Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Who should have the primary strategic responsibility for making American workers globally competitive - the private sector or government? This will be a defining issue in the 2012 campaign."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



The State of Our Disunion

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

24 January 12

 

The state of our disunion: A globalizing private sector, a government overwhelmed by corporate money.

ho should have the primary strategic responsibility for making American workers globally competitive - the private sector or government? This will be a defining issue in the 2012 campaign.

In his State of the Union address, President Obama will make the case that government has a vital role. His Republican rivals disagree. Mitt Romney charges the President is putting "free enterprise on trial," while Newt Gingrich merely fulminates about "liberal elites."

American business won't and can't lead the way to more and better jobs in the United States. First, the private sector is increasingly global, with less and less stake in America. Second, it's driven by the necessity of creating profits, not better jobs.

The National Science Foundation has just released its biennial report on global investment in science, engineering and technology. The NSF warns that the United States is quickly losing ground to Asia, especially to China. America's share of global R&D spending is tumbling. In the decade to 2009, it dropped from 38 percent to 31 percent, while Asia's share rose from 24 to 35 percent.

One big reason: According to the NSF, American firms nearly doubled their R&D investment in Asia over these years, to over $7.5 billion.

GE recently announced a $500 million expansion of its R&D facilities in China. The firm has already invested $2 billion.

GE's CEO Jeffrey Immelt chairs Obama's council on work and competitiveness. I'd wager that as an American citizen, Immelt is concerned about working Americans. But as CEO of GE, Immelt's job is to be concerned about GE's shareholders. They aren't the same.

GE has also been creating more jobs outside the United States than in it. A decade ago, fewer than half of GE's employees were non-American; today, 54 percent are.

This is all good for GE and its shareholders, but it's not necessarily good for America or American workers. The Commerce Department says U.S. based global corporations added 2.4 million workers abroad in first decade of 21st century, while cutting their US workforce by 2.9 million.

According to the New York Times, Apple Computer employs 43,000 people in the United States but contracts with over 700,000 workers abroad. It makes iPhones in China not only because of low wages there but also the ease and speed with which its Chinese contractor can mobilize their workers - from company dormitories at almost any hour of the day or night.

An Apple executive says "We don't have an obligation to solve America's problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible." He might have added "and showing a big enough profits to continually increase our share price."

Most executives of American companies agree. If they can make it best and cheapest in China, or anywhere else, that's where it will be made. Don't blame them. That's what they're getting paid to do.

What they want in America is lower corporate taxes, less regulation, and fewer unionized workers. But none of these will bring good jobs to America. These steps may lower the costs of production here, but global companies can always find even lower costs abroad.

Global corporations - wherever they're based - will create good jobs for Americans only if Americans are productive enough to summon them. Problem is, a large and growing portion of our workforce isn't equipped to be productive.

Put simply, American workers are hobbled by deteriorating schools, unaffordable college tuitions, decaying infrastructure, and declining basic R&D. All of this is putting us on a glide path toward even lousier jobs and lower wages.

Get it? The strategic responsibility for making Americans more globally competitive can't be centered in the private sector because the private sector is rapidly going global, and it's designed to make profits rather than good jobs. The core responsibility has to be in government because government is supposed to be looking out for the public, and investing in public schools, colleges, infrastructure, and basic R&D.

But here's the political problem. American firms have huge clout in Washington. They maintain legions of lobbyists and are pouring boatloads of money into political campaigns. After the Supreme Court's Citizen's United decision, there's no limit.

Who represents the American workforce? Organized labor represents fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers and has all it can do to protect a dwindling number of unionized jobs.

Republicans like it this way, and for three decades have been trying to convince average working Americans government is their enemy. Yet corporate America isn't their friend. Without bold government action on behalf of our workforce, good American jobs will continue to disappear.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+12 # marthature 2012-01-24 08:31
To the extent that campaign contributions come under states' authority, I propose legislation banning campaign contributions from corporations that close US factories, offshore work, and/or evade paying US taxes. I'd like to see this as US legislation, but given a bespoke Congress, I could not see it passing. Unless, of course, some young Turk corporations and legislators want to wrest power away from the old guard.
 
 
+19 # wantrealdemocracy 2012-01-24 08:40
In another article I read on line today is one by Chris Hedges which says, "Voting is an act of political theater." Robert Reich says we need "bold government action on behalf of our workforce". These views demonstrate the difficulty in changing the policies of 'our' government. We, the people, must be active on both weakening the pillars of corporate power with street action as well as voting for men and women of honesty and moral ethics to replace the Democrats and Republicans who are now serving their corporate masters so well. Since it is easy to see that 'your' rep is not really representing you at all, you must not vote for that corrupt person's re election.
 
 
+7 # harbormon 2012-01-24 10:12
...sadly, folowing Chris Hedge's very succinct and specific point to his article, the alternative candidiate regardless of Party is likely to be no better. Even the most corrupt of governments throw up a variety of candidates with which to distract or mislead the voter into thinking they actually have a real choice.

In our case, any candidate that has received the financial and emotional support of their party, a critical component in today's "two party" election strategy, is going to tow the Party's line and all the ensuing corporate malfeasance that comes with it.
 
 
+8 # John Locke 2012-01-24 10:36
wantrealdemocra cy: we are our own worst enemy. If we stop suporting these global cabals who outsource our jobs, and buy locally, from Companies that employ us...things would turn around. But the Government who was responsible for this global outsource of employment in the first place, (Think Regan), MUST now make money available for American entrepreneurs with innovative ideas that will develope manufacturing in the US. If the Government does nothing as it has so far...our wages will further decline as more of our jobs are outsourced, until we are back to where we were in the 1960's and a minimum wage of $1.25 an hour. That is really what our global companies want...a 40 hour work week at $1.25 is $50.00 a week.
 
 
+7 # colvictoria 2012-01-24 15:32
John Locke,
This is scary! I believe the now deceased Steve Jobs once told Obama that he would be a one term pres if he did not open up the U.S. like China does.
Did he mean decrease the cost of labor? no regulations like OSHA, EPA? No health care to workers? no pensions or other fringe benefits? merit pay instead of ranking by seniority? no unions? Do these companies really believe they can force us into slaves thus ending the middle class?
 
 
+3 # John Locke 2012-01-25 00:17
colvictoria: the Middle class is gone now, without decent jobs, it is never coming back, Our government is taking the wrong direction, it should be supporting a strong middle class, and small business, but is to focused on big business where their campaign money comes from
 
 
0 # Progressive Patriot 2012-01-25 21:49
My Representative _is_ working for me ... with the one exception of _always_ voting for more military aid to Israel. I write to him occasionally, and the return e-mails express the sheer frustration he feels with the TeaTHUGs across the aisle.
 
 
+18 # LiberalLibertarian 2012-01-24 08:41
Great article.

This man should Secretary of Something. maybe Labor?

Seriously, in Obama's 2nd Term he will need to recreate his cabinet. Why not Robert Reich? And tonight would be an excellent opportunity to begin floating trial balloons by calling out ideas put forward by people like Robert Reich.

The President appears to have undergone a political transformation and moved toward the left economically. In the middle of all the pablum he will put on the table such as tax cuts that only minimally improve the economy, we need to hear new ideas. We need to hear the desperate need look for people that put people first. If people prosper, then the corporations that they work at must also prosper. He has to put it in simple terms. The Republican economic policy boils down to Corporations first, and that is backwards. Because when you do that, then the people that work there do not necessarily prosper.
 
 
+18 # LarrySantoro 2012-01-24 09:07
One of the best reasoned statements of the basic dichotomy I've heard:

"...the private sector is rapidly going global, and it's designed to make profits rather than good jobs.

"...Who represents the American workforce? Organized labor represents fewer than 7 percent of private-sector workers and has all it can do to protect a dwindling number of unionized jobs.

"Republicans like it this way, and for three decades have been trying to convince average working Americans government is their enemy. Yet corporate America isn't their friend. Without bold government action on behalf of our workforce, good American jobs will continue to disappear."

Simple statement of the quandary. Now... What do we do about it?
 
 
+10 # cadan 2012-01-24 10:02
I don't understand why we can't have tariffs on foreign made goods.

We had tariffs historically, and they seemed to work.

And if there's a global trade war, then so what?

Would we be worse off than we are now, when the percentage of our workers in manufacturing is at its lowest since before the civil war? Would we be worse off than having (perhaps) 20% real unemployment? Would we be worse off than our situation now, where we're losing the very human know-how to even run factories? It sure might hurt Walmart's bottom line, but would it really hurt our standard of living?

Globalization is not necessarily good---one big interconnected system is much more fragile than many smaller independent ones.

And 300 million people is surely enough to provide for our own needs.

I think insisting on one global marketplace with everybody in the whole world competing with everybody else in the whole world has the effect of making the workers work harder for less and less, while all benefits from advancing technology etc flow straight up to the (very few!!) owners.
 
 
+6 # Todd Williams 2012-01-24 11:49
When many of us preach the concept of buying locally produced food, why can't we expand that to buying US produced goods? If we had more stringent tariffs, maybe that would bring more jobs home. There might be counter tariffs and a trade war, but could it be worse than what's going on now? Just a thought....
 
 
+7 # Ken Hall 2012-01-24 16:58
In order to be able to buy US goods, we have to resurrect the industrial base so US workers can produce goods once again. A friend of mine had a summer job dismantling and crating a factory that was then shipped to Asia, all of it subsidized by tax breaks to the company. Thank you, Uncle Ronny! The US used to produce high quality goods but the infrastructure isn't here anymore. Germany, with 1/4 the population of the US, exports 4 times the goods! This needn't have happened, but US voters bought into the conservative view. Poor choice! We are going to have to hunker down and rebuild if the US is to become prosperous once again.
 
 
+12 # RJB 2012-01-24 10:57
OCCUPY!
 
 
+20 # jwb110 2012-01-24 10:59
There is no difference between the Global Economy of the Republicans and the old One Worldism of the long gone Communist regimes. Lots of promises of benefits to the workers and still the few (1%) are the only ones to see any benefit.
I do think that a message from the White House letting the 1% know that if they want to continue to benefit from their tax breaks etc,. they had best do SOME re-investing in the US. A dwindling work force with dwindling skills and the future of substantially fewer jobs will not be able to take of the slack created by subsidizing these tax breaks for the rich. There is no trickle down. We have had 30 years to see the Reagan fallacy in action.
The 1% are being kept afloat in their ocean of cash by increasing taxes on the lowest members of the citizenry. Any fool, even a rich fool, should be able to see that that system is not sustainable.
 
 
+5 # economicminor 2012-01-24 11:48
The White House does not control taxation. That is the House and Senate. All the President can do besides persuade is VETO which this President has been to cowardly to do.

The country is divided in more ways than a few. The political system is Owned by the Corporate Interests. Just watch the circus of Super Pac TV commercials and robo calls and .... And the way they can influence and even write most legislation.

This is the worse dilemma this country has ever faced. It is a bigger threat than WWII and certainly bigger than terrorism.

We have so many crises that it is hard to pick which is most important. The educational system here in Oregon is disintegrating. Public health and county government is dying. In another few years, it will truly be the wild west in the rural Northwest. I'm not sure what the cities will be like as the food and resources all come from or thru the rural areas of the country. I'm thinking, defended convoys like in Afghanistan and Iraq will be prevalent.
 
 
+10 # Todd Williams 2012-01-24 11:51
It is especially not sustainable when we cut money for education, the environment, r&d and other favorite programs that Rethugs love to bash.
 
 
-6 # economicminor 2012-01-24 13:14
Yes but that is the system we have. We would have to basically do away with all defense spending to even stay at current levels of other spending and there still would be consequences as much of that defense spending is spent here or comes home in many ways.

One of the big problems is our aging entitled system. Everyone is entitled to something. Defense contractors, farmers, ranchers, food stamps, others are jobs that are funded in some fashion by or thru a government entity. For others it is the prescription drug benefit or even SS or a pension that they believe they are entitled to.

Like I said, there are so many crises that it is hard to pick one.

We are in a predicament and the dilemma is that there is no whos that are going to take the biggest hits to their current standard of living. We have a dysfunctional government that leans towards fascism.

So I imagine, we will do what Germany did in the 20's when they found themselves in this kind of predicament. We will just print money like there is no tomorrow or consequences and heavy inflationary pressures will continue to move the wealth up from the productive class to those with insider access.

My biggest fear is this is the kind of mess that brings on stupid leaders who become dictators or despots. It was a financial predicament that brought Christian Right Adolph Hitler to power.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.
 
 
+7 # delacrews 2012-01-24 11:05
I've been saying it for years; if American corporations MAKE it outside of the USA, then they should SELL it outside of the USA. Other countries would have to develop market economies to consume what is made in their country. This is not protectionism
I call it "common sense".
The BRIC nations have the populations to consume all that is currently made.
 
 
+12 # mikehz 2012-01-24 11:23
This is one of the best, clearest, and most logical descriptions of Democratic/Republican dichotomy that I've seen. If every voter understood this clearly, it would reduce the posturing dramatically, and disintegrate the Republican ideological flim/flam.

I'd love to see Dr. Reich in Obama's next cabinet!
 
 
+5 # happycamper690 2012-01-24 11:24
The NYTimes article on Apple's use of the Chinese labor force (last Sunday and a must read) shows that schools, college tuition and infrastructure alone will not help if Chinese workers are eager enough for low-paying jobs to reside in dormitories and be available 24/7. What currently constituted union would put up with this? We see some of the Chinese determination in the North Dakota oil workers who are earning good salaries working all kinds of odd shifts and rotations. Are we our own worst enemy sometimes?
 
 
0 # dadepfan 2012-01-24 12:58
I just posted something appropriate to this on RSN Godot: American Political Myths - the "Invisible Hand"

http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/84-84/9575-american-political-myths-the-invisible-hand
 
 
+4 # Nell H 2012-01-24 13:19
No surprises here. People in higher ed could see this coming when American students started majoring in business instead of science. Science courses took up a lot of time and required too many math courses -- much easier to have fun instead of work so hard.
 
 
+10 # boater1 2012-01-24 13:45
...and, to whom do now near-record profits go? The top 1/10th of 1% grab 1/2 of all cap. gains. How dumb can the nation be to tolerate even more disparity?

More for the few means less for all others... automatically!
 
 
0 # Spleedeladee 2012-01-24 16:12
Unionized world labor: real threats of this might scare some of these international corporations. Now to create a test in a specific market: boycott steel products and/or higher tariffs from India, China, and from any former US steel stanping producer in these countries. Yea, too much politics...
 
 
+3 # berensmann 2012-01-24 21:16
If a US citizen decided to serve in the armed forces of another nation he/she would be charges with treason. But, if an American corporation decides to enrich the lives of the citizens of other nations, at the expense of US citizens, they are subsidized, not charged with treason.
 
 
+1 # Progressive Patriot 2012-01-25 21:35
One of the things Congress must do is stop subsidizing mega-corporations ... especially the ones that move their "headquarters" to a PO Box in a tax haven, and don't pay any US taxes.
 
 
+1 # Progressive Patriot 2012-01-25 21:32
That's part of what I call "Raygun's trickle-down stupidity" ... People believed him when he told them that "Government is the enemy. They're too stupid to figure out that Raygun LIED to them ... like every Republican over the past 40 years has done.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.