RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "One of the few things Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich agree on is that President Obama is turning America into 'European-style welfare culture.' ... This is the real scandal..."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Republican Myth: Obama's "Entitlement Society"

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

02 February 12

 

ne of the few things Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich agree on is that President Obama is turning America into "European-style welfare culture."

In his standard stump speech Romney charges Obama with creating a nation of dependents. "Over the past three years Barack Obama has been replacing our merit-based society with an entitlement society."

Gingrich calls Obama "the best food-stamp president in American history."

What's their evidence? Both rely on federal budget data showing direct payments to individuals shot up by almost $600 billion, a 32 percent increase, since the start of 2009.

They also point to Census data showing that 49 percent of Americans now live in homes where at least one person is collecting a federal benefit - Social Security, food stamps, unemployment insurance, worker's compensation, or subsidized housing. That's up from 44 percent in 2008.

Finally, they trumpet Social Security Administration figures showing that the number of people on Social Security disability jumped 10 percent in Obama's first two years in office.

They argue our economic problems stem from this sharp rise in "dependency." Get rid of these benefits and people will work harder.

But they have cause and effect backwards. The reason for the rise in food stamps, unemployment insurance, and other safety-net programs is Americans got clobbered in 2008 with the worst economic catastrophe since the Great Depression. They and their families have needed whatever helping hands they could get.

If anything, America's safety nets have been too small and shot through with holes. That's why the number and percentage of Americans in poverty has increased dramatically over the past three years. According to a study by Northeastern University, a third of families with young children are now in poverty.

This is the real scandal. For example, only 40 percent of the unemployed qualify for unemployment benefits because they weren't working full time or long enough on a single job before they were canned. The unemployment system doesn't take account of the fact that a large portion of the workforce typically works part time on several jobs, and moves from job to job.

Republicans also object to Obama's health care law, which covers 30 million more Americans than were covered before. That law still leaves over 20 million without health insurance. They'll get emergency care when they're in dire straights - hospitals won't refuse them - but we all end up paying indirectly.

Regressive Republicans pretend they're about opportunity. In reality they're back at what they've been doing for years - promoting Social Darwinism.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+120 # leedeegirl 2012-02-02 13:28
Prof. Reich states: "Regressive Republicans pretend they're about opportunity. In reality they're back at what they've been doing for years - promoting Social Darwinism."

to which i reply: BACK AT what they've been doing for years??? when did they ever STOP?

the sentence SHOULD be, "In reality, they're still just doing what they've been doing for decades - promoting Social Darwinism."
 
 
+114 # Barbara K 2012-02-02 13:48
The Greedy Old Pigs lie constantly. They are too stupid to know how the people got into this position. But we all know they do know, but truth means nothing to this bunch of heartless morons. We just must get them out of our government to save ourselves. They don't want us to have anything. They made their money off the backs of the middle class and the poor; then don't even pay their share of taxes on it. We should never forget what they are doing to us.

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!

our future and very existence are at stake
 
 
-246 # Robt Eagle 2012-02-02 13:58
Reich, you are the one who has it backwards!!! Stop the bleeding heart liberal give it all away crap. Some will suffer who have made bad choices, that is appropriate. Those who had no savings, but had cell phones; those who had more children than they could afford; those who bought houses they couldn't make the mortgage payments on; those who have bad diets and do no exercise who get diabetes; those who choose poorly should all pay the price. And NO, the government should not bail them out, just like the gov't should not have bailed out the auto makers, or the baks, or Solyndra, etc. Failure is part of life and those that succed should not shoulder the debt of those who have done poorly. If the successful CHOOSE to help out the unfortunate it is through charity. Do not tax those who have made good decisions to take care of those who have made poor choices. Get real!
 
 
+98 # cadan 2012-02-02 14:22
So Robt, your position seems to be that it's wrong to give to a poor person with a cell phone and kids, but it's right to spend trillions on dumb, pointless wars with millions of maimed and killed victims including tens of thousands of our own soldiers??

That doesn't make sense.

Even if there were such a thing as a welfare queen driving a cadillac, it would be cheaper (by a factor of 2) to give ten million welfare queens $50,000 each to go get a cadillac than to fight either of our pointless wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. (It would also stimulate our economy more.)
 
 
+49 # Cambridgemac 2012-02-02 16:55
Oh yes it does make sense. Dollars and Sense. Robt and his buddies are raking in the dough on our wildly corrupt, expensive imperial adventures. Or maybe he just enjoys the cruelty of it.

These guys don't want to grow the economy. They're doing just fine.
 
 
+69 # Michael Lee Bugg 2012-02-02 14:42
If all of those you condemn were mentally and physically able to do what you think they simply choose not to do and were not genetically predisposed to a multitude of God-given illnesses, and were not born into abject poverty from which few escape on their own I would agree with you as long as you give up all the public assistance you get also! Like public schools, public water and sewer, public libraries, police and fire protection, copyright and patent protection, deed recording and storage, national defense, and promise to never sign up for Social Security or Medicare even though you think you have paid for them. If you think it should be every man for himself you are one of every man!
 
 
+82 # bugbuster 2012-02-02 14:45
Are you actually lamenting that the auto makers are doing well again? That is a sick and twisted outlook, Robt Eagle. You need help.
 
 
+53 # leedeegirl 2012-02-02 15:16
Quoting Robt Eagle:
Reich, you are the one who has it backwards!!! Stop the bleeding heart liberal give it all away crap. Some will suffer who have made bad choices, that is appropriate. Those who had no savings, but had cell phones; those who had more children than they could afford; those who bought houses they couldn't make the mortgage payments on; those who have bad diets and do no exercise who get diabetes; those who choose poorly should all pay the price. And NO, the government should not bail them out, just like the gov't should not have bailed out the auto makers, or the baks, or Solyndra, etc. Failure is part of life and those that succed should not shoulder the debt of those who have done poorly. If the successful CHOOSE to help out the unfortunate it is through charity. Do not tax those who have made good decisions to take care of those who have made poor choices. Get real!


methinks that Mr. Eagle (and i use the term "Mr." very loosely) is actually the reincarnation of Ebeneezer Scrooge ...
 
 
+78 # reiverpacific 2012-02-02 15:17
Quoting Robt Eagle:
Reich, you are the one who has it backwards!!! Stop the bleeding heart liberal give it all away crap. Some will suffer who have made bad choices, that is appropriate. Those who had no savings, but had cell phones; those who had more children than they could afford; those who bought houses they couldn't make the mortgage payments on; those who have bad diets and do no exercise who get diabetes; those who choose poorly should all pay the price. And NO, the government should not bail them out, just like the gov't should not have bailed out the auto makers, or the baks, or Solyndra, etc. Failure is part of life and those that succed should not shoulder the debt of those who have done poorly. If the successful CHOOSE to help out the unfortunate it is through charity. Do not tax those who have made good decisions to take care of those who have made poor choices. Get real!

"Are there no prisons. no workhouses?"
You are a mass or reactionary clichés and mean-spirited declamations based on blinkered assumptions. Do you spit on the homeless when you pass them and how do you know how they got that way? You make Archie Bunker seem like a "Knee-jerk Liberal" -except that he was quite funny. Some of us believe that we are on this planet, in this short life, to help each other and be good stewards of the lands; if that makes me a "knee-jerk" (and I can here that in any redneck bar) -well guilty as charged! It's better than just being a "Jerk".
 
 
+15 # reiverpacific 2012-02-02 16:48
I meant "hear" of course; 'scuse crappy typing skills
 
 
+3 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-03 23:41
Good Post, Reiverpacific!
 
 
+37 # Cassandra2012 2012-02-02 15:23
Hard to eat a good diet of lobster and caviar on a minimum wage or welfare check, dearie.
 
 
+23 # leedeegirl 2012-02-02 15:57
Quoting Cassandra2012:
Hard to eat a good diet of lobster and caviar on a minimum wage or welfare check, dearie.


or even vegetables not covered in "health-crippli ng poisons" for that matter ...
 
 
+86 # ericlipps 2012-02-02 15:41
Quoting Robt Eagle:
Reich, you are the one who has it backwards!!! Stop the bleeding heart liberal give it all away crap. Some will suffer who have made bad choices, that is appropriate. Those who had no savings, but had cell phones; those who had more children than they could afford; those who bought houses they couldn't make the mortgage payments on; those who have bad diets and do no exercise who get diabetes; those who choose poorly should all pay the price. And NO, the government should not bail them out, just like the gov't should not have bailed out the auto makers, or the baks, or Solyndra, etc. Failure is part of life and those that succed should not shoulder the debt of those who have done poorly. If the successful CHOOSE to help out the unfortunate it is through charity. Do not tax those who have made good decisions to take care of those who have made poor choices. Get real!

Ah, yes. So anyone who had bad luck (who, say7, was disabled in a car accident caused by a drunk driver) should just pray the "successful" will deign to help out. Anyone who lost his job because of the banking crisis? Tough noogies. Anyone who can't feed his kids because he can't make enough money to make ends meet? Either count on your local church or just acknowledge you're a Darwinian failure and die--and take your failure-tainted kids with you.

Don't know about you, Eagle, but that's not the sort of America I'd want to live in.
 
 
+74 # Art947 2012-02-02 15:48
I always find it interesting that individuals such as Robt Eagle are always ready to castigate others for the problems that they face -- until they face the same problems themselves! The income of the typical American has not increased over the past 30 years, especially when inflation is taken into consideraation. Yet, these Americans are expected to be able to afford living quarters, food, clothing, etc.? How? Note that many of these same people probably could not afford the rent on an available(?) apartment any more than they could afford a mortgage payment. In fact, they were probably sold a bill of goods by a repugnican entrepreneur that getting a mortgage would allow them to build equity rather than a collection of rent receipts!
I am constantly reminded of the selfishness that exists in our society when you consider the following items: those who champion war are rarely, if ever, the ones who fight or send their children to fight the wars; those who look for an adequate blood supply to meet our country's daily need for this life-saving fluid are rarely the ones who donate blood. I am sure that I could provide many more examples, however, let me end with a major question...are the statements that these individuals make to castigate others congruent with their professed religiosity?
 
 
+33 # Cambridgemac 2012-02-02 16:57
My favoriate part of Robt's silly rant: implying that the 60% of the American workforce that is not covered by unemployment insurance "made bad choices." Yeah, they chose to get screwed. Whereas Robt - well, he chose to be one of the screwers! Yay! Thank Jebus!
 
 
+42 # Observer 47 2012-02-02 16:02
And so, according to you, everyone who is needy, by definition, has made stupid choices, lived beyond his/her means, or is simply a slacker wanting a handout? There couldn't possibly be people who have had their savings wiped out by medical bills that insurance won't cover, or who bought modest homes but who were downsized through no fault of their own and now can't even afford minimal mortgages?? Everyone who receives aid is an ignorant, greedy, undeserving loser? Ayn Rand would be proud of you, Mr. Eagle. I'd suggest that you be a bit more careful about what you put out to the Universe, though, lest you get it back---it won't be pretty.
 
 
+37 # suzyskier 2012-02-02 16:04
Dear Mr Eagle

One day you may end up like these so called "loosers". No one is exempt from misery. You sound like a page right out of the right wing handbook. So it is ok with you is some suffer from bad choices and they beecome homeless or even dead ? You must be a very lonely guy, I feel sorry for you, you seem filled with hate.
 
 
+46 # BradFromSalem 2012-02-02 17:54
Man, you are really wacko!

Are trying to see if you can break the thumbs down counter?

I have often written about how the Right Wing always blames the victim. Can I borrow your BS comment to use as the pudding that contains my proof?
I will only respond to your last assertion as I am assuming that you have followed good writing practice and summed up your comments into a final statement at the end.

Many of those that are financially successful reached success by making good decisions is just plain incorrect. Luck accounts for 50% - 75% of one's financial success. Luck that you happen to be born to the right parents, luck that your idea was the one used. Luck in so many ways. True, they are also often hard working; but that is not the only factor.
Your ilk claims that there is a safety net for hard working people that fall on bad times. Yet your policies destroy that net by doing everything possible to lower their wages. You ideas do everything possible to make an impossible to predict disease able to destroy the financial stabilty of entire families, including innocent children.

You don't have it backwards, you just don't get it at all. We are all in this together. In your world, I hope there is a god, because in your world thats only helping hand you get.
 
 
+16 # Barbara K 2012-02-03 05:04
Amen to you, Liberal L. I suspect that Eagle is one of those we were warned about nearly a year ago; who are being paid by the Koch Bastards to go on these sites and slam our comments and put out their lies. I bet the guy is all garbage-mouth and doesn't have a pot to pee in himself. Possible?

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!

our very existence is at stake
 
 
+14 # BradFromSalem 2012-02-03 08:00
Barbara,

I agree. Nobody would put up with the abuse we heap on this clown unless they were getting paid.

But at least the Left Wing comment sites allow anyone to post their point of view. I have tried and cannot get past the thought police on the Right Wing sites.

I guess they are not man/woman/human enough to deal with criticism.

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!

They will repeal the ENTIRE 1st Amendment.
 
 
+29 # historywriter 2012-02-02 18:08
I guess all that nonsense about providing for the "general welfare" of Americans doesn't mean that our government ever takes care of the sick or helps out the unemployed. Robt, you are doing the age-old "blame the victim" trick so dear to conservatives who believe it's everyone for himself/herself .
Still, the U.S. has a soft spot for energy companies. U.S. federal subsidies to the domestic oil and gas industry alone (not coal) range from “only” $4 billion a year, to $41 billion annually. One recent comprehensive study of U.S. energy subsidies identified $72.5 billion in federal subsidies for fossil fuels between 2002-2008, or just over $10 billion annually.
And how about the subsidies (in practical terms) to those companies who pay no taxes, like GE? Or how about the 15% tax on investment income, paid out to people who in general have money and who do no work for the money?
Those people "who have made good decisions" and are now rich are primarily those who, like Romney, inherited it! And, on the other side, if you are from a poor family, your opportunities are limited and the statistical odd are that you will stay poor.
This is the nightmarish "vision" of America that repubs seem to want.
Sounds like a 3rd world country. Sounds like one of those Communist or formerly Communist countries like Romania most are poor, and a few at the top are rich. Oh, wait, that sounds like the U.S.
 
 
+22 # ABen 2012-02-02 19:16
Eagle; you need to revisit the definition of society and examine its developmental history. If you do, you will find terms such as "mutual benefit and support, "pursuit of common interests and goals," and establishment of community norms, structures and identity." It appears that you don't really understand the nature and purpose of a society or social structure. Societal structures did not come into existence to enable each individual to be selfish and self-centered.
 
 
+13 # Kiwikid 2012-02-02 21:21
We're all so pleased for you Robt. Pleased you chose the right parents with good genes. Pleased you had the luxury of making good choices because you weren't born into abject poverty. Pleased you were presumably provided with a good education and solid parenting. Pleased you have the intelligence (sic) and the drive to be able to get where you've needed to. Pleased that to date you've lived a realatively privileged life. I know, you believe it was all your own doing. Congratulations ! May no unplanned, unexpected catastrophe which you are not equipped to deal with befall you so that you don't have to learn how it really is for many of your fellow citizens.
 
 
+4 # mayordoug 2012-02-02 21:35
Thank you Mr. Scrooge.
 
 
+10 # Vision is Clear 2012-02-03 07:46
I bet you call yourself a Christian.
 
 
+4 # tfentonian 2012-02-04 06:53
Yes, Liberals give it all away. That's why 1% of Americans control 50% of the wealth...your comments, RE, make no sense!
 
 
+73 # Toribeth 2012-02-02 14:01
The poverty that many of Americans are facing also carries with it, hunger and depression.
Emergency rooms will admit life-threatenin g cases but what about those suffering from hunger or dispair. These Americans are also stripped of their self-respect and dignity.
What would the Republican candidates know of that?
 
 
+36 # bugbuster 2012-02-02 15:15
Once these stresses take hold on a family, for example the 13,000 hard working folks who are about to get laid off from American Airlines, the hole gets deeper and deeper and exponentially harder to dig out of without some outside help.

Kids miss school, parents lose it and sometimes split up, home values drop from foreclosures and deterioration due to lack of maintenance funds, and on and on.

It is fiscal lunacy to just leave people to the mercy of misfortune. The whole society ends up bearing the cost whether you help them out or not, only I think it's worse if you don't.
 
 
+76 # bugbuster 2012-02-02 14:02
I'm not ready to believe that all recipients of public aid are Democrats. Or maybe so. Could it be that male heads of Republican households would rather, as a matter of principle, starve their own children than accept aid? Are these the family values we hear so much about?
 
 
+36 # Billy Bob 2012-02-02 15:19
No. Believe me, they accept aid just as willingly as anyone else when push comes to shove. They just preach about no one else doing it, if they can get away with it.
 
 
-92 # WindyCityCane 2012-02-02 14:24
+1 with Robt Eagle... was this country founded upon an 'entitlement' mentality or upon principles of liberty and responsibility for our own choices? I would suspect many of the so-called 'families' in the article refer to a unwed teenage mother. We don't need a larger government to confiscate even more of our hard-earned money - we need to take more responsibility for ourselves. I might be poor myself, but I don't look at those who are rich and say 'give me what you have', however, I would like the opportunity on my own merits to attain their status someday through my own hard work. I earn my own money, I should decide what I want to do with it.
 
 
+33 # bugbuster 2012-02-02 16:06
Do you have any personal relationships? Would you impose these "values" on those persons? Do you have children? Would you impose these "values" on them?

When *you* get laid off and it takes you 2-3 years to find your next job, will you deny *your* children public assistance? Will you make *them* sleep with you in your car all winter to avoid the predators at the homeless shelter?

People who write posts like yours must not have any real life experience. I suspect that most of you are too young for that.
 
 
+29 # reiverpacific 2012-02-02 16:46
Quoting WindyCityCane:
+1 with Robt Eagle... was this country founded upon an 'entitlement' mentality or upon principles of liberty and responsibility for our own choices? I would suspect many of the so-called 'families' in the article refer to a unwed teenage mother. We don't need a larger government to confiscate even more of our hard-earned money - we need to take more responsibility for ourselves. I might be poor myself, but I don't look at those who are rich and say 'give me what you have', however, I would like the opportunity on my own merits to attain their status someday through my own hard work. I earn my own money, I should decide what I want to do with it.

Actually it was founded on Genocide towards the natives who initially helped the "Pligrims" survive, then turned around and slaughtered them, took thier lands and tried to christianize the remainig "savages", and later by white men who allowed only white landowners to vote. Quite a start, eh? Commodification and exploitation of every thing has been the motive ever since.
Some people have no bootstraps to haul themselves up by; would you turn them away?
 
 
+7 # Lolanne 2012-02-03 15:42
Quoting reiverpacific:

Actually it was founded on Genocide towards the natives who initially helped the "Pligrims" survive, then turned around and slaughtered them, took thier lands and tried to christianize the remainig "savages", and later by white men who allowed only white landowners to vote. Quite a start, eh? Commodification and exploitation of every thing has been the motive ever since.
Some people have no bootstraps to haul themselves up by; would you turn them away?


Quite right, rp. It took me a lot of years to realize that our "sanitized" history books have fed us a lot of garbage in relating our so-called "history." Not a lot of truth there.

Re R Eagle, I have long suspected he's a plant and so far tried to simply ignore him, though I must admit it's been difficult and I've often wished he'd just disappear.
Wonder if that might happen if we ALL just ignored him completely? No responses at all...
This type usually thrives on attention. Let's just withhold it! Maybe then he'll slink back into his slime pit and stay there.
 
 
+2 # reiverpacific 2012-02-04 16:19
Quoting Lolanne:
Quoting reiverpacific:

Actually it was founded on Genocide towards the natives who initially helped the "Pligrims" survive, then turned around and slaughtered them, took thier lands and tried to christianize the remainig "savages", and later by white men who allowed only white landowners to vote. Quite a start, eh? Commodification and exploitation of every thing has been the motive ever since.
Some people have no bootstraps to haul themselves up by; would you turn them away?

Quite right, rp. It took me a lot of years to realize that our "sanitized" history books have fed us a lot of garbage in relating our so-called "history." Not a lot of truth there.

Re R Eagle, I have long suspected he's a plant and so far tried to simply ignore him, though I must admit it's been difficult and I've often wished he'd just disappear.
Wonder if that might happen if we ALL just ignored him completely? No responses at all...
This type usually thrives on attention. Let's just withhold it! Maybe then he'll slink back into his slime pit and stay there.

Nah! He'll keep it rollin' -and I quite enjoy rattlin' an empty kettle once in a while; -it at least gives out something slightly musically absorbable. And if he's a plant, he'll be a leafless one, fed on infertile, Monsanto-type GM shit.
 
 
+5 # Kiwikid 2012-02-02 21:30
If you are poor in America now, the jury is no longer out Windy - you have just engaged in Mission Virtually Impossible if you think you can work your way out of it into prosperity. Good luck anyway:-)
 
 
+51 # Klanders 2012-02-02 14:29
Ok! I'm really quite warn out from hearing the GOP rant about how Americans are expecting a handout. Get this Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich, What a lot of Americans are asking for is a Hand up and no more. I have not held a full time position within corporate America, nor "mainstream" employment since 2001! That is over 11 Years! I have managed to keep afloat, barely, as a contractor, working "engagements", paying for my own benefits, not being an entitled employee. Hard way to go. Then, I got old, I discovered another impairment to employment: no one will even consider contracting with a Senior citizen for work; even when that Senior has completed the very same set of tasks over and over again. So, get this fact straight. President Obama is not responsible for creating entitlements, or consumers of entitlements as much as the fact that Corporate prejudice against "Seniors" seems hell bent on forcing willing workers into retirement or into just plain giving up.
 
 
+26 # Cambridgemac 2012-02-02 16:59
Hey Klanders, Robt says you made a "bad choice" when you decided to get old. So stop yer whinin and deal!
 
 
+16 # AKPatriot 2012-02-02 14:38
abiogenisis-or Social Dar-win-ism fits the Repuks to a Tea.
 
 
+44 # fredboy 2012-02-02 14:55
I think that Bush/GOP $700 billion "no questions asked, and unmarked bills" payoff pretty much set the record for an "entitlement society"...
 
 
+47 # Susan1989 2012-02-02 15:07
Would Jesus have blamed the poor? I think not. Can we blame people for losing their jobs if the company downsizes, for getting sick or too old to work, or for being disabled? Do we allow our children to go hungry or without care? The "every man for himself" philosophy is without soul or compassion.
 
 
+16 # bugbuster 2012-02-02 16:46
Without soul or compassion is a given. But does letting people go into free fall make good fiscal sense?

If you are a pure right winger, you see a person as a unit of productivity. When a human being is subjected to the stresses of unemployment and financial hardship, their productivity declines.

The wealth of the country declines with it.

That's why liberals and conservatives alike through the years have supported social safety nets. It makes good business sense.

The of ideological fixations we see on the right these days are not real. They are simply devices used by political manipulators to help confused people differentiate themselves from The Other and feel like part of a larger group.
 
 
+22 # jon 2012-02-02 17:15
"The "every man for himself" philosophy is without soul or compassion."

AND, it is un-American.
 
 
+32 # ramblerman 2012-02-02 15:18
Classic Republican ingenuousness - them complaining about safety net payments the past four years are like the proverbial man who shot his parents and then begged the court for mercy because he was an orphan.
 
 
+52 # bluebluesdancer 2012-02-02 15:47
@Robt Eagle: What a pathetic example of an American you are! You completely miss what our nation is all about! Have you even READ the Constitution? If you did you would see that the concept of our independent ability to 'make good' on our own, was tempered with the strong belief that Society and those that make the laws (i.e. the government) would also do what is best for the People. You are advocating a "Dog-eat-dog, You-Are-On-Your -Own" Society, which is absolutely NOT what was intended! The government and our forefathers were concerned that the wealthy and the corporations would become too strong and turn us back into the slaves and serfs that are what we escaped when we came to the US, and that is what we are trying to counteract right now!
Our standard of living and societal health, compared to the rest of the world is in dire straights and getting worse every year that we continue to follow the Conservative mantra of the "Trickle Down" theory, and the more recent "Out-Sourcing" of everything that we can. They had 30+ years to prove it worked and look at us now! It proves that the idea is a disaster! NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!
 
 
+18 # mjc 2012-02-02 16:05
The very amazing arguments that the Republicans make, including Robert Eagle, are as old as those made about the New Deal, Franklin Roosevelt's administration, the establishment of Social Security or any of the other truly major attempts to help level the playing field and support social justice in this country. Many of these programs were ones that helped these rock-headed Republicans and their families but still the arguments come about the bad choices that the poor make and how they cannot be supported. Such a sad commentary on our society's well-off and wealthy citizens.
 
 
+10 # fixtroy 2012-02-02 16:07
Mr. Eagle,
You might do well to actually read the article. Reich was saying that it's NOT the case that we are giving away the house.
I just wish that Reich wouldn't use the phrase "Social Darwinism." Even the early evolutionists knew that Darwin's ideas could not be distilled into, as many put it, survival of the fittest. The attitude and ideology that I'm sure Mr. Reich is referring to is neither social or Darwinian. It's just meanness.
 
 
+16 # bbforlife 2012-02-02 16:15
Robt Eagle etc. "We need to build a super-race" - "Let the inferior ones die off". Where have we heard this before? "Tell a lie big enough, loud enough and long enough and it will be believed"

This depraved concept is "Fascism" Do you really think it would make our country a better place? Please think and read some history. We have a lot to deal with right now as a country, we can't afford to go down this road again!
 
 
+17 # wendy 2012-02-02 16:59
In this day & age its next to impossible to find a job without a phone or a car & as far as having too many children is concerned I suppose the answer is for people to just not have sex seeing as how the repressed in power also don't want anyone to have abortion or birth control available.
 
 
+24 # Rick Levy 2012-02-02 17:27
"European-style welfare culture"? Were that it were so. Europeans are healthier and have a higher life expectancy than Americans. Leave it to the Rethuglicans to make that sound like a bad thing.

On second thought a "European-style welfare culture" is exactly what the GOP has in their congressional benefits package. F**king hypocrites.
 
 
+24 # Stephen 2012-02-02 17:27
Anyway, having lived myself both in Europe and the States, I can say I wish the US was a European style social democracy. For the same taxes paid, there we got free health-care, free education, free pre-school, even lunch tickets if you worked in Paris. Ah, you say, but their collapse over there proves it didn't work! No- what's happening over there is the same as here- the banksters and global mega-capitalist s are grabbing power.
It's ironic that for a progressive like myself it is Obama's great failure that he did not help bring us in that direction, in fact, all the contrary. Yet the GOP marches to the strange fiction that he is bringing social democracy, European style, to the states.
We have reached the point of utter nonsense.
 
 
+11 # klondikekitty 2012-02-02 17:33
I am a firm believer in karma, both good and bad, and I believe that sooner or later, all those who say we should let the poor, disabled and elderly to fend for themselves by eliminating the federal and state safety net programs that give them a fighting chance in today's America WILL one fine day find themselves bankrupt, homeless or old, and I am sooo hoping they will at last realize what it feels like to save money by eating macaroni and cheese dinners from a box (which might have come from a food shelf) for supper every night, sleep in their clothes because their drafty, but inexpensive apt (if they're lucky enough to have one) is too cold and there's not enough blankets, or wind up as wards of the state or county, barely existing in a nursing home, wondering where their children are and why they never come to visit them. As the saying goes, "Do not judge anyone until you have walked a mile in their shoes."
 
 
+9 # Doubter 2012-02-02 18:51
Maybe you're right, but maybe their Karma won't show up till their next life!
 
 
+1 # dorianb@fuse.net 2012-02-04 20:39
often happens like that, Doubter. Time is irrelevant when it comes to Karma.
 
 
+9 # futhark 2012-02-02 17:49
Compassion is a very human trait. Evidence for human compassion goes back to the Neandertals (correct modern spelling) who cared for and supported amputees and gave them decent burials. The notion that the best society is one in which the physical and mental "misfits" have been pruned away by their inherent lack of survival skills is a markedly anti-social attitude. Everyone deserves an opportunity to enrich the experience of those around him/her. That's why I always give panhandlers $2 in gratitude for their courage and contribution to the variety of people around me. I'd hate to live in a place where everyone was a wine snob and drove a Lexus. Well, Santa Rosa comes close, but I am grateful for the panhandlers I occasionally encounter here.
 
 
+15 # Eliza D 2012-02-02 18:41
We are in the early years of feudalism, in which lack of money prevents most of us from attending the prestigious universities which allow entry into the elite, astronomically high-paid world of the rich and powerful. Yes, one hears about the occasional Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg who skyrockets to fame and riches, but these are such a small percentage of Americans as to be statistically insignificant. The rest of us are mostly resigned to living paycheck to paycheck,prayin g that some calamity doesn't plummet us into poverty and despair.Further more, we are no longer allowed the luxury of raising our own children, as most families must have two adults working to have a decent lifestyle. And the Republicans say they are the party of family-values! Women don't even get paid maternity leave to have a child-the six-week maternity leave you hear about is unpaid! Most of us work until we are ready to deliver and then rush back to work before our babies are weaned because we can't afford the lost income. Safety net indeed! Third world status is not far off!
 
 
+2 # jky1291 2012-02-03 08:54
It is very doubtful we will ever again ascend to third world status with the ignorance so prominently displayed by the special interests, the wealthy, and multinational corporations in successfully enslaving the citizens of this country for their own perverted self interest and greed.
 
 
+12 # Majikman 2012-02-02 19:06
Rbt Eagle has eloquently revealed himself for what he is...a terrified delusional bully. Like those of his party who believe that any assistance given to someone less fortunate diminishes them, they smugly believe that they have achieved, single handedly, the accumulation of the work of others. Why the need for gated communities, backyard bomb shelters, private security forces etc except to protect oneself from the kid who's milk money you stole from reclaiming what's his.
 
 
+20 # Sassy 2012-02-02 20:23
What Eagle didn't say is that Red states are the ones using the "entitlements" most. If anyone knows anything, it's that the poorest states are RED. As usual, it is the very poor REPUBLICANS who are being misled by their leaders into believing anything they say so they turn up to vote, to give away their money...and to be left starving and homeless as their benefits disappear.
 
 
+12 # LML 2012-02-02 22:56
In heaven'sname, why do we always let them frame the debate using "dirty" words like "entitlement"?
Why don't the Dems at least make an attempt to introduce the terminology that would actually be more correct when referring to Social Security and Medicare?
They are EARNED BENEFITS (Damn it!!) We contributed to them all our working lives....
(sigh....and oh, yes, don't spend so much energy on Robt. Eagle's rants....keep your eye on the ball instead of getting distracted by him!!!)
 
 
+9 # JohnRussell2012 2012-02-03 04:00
The "Foxonomics" is very successful in persuading those who have never taken an economics course to believe the absolute polar opposite of reality.

It is as if to say that all those people in rags and soup kitchens in the last DEPRESSION were there just to "take advantage" of all the free food and accommodations. The voice of fact and TRUTH cannot match the CORPORATE MEGAPHONE that spews this NONSENSE.

In an environment where virtually all of our representatives are bought and paid for by the exact same entities that "own" those megaphones it is little wonder that the larger segment of America is all up in arms about the wrong side of almost every issue. http://www.johnrussellforcongress.com John Russell
 
 
+5 # AICS 2012-02-03 08:59
This is the age-old question: Who is responsible for What?. There are the ones who firmly believe it is the Individual who has to make his/her own decision. And there are the others who firmly believe it is society who has to take care of its members.
Neither side is completely right or wrong.

But instead of EITHER/OR we need to accept that both sides are important:
YES, everybody is responsible for the choices they make AND
YES, society is responsible so that all it's members can be supported to live a decent life in relation to everybody's capabilities.
Neither Democrats or Republicans show this attitude. I am still hoping for a political leader who will make his/her decision on the ground of "What is best for the people" instead of "What is best for Me/or MY Party:
 
 
+2 # Sassy 2012-02-03 22:49
I just want to add something of huge importance:

THIS IS WHY WE OCCUPY

Thank you.
 
 
0 # Martintfre 2012-02-07 13:38
ORomney care has nothing to do with the entitlement state.. Yea sure.

the massive bail outs of GM, AIG, Fanny Mae Freddi Mack .. and the rest of the 'too bigs to fail' -- all passed by a democratic house and Obama's senate.

what about us little people? the too small to saves?

And any one who thinks Republicans are not equally willing to enslave the next generation with debt so they can get elected now is also uninformed at best - and more likely stupid.
 
 
0 # Uncle Joe 2012-02-09 09:37
What about their entitlements? Tax holidays & loopholes that allow the uber-rich to move jobs overseas to be run in gulags. Slavery is now a worldwide pandemic.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN