Excerpt: "One of the few things Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich agree on is that President Obama is turning America into 'European-style welfare culture.' ... This is the real scandal..."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Republican Myth: Obama's "Entitlement Society"
02 February 12
ne of the few things Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich agree on is that President Obama is turning America into "European-style welfare culture."
In his standard stump speech Romney charges Obama with creating a nation of dependents. "Over the past three years Barack Obama has been replacing our merit-based society with an entitlement society."
Gingrich calls Obama "the best food-stamp president in American history."
What's their evidence? Both rely on federal budget data showing direct payments to individuals shot up by almost $600 billion, a 32 percent increase, since the start of 2009.
They also point to Census data showing that 49 percent of Americans now live in homes where at least one person is collecting a federal benefit - Social Security, food stamps, unemployment insurance, worker's compensation, or subsidized housing. That's up from 44 percent in 2008.
Finally, they trumpet Social Security Administration figures showing that the number of people on Social Security disability jumped 10 percent in Obama's first two years in office.
They argue our economic problems stem from this sharp rise in "dependency." Get rid of these benefits and people will work harder.
But they have cause and effect backwards. The reason for the rise in food stamps, unemployment insurance, and other safety-net programs is Americans got clobbered in 2008 with the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. They and their families have needed whatever helping hands they could get.
If anything, America's safety nets have been too small and shot through with holes. That's why the number and percentage of Americans in poverty has increased dramatically over the past three years. According to a study by Northeastern University, a third of families with young children are now in poverty.
This is the real scandal. For example, only 40 percent of the unemployed qualify for unemployment benefits because they weren't working full time or long enough on a single job before they were canned. The unemployment system doesn't take account of the fact that a large portion of the workforce typically works part time on several jobs, and moves from job to job.
Republicans also object to Obama's health care law, which covers 30 million more Americans than were covered before. That law still leaves over 20 million without health insurance. They'll get emergency care when they're in dire straights - hospitals won't refuse them - but we all end up paying indirectly.
Regressive Republicans pretend they're about opportunity. In reality they're back at what they've been doing for years - promoting Social Darwinism.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
to which i reply: BACK AT what they've been doing for years??? when did they ever STOP?
the sentence SHOULD be, "In reality, they're still just doing what they've been doing for decades - promoting Social Darwinism."
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
our future and very existence are at stake
That doesn't make sense.
Even if there were such a thing as a welfare queen driving a cadillac, it would be cheaper (by a factor of 2) to give ten million welfare queens $50,000 each to go get a cadillac than to fight either of our pointless wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. (It would also stimulate our economy more.)
These guys don't want to grow the economy. They're doing just fine.
methinks that Mr. Eagle (and i use the term "Mr." very loosely) is actually the reincarnation of Ebeneezer Scrooge ...
"Are there no prisons. no workhouses?"
You are a mass or reactionary clichés and mean-spirited declamations based on blinkered assumptions. Do you spit on the homeless when you pass them and how do you know how they got that way? You make Archie Bunker seem like a "Knee-jerk Liberal" -except that he was quite funny. Some of us believe that we are on this planet, in this short life, to help each other and be good stewards of the lands; if that makes me a "knee-jerk" (and I can here that in any redneck bar) -well guilty as charged! It's better than just being a "Jerk".
or even vegetables not covered in "health-crippli ng poisons" for that matter ...
Ah, yes. So anyone who had bad luck (who, say7, was disabled in a car accident caused by a drunk driver) should just pray the "successful" will deign to help out. Anyone who lost his job because of the banking crisis? Tough noogies. Anyone who can't feed his kids because he can't make enough money to make ends meet? Either count on your local church or just acknowledge you're a Darwinian failure and die--and take your failure-tainted kids with you.
Don't know about you, Eagle, but that's not the sort of America I'd want to live in.
I am constantly reminded of the selfishness that exists in our society when you consider the following items: those who champion war are rarely, if ever, the ones who fight or send their children to fight the wars; those who look for an adequate blood supply to meet our country's daily need for this life-saving fluid are rarely the ones who donate blood. I am sure that I could provide many more examples, however, let me end with a major question...are the statements that these individuals make to castigate others congruent with their professed religiosity?
One day you may end up like these so called "loosers". No one is exempt from misery. You sound like a page right out of the right wing handbook. So it is ok with you is some suffer from bad choices and they beecome homeless or even dead ? You must be a very lonely guy, I feel sorry for you, you seem filled with hate.
Are trying to see if you can break the thumbs down counter?
I have often written about how the Right Wing always blames the victim. Can I borrow your BS comment to use as the pudding that contains my proof?
I will only respond to your last assertion as I am assuming that you have followed good writing practice and summed up your comments into a final statement at the end.
Many of those that are financially successful reached success by making good decisions is just plain incorrect. Luck accounts for 50% - 75% of one's financial success. Luck that you happen to be born to the right parents, luck that your idea was the one used. Luck in so many ways. True, they are also often hard working; but that is not the only factor.
Your ilk claims that there is a safety net for hard working people that fall on bad times. Yet your policies destroy that net by doing everything possible to lower their wages. You ideas do everything possible to make an impossible to predict disease able to destroy the financial stabilty of entire families, including innocent children.
You don't have it backwards, you just don't get it at all. We are all in this together. In your world, I hope there is a god, because in your world thats only helping hand you get.
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
our very existence is at stake
I agree. Nobody would put up with the abuse we heap on this clown unless they were getting paid.
But at least the Left Wing comment sites allow anyone to post their point of view. I have tried and cannot get past the thought police on the Right Wing sites.
I guess they are not man/woman/human enough to deal with criticism.
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
They will repeal the ENTIRE 1st Amendment.
Still, the U.S. has a soft spot for energy companies. U.S. federal subsidies to the domestic oil and gas industry alone (not coal) range from “only” $4 billion a year, to $41 billion annually. One recent comprehensive study of U.S. energy subsidies identified $72.5 billion in federal subsidies for fossil fuels between 2002-2008, or just over $10 billion annually.
And how about the subsidies (in practical terms) to those companies who pay no taxes, like GE? Or how about the 15% tax on investment income, paid out to people who in general have money and who do no work for the money?
Those people "who have made good decisions" and are now rich are primarily those who, like Romney, inherited it! And, on the other side, if you are from a poor family, your opportunities are limited and the statistical odd are that you will stay poor.
This is the nightmarish "vision" of America that repubs seem to want.
Sounds like a 3rd world country. Sounds like one of those Communist or formerly Communist countries like Romania most are poor, and a few at the top are rich. Oh, wait, that sounds like the U.S.
Emergency rooms will admit life-threatenin g cases but what about those suffering from hunger or dispair. These Americans are also stripped of their self-respect and dignity.
What would the Republican candidates know of that?
Kids miss school, parents lose it and sometimes split up, home values drop from foreclosures and deterioration due to lack of maintenance funds, and on and on.
It is fiscal lunacy to just leave people to the mercy of misfortune. The whole society ends up bearing the cost whether you help them out or not, only I think it's worse if you don't.
When *you* get laid off and it takes you 2-3 years to find your next job, will you deny *your* children public assistance? Will you make *them* sleep with you in your car all winter to avoid the predators at the homeless shelter?
People who write posts like yours must not have any real life experience. I suspect that most of you are too young for that.
Actually it was founded on Genocide towards the natives who initially helped the "Pligrims" survive, then turned around and slaughtered them, took thier lands and tried to christianize the remainig "savages", and later by white men who allowed only white landowners to vote. Quite a start, eh? Commodification and exploitation of every thing has been the motive ever since.
Some people have no bootstraps to haul themselves up by; would you turn them away?
Quite right, rp. It took me a lot of years to realize that our "sanitized" history books have fed us a lot of garbage in relating our so-called "history." Not a lot of truth there.
Re R Eagle, I have long suspected he's a plant and so far tried to simply ignore him, though I must admit it's been difficult and I've often wished he'd just disappear.
Wonder if that might happen if we ALL just ignored him completely? No responses at all...
This type usually thrives on attention. Let's just withhold it! Maybe then he'll slink back into his slime pit and stay there.
Nah! He'll keep it rollin' -and I quite enjoy rattlin' an empty kettle once in a while; -it at least gives out something slightly musically absorbable. And if he's a plant, he'll be a leafless one, fed on infertile, Monsanto-type GM shit.
If you are a pure right winger, you see a person as a unit of productivity. When a human being is subjected to the stresses of unemployment and financial hardship, their productivity declines.
The wealth of the country declines with it.
That's why liberals and conservatives alike through the years have supported social safety nets. It makes good business sense.
The of ideological fixations we see on the right these days are not real. They are simply devices used by political manipulators to help confused people differentiate themselves from The Other and feel like part of a larger group.
AND, it is un-American.
Our standard of living and societal health, compared to the rest of the world is in dire straights and getting worse every year that we continue to follow the Conservative mantra of the "Trickle Down" theory, and the more recent "Out-Sourcing" of everything that we can. They had 30+ years to prove it worked and look at us now! It proves that the idea is a disaster! NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!
You might do well to actually read the article. Reich was saying that it's NOT the case that we are giving away the house.
I just wish that Reich wouldn't use the phrase "Social Darwinism." Even the early evolutionists knew that Darwin's ideas could not be distilled into, as many put it, survival of the fittest. The attitude and ideology that I'm sure Mr. Reich is referring to is neither social or Darwinian. It's just meanness.
This depraved concept is "Fascism" Do you really think it would make our country a better place? Please think and read some history. We have a lot to deal with right now as a country, we can't afford to go down this road again!
On second thought a "European-style welfare culture" is exactly what the GOP has in their congressional benefits package. F**king hypocrites.
It's ironic that for a progressive like myself it is Obama's great failure that he did not help bring us in that direction, in fact, all the contrary. Yet the GOP marches to the strange fiction that he is bringing social democracy, European style, to the states.
We have reached the point of utter nonsense.
Why don't the Dems at least make an attempt to introduce the terminology that would actually be more correct when referring to Social Security and Medicare?
They are EARNED BENEFITS (Damn it!!) We contributed to them all our working lives....
(sigh....and oh, yes, don't spend so much energy on Robt. Eagle's rants....keep your eye on the ball instead of getting distracted by him!!!)
It is as if to say that all those people in rags and soup kitchens in the last DEPRESSION were there just to "take advantage" of all the free food and accommodations. The voice of fact and TRUTH cannot match the CORPORATE MEGAPHONE that spews this NONSENSE.
In an environment where virtually all of our representatives are bought and paid for by the exact same entities that "own" those megaphones it is little wonder that the larger segment of America is all up in arms about the wrong side of almost every issue. http://www.johnrussellforcongress.com John Russell
Neither side is completely right or wrong.
But instead of EITHER/OR we need to accept that both sides are important:
YES, everybody is responsible for the choices they make AND
YES, society is responsible so that all it's members can be supported to live a decent life in relation to everybody's capabilities.
Neither Democrats or Republicans show this attitude. I am still hoping for a political leader who will make his/her decision on the ground of "What is best for the people" instead of "What is best for Me/or MY Party:
THIS IS WHY WE OCCUPY
Thank you.
the massive bail outs of GM, AIG, Fanny Mae Freddi Mack .. and the rest of the 'too bigs to fail' -- all passed by a democratic house and Obama's senate.
what about us little people? the too small to saves?
And any one who thinks Republicans are not equally willing to enslave the next generation with debt so they can get elected now is also uninformed at best - and more likely stupid.
RSS feed for comments to this post