The piece begins: "President Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics - this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations."
A family crossing the Arizona desert from Mexico, 05/18/06. (photo: Luis J. Jimenez/NYT)
How a Democracy Works
04 June 11
resident Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics - this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations.
As for the other parts of reform - where millions of immigrants get right with the law and get on with becoming Americans, where workers are better protected - he threw up his hands. He said immigration advocates "wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that's not how a democracy works."
O.K., so maybe it isn't. But there is a lot President Obama can and should do, using the discretion and authority granted to the executive branch and its agencies to make the system work better:
- Mr. Obama can bolster public safety by pulling the plug on Secure Communities, a program that sends fingerprints of everyone booked by state or local police to Department of Homeland Security databases to be checked for immigration violations. It was supposed to focus on dangerous felons, but the heavy majority of those it catches are noncriminals or minor offenders - more than 30 percent have no convictions for anything.
The president should listen to the many law enforcement professionals and local officials, like the governors of New York and Illinois, who want nothing to do with Secure Communities. They say it endangers the public by catching the wrong people and stifling community cooperation with law enforcement. - The president can push much harder against the noxious anti-immigrant laws proliferating in the national free-for-all. The administration sued to stop Arizona's radical scheme. But Utah, Alabama, Indiana and Georgia are trying to do the same thing.
- He can grant relief from deportation to young people who would have qualified for the Dream Act, a filibustered bill that grants legal status to the innocent undocumented who enter college or the military. He can do the same for workers who would qualify for the Power Act, a stalled bill that seeks to prevent employers from using the threat of deportation and immigration raids to retaliate against employees who press for their rights on the job.
- He can resist Republican lawmakers who want mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify, a flawed hiring database, which would likely lead to thousands of Americans losing their job because of data errors. A December report by the Government Accountability Office warned that E-Verify is plagued by inaccurate records and vulnerable to identity theft and employer fraud.
- He can order the citizenship agency to keep families intact by making it easier for illegal immigrants who are immediate relatives of American citizens to fix their status without having to leave the country. Many already qualify for green cards but are afraid to risk getting stuck abroad under too-strict laws that could bar their re-entry.
- He can bolster the civil rights division of the Department of Justice and give the Department of Labor more tools to strengthen protections for all workers and the authority to combat labor trafficking. Such authority now lies with Homeland Security, which means many immigrants are too frightened to speak up when their rights are abused.
As President Obama said in El Paso, the United States needs to address "the real human toll of a broken immigration system." There's work to do, Mr. President.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Borders are man made - many times by wars.
What is now "south" was Mexico few centuries ago. Open borders - the best security is to invest in Mexico - will come back many times over.
great enough so that people do not want to leave?
There was no "immigration problem".
Now after banks and speculators made/lost their money - the same people who build houses for the middle class are "illegals".
Go to the reservations and tell them how important it is that we spend money on those who have a country but won't make it great.
Seriously, if Calderon is a great man, he could actually run a country that people want to live in
Yes, we all want 'legal' immigration, and 'legal guest workers'. However, the US has done a great job of stealing resources from Mexico, with implied threats. Now American guns flood Mexico, creating cartel violence. The US could easily classify these transactions as "terrorist" and trace the money, but US Banks are benefiting from deposits. You choose to blame Calderon for a 60 decade problem, and like many Americans, refuse to look at the policies of our own country. We took the water from the agricultural areas of Mexico, denying food and jobs to millions of Mexicans. We create the problem, and then blame the victims. And yes, many people do love living in Mexico. The poor just don't want their families to starve. Educate yourself before you make empty statements.
Once done, then we can address immigration in a sensible manner. Until then, both the U.S. and Mexico are hurt by the current climate. The U.S. got screwed as badly (or worse) than Mexico, by NAFTA. We have to stop screwing everyman before anyman can make forward gains.
Yes, I understand that business does not want a level playing field. But I also understand that Americans have the capability to dominate per capita consumption if they have the means. The means is created only with jobs other than McWage jobs. Yeah, there are a lot of Chinese workers that have a little money to spend. But at fifteen cents an hour wages, it'll be a cold day in hell before they start buying Buicks.
Whether immigration, debt ceiling, entitlements, infrastructure, education, or whatever ... the problem is JOBS. If you don't fix JOBS, none of this other bullshit matters. Without jobs, it is game over. Focus, people!
My friend taught ESL - English As the Second Language evening classes at the City College in Seattle.
Of course this program was first to be cut from budget -
After 10 hours of hard work immigrants (mostly Mexicans) spend 3+ hours learning English to move up/contribute.
This is core/values that made this country - not banksters and speculators.
Not everybody has thousands of dollars to import his wife to US.
Yep, more than likely there are two sessions in your child's school to accommodate immigrants. That's true even in places like Nashville TN. A complicated mess, it is. As I have said, there will be no solution unless our government pressures Mexico to get their business in order and get our citizens on board. Until then, it will be up to individual states to determine their own course. We should all participate in state government decisions.
Federal education funds are from income taxes, which the rich routinely avoid, in large part and often in whole.
But local funds are usually segregated, and schools in poorer areas have less money to begin with. Plus, these are usually the very areas that are burdened with the extra costs of educating students who enter school with little or no English. (They are not necessarily the children of ILlegal immigrants.)
Immigration is a federal matter and federal dollars ought to go to remedying any financial problems that are incurred because of immigration, whether legal or illegal.
RSS feed for comments to this post.