Wolf writes: "Drones on domestic surveillance duties are already deployed by police and corporations. In time, they will likely be weaponized."
Portrait, author and activist Naomi Wolf, 10/19/11. (photo: Guardian UK)
The Coming Drone Attack on America
22 December 12
Drones on domestic surveillance duties are already deployed by police and corporations. In time, they will likely be weaponised
eople often ask me, in terms of my argument about "ten steps" that mark the descent to a police state or closed society, at what stage we are. I am sorry to say that with the importation of what will be tens of thousands of drones, by both US military and by commercial interests, into US airspace, with a specific mandate to engage in surveillance and with the capacity for weaponization - which is due to begin in earnest at the start of the new year - it means that the police state is now officially here.
In February of this year, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act, with its provision to deploy fleets of drones domestically. Jennifer Lynch, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that this followed a major lobbying effort, "a huge push by […] the defense sector" to promote the use of drones in American skies: 30,000 of them are expected to be in use by 2020, some as small as hummingbirds - meaning that you won't necessarily see them, tracking your meeting with your fellow-activists, with your accountant or your congressman, or filming your cruising the bars or your assignation with your lover, as its video-gathering whirs.
Others will be as big as passenger planes. Business-friendly media stress their planned abundant use by corporations: police in Seattle have already deployed them.
An unclassified US air force document reported by CBS (pdf) news expands on this unprecedented and unconstitutional step - one that formally brings the military into the role of controlling domestic populations on US soil, which is the bright line that separates a democracy from a military oligarchy. (The US constitution allows for the deployment of National Guard units by governors, who are answerable to the people; but this system is intended, as is posse comitatus, to prevent the military from taking action aimed at US citizens domestically.)
The air force document explains that the air force will be overseeing the deployment of its own military surveillance drones within the borders of the US; that it may keep video and other data it collects with these drones for 90 days without a warrant - and will then, retroactively, determine if the material can be retained - which does away for good with the fourth amendment in these cases. While the drones are not supposed to specifically "conduct non-consensual surveillance on on specifically identified US persons", according to the document, the wording allows for domestic military surveillance of non-"specifically identified" people (that is, a group of activists or protesters) and it comes with the important caveat, also seemingly wholly unconstitutional, that it may not target individuals "unless expressly approved by the secretary of Defense".
In other words, the Pentagon can now send a domestic drone to hover outside your apartment window, collecting footage of you and your family, if the secretary of Defense approves it. Or it may track you and your friends and pick up audio of your conversations, on your way, say, to protest or vote or talk to your representative, if you are not "specifically identified", a determination that is so vague as to be meaningless.
What happens to those images, that audio? "Distribution of domestic imagery" can go to various other government agencies without your consent, and that imagery can, in that case, be distributed to various government agencies; it may also include your most private moments and most personal activities. The authorized "collected information may incidentally include US persons or private property without consent". Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told CBS:
"In some records that were released by the air force recently … under their rules, they are allowed to fly drones in public areas and record information on domestic situations."
This document accompanies a major federal push for drone deployment this year in the United States, accompanied by federal policies to encourage law enforcement agencies to obtain and use them locally, as well as by federal support for their commercial deployment. That is to say: now HSBC, Chase, Halliburton etc can have their very own fleets of domestic surveillance drones. The FAA recently established a more efficient process for local police departments to get permits for their own squadrons of drones.
Given the Department of Homeland Security militarization of police departments, once the circle is completed with San Francisco or New York or Chicago local cops having their own drone fleet - and with Chase, HSBC and other banks having hired local police, as I reported here last week - the meshing of military, domestic law enforcement, and commercial interests is absolute. You don't need a messy, distressing declaration of martial law.
And drone fleets owned by private corporations means that a first amendment right of assembly is now over: if Occupy is massing outside of a bank, send the drone fleet to surveil, track and harass them. If citizens rally outside the local Capitol? Same thing. As one of my readers put it, the scary thing about this new arrangement is deniability: bad things done to citizens by drones can be denied by private interests - "Oh, that must have been an LAPD drone" - and LAPD can insist that it must have been a private industry drone. For where, of course, will be the accountability from citizens buzzed or worse by these things?
Domestic drone use is here, and the meshing has begun: local cops in Grand Forks, North Dakota called in a DHS Predator drone - the same make that has caused hundreds of civilian casualties in Pakistan - over a dispute involving a herd of cattle. The military rollout in process and planned, within the US, is massive: the Christian Science Monitor reports that a total of 110 military sites for drone activity are either built or will be built, in 39 states. That covers America.
We don't need a military takeover: with these capabilities on US soil and this air force white paper authorization for data collection, the military will be effectively in control of the private lives of American citizens. And these drones are not yet weaponized.
"I don't think it's crazy to worry about weaponized drones. There is a real consensus that has emerged against allowing weaponized drones domestically. The International Association of Chiefs of Police has recommended against it," warns Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the ACLU, noting that there is already political pressure in favor of weaponization:
"At the same time, it is inevitable that we will see [increased] pressure to allow weaponized drones. The way that it will unfold is probably this: somebody will want to put a relatively 'soft' nonlethal weapon on a drone for crowd control. And then things will ratchet up from there."
And the risk of that? The New America Foundation's report on drone use in Pakistan noted that the Guardian had confirmed 193 children's deaths from drone attacks in seven years. It noted that for the deaths of ten militants, 1,400 civilians with no involvement in terrorism also died. Not surprisingly, everyone in that region is traumatized: children scream when they hear drones. An NYU and Stanford Law School report notes that drones "terrorize citizens 24 hours a day".
If US drones may first be weaponized with crowd-control features, not lethal force features, but with no risk to military or to police departments or DHS, the playing field for freedom of assembly is changed forever. So is our private life, as the ACLU's Stanley explains:
"Our biggest concerns about the deployment of drones domestically is that they will be used to create pervasive surveillance networks. The danger would be that an ordinary individual once they step out of their house will be monitored by a drone everywhere they walk or drive. They may not be aware of it. They might monitored or tracked by some silent invisible drone everywhere they walk or drive."
"So what? Why should they worry?" I asked.
"Your comings and goings can be very revealing of who you are and what you are doing and reveal very intrusive things about you - what houses of worship you are going to, political meetings, particular doctors, your friends' and lovers' houses."
I mentioned the air force white paper. "Isn't the military not supposed to be spying on Americans?" I asked.
"Yes, the posse comitatus act passed in the 19th century forbids a military role in law enforcement among Americans."
What can we do if we want to oppose this? I wondered. According to Stanley, many states are passing legislation banning domestic drone use. Once again, in the fight to keep America a republic, grassroots activism is pitched in an unequal contest against a militarized federal government.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
We haven't been invited to the feast as guests. There is no seat at the table for any of us. Our place is on the table itself. We are the meal itself, roasted to a delicious golden brown and riding the sacrificial end of the corporate fork.
The guests will raise their glasses and toast to their victory. The terrorists have won.
Yeah, because everybody has a high powered laser out in the garage on the work bench.
Lots and lots we've gotta do to.....
UNDO THE COUP !
Besides, all those companies were formed to build very simple devices...cheap 'drones', ie model airplanes, remotely controlled. Great profits. Same game as the gun companies...ANY BODY can make guns. Very old technology, cheap, sell for mucho dinero.
Gun makers and drone makers, plus some others, have worse morals and ethics than politicians and drug barons.
When I think about their actions, I hope there is a Just God.
"for the deaths of ten militants, 1,400 civilians with NO involvement in terrorism also died"
I.E. US kills 140 civilians for one militant? How do you define terrorism? US MONEY CULTURE (military oligarchy) IS TERRORISM!
The police violence thing is already happening. Taxpayer-suppor ted police departments have become “security forces” for corporations owned by very wealthy domestic and foreign investors. They crack heads, fill the air with pepper spray, and many appear to enjoy themselves in the process.
We workers must let police know that they if commit violence against us we will not lift a finger to defend the tax-payer funded pension and health care perks they enjoy. We must let them know that while we understand they are obligated to “protect and serve” we also know that no civilized definition of that phrase rationalizes their thuggery.
The ultimate villains in this whole scenario are, however, the lawmakers who have sold their souls to corporatism...a t our expense. While patriotic workers fight to keep jobs here in the U.S., unpatriotic politicians enter into “free” trade schemes designed to move our jobs offshore.
We have a power greater than their hoarded gold. It lies in our ability to withhold our labor until justice is won. We must seriously consider deploying that “weapon” of mass social and civil legitimacy.
Why blame the tools? the Corporations -- they merely are doing the bidding of the legislators . IF the government was not ordering those goods -- the companies would not make them.
They don't have to.
A cheap laser pointer can disable a drone's camera. And right now they're only allowed by the FAA to fly 400 feet high or less, so a decent pellet gun can take them out.
So the "libertarian" militia vigilante "Doomsday Prepper" types, who want Small Government and no regulators like the FAA, are really shooting themselves in the foot - so to speak.
At this point I doubt even rabid Right Wingers believe the police are your friends.
Free gummint skeet.
Heh-heh! Good one y'all.
Imagine nano-drones the size of a dust particle lurking watching, spying for all kinds of nefarious reasons.
No - this is not unwarranted paranoia - it's terribly justifiable paranoia and is where we are headed if we allow this drone bulls--t to continue (not sure how we stop it).
I am no doomsday believer nor am I a survivalist nutcase. I am simply seeing the trends, looking at the reality of who is in control here (larger corp. interests, including military contractors, large financial interests, and their political dupes) and putting 2 and 2 together. This is not a stretch at all. Time to wake up, America. Get rid of the tea party nuts and get some adult supervision.
Merry Christmas
ElliotH
Geheim mean "secret."
REmember, Bush claimed prisoners or so-called terrorists are no longer being tortured. We know that wasn't true. Now they will assure us they are not using Drones to spy on and control us. Don't believe anything the government, corporations and most of the wealthy tell us.
They look around them, and everything seems fine. They can still go to their Christmas parties where they can talk about "nothing" and avoid all discussion of reality. And, if someone brings any reality into the mix, they'll be summarily treated like the "crazy uncle", or like, "Who let that fruitloop in here?"... "How dare he (or she) ruin our festivities!" It's like it must have been in Germany as the country was sinking ever deeper into fascism; with most people going along, allowing it to happen and doing nothing to prevent the madness from taking over fully.
America in the 21st century; becoming the Fourth Reich; and most Americans are just insanely acting like everything's fine. Well, it's NOT fine. But most aren't going to listen. They just want any reality impinging on their fantasy world, silenced. Maybe all those facing reality should be taken away and gassed.
- Continued -
- Continued -
- Continued -
Never mind that the government is heavily sacrificing liberty for so-called security that is not truly making us secure; for the very reason that it is sacrificing our liberty and making us increasingly insecure because we don't have any freedoms anymore. Everything is monitored; and simply, nothing but non-violently, standing up against these eliminations of our liberties can get one falsely accused of being a "threat" to the government, and soon taken away to some "due-process-fr ee", indefinite detention gulag to be held incommunicado for the rest of your life if they deem it "necessary". And what would most so-called Americans do about this? They would not only do nothing to stand up against it; they would cheer it on! Like the "good Germans" of the then rapidly developing Nazi Germany, they will want to see all of the dissenters, those who disturb their fantasy world(s), taken away and removed from their presence; rather than have to be reminded that their country is literally turning into a hellhole with no true freedom anymore, and where everyone is under grave threat of the government taking such action(s) against them for the slightest perceived "threat" to "national security". Even if you're doing absolutely nothing wrong, if a neighbor decides to claim that you are, increasingly the government is taking nothing but peoples' word for your "transgressions ", and we will very soon be able to be taken away based on nothing but such whims.
- Cont'd -
Let's get the hell out.
The next generation of our "best and brightest" is already exploring possibilities outside the US. Australia is attractive, as are some places in Europe. I hear lots of stories of 20-somethings who live out of suitcases, ready to relocate wherever and whenever the employment situation warrants.
The Brave New World is here and it happened under a Republican and a Democrat administration.
working on the purest LSD couldn't make up
something this insane.
Yet Congress --a 5th Wheel to the
10th power--is sooo happy to let this
happen.
Mark Twain tried to warn is 140 years
ago.
Twice.
1. "Suppose I was an idiot. And suppose
I was in Congress. Buf I repeat myself."
2." America'a only distinctly criminal class
...is Congress."
Mark Twain tried to warn is 140 years
ago.
And the founding fathers before him.
constitution is being used to wipe the drooling mouth of Capitalism. Is it any accident that Sandy Hook is being used to ensure that the populace are not armed sufficiently that they might pose a serious obstacle to the treacherous cabal of corporations and congress.
They would have us homeless -and gun less "for our own good" If the President is complicit in the destruction of democracy -with the culling of our rights -then has he lost his right to lead us? There comes a point where silence is betrayal -we have reached this point. There comes a time when armed resistance is not only permissible but necessary to defeat tyranny -even -and especially -when it threatens to poison the United States -without which all of the other democracies will inevitably crumble. It would be futile to throw oneself against the military machine -to die like a bug on a windscreen -We must but TACTICAL, COORDINATED and DISCIPLINED -to achieve the task at hand, -to take back America and return it to the control of the people, by the people and of the people. America was born in revolution, forged in revolution and she can be emancipated by revolution. The machinery of our destruction is around us and we must act swiftly and fearlessly. We may get only one shot at each objective. The time for protest is over, the time for negotiation is over, the time for Action is upon us - and we must take the power back.
What do they want to do to us? Suck the economic marrow from our bones and then kill any protestors? What horrible plan awaits us and our children? With this new TPP corporate coup on the horizon god knows what horrible abuses they want to shove down our throats. It is a terrifying prospect. Will we all be at the mercy of horribly abusive powers that want to destroy any hope for a happy futures? Only an agenda of abuse would allow killer drones to flood our skies. God help us.
I am appalled at the comments and opinions I have read lately where some believe that only the military and law enforcement should be armed. Those who put their faith on their own government for their defense and protection sadly do not understand history and totalitarianism .
They know that we know, and it makes them nervous. You will now see President Haniman take ever more obnoxious and overt steps towards authoritarian population control.
We took steps (by no means perfect) to insure that would never happen again. It hasn't. Given that, could we perhaps back off on certain other "security" measures which have never been needed and which have done nothing but the reduce the freedom of law-abiding Americans? We're not only on a slippery slope, we're sliding toward a cliff.
I heard Paneta coin a new phrase--the industrial, security complex. Has a nice ring doesn't it?
Drones engaged in domestic spying should be as frightening as is the well intentioned folks who think that disarming the citizens will make us safe. Perhaps Franklin is more topical today than back in 1787---we have a Republic, if we can keep it.
On Friday, I had occassion to be in several warehouses, mostly staffed by Union members. In each one, Rush was on the radio. I asked a couple of them what was with that? The response was that it was better than most other entertainment. WOW
Make no mistake about it, the elites and their minions like Rush have wages war on us in earnest since 1964 and they have gained enormous ground. Drones? We should be in the street, flooding the President and Congress with the outrage that we should feel. So far, our voice is tiny. Do we really value what we have or will we only miss it when it is gone?
We have a president who unloads thousands of assault weapons onto the most nefarious drug dealers and murders in the fast and furious affair -- where thousands (almost all south of the border so apparently no one cares about them) have been either murdered wounded and are intimidated by the freshly armed thugs and no one blinks an eye
Thousands more innocents have been killed by the same drone tech in foreign countries -- and think he should shine his Nobel prize - I think the Nobel committee should take it back.
And now we the people are in his sites.
we as a nation are loaded with suicidally stupid people - this cant bode well for us. The biggest political fights in the future will be for who controls the fire button on these rather then the notion that they should not exist.
Most of you are nuts.
Do you wonder why americans are hated everywhere ?
Those who are really in control simply don't care who is in the White House. They have commanded the air waves and this is a huge accomplishment- --the braind dead Rush and his cadre of dunces are everywhere. Thinking is forbidden. We have been on this path for decades and it seems to be speeding up. It is not a fiscal cliff that is approaching although this situation is serious, no, it is the shredding of a great nation and replacing it with a Euopean style system of elites and the rest of us. Wake up Martin----you should be irritated that you have been used as a dupe.
This totalitarian state would NOT even allow this story to see the light of day. With so much to fear is this just another notch in the fear machine of the left and right? What is one to believe?
Use and abuse of the public is not new. Americans don't study enough history. My high school history education never got to the study of WWI and WWII. We were told there wasn't enough time. The reality is that the system wanted to avoid introducing such "controversial" subjects. Students would have found themselves as disillusioned as we do now. Much easier to teach history as mythology if you stick to events farther in the past.
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/
How long before Anonymous hacks a drone, if only to make a point? Al-Quaeda hacks a drone? Who else? Iran captured one a while back, they've been busy reverse engineering the thing.
Silver lining for the DoD: now whenever a drone blows up a day care, they can claim it was hacked.
The government's excessive reliance upon digital technology will eventually result in tech-savvy individuals wielding almost as much power as the government can deploy. Our future freedom fighter heroes will be hackers, not gun slingers.
Chomsky has noted that the US military, anticipating civil unrest due to rising income inequality, is already making plans for the control of the US population.
Tommy Rimes
The World Bank has already admonished governments to take steps to repress populations who will necessarily become angered by the required "fiscal discipline" needed to repay bankers for fraudulent loan deals.
If the government through it's actions acts to harm American citizens using American military force then Americans have a right to protect themselves from this abuse of power. Therefore, every time a drone gets in your face - shoot the fxxxer down!
RSS feed for comments to this post