 2012-10-18 21:28
RMDC... you're right. What is so weird is even on a supposedly Liberal intelligent site, forget brain power, the vast majority of people on this site support her. She is a joke and obviously does this as part of her PR program. It's so repulsive, especially all the people who are posting negative numbers on your response... your first response is a plus7 at the moment and then your 2nd post pointing out in a very nice way that this ... I'll refrain from any cuss workds... "person" ... supposed star... is part of the problem, then you get a .. at the moment, minus 8. Says a lot about this site we're both on now. Sure they will delay adding this to the comments≥ I've found the delays are often several hours.
 
 
+10 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 07:55
Well Mickeyfilm..... ..once again a republican neo-con didn't think that we think like them. Let me clue you into something. Unlike you people, liberals are not in lock-step with each other. We are capable of thinking on our own. That said..........N O, dear.......the vast majority of us DO NOT support her. We may support some of her ideals like...oh I don't know....maybe that girls should be allowed to go to school. That doesn't mean we support her enmass without any deviation. Again, we are not like you people who can only think about what they're told to think about. And that is...if it at all resembles a liberal thought.....it is baaaaad. No matter if its logical....it is baaaad.
 
 
+19 # Lolanne 2012-10-19 06:14
Quoting RMDC:
I meant to add that Angelina Jolie is part of the problem. She distracts the world from the real problem.She should use her fame to really go after the causes. But she never does that.


Ask the children she has adopted and is raising whether Ms Jolie is a "problem." I suspect they would think you're nuts.

She is not a problem or a "joke," as Mickeyfilm calls her. She behaves according to her personal belief system and is doing her bit to help the world's children. Not a one of us can do it alone, but if we all did our part as she is doing, it just might go a long way toward bringing some measure of peace to the world.
 
 
0 # pegasus4508 2012-10-20 10:46
At least Ms. Jolie lives her life with conviction, as does Brad Pitt. Both of them put their MONEY where their mouth is and do their best to make this a better world. When will the day come that any Republican can say the same. NEVER since the republican policy is "It is ALL about ME"
 
 
+22 # DaveM 2012-10-18 20:19
In Ronald Reagan's America, the Taliban were "freedom fighters" since they were fighting the big bad Soviet Union (remember them?). They were provided with billions of dollars in aid, a fair amount of which was weapons and ammunition. Now they fire those bullets back at us and at their own people--and are their influence is expanding into several dubious U.S. allies, of which Pakistan is one. Why? Because after the big bad Soviet Union was gone, we left the "freedom fighters" and the people of Afghanistan out in the cold, at least once refusing to send a small amount of aid which would have built schools.

Had we left well enough alone once upon a time, the Taliban might well have gone the way of most terrorist groups and Afghanistan would just be another post-Soviet bloc country desperately trying to become Western. As to Pakistan, does anyone remember Benazir Bhutto?

The United States owes Malala and every woman under the Taliban's iron rule an apology backed by appropriate action. Perhaps a drone strike on the thug who shot her is in order.
 
 
+9 # Scott Galindez 2012-10-18 23:06
The Taliban did NOT fight the Soviets. they filled the power vacum after the Soviets fell. They were students not fighters.

They became fighters but after the Soviets fell, and two Rival militias were fighting a civil war, one militia backed by the Saudi's, the other by Iran. That civil war left the rest of the country without working government institutions which allowed the Taliban to take power by offering Shira law and security.
 
 
+5 # Rick Levy 2012-10-18 23:21
Their forerunners were the Mujahideen which morphed into the Taliban.
 
 
+4 # Lolanne 2012-10-19 06:20
Quoting Scott Galindez:
The Taliban did NOT fight the Soviets. they filled the power vacum after the Soviets fell. They were students not fighters.

They became fighters but after the Soviets fell, and two Rival militias were fighting a civil war, one militia backed by the Saudi's, the other by Iran. That civil war left the rest of the country without working government institutions which allowed the Taliban to take power by offering Shira law and security.


Mr. Galindez, thank you for bringing real (that is to say FACTUAL) information into these comments. Too many times what purports to be informed opinion is just the ranting of angry, ill-informed individuals.
 
 
+6 # reiverpacific 2012-10-19 08:24
Quoting Lolanne:
Quoting Scott Galindez:
The Taliban did NOT fight the Soviets. they filled the power vacum after the Soviets fell. They were students not fighters.

They became fighters but after the Soviets fell, and two Rival militias were fighting a civil war, one militia backed by the Saudi's, the other by Iran. That civil war left the rest of the country without working government institutions which allowed the Taliban to take power by offering Shira law and security.


Mr. Galindez, thank you for bringing real (that is to say FACTUAL) information into these comments. Too many times what purports to be informed opinion is just the ranting of angry, ill-informed individuals.

Peripheral to the subject but it was the Afghan-based Mujahadeen, armed by the US, who fought the Soviet Union in AFGHANISTAN, one of their leaders being the late Saudi, Osama B. L.
There's little evidence of how many of the former "Our bad guys" became Taliban that I can find, doubtless many did join that totalitarian, repressive regime that ruled Afghanistan for a time. We're talking PAKISTAN here but it seems that the various violent and fanatical arms of some Islamic factions find rather porous borders, moving fairly freely via terrain, collaboration and corruption, between the UAE, Saudi Arabia, various 'Stahns, (Not Iran) which the US refused to acknowledge.
Glad that Ms Jolie spoke out; her motives are none of our business.
 
 
+13 # Dion Giles 2012-10-18 20:48
The real problem is at the front line where decent people like Malala are struggling against tyranny. All that geopolitics (origin of Taliban, strategic interests etc.) does is trace the setting in which real history is being made by real people who confront the world as they find it. Full marks to Angelina Jolie for writing about them.

Daily drone attacks are also part of the real problem in the Swat valley. The Serb racists who persistently shelled Sarajevo, and powermongers who are shelling Aleppo, deserve to be put down as vermin. The same applies to the launchers of drones, which is simply long range shelling of communities. Full marks too for Imran Khan and those who went with him into Talibanland to raise a protest against the murderers joining with the Taliban in terrorising the people.
 
 
-33 # Mickeyfilm 2012-10-18 21:05
In no way do I think that it takes this superficial "star" to play a role in making Malala a person of importance representing her power. I really wish these "people" such as Angelina Jokie to stay out of these situations. Malala is the real star, Angelina Jokie is a joke and only trying to capitalize on this horrible situation.
 
 
+4 # reiverpacific 2012-10-19 13:27
Quoting Mickeyfilm:
In no way do I think that it takes this superficial "star" to play a role in making Malala a person of importance representing her power. I really wish these "people" such as Angelina Jokie to stay out of these situations. Malala is the real star, Angelina Jokie is a joke and only trying to capitalize on this horrible situation.

You must be a real load o' fun to be around. -D'you wake up on a nice day and declare "By Gawd we'll pay for this!"?
 
 
+18 # dyannne 2012-10-18 22:07
Did you watch the film, RMDC? I think it really does take individuals like those women in it and like Malala and Angelina Jolie to make real change. They inspire and courage ignites movement. Governments need prodding to do the right thing. These people are doing good. They are prodders.
 
 
+15 # susants 2012-10-18 22:14
In response to RMDC's comments about the "problem", the Wahhabis and Taliban are the fundamentalist problems in that region and they armed. They are blackmailing Saudia Arabia (as did Osuma bin Laden who thrived as an exile among the Taliban).
Miss Jolie's good heart and celebrity has focused on the individuals' problems in just surviving amongst such terrorism.
Everyone in the media understands that human interest stories move hearts and sometimes mountains.
She and others highlight those problems which mirror our own super-aggressiv e prejudiced, racist, sexist, etc., and fundamentalist minorities who are wrecking the advance of civilisation.
The latter are fighting harder for our geopolitical domination of that area for profit. The rest of us would be furious if we lost the gas, oil, geographical access, lithium and other precious metals of Afghanistan and we couldn't keep Pakistan and India fighting it out.
Though correct in the immediate cause of Malala's tragedy, RMDC simplifies with an impossible solution.
 
 
+11 # NOMINAE 2012-10-19 00:14
@ susants

Very well reasoned comment, with an actual grasp of what is going on in that area of the world.

Some of the other comments above (minus those of Scott Galindez) are proof that having the slightest idea of the facts on the ground, or the faintest ghost of an idea what one is talking about, has never proved to be an impediment for some posters who hold forth exposing the paucity of their grasp on this subject.

Kudos to you and to Scott Galindez for introducing a "fact based" assessment of the picture.

And, whatever one chooses to think of Ms. Jolie, she is at least doing *something* more productive than simply whining inanities on some computer comment string.

Ms. Jolie is bringing focus to a problem that drastically needs attention, attribute to her whatever other motives one may be sufficiently cruel to conjecture.

Only Ms. Jolie knows *why* Ms. Jolie does what she does. The rest cannot be known by any observer, and remains truly no one else's business.
 
 
+6 # susants 2012-10-18 22:16
Reviewer: why do you list Xnumber of symbols left and then say the comment is too long - requiring cutting?
Shouldn't you list the correct limit on the number of symbols?
 
 
+3 # NOMINAE 2012-10-19 00:18
@ susants

Agreed. I have had the same difficulty. But, from word count in comments to the opinion registers thumbs up or down, the IT dept. at RSN would appear to be either IT challenged, or arithmetically confused.
 
 
+3 # Lolanne 2012-10-19 06:24
@ susants and NOMINAE:

I've had the same issue with having to cut responses sometimes, even though the note tells me I still have symbols left until I finally realized I could just make two separate comments, stating "continued in pt 2" at the bottom of the first, and then go on with whatever I was trying to say. It's a small victory but I do enjoy winning a skirmish with a computer once in a while! :-)
 
 
+10 # natalierosen 2012-10-19 04:35
Thank you, Angelina, for all you have done and for your commitment to innocents everywhere who are at the mercy of tyranny.

I hold a special place in my heart for Malala. This issue transcends religion. It reinforces our common humanity and our greatest gift that nature or God has bestowed upon us and that is compassion, understanding and most of all our ability to learn.

It is that gift -- learning -- which civilizes man. It is clear to those who gain power through ignorance that there is nothing they will not do to achieve their cause and inject the poison of ignorance into those they control.

Education IS dangerous because it liberates man stuck in a 7th century mindset in this the 21st century.

The Taliban though are a metaphor for the toxicity of uncompromising and extreme fundamentalist belief. Our own nation should not sit smugly secure thinking that we are so much more advanced than they. WE ARE NOT. Our own American Taliban have seized power through an unrecognizable Republican Party which shows NO mercy, has NO compassion and whose minds are so closed they want to return our heretofore advanced country to an 18th century world our Founders would find abhorrent.

Those of us who care about human advancement should ALL be Malalas hoping and praying, if it is your choice, that Malala, this profound example of heroism, heal and return to speak another day for her cause.
 
 
+10 # bobby t. 2012-10-19 05:25
One woman I know was an Israeli tank commander. Another was a great gourmet chef in England, and this after being the global marketing director of attuk.com in London. That woman is my eldest daughter. There have been women prime ministers, etc. In the U.S.S.R over fifty percent of the doctors were and are woman. Education is the key to releasing the enormous power of women around the World. And yes, it is power.
For too long men have ruled the World and what have we seen? How good a job have they done? We are headed towards a global disaster, and there are people among us arguing about the "students" and where they came from?
In the coming election, there is a party that is pro women, and another that is anti women. Sure, knock out half the population from the productivity of America and what do you have? That's right folks.
 
 
+7 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 08:01
Men have behaved like bad boys since religion was invented. Unfortunately, we women have been enableing them in the false belief that it would protect us. NOT.........It' s going to take time but women are slowly beginning to get control. Alread there are more women graduating from college then men. Let's just hope we can get there before the boys blow this world up.
 
 
+3 # cordleycoit 2012-10-19 05:45
If we could ignore the fundamentalists in Christianity and Islam we might stand a chance at living good lives side by side but the psychopaths seem to rule. Mad men at the helm and the people deliberately confused. Children attacked by grown men with pee pee problems on hopes the Taliban gets the mental health treatment the need so badly.Then we treat our leadership as well. We have got to stop being a police state.
 
 
+3 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 08:02
You can't. That's what these religions are based on. The rule/laws are written down and support all actions.
 
 
+4 # Mannstein 2012-10-19 08:07
Let's not forget the fundamentalists in Judaism and Zionism for doing their part at being psychopaths.
 
 
+6 # solarpete 2012-10-19 07:38
If the Saudi's do support the Traliban "cowards" and the U.S. does nothing about it - then the answer is OIL.

The U.S. is an oil slave to the Saudi's and it is our own fault and we need to get off
of this addition as fast as possible....
 
 
0 # Johnny 2012-10-19 08:23
IF ONLY THE people of the U.S. would refuse to back down from opposing the mass murder of helpless girls by Obomber, Sarkozy, and Gray with their cruise missiles, artillery, night raids, and drones! Instead, Americans embrace "the tyranny of fear."
 
 
+6 # susants 2012-10-19 08:40
Thank you Nominae, Scott and RMDC for helping re-focus. This is a now a 'thinking string' despite efforts to derail.

People are seeing that we all face the same problems to a greater or lesser degree. Civilization cannot progress without secular or tolerant committment to "the common good".

We are talking about our shared problems because of Angelina Jolie (whatever her motives which I suspect are good) and Malala (who is safe in England).

BRAVA ladies!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN