RSN April 14 Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Turse writes: "The true size and scope of the U.S. military's secret military began to come into focus. It was, to say the least, vast."

US soldiers pursue militants in Helmand province. The shadowy Task Force 373 meanwhile focuses its efforts on more than 2,000 senior Taliban figures on a target list. (photo: Adrees Latif/Reuters)
US soldiers pursue militants in Helmand province. The shadowy Task Force 373 meanwhile focuses its efforts on more than 2,000 senior Taliban figures on a target list. (photo: Adrees Latif/Reuters)


The Rise of the Military's Secret Military

By Nick Turse, TomDispatch

08 January 14

 

ude, I don't need to play these stupid games. I know what you're trying to do." With that, Major Matthew Robert Bockholt hung up on me.

More than a month before, I had called U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) with a series of basic questions: In how many countries were U.S. Special Operations Forces deployed in 2013? Are manpower levels set to expand to 72,000 in 2014? Is SOCOM still aiming for growth rates of 3%-5% per year? How many training exercises did the command carry out in 2013? Basic stuff.

And for more than a month, I waited for answers. I called. I left messages. I emailed. I waited some more. I started to get the feeling that Special Operations Command didn't want me to know what its Green Berets and Rangers, Navy SEALs and Delta Force commandos -- the men who operate in the hottest of hotspots and most remote locales around the world -- were doing.

Then, at the last moment, just before my filing deadline, Special Operations Command got back to me with an answer so incongruous, confusing, and contradictory that I was glad I had given up on SOCOM and tried to figure things out for myself. I started with a blank map that quickly turned into a global pincushion. It didn't take long before every continent but Antarctica was bristling with markers indicating special operations forces' missions, deployments, and interactions with foreign military forces in 2012-2013. With that, the true size and scope of the U.S. military's secret military began to come into focus. It was, to say the least, vast.

A review of open source information reveals that in 2012 and 2013, U.S. Special Operations forces (SOF) were likely deployed to -- or training, advising, or operating with the personnel of -- more than 100 foreign countries. And that's probably an undercount. In 2011, then-SOCOM spokesman Colonel Tim Nye told TomDispatch that Special Operations personnel were annually sent to 120 countries around the world. They were in, that is, about 60% of the nations on the planet. "We're deployed in a number of locations," was as specific as Bockholt would ever get when I talked to him in the waning days of 2013. And when SOCOM did finally get back to me with an eleventh hour answer, the number offered made almost no sense.

Despite the lack of official cooperation, an analysis by TomDispatch reveals SOCOM to be a command on the make with an already sprawling reach. As Special Operations Command chief Admiral William McRaven put it in SOCOM 2020, his blueprint for the future, it has ambitious aspirations to create "a Global SOF network of like-minded interagency allies and partners." In other words, in that future now only six years off, it wants to be everywhere.

The Rise of the Military's Secret Military

Born of a failed 1980 raid to rescue American hostages in Iran (in which eight U.S. service members died), U.S. Special Operations Command was established in 1987. Made up of units from all the service branches, SOCOM is tasked with carrying out Washington's most specialized and secret missions, including assassinations, counterterrorist raids, special reconnaissance, unconventional warfare, psychological operations, foreign troop training, and weapons of mass destruction counter-proliferation operations.

In the post-9/11 era, the command has grown steadily. With about 33,000 personnel in 2001, it is reportedly on track to reach 72,000 in 2014. (About half this number are called, in the jargon of the trade, "badged operators" -- SEALs, Rangers, Special Operations Aviators, Green Berets -- while the rest are support personnel.) Funding for the command has also jumped exponentially as SOCOM's baseline budget tripled from $2.3 billion to $6.9 billion between 2001 and 2013. If you add in supplemental funding, it had actually more than quadrupled to $10.4 billion.

Not surprisingly, personnel deployments abroad skyrocketed from 4,900 "man-years" -- as the command puts it -- in 2001 to 11,500 in 2013. About 11,000 special operators are now working abroad at any one time and on any given day they are in 70 to 80 countries, though the New York Times reported that, according to statistics provided to them by SOCOM, during one week in March 2013 that number reached 92.

The Global SOF Network

Last year, Admiral McRaven, who previously headed the Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC -- a clandestine sub-command that specializes in tracking and killing suspected terrorists -- touted his vision for special ops globalization. In a statement to the House Armed Services Committee, he said:

"USSOCOM is enhancing its global network of SOF to support our interagency and international partners in order to gain expanded situational awareness of emerging threats and opportunities. The network enables small, persistent presence in critical locations, and facilitates engagement where necessary or appropriate..."

In translation this means that SOCOM is weaving a complex web of alliances with government agencies at home and militaries abroad to ensure that it's at the center of every conceivable global hotspot and power center. In fact, Special Operations Command has turned the planet into a giant battlefield, divided into many discrete fronts: the self-explanatory SOCAFRICA; the sub-unified command of U.S. Central Command in the Middle East SOCCENT; the European contingent SOCEUR; SOCKOR, which is devoted strictly to Korea; SOCPAC, which covers the rest of the Asia-Pacific region; and SOCSOUTH, which conducts special ops missions in Central and South America and the Caribbean, as well as the globe-trotting JSOC.

Since 2002, SOCOM has also been authorized to create its own Joint Task Forces, a prerogative normally limited to larger combatant commands like CENTCOM. These include Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines, 500-600 personnel dedicated to supporting counterterrorist operations by Filipino allies against insurgent groups like Abu Sayyaf.

A similar mouthful of an entity is the NATO Special Operations Component Command-Afghanistan/Special Operations Joint Task Force-Afghanistan, which conducts operations, according to SOCOM, "to enable the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), the Afghan National Security Force (ANSF), and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) to provide the Afghan people a secure and stable environment and to prevent insurgent activities from threatening the authority and sovereignty of GIRoA." Last year, U.S.-allied Afghan President Ha­mid Karzai had a different assessment of the "U.S. special force stationed in Wardak province," which he accused of "harassing, annoying, torturing, and even murdering innocent people."

According to the latest statistics made available by ISAF, from October 2012 through March 2013, U.S. and allied forces were involved in 1,464 special operations in Afghanistan, including 167 with U.S. or coalition forces in the lead and 85 that were unilateral ISAF operations. U.S. Special Operations forces are also involved in everything from mentoring lightly armed local security forces under the Village Stability Operations initiative to the training of heavily armed and well-equipped elite Afghan forces -- one of whose U.S.-trained officers defected to the insurgency in the fall.

In addition to task forces, there are also Special Operations Command Forward (SOC FWD) elements which, according to the military, "shape and coordinate special operations forces security cooperation and engagement in support of theater special operations command, geographic combatant command, and country team goals and objectives." These light footprint teams -- including SOC FWD Pakistan, SOC FWD Yemen, and SOC FWD Lebanon -- offer training and support to local elite troops in foreign hotspots. In Lebanon, for instance, this has meant counterterrorism training for Lebanese Special Ops forces, as well as assistance to the Lebanese Special Forces School to develop indigenous trainers to mentor other Lebanese military personnel.

SOCOM's reach and global ambitions go further still. TomDispatch's analysis of McRaven's first two full years in command reveals a tremendous number of overseas operations. In places like Somalia and Libya, elite troops have carried out clandestine commando raids. In others, they have used airpower to hunt, target, and kill suspected militants. Elsewhere, they have waged an information war using online propaganda. And almost everywhere they have been at work building up and forging ever-tighter ties with foreign militaries through training missions and exercises.

"A lot of what we will do as we go forward in this force is build partner capacity," McRaven said at the Ronald Reagan Library in November, noting that NATO partners as well as allies in the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America "are absolutely essential to how we're doing business."

In March 2013, for example, Navy SEALs conducted joint training exercises with Indonesian frogmen. In April and May, U.S. Special Operations personnel joined members of the Malawi Defense Forces for Exercise Epic Guardian. Over three weeks, 1,000 troops engaged in marksmanship, small unit tactics, close quarters combat training, and other activities across three countries -- Djibouti, Malawi, and the Seychelles.

In May, American special operators took part in Spring Storm, the Estonian military's largest annual training exercise. That same month, members of the Peruvian and U.S. special operations forces engaged in joint training missions aimed at trading tactics and improving their ability to conduct joint operations. In July, Green Berets from the Army's 20th Special Forces Group spent several weeks in Trinidad and Tobago working with members of that tiny nation's Special Naval Unit and Special Forces Operation Detachment. That Joint Combined Exchange Training exercise, conducted as part of SOCSOUTH's Theater Security Cooperation program, saw the Americans and their local counterparts take part in pistol and rifle instruction and small unit tactical exercises.

In September, according to media reports, U.S. Special Operations forces joined elite troops from the 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations member countries -- Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar (Burma), and Cambodia -- as well as their counterparts from Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, China, India, and Russia for a US-Indonesian joint-funded coun­terterrorism exercise held at a training center in Sentul, West Java.

Tactical training was, however, just part of the story. In March 2013, for example, experts from the Army's John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School hosted a week-long working group with top planners from the Centro de Adiestramiento de las Fuerzas Especiales -- Mexico's Special Warfare Center -- to aid them in developing their own special forces doctrine.

In October, members of the Norwegian Special Operations Forces traveled to SOCOM's state-of-the-art Wargame Center at its headquarters on MacDill Air Force Base in Florida to refine crisis response procedures for hostage rescue operations. "NORSOF and Norwegian civilian leadership regularly participate in national field training exercises focused on a scenario like this," said Norwegian Lieutenant Colonel Petter Hellesen. "What was unique about this exercise was that we were able to gather so many of the Norwegian senior leadership and action officers, civilian and military, in one room with their U.S counterparts."

MacDill is, in fact, fast becoming a worldwide special ops hub, according to a report by the Tampa Tribune. This past fall, SOCOM quietly started up an International Special Operations Forces Coordination Center that provides long-term residencies for senior-level black ops liaisons from around the world. Already, representatives from 10 nations had joined the command with around 24 more slated to come on board in the next 12-18 months, per McRaven's global vision.

In the coming years, more and more interactions between U.S. elite forces and their foreign counterparts will undoubtedly take place in Florida, but most will likely still occur -- as they do today -- overseas. TomDispatch's analysis of official government documents and news releases as well as press reports indicates that U.S. Special Operations forces were reportedly deployed to or involved with the militaries of 106 nations around the world during 2012-2013.

For years, the command has claimed that divulging the names of these countries would upset foreign allies and endanger U.S. personnel. SOCOM's Bockholt insisted to me that merely offering the total number would do the same. "You understand that there is information about our military… that is contradictory to reporting," he told me. "There's certain things we can't release to the public for the safety of our service members both at home and abroad. I'm not sure why you'd be interested in reporting that."

In response, I asked how a mere number could jeopardize the lives of Special Ops personnel, and he responded, "When you work with the partners we work with in the different countries, each country is very particular." He refused to elaborate further on what this meant or how it pertained to a simple count of countries. Why SOCOM eventually offered me a number, given these supposed dangers, was never explained.

Bringing the War Home

This year, Special Operations Command has plans to make major inroads into yet another country -- the United States. The establishment of SOCNORTH in 2014, according to the command, is intended to help "defend North America by outpacing all threats, maintaining faith with our people, and supporting them in their times of greatest need." Under the auspices of U.S. Northern Command, SOCNORTH will have responsibility for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and portions of the Caribbean.

While Congressional pushback has thus far thwarted Admiral McRaven's efforts to create a SOCOM satellite headquarters for the more than 300 special operators working in Washington, D.C. (at the cost of $10 million annually), the command has nonetheless stationed support teams and liaisons all over the capital in a bid to embed itself ever more deeply inside the Beltway. "I have folks in every agency here in Washington, D.C. -- from the CIA, to the FBI, to the National Security Agency, to the National Geospatial Agency, to the Defense Intelligence Agency," McRaven said during a panel discussion at Washington's Wilson Center in 2013. Referring to the acronyms of the many agencies with which SOCOM has forged ties, McRaven continued: "If there are three letters, and in some cases four, I have a person there. And they have had a reciprocal agreement with us. I have somebody in my headquarters at Tampa." Speaking at Ronald Reagan Library in November, he put the number of agencies where SOCOM is currently embedded at 38.

"Given the importance of interagency collaboration, USSOCOM is placing greater emphasis on its presence in the National Capital Region to better support coordination and decision making with interagency partners. Thus, USSOCOM began to consolidate its presence in the NCR [National Capitol Region] in early 2012," McRaven told the House Armed Services Committee last year.

One unsung SOCOM partner is U.S. AID, the government agency devoted to providing civilian foreign aid to countries around the world whose mandate includes the protection of human rights, the prevention of armed conflicts, the provision of humanitarian assistance, and the fostering of "good will abroad." At a July 2013 conference, Beth Cole, the director of the Office of Civilian-Military Cooperation at U.S. AID, explained just how her agency was now quietly aiding the military's secret military.

"In Yemen, for example, our mission director has SVTCs [secure video teleconferences] with SOCOM personnel on a regular basis now. That didn't occur two years ago, three years ago, four years ago, five years ago," Cole said, according to a transcript of the event. But that was only the start. "My office at U.S. AID supports SOF pre-deployment training in preparation for missions throughout the globe... I'm proud that my office and U.S. AID have been providing training support to several hundred Army, Navy, and Marine Special Operations personnel who have been regularly deploying to Afghanistan, and we will continue to do that."

Cole noted that, in Afghanistan, U.S. AID personnel were sometimes working hand-in-hand on the Village Stability Operation initiative with Special Ops forces. In certain areas, she said, "we can dual-hat some of our field program officers as LNOs [liaison officers] in those Joint Special Operations task forces and be able to execute the development work that we need to do alongside of the Special Operations Forces." She even suggested taking a close look at whether this melding of her civilian agency and special ops might prove to be a model for operations elsewhere in the world.

Cole also mentioned that her office would be training "a senior person" working for McRaven, the man about to "head the SOF element Lebanon" -- possibly a reference to the shadowy SOC FWD Lebanon. U.S. AID would, she said, serve as a facilitator in that country, making "sure that he has those relationships that he needs to be able to deal with what is a very, very, very serious problem for our government and for the people of that region."

U.S. AID is also serving as a facilitator closer to home. Cole noted that her agency was sending advisors to SOCOM headquarters in Florida and had "arranged meetings for [special operators] with experts, done roundtables for them, immersed them in the environment that we understand before they go out to the mission area and connect them with people on the ground." All of this points to another emerging trend: SOCOM's invasion of the civilian sphere.

In remarks before the House Armed Services Committee, Admiral McRaven noted that his Washington operation, the SOCOM NCR, "conducts outreach to academia, non-governmental organizations, industry, and other private sector organizations to get their perspective on complex issues affecting SOF." Speaking at the Wilson Center, he was even more blunt: "[W]e also have liaison officers with industry and with academia... We put some of our best and brightest in some of the academic institutions so we can understand what academia is thinking about."

SOCOM's Information Warfare

Not content with a global presence in the physical world, SOCOM has also taken to cyberspace where it operates the Trans Regional Web Initiative, a network of 10 propaganda websites that are run by various combatant commands and made to look like legitimate news outlets. These shadowy sites -- including KhabarSouthAsia.com, Magharebia which targets North Africa, an effort aimed at the Middle East known as Al-Shorfa.com, and another targeting Latin America called Infosurhoy.com -- state only in fine print that they are "sponsored by" the U.S. military.

Last June, the Senate Armed Services Committee called out the Trans Regional Web Initiative for "excessive" costs while stating that the "effectiveness of the websites is questionable and the performance metrics do not justify the expense." In November, SOCOM announced that it was nonetheless seeking to identify industry partners who, under the Initiative, could potentially "develop new websites tailored to foreign audiences."

Just as SOCOM is working to influence audiences abroad, it is also engaged in stringent information control at home -- at least when it comes to me. Major Bockholt made it clear that SOCOM objected to a 2011 article of mine about U.S. Special Operations forces. "Some of that stuff was inconsistent with actual facts," he told me. I asked what exactly was inconsistent. "Some of the stuff you wrote about JSOC… I think I read some information about indiscriminate killing or things like that."

I knew right away just the quote he was undoubtedly referring to -- a mention of the Joint Special Operations Command's overseas kill/capture campaign as "an almost industrial-scale counterterrorism killing machine." Bockholt said that it was indeed "one quote of concern." The only trouble: I didn't say it. It was, as I stated very plainly in the piece, the assessment given by John Nagl, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and former counterinsurgency adviser to now-retired general and former CIA director David Petraeus.

Bockholt offered no further examples of inconsistencies. I asked if he challenged my characterization of any information from an interview I conducted with then-SOCOM spokesman Colonel Tim Nye. He did not. Instead, he explained that SOCOM had issues with my work in general. "As we look at the characterization of your writing, overall, and I know you've had some stuff on Vietnam [an apparent reference to my bestselling book, Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam] and things like that -- because of your style, we have to be very particular on how we answer your questions because of how you tend to use that information." Bockholt then asked if I was anti-military. I responded that I hold all subjects that I cover to a high standard.

Bockholt next took a verbal swipe at the website where I'm managing editor, TomDispatch.com. Given Special Operations Command's penchant for dabbling in dubious new sites, I was struck when he said that TomDispatch -- which has published original news, analysis, and commentary for more than a decade and won the 2013 Utne Media Award for "best political coverage" -- was not a "real outlet." It was, to me, a daring position to take when SOCOM's shadowy Middle Eastern news site Al-Shorfa.com actually carries a disclaimer that it "cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided."

With my deadline looming, I was putting the finishing touches on this article when an email arrived from Mike Janssen of SOCOM Public Affairs. It was -- finally -- a seemingly simple answer to what seemed like an astonishingly straightforward question asked a more than a month before: What was the total number of countries in which Special Operations forces were deployed in 2013? Janssen was concise. His answer: 80.

How, I wondered, could that be? In the midst of McRaven's Global SOF network initiative, could SOCOM have scaled back their deployments from 120 in 2011 to just 80 last year? And if Special Operations forces were deployed in 92 nations during just one week in 2013, according to official statistics provided to the New York Times, how could they have been present in 12 fewer countries for the entire year? And why, in his March 2013 posture statement to the House Armed Services Committee, would Admiral McRaven mention "annual deployments to over 100 countries?" With minutes to spare, I called Mike Janssen for a clarification. "I don't have any information on that," he told me and asked me to submit my question in writing -- precisely what I had done more than a month before in an effort to get a timely response to this straightforward and essential question.

Today, Special Operations Command finds itself at a crossroads. It is attempting to influence populations overseas, while at home trying to keep Americans in the dark about its activities; expanding its reach, impact, and influence, while working to remain deep in the shadows; conducting operations all over the globe, while professing only to be operating in "a number of locations"; claiming worldwide deployments have markedly dropped in the last year, when evidence suggests otherwise.

"I know what you're trying to do," Bockholt said cryptically before he hung up on me -- as if the continuing questions of a reporter trying to get answers to basic information after a month of waiting were beyond the pale. In the meantime, whatever Special Operations Command is trying to do globally and at home, Bockholt and others at SOCOM are working to keep it as secret as possible.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+39 # AndreM5 2014-01-08 09:48
If you don't grow your command budget you don't get that next star.

If you have 72,000 hammers you hit everything as if it is a nail.
 
 
+55 # wantrealdemocracy 2014-01-08 11:45
The military and the whole of the government of the United States is out of any control by the people of this nation---except for the top 1% of our citizens. They get just what they want. This means we are in NO WAY a democratic nation. It is your duty, your responsibilty as a citizen of this nation, to over throw this evil corrupt government and form a new government of the people, by the people and for the people---with protections for the eco systems of the earth. We must value life over profits.
 
 
+12 # SenorN 2014-01-08 18:08
"Reform" would be a far safer and less off-putting term than "overthrow."
 
 
+64 # fredboy 2014-01-08 11:48
Amazing that there were 31,000 of them in 2001 and not one of them knew about or could even envision the possibility of the 9/11 attacks. In fact, isn't it also amazing that no one in our entire Defense Department and "intelligence" community could even envision any such attack.

Sorry, but what in the fuck are we paying these people for?
 
 
+17 # Philothustra 2014-01-08 16:09
The Republican constituency includes everyone in the military, defense industries and related big government bloodsuckers of every description. The GOP is buying votes- that is what "we are paying these people for," fredboy.

Except when you wise up to 9/11 and the Dick Cheney "special operations," and the Bush family Securacom operations in Bldg 7 of the World Trade Center, you will no longer expect these military special ops forces to protect you against terrorists- because they ARE the terrorists.
And thanks to NSA total sweep of all communications (including this one) you can be sure you are on their shitlist.

AS for the budget and how its paid for- all the military budget is off the books, the entire CIA-NSA "intelligence" budget is not open to inspection by Congress, and all the black ops heroes that the media celebrate in television, movies and comic books-- well, they are YOUR paid operatives. Yes, YOU Mr America

PS It was Lt CALLEY. And he didn't even get a slap on the wrist. All these killers went unpunished. Look at the pictures of your handiwork, America!

www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/photo-gallery/mylai-massacre-evidence/
 
 
+1 # Tigre1 2014-01-09 22:31
with "These peope" are not in the biz of envisioning any attacks on the US...the enlisted who are not following orders in theater are busy following orders elsewhere, practicing, practicing, practicing to get out of planes, over mountains under their own power, all kinds of ways to deal at close range with enemies...as so delineated...

No apologies. I know you didn't know. Even superguys are highly specialized, and they AREN'T guys sitting around watching tv or checking their emails much.They are on their feet slogging, running, sneaking jumping, training training training...or in country doing their jobs. Hope you understand: they aren't the guys who let you down by not knowing that the Saudis were about to launch 911.
 
 
+5 # Anarchist 23 2014-01-10 13:01
They are doing exactly what the Elite pays them to do and doing it magnificently! 9/11 was an inside job and handily, the 1000 page 'Patriot Act' was all written and just ready to be passed within days of the 'attack', which of course opened the door to our present Stasi States and corporate looting...since the process of destroying the post-New Deal country began, certainly, with the Assassinations of JFK,MLK,RFK, and those who planned and then had carried out the assassinations did not declare victory and go away..if you look you can see their tracks through all the enormities that have been visited on 'We the People' down to our present state of surveilled serfdom.
 
 
+3 # bingers 2014-01-11 04:16
The Clinton people envisioned such an attack and warned the Bush people who said that Clinton's people did a good job, but took exception with their "obsession" with al Qaeda.
 
 
+26 # reiverpacific 2014-01-08 12:32
Gettin' more like the "Turd Reich" every day innint?!
Doesn't it feel great to have another gigantic death culture mouth to feed lurking just inside the main one.
And then of course, there is the CIA's Black Budget; the article doesn't say if this SOCOM shit is financed by that (it's not even accountable to the President) or if all the silly name-making is just another way to squander our taxes for the Military-Indust rial-resource-g obbling Goliath to try and stop the top-heavy Empire falling under it's own weight like all the rest before it.
Meanwhile, we are backpedalling into socio-economic Feudalism at home with the exception of one or two states, and being spied on to make sure we don't get too out of hand or pissed off.
As the late, appalling Alexander Haig said in all his contemptuous arrogance, "Let them march in the streets as long as they pay their taxes"! He'd ha' loved SOCOM methinks.
 
 
+11 # Jay1980 2014-01-08 12:45
fredboy, we pay them to answer to the elite, not us. I really doubt 'nobody' envisioned 9/11; we the people were not notified ( and if our "leaders" were, well, would they admit it after the fact? Knowing how NSA, et.al. track "all" communications nowadays, the intransigent suspicious Col. is, at least, realistic in keeping reporters at arms' length, regardless of the reporter's professionalism .
But it seems like the standard, "Asking questions is not trusting Big Bro to do what's Best for You, citizen."
Where do we draw the line between accountability and security? The ultimate trump card of The Man.
 
 
-18 # seeuingoa 2014-01-08 12:46
easy to say andf easy to do:

fuck you
 
 
+11 # reiverpacific 2014-01-08 16:58
Quoting seeuingoa:
easy to say andf easy to do:

fuck you


????????
 
 
+19 # dyannne 2014-01-08 12:48
One man. One vote. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha hah.
 
 
+2 # tm7devils39 2014-01-11 20:00
That slogan has been updated in those states under Repug control...it is now:
"Three registered voters, one vote"
 
 
+29 # RMDC 2014-01-08 13:13
Nick, Thanks for this. Your reporting is good. The US has for a long time been a military dictatorship. It ranks right up there with the Nazi regime. It is only better at keeping things secret and keeping american citizens distracted and entertained with I-garbage and celebrity gossip.

I just wonder how long this can go on. US imperialism is bankrupting the country. But the media blames the unemployed and food stamp recipients. Militarism is a a bottomless pit. There's always someone to kill or brutalize. Always some where to conquer. Soon the pentagon will be sending these special op psychos to conquer the moon and the planets.
 
 
+19 # Inspired Citizen 2014-01-08 13:14
The US makes the Roman Empire look like a small-time operation. In The Rise and Fall of Great Powers, author Paul Kennedy describes what causes great powers to fall. In a word, "over-stretch." If this article does not describe over-stretch, then the concept has no meaning.

This begs the question: at what point does this great power, the American Empire, collapse? $17 trillion of debt is an indication that we'll already set up to fall.
 
 
+16 # Inspired Citizen 2014-01-08 13:17
Follow up question: will this happen without bloodshed like the Soviet Empire, or will we fall like every other empire, in a bloodbath?
 
 
+6 # RMDC 2014-01-09 07:23
Good question. I don't see the US regime going out without a lot of bloodshed. It has created a national police force out of what used to be local police. Many of these are veterans who practice the same terror and violence that they did in war. The US regime has already built up a war making capacity against the american people. All they need is a declaration of war or an AUMF (authorization to use military force) against the American people. They are ready to shed blood. they have the killers in place.
 
 
+11 # James Marcus 2014-01-08 13:35
WAY Past-Time... to 'Contain' (read 'dis-member') ALL the 'Cowboys', ('Yahoos', adolescent ASS Holes, if you will).
They are collectively Ripping Us blind and destroying everything, as well.
In addition to destruction, they are collectively responsible for the Poverty and Want in the USA and everywhere.
Their 'Programs , both Budgeted and, especially, 'Black' are despicable and Treasonous.
 
 
-3 # Buddha 2014-01-08 14:25
Actually, as far as I am concerned, Special Forces are what we SHOULD be spending money on, and not still spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually on expensive weapons systems meant to fight an equally powerful Superpower which doesn't exist on the Earth. The USSR is dead, and China and Russia are just regional powers. Our current enemies are religious fanatics living in hovels with goats in the front yard that use IED's and AK-47's. You don't fight enemies like that with nuclear aircraft carriers and stealth fighters and main-battle-tan ks. You fight them with highly trained Special Forces who sneak in, take scalps, and gtfo again before the enemy even knows they are there. Invading and occupying other nations and deploying a global military in those nations is so 20th Century, and simply recruits more to the enemy who come from all over the Muslim world to fight the evil "foreign occupier".
 
 
+17 # Agricanto 2014-01-08 14:53
The worst human rights abuses and wartime atrocities by the US have been committed by US Special Forces. The Green Berets stand out at particularly evil acts in Vietnam and since.

So "You fight them with highly trained Special Forces who sneak in, take scalps, and gtfo (sic) again before the enemy even knows they are there." Take scalps? Piss on cadavers? kill whole families? Torture captives? waste the whole village? I guess you must be a fan of Lt. Caley at Mi Lai.
 
 
+7 # reiverpacific 2014-01-08 18:14
Quoting Agricanto:
The worst human rights abuses and wartime atrocities by the US have been committed by US Special Forces. The Green Berets stand out at particularly evil acts in Vietnam and since.

So "You fight them with highly trained Special Forces who sneak in, take scalps, and gtfo (sic) again before the enemy even knows they are there." Take scalps? Piss on cadavers? kill whole families? Torture captives? waste the whole village? I guess you must be a fan of Lt. Caley at Mi Lai.


Good comment.
I occasionally go to 'Veterans for peace' meetings (although I'm not a veteran -I've been an anti-war activist all my conscious life) just to listen and I hear stuff like this frequently, told by some of those who did things they'll be traumatized by for life.
Try it: if you don't come away with an outrage-o-meter off the clock, you must be a clone of Dick (Mr "seven deferments") Cheney, Atilla the Hun or Ollie North!
 
 
-1 # Buddha 2014-01-09 09:29
Oh, so Hellfire missiles fired from circling warplanes or drones is somehow a cleaner form of warfare? Napalm?Widespre ad contamination of the environment due to depleted uranium anti-armor rounds is the way to go? The simple truth is war sucks, and the bigger the hammer you bring to bear in war, the greater the casualties in the form of collatoral damage for innocent civilians. The simple reality is that right now, our enemies are insurgents, Islamic radicals who for many reasons, some of them quite valid, feel that America is their enemy that they are going to fight to the death. And those radicals are living among the general civilian populous in these overseas hotspot nations. If we as a nation are going to keep fighting these radicals who want to attack us, dropping bombs at them from 10K feet and killing civilians in collatoral damage is not only counter-product ive and just pisses off the civilians who you need to get on your side, but it also entials a huge costly militarly occupation to maintain the ground, air and drone assetts of your Big Hammer against those insurgents.

Let me give you an example: we took out OBL in a clean Special Forces Raid, civilian loss of life was nil. On the other hand, we could have gotten OBL by just dropping a bunch of bombs on his compound, turned it into a crater, and who cares that it likely would have killed dozens of civilians in the surrounding neighborhood, right?
 
 
+7 # elizabethblock 2014-01-08 16:06
Chalmers Johnson has been writing for years about US military bases abroad. (Well worth reading.) Not secret, exactly, but mostly not known to Americans. Even the number isn't known, though it is almost certainly in four figures. But the bases, and the behavior of the American soldiers, are very well known to the people who live there.
Why does the United States of America think it has to control everybody, everywhere, in every country?
 
 
+2 # sunflower333 2014-01-08 17:37
The military is expecting economic and climate collapse.
 
 
+4 # Lorraine B. 2014-01-08 17:55
"How, I wondered, could that be? In the midst of McRaven's Global SOF network initiative, could SOCOM have scaled back their deployments from 120 in 2011 to just 80 last year?" You asked.

EASY: THEY LIED. Can anyone possibly think otherwise? If anything, they are probably in MORE countries than they were in 2011.
 
 
+6 # sharag 2014-01-08 18:49
As Chalmers Johnson once wrote, there will be blow back from all this. Training elite forces in more than 100 countries to be just like the U.S. elite forces? Some of whom are already returning to their roots, like the Taliban, with their new found skills. And why does McRaven want SOCOM personnel in every American industry, academic institution and government agency in the U.S. and abroad? The chickens have come home to roost.
 
 
+7 # sharag 2014-01-08 19:32
And, as one Afghan villager/local Taliban fighter said when asked why he and his fellow villagers were fighting the U.S. forces stationed there, he replied "because they are in our valleys".

So, don't go to those valley's, their homes.

The U.S is in all these countries for control of resources. You control and take resources with chaos and conflict.

At some point though all this military hubris must collapse.
 
 
-8 # Tigre1 2014-01-08 20:11
'must collapse'. Of course, silly, of course. And did you have a point,
any point to make? SF behavior has NOTHING to do with you. Will collapse! sometime, some other time, maybe...meanwhi le, there are things to do...'will collapse'...doe sn't everything? What an obvious thing to say. It won't today, though, and it has given the guys something to do, keeping the world's teeming zillions off balance and off their high horse and thinking they can come over here again and break any of our toys, as in 9/11. This is all preemptive, and I don't expect any of the readers to understand that as the world is currently staffed there are many who aren't very nice, under which we would not like to suffer, so we aim to keep them from ever becoming powerful enough. On the farm we cut off their balls, ie, gelded them, so they wouldn't be fierce...it isn't very complex in its grand strategies, this military thingie.


By the way, sir, before you were born and long before internet and cellphones I did my military time in Special Forces...mostly in training, long before today's JSOC. I tell you this with pride. I never said I was smart, but when young I was brave and capable in some things that others don't seem to have much of, yourself included.

I will always treasure the memory of friendships that bordered on extreme...
 
 
+8 # Philothustra 2014-01-08 20:08
There are NO resources in Afghanistan, which historians have long called "the graveyard of empires."
In other words, the American empire. If they didn't have these bases abroad, they would just declare war and send in the fake troops and the "contractors"

The US is in the grip of overwhelming evil, and most folks just want to blame
"the military"....

The "military industrial complex" does what the imperialist elite, the "1%", tell them to dol Don't blame the idiot army volunteers or the pinhead rightwing politicians. They are just taking orders

Focus your attention on the superrich
billionaires. Look up the Carlyle Group, the Securacom Corp, Halliburton's history, and all the other secret global organizations. They run the show....
 
 
0 # maryf 2014-02-23 18:55
Quoting Philothustra:
The "military industrial complex" does what the imperialist elite, the "1%", tell them to do! Don't blame the idiot army volunteers or the pinhead rightwing politicians. They are just taking orders

"Just taking orders" was the excuse used unsuccessfully at Nuremberg. What if the "idiot army volunteers" grew up with better values, that did not include militarism? Remember the old '60s song, "What if they gave a war and nobody came?"

Just because the billionaires want us to do nothing but go shopping and kill people in other parts of the world doesn't mean we have to cooperate. That part is our own damn fault.
 
 
+6 # tclose 2014-01-08 20:12
It is interesting that this article is written at the same time that former Sec. of "Defense" Robert Gates comes out with a memoir bashing Obama (and Biden) for questioning what is going on in the military under his responsibility as Commander in Chief. Good for Obama, he is doing this in the spirit of JFK who stood up to the military hierarchy during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
 
 
+2 # hwmcadoo 2014-01-09 08:27
All this is necessary for America to occupy the world in a fascist dictatorship. Sound far-fetched? just look at the changes in the last 20 years and project 10 more or so.
 
 
+2 # RobertMStahl 2014-01-09 09:34
Or, take Mark Novitsky, for example. Great piece, really thankful.
 
 
+2 # cordleycoit 2014-01-09 19:30
Look at the cost at home. Look at the abandoned and wounded fighters. Thepeople we abandoned in their countries and the myths we live in and with every day. The Congress is a Parliament of Whores. The Executive a fascist Party with its bully boys deployed. The judicial branch a home for careerist lawyers bent on splitting the spoils with their corporate masters.
dissent is turned into astro turf by the media, the fifth arm of the Spectacle.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN