RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The immorality of the United States and Great Britain's decision to invade Iraq in 2003, premised on the lie that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, has destabilized and polarized the world to a greater extent than any other conflict in history."

Desmond Tutu pulled out of a seminar which Tony Blair was scheduled to attend. (photo: Str/Reuters)
Desmond Tutu pulled out of a seminar which Tony Blair was scheduled to attend. (photo: Str/Reuters)


Why I Had No Choice But to Spurn Tony Blair

By Desmond Tutu, Guardian UK

03 September 12

 

I couldn't sit with someone who justified the invasion of Iraq with a lie.

he immorality of the United States and Great Britain's decision to invade Iraq in 2003, premised on the lie that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, has destabilised and polarised the world to a greater extent than any other conflict in history.

Instead of recognising that the world we lived in, with increasingly sophisticated communications, transportations and weapons systems necessitated sophisticated leadership that would bring the global family together, the then-leaders of the US and UK fabricated the grounds to behave like playground bullies and drive us further apart. They have driven us to the edge of a precipice where we now stand - with the spectre of Syria and Iran before us.

If leaders may lie, then who should tell the truth? Days before George W Bush and Tony Blair ordered the invasion of Iraq, I called the White House and spoke to Condoleezza Rice, who was then national security adviser, to urge that United Nations weapons inspectors be given more time to confirm or deny the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Should they be able to confirm finding such weapons, I argued, dismantling the threat would have the support of virtually the entire world. Ms Rice demurred, saying there was too much risk and the president would not postpone any longer.

On what grounds do we decide that Robert Mugabe should go the International Criminal Court, Tony Blair should join the international speakers' circuit, bin Laden should be assassinated, but Iraq should be invaded, not because it possesses weapons of mass destruction, as Mr Bush's chief supporter, Mr Blair, confessed last week, but in order to get rid of Saddam Hussein?

The cost of the decision to rid Iraq of its by-all-accounts despotic and murderous leader has been staggering, beginning in Iraq itself. Last year, an average of 6.5 people died there each day in suicide attacks and vehicle bombs, according to the Iraqi Body Count project. More than 110,000 Iraqis have died in the conflict since 2003 and millions have been displaced. By the end of last year, nearly 4,500 American soldiers had been killed and more than 32,000 wounded.

On these grounds alone, in a consistent world, those responsible for this suffering and loss of life should be treading the same path as some of their African and Asian peers who have been made to answer for their actions in the Hague.

But even greater costs have been exacted beyond the killing fields, in the hardened hearts and minds of members of the human family across the world.

Has the potential for terrorist attacks decreased? To what extent have we succeeded in bringing the so-called Muslim and Judeo-Christian worlds closer together, in sowing the seeds of understanding and hope?

Leadership and morality are indivisible. Good leaders are the custodians of morality. The question is not whether Saddam Hussein was good or bad or how many of his people he massacred. The point is that Mr Bush and Mr Blair should not have allowed themselves to stoop to his immoral level.

If it is acceptable for leaders to take drastic action on the basis of a lie, without an acknowledgement or an apology when they are found out, what should we teach our children?

My appeal to Mr Blair is not to talk about leadership, but to demonstrate it. You are a member of our family, God's family. You are made for goodness, for honesty, for morality, for love; so are our brothers and sisters in Iraq, in the US, in Syria, in Israel and Iran.

I did not deem it appropriate to have this discussion at the Discovery Invest Leadership Summit in Johannesburg last week. As the date drew nearer, I felt an increasingly profound sense of discomfort about attending a summit on "leadership" with Mr Blair. I extend my humblest and sincerest apologies to Discovery, the summit organisers, the speakers and delegates for the lateness of my decision not to attend.



Archbishop Desmond Tutu is a winner of the Nobel Prize for Peace.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+55 # Guy 2012-09-03 07:12
A man of integrity that speaks the truth.
Wake ,sheeple of the world !
 
 
+62 # indian weaver 2012-09-03 07:13
Tutu deserves another Nobel Peace Prize. While dubya and blair deserve the orange jump suits on their way to public hanging at The Hague's War Crimes Tribunal. How many billions of humans expect and want to see that happen? How many of us know the travesty of international justice since that is not happening, yet.
 
 
+52 # hobbesian 2012-09-03 07:27
Don't forget that snake Cheney - worth $90 million...
 
 
+44 # BobbyLip 2012-09-03 07:57
That someone of the standing of Archbishop Tutu speaks out about the war criminal Blair is of enormous importance. Too bad Blair is incapable of shame.
 
 
+40 # cafetomo 2012-09-03 08:25
Ever notice how those speaking truth with conscience have clear and linear thoughts that are easily conveyed, and those with ulterior motives have convoluted concepts that have more to do with causing fear & outrage for the purpose of stampeding past certain details?

Most of us seem to have our BS detectors turned off these days, just to cope with the unbelievable stench. We may have to hold our nose, but we can still open our eyes. I know a breath of fresh air, when I see it.
 
 
+7 # Mrcead 2012-09-03 11:28
Agreed. RSN gives me hope.
 
 
+44 # jerry6665 2012-09-03 08:46
I am honored to be alive at the same time as Archbishop Tutu. As an extensive world traveler, I know he speaks the truth. The world wants to know why our great Country has stood by and done nothing to bring Cheney, Rove, Bush, et al, to justice and instead have made them heroes in some quarters. And, they also wonder why our great Country, where all men are equal under the laws, has allowed them to profit so egregiously from their actions.

Thank you, Archbishop Tutu, for bringing honor into the world.
jerry s
 
 
+25 # Rich Austin 2012-09-03 09:05
But who elected Bush? (Ok, ok, he stole the election. All that means is that enough people voted for him to make the theft possible. And four years later? Yup, Dubbya got elected again.)

Desmond Tutu is correct. Rational people know that. Evidently our nation has a shortage of rational people. Our people must look in the mirror. The DNA of America is Do No Admit. People do not admit error. They make excuses, or else they hunker down and angrily defend their idiocy. We are taught, after all, that losing is tantamount to being un-American.

Stop electing people like Bush. And don’t elect sociopaths like Romney or Ryan, or others who have conned Tea Party roadies into supporting mean-spirited right wingers and their causes. That way Archbishop Tutu won’t have to expose their crimes.

(Hell, even the “opposition” is afraid to tell it like it is. Remember when Pelosi said “impeachment is off the table”. Evidently, war crimes are not considered impeachable offenses by a majority of Congress.)
 
 
+7 # indian weaver 2012-09-03 12:53
Good point about Pelosi. In fact, most of the democratic side of the aisle is as complicit in committing war crimes as dumdum dubya et. al. By their silence and voting records, very few democrats are blameless in the commission of international Crimes Against Humanity as waged by this current fascist terrorist regime in washington dc. And the current resident of the Black House isn't helping at all. Talk about cowardly complicity, it's endemic in once was The People's government. Now, we have no say, so it's not ours, and we don't want it anymore. This government is counter productive to life.
 
 
+23 # anntares 2012-09-03 09:05
Thank you. I was just in a Muslim country and on every street I realized how horrific it would be if our US military were charging into homes and stores chasing down people we thought were "terrorists" but who saw themselves as defending their country against invaders, just as any "red blooded American" would do if another country or coalition of countries invaded us to relieve us of our leader on the grounds that we have nukes.
Before we "liberated" Iraq, Iranians were becoming fed up with their mullahs and very pro-Western ... after we invaded, they could not support the US or the West without sounding as if they supported the invasion. So the extremists re-gained the power they had been losing.
 
 
+14 # jerry6665 2012-09-03 12:02
Quoting anntares:
Thank you. I was just in a Muslim country and on every street I realized how horrific it would be if our US military were charging into homes and stores chasing down people we thought were "terrorists" but who saw themselves as defending their country against invaders, just as any "red blooded American" would do if another country or coalition of countries invaded us to relieve us of our leader on the grounds that we have nukes.
Before we "liberated" Iraq, Iranians were becoming fed up with their mullahs and very pro-Western ... after we invaded, they could not support the US or the West without sounding as if they supported the invasion. So the extremists re-gained the power they had been losing.


i was in jakarta, indonesia, the day bush's war started. i had always been treated with respect and had never felt threatened in muslim countries until then. the many people with whom i came in contact could even discuss politics and religion without a problem.

however, since we basically destroyed iraq and continue our threat stances, as i travel now, my contacts are very careful to protect me as the world now is wary of our intentions.

trying to win the 'hearts and minds' becomes more difficult daily and, as most rational people may have noticed, we are no longer trusted by our neighbors. we are all now citizens of the world and the world is getting smaller daily.
 
 
+7 # indian weaver 2012-09-03 12:57
This amerikan regime has lost the hearts of minds of us citizens at this point, not only in those countries we are invading for personal greed and arrogance. Talk about losing the war for hearts and minds! The terrorist police invasions we wage worldwide are doing exactly the opposite. However, remember that any war games at all makes the powerful richer. And that is the bottom line, everything else is propaganda. Don't believe a word your government ever says again until we seriously revamp the government.
 
 
+20 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-09-03 09:27
One more lucidly righteous statement from a great Archbishop.
 
 
+19 # motamanx 2012-09-03 10:18
Worldwide, more people marched against the war than against anything in history. Democratic leaders paid no attention. Desmond Tutu did pay attention. Who showed better leadership?
 
 
+3 # Jyl 2012-09-04 12:31
I don't quite understand why it is that Blair has been particularly singled out for the Hague, though he well deserves whatever is that befalls him. It seems to me that his guilt is completely and absolutely in synch with Bush et al. He was a great encourager of Bush's crimes but quite helpless without the Bush despots. It has always amazed me that the invasion of Iraq was reportedly, as well, in retaliation for 9/11. Isn't it ironic, as well as tragic, that this retaliatory measure caused more American deaths (of military personnel) than 9/11 itself!?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN