Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

The piece begins: "President Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics - this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations."

A family crossing the Arizona desert from Mexico, 05/18/06. (photo: Luis J. Jimenez/NYT)
A family crossing the Arizona desert from Mexico, 05/18/06. (photo: Luis J. Jimenez/NYT)



How a Democracy Works

By The New York Times | Editorial

04 June 11

 

resident Obama, who has spent two and a half years not delivering on his promise to fix immigration, gave a speech in El Paso last month and cloaked his failure in tough statistics - this many new border agents, that much fencing, these thousands of deportations.

As for the other parts of reform - where millions of immigrants get right with the law and get on with becoming Americans, where workers are better protected - he threw up his hands. He said immigration advocates "wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that's not how a democracy works."

O.K., so maybe it isn't. But there is a lot President Obama can and should do, using the discretion and authority granted to the executive branch and its agencies to make the system work better:

  • Mr. Obama can bolster public safety by pulling the plug on Secure Communities, a program that sends fingerprints of everyone booked by state or local police to Department of Homeland Security databases to be checked for immigration violations. It was supposed to focus on dangerous felons, but the heavy majority of those it catches are noncriminals or minor offenders - more than 30 percent have no convictions for anything.

    The president should listen to the many law enforcement professionals and local officials, like the governors of New York and Illinois, who want nothing to do with Secure Communities. They say it endangers the public by catching the wrong people and stifling community cooperation with law enforcement.


  • The president can push much harder against the noxious anti-immigrant laws proliferating in the national free-for-all. The administration sued to stop Arizona's radical scheme. But Utah, Alabama, Indiana and Georgia are trying to do the same thing.


  • He can grant relief from deportation to young people who would have qualified for the Dream Act, a filibustered bill that grants legal status to the innocent undocumented who enter college or the military. He can do the same for workers who would qualify for the Power Act, a stalled bill that seeks to prevent employers from using the threat of deportation and immigration raids to retaliate against employees who press for their rights on the job.


  • He can resist Republican lawmakers who want mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify, a flawed hiring database, which would likely lead to thousands of Americans losing their job because of data errors. A December report by the Government Accountability Office warned that E-Verify is plagued by inaccurate records and vulnerable to identity theft and employer fraud.


  • He can order the citizenship agency to keep families intact by making it easier for illegal immigrants who are immediate relatives of American citizens to fix their status without having to leave the country. Many already qualify for green cards but are afraid to risk getting stuck abroad under too-strict laws that could bar their re-entry.


  • He can bolster the civil rights division of the Department of Justice and give the Department of Labor more tools to strengthen protections for all workers and the authority to combat labor trafficking. Such authority now lies with Homeland Security, which means many immigrants are too frightened to speak up when their rights are abused.

As President Obama said in El Paso, the United States needs to address "the real human toll of a broken immigration system." There's work to do, Mr. President.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+10 # Activista 2011-06-04 17:58
US immigration laws to our neighbor south are against all articles of human rights.
Borders are man made - many times by wars.
What is now "south" was Mexico few centuries ago. Open borders - the best security is to invest in Mexico - will come back many times over.
 
 
+11 # dawn99 2011-06-04 21:56
Is anyone, ever going to put forth the idea of making Mexico ( and below )
great enough so that people do not want to leave?
 
 
+3 # Activista 2011-06-05 09:21
Before 2008 - during housing bubble - Mexicans did ALL the hard construction work.
There was no "immigration problem".
Now after banks and speculators made/lost their money - the same people who build houses for the middle class are "illegals".
 
 
+1 # rf 2011-06-06 03:48
Mexicans put lots of Americans out of work by doing the construction for peanuts also. The argument that they only do work no one else wants to do is a load of crap. As a Liberal, I think we should send them all home with an AK and ammo so they can take care of their own aristocracy problem. Then Mexico can develop like the rich, cultured, intelligent country it is.
 
 
+6 # Ken Hall 2011-06-06 07:22
South Americans are beginning to elect nationalist leaders, such as Evo Morales, Hugo Chavez, Lula da Silva, who promote programs that benefit the majority of their populations. This has taken some effort and political will, and probably wouldn't have been possible if the US, which has a long history of supporting tyrants in Central and South American, hadn't been distracted by wars in the mideast. When I was young I wondered why Mexico was such a different society, with the many have-nots. Part of it is because of US policy. Maybe Mexicans will follow the examples of Bolivia, Venezuela, etc, and create change in their political systems. I can't help but point out how the comparative situation has changed since my boyhood days; the US is now, in terms of income distribution, more akin to Mexico than to other industrialized nations. I wish conservative voters could comprehend that when you turn a nation's governance over to corporations, you aren't going to have a viable middle class. Corporations see the population as potential wage slaves, and have done a remarkable job of profiting from it. Hail the United Corporations of America!
 
 
+4 # dawn99 2011-06-04 21:58
Native Americans are not "Mexicans".

Go to the reservations and tell them how important it is that we spend money on those who have a country but won't make it great.

Seriously, if Calderon is a great man, he could actually run a country that people want to live in
 
 
+5 # mtnview 2011-06-05 13:47
Perhaps you are ignorante as to the history of Western States. Most were stolen from Mexico after the Civil War of 1865. In the 1930's the first official workers program, The Braseros, provided much needed agricultural workers for the new vegie and fruit fields of California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Colorado. This increased during WWII, when soldiers were overseas. Only in 1980, when these workers demanded their rights to be treated as human, Governor Reagan began to treat Mexicans as undesirables. This became a platform issue for Republicans, and is now a race issue.

Yes, we all want 'legal' immigration, and 'legal guest workers'. However, the US has done a great job of stealing resources from Mexico, with implied threats. Now American guns flood Mexico, creating cartel violence. The US could easily classify these transactions as "terrorist" and trace the money, but US Banks are benefiting from deposits. You choose to blame Calderon for a 60 decade problem, and like many Americans, refuse to look at the policies of our own country. We took the water from the agricultural areas of Mexico, denying food and jobs to millions of Mexicans. We create the problem, and then blame the victims. And yes, many people do love living in Mexico. The poor just don't want their families to starve. Educate yourself before you make empty statements.
 
 
+1 # rf 2011-06-06 03:53
I believe that, when Mexico lost the southwest, the US and they were more like equals than not. If the country has stayed poor it is not on the basis of US abuse only, but also abuse by an aristocracy that, like our own, became a cleptocracy. Blame not only the US for Mexico's poorness, but the pressure is relieved by people coming north and sending resources home. If the had to stay home, we would see riots like in the 60's in Mexico.
 
 
+9 # AngryMan 2011-06-04 22:43
Get out of the WTO. Kill NAFTA and all the other treaties that are the root cause of shedding many American jobs. We can't sell cars into Korea so bye-bye KIA and the other Korean car makers. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Wherever in this world we cannot sell American products due to "protectionism", we should not allow their products into the US. If that were done, maybe we'd see a few jobs sprout up.

Once done, then we can address immigration in a sensible manner. Until then, both the U.S. and Mexico are hurt by the current climate. The U.S. got screwed as badly (or worse) than Mexico, by NAFTA. We have to stop screwing everyman before anyman can make forward gains.

Yes, I understand that business does not want a level playing field. But I also understand that Americans have the capability to dominate per capita consumption if they have the means. The means is created only with jobs other than McWage jobs. Yeah, there are a lot of Chinese workers that have a little money to spend. But at fifteen cents an hour wages, it'll be a cold day in hell before they start buying Buicks.

Whether immigration, debt ceiling, entitlements, infrastructure, education, or whatever ... the problem is JOBS. If you don't fix JOBS, none of this other bullshit matters. Without jobs, it is game over. Focus, people!
 
 
+1 # Big Jo 2011-06-05 06:25
My wife is an immigrant from the Philippines; I spent thousands of dollars for medical exams, physicals, interviews, trips to the embassy, etc. because we wanted to ensure that she entered the US legally and on a path to citizenship. My wife who already spoke English, quickly enrolled in English classes to polish her skills once she got here. Several years later, when I enrolled my daughter in school, she had to get a half day kindergarten rather than a full day class that we were promised - the primary reason, dozens of Spanish speaking children (presumably children of illegal immigrants) forced the school administrators to open 2 kindergartens for non-English speakers - my daughter was cheated and got only a half day. Illegal immigration makes a mockery of people who tried to follow the law.
 
 
+5 # Michael Mulholland 2011-06-05 07:32
Actually, the reason your daughter couldn't attend full-time kindergarten was because of the under-funding of that program. Why does everyone just accept that the ever decreasing money allocated to education is just a given rather than a choice that serves the rich who wish to pay less & less taxes every year. I suspect your enemy is white, not brown.
 
 
0 # Activista 2011-06-05 09:34
"spent thousands of dollars - we wanted to ensure that she entered the US legally ..???"
My friend taught ESL - English As the Second Language evening classes at the City College in Seattle.
Of course this program was first to be cut from budget -
After 10 hours of hard work immigrants (mostly Mexicans) spend 3+ hours learning English to move up/contribute.
This is core/values that made this country - not banksters and speculators.
Not everybody has thousands of dollars to import his wife to US.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2011-06-06 05:35
Big Jo, kindergarten is different in every state. When I was that young, kindergarten was half day because the schools thought a full day was too much for folks so young. As populations grew, there were two sessions to accommodate more children. In rural areas now, kindergarten is full day because the schools don't want the expense of running buses twice a day. The kids do get tired and have nap time.

Yep, more than likely there are two sessions in your child's school to accommodate immigrants. That's true even in places like Nashville TN. A complicated mess, it is. As I have said, there will be no solution unless our government pressures Mexico to get their business in order and get our citizens on board. Until then, it will be up to individual states to determine their own course. We should all participate in state government decisions.
 
 
+1 # je proteste 2011-06-05 09:52
Has it occurred to you that are you both right - up to a point?

Federal education funds are from income taxes, which the rich routinely avoid, in large part and often in whole.

But local funds are usually segregated, and schools in poorer areas have less money to begin with. Plus, these are usually the very areas that are burdened with the extra costs of educating students who enter school with little or no English. (They are not necessarily the children of ILlegal immigrants.)

Immigration is a federal matter and federal dollars ought to go to remedying any financial problems that are incurred because of immigration, whether legal or illegal.
 
 
+3 # Patricia Chang 2011-06-06 21:53
Obama has a well-established habit of throwing up his hands on the most important issues. From job creation to healthcare, he has done what is most expedient. He goes to bat for big corporations, but only halfway or not-at-all for the average citizen. He likes to blame his failures on Congress, but does not use the powers he has to counteract their gridlock or blocking.It is my conclusion that he does not care about the plight of the jobless, the homeless, those still without health insurance. First and foremost, he cares only. about himself and his big money campaign donations. He is an elitist and a corporatist. He doesnt want to upset the plutocracy for the hoi-poloi! I wish we had a choice that was a person with courage, strength, and integrity.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.