Van Gelder writes: "... the legitimacy of rule by giant corporations and Wall Street banks is crumbling. This system of corporate rule also benefits few and harms many, affecting nearly every major issue in public life."
Eighty percent of Americans oppose Citizens United, which turns two years old today. (photo: PointNineNine.com)
Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable
21 January 12
�
7 signs the corporatocracy is losing its legitimacy ... and 7 populist tools to help shut it down.
ou may remember that there was a time when apartheid in South Africa seemed unstoppable.
Sure, there were international boycotts of South African businesses, banks, and tourist attractions. There were heroic activists in South Africa, who were going to prison and even dying for freedom. But the conventional wisdom remained that these were principled gestures with little chance of upending the entrenched system of white rule.
"Be patient," activists were told. "Don't expect too much against powerful interests with a lot of money invested in the status quo."
With hindsight, though, apartheid's fall appears inevitable: the legitimacy of the system had already crumbled. It was harming too many for the benefit of too few. South Africa's freedom fighters would not be silenced, and the global movement supporting them was likewise tenacious and principled.
In the same way, the legitimacy of rule by giant corporations and Wall Street banks is crumbling. This system of corporate rule also benefits few and harms many, affecting nearly every major issue in public life. Some examples:
- Powerful corporations socialize their risks and costs, but privatize profits. That means we, the 99 percent, pick up the tab for environmental clean ups, for helping workers who aren't paid enough to afford food or health care, for bailouts when risky speculation goes wrong. Meanwhile, profits go straight into the pockets of top executives and others in the 1 percent.
- The financial collapse threw millions of Americans into poverty. 25 million are unemployed, under-employed, or have given up looking for work; four million have been unemployed for more than 12 months. Poverty increased 27 percent between 2006 and 2010. And students who graduated with student loans in 2010� had borrowed 5 percent more than the previous year's graduating class - owing more than $25,000. Meanwhile, those who caused the collapse continue the same practices. And the unwillingness of the 1 percent to pay their fair share of taxes means the the public services we rely on are fraying.
- Scientists say that we are on the brink of runaway climate change; we only have a few years to make the needed investments in clean power and energy efficiency. This transition <could be a huge job creator - on the order of the investments made during World War II, which got us out of the Depression. But fossil fuel industries don't want to see their investment in dirty energy undermined by the switch to clean energy and conservation. So far, by paying millions to climate deniers, lobbyists, and political campaigns, they've succeeded in stymieing change.
- Agribusiness get taxpayer subsidies for foods that make us sick; for farming practices that destroy rivers, soils, the climate, and the oceans; and for trade practices that cause hunger at home and abroad.
- Through ALEC, the private prison industry crafts state laws that boost the numbers behind bars, lengthen sentences, and privatize prisons.
- Big Pharma jacks up prices; insurance companies raise premiums and delivers fewer benefits; the burden of inflated care drags down the economy and bankrupts families. But only a very few politicians stand up to the health care industry's war chests and advocate for Canadian-style single-payer health care, which would go a long way toward solving the cost problem.
- Corporations and wealthy executives fund an army of lobbyists and election campaigns, spreading untruths and self-serving policy prescriptions.
It's not that we, the people, haven't noticed all this.
In a recent poll by the Pew Research Center, 77 percent of Americans said too much power is concentrated in the hands of a few rich people and large corporations. In a poll by Time Magazine, 86 percent of Americans said Wall Street and its lobbyists have too much influence in Washington.
And 80 percent of Americans oppose Citizens United, the pro-corporate Supreme Court ruling that turns two years old today. Eighty percent - that's among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.
Some say corporations have such a strong grip on politicians and big media that it is impossible to challenge them, no matter how many of us there are.
But I believe we can do it. In the past few months, YES! Magazine has been researching ways that ordinary people can challenge corporate power (look for strategies in our spring issue, out in February). And we found that there are actually a lot of tools at our disposal:
- Corporations were created by public law to provide a public benefit. If we the people no longer feel that a corporation is providing a benefit - or if we feel that it is operating in a lawless and destructive manner - we can revoke their charter. That's what Free Speech for People has asked the attorney general of Delaware to do to Massey Energy, which has been one of the worst culprits in mountaintop removal and which has operated its mines in a lawless and negligent manner, resulting in 29 deaths at the Upper Big Branch Mine.
- We can insist that, in exchange for use of our public airwaves, broadcasters provide free airtime to candidates for public office. If they don't need to raise millions for media buys, they don't need to be as beholden to the 1 percent.
- We can get our governments to quit banking with Bank of America and Chase, and start our own state banks - 14 states, including California and Washington, are considering such a move. And while we're at it, we can localize food, energy, and other aspects of our economy so local, independent businesses and cooperatives can thrive.
- We can stand up to specific parts of the corporate agenda by engaging in the sort of direct action that halted the KXL Pipeline.
- We can call for a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United, corporate personhood, and the ridiculous notion that money is the same thing as speech. So far, Los Angeles, New York City, and about 50 other towns and cities have done so far.
- We can use mechanisms like clean elections, electoral transparency, citizen review of legislation, and recalls to keep corporate control of our democracy in check.
- Finally, the reason I am most hopeful today: We can take a cue from Occupy Wall Street and continue to name the source of political corruption - something the political establishment and mainstream media have refused to do. We can occupy homes that are slated for foreclosure, as people have been doing all over the country. We can mic check places like Walmarts that intimidate and fire workers who want to unionize. We can set up tents in public places and in other ways join with the Occupy movement to take a stand for a world that works for the 100 percent - a world where we all benefit.
None of these actions will be easy. It will take time - potentially years of work - to make big change. But just as the legitimacy of apartheid crumbled well before the institutions of apartheid went down, the legitimacy of corporate rule is crumbling. So I'm convinced that, with you and me and all the others out there creating alternatives and taking a stand, we will see change.
Sarah van Gelder will deliver these comments at Seattle's rally on the second anniversary of the Citizens United ruling. Sarah is YES! Magazine's co-founder and executive editor, and editor of the new book: ""This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement."
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
By the way, MainStreet, I always thought it was "Lush Rambo," but it doesn't matter. Shakespeare had it right, a Rush by any other name would still stink up the airwaves.
If Rush had a brain,..... instead of the drug mush, in his scull....He would know that if Lewis and the other marchers had guns, they would have been shot.
Rush would have liked that I think. He is always inciting to violence....Scu m.
Every time we respond to one of his insane dialogs we inadvertently fuel the fire.
I was warned about the danger of arguing with a lunatic, I was told that a third party might mistake me for a madman as well.
Let the fool stew in his own juices and pray for a heart attack.
John Lewis need not stoop to that level it is undignified.
Another must-read is "The Children" by David Halberstam. They knew that non-violence was the only viable approach. To have had guns would only have given the police an excuse for mass murder in "self defense."
Dr. King and those who followed him knew better. They knew they must not give anyone "an excuse". So they didn't. Who is more brave: the armed man who cracks an unarmed man's skull or the unarmed man who walks up to that armed man knowing his skull may well end up cracked?
Rush Limbaugh, please go away. You said you would go to Costa Rica. We'll take care of your airfare. Just go. Or at least put down that microphone.
It would appear that Lintball's purpose is to spread hate and divisiveness. He attacks this nation's heros. Where does he come from?
Costa Rica is too good for him (and has universal health care). More like Honduras, Colombia or better still Paraguay, next to e the Bush compound.
And he is wealthy enough to take care of his own airfare; agree with you but like a truly virulent virus, he is hard to budge and there are plenty others of his ilk in the US.
Rush, Get thee to the Jersey Shore for a swim.
Actually the Panthers were crushed and jailed, their lives destroyed.
Only because the Black Panthers were black.
There should be no argument whatsoever that that man doesn't contribute to the health of this country and that he should be held accountable. If there was a rebuttal after every show, or he would actually have someone with an opposing view on, where he lets them talk, it might be a different matter. But propaganda can't work with opposition.
From what I've listened of Limbaugh, he never even lets a caller that opposes him on the air for long, and when one slips through, he is vicious & crude. I don't think we can reason with someone like that. Someday Rush will be remembered as trash. (Rich, greedy trash, but trash.)
John Lewis should be treated like the national treasure that he is, and how he will be remembered, as a hero., not only that, but we should let him know how much we appreciate what he did for his people and the country.
Clear Channel Communications, Inc. is an American mass media company headquartered in San Antonio, Texas. Founded in 1972 by Lowry Mays and B. J. "Red" McCombs, the company was taken private by Bain Capital, LLC and Thomas H. Lee Partners in a leveraged buyout in 2008; as a result, the company now operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of CC Media Holdings, Inc.
Contrast this with a highly paid coward who hides behind a microphone in a nice, warm, safe studio and won't even DEBATE anybody with half a brain, never mind stand up and be counted in public against injustice but in fact helps to perpetrate it. And he gets heard on most of Clear Channels hundreds of robotic stations nationwide.
I've been jailed and beaten on protests and rallies quite a few times in my youth and not-so-youth but had a hot temper, no bloody sense and fought like Hell until either beaten unconscious or subdued by cops and cuffs. I just don't know how Rep Lewis, King and the others did it, and they had it a lot harder than I will ever know.
That's real strength, as is Leonard Peltier in Max security prison for F.B.I. revenge only, and still sane after 37 years.
These folks are the saints of our time.
Sorry, I hit the wrong thumbs button -meant it to be a green one. Aging is a bitch!
Any armed opposition by Blacks to change the society would have been seen as an uprising / riot and the perfect excuse for those in power and content on maintaining the status quo to gun them down.
was what started as a Racial March on downtown Tulsa. Some of the Blacks were armed some not and what started
as a peaceful march became a race riot and the National Guard was called out. Unarmed Blacks were shot and killed as well as armed and major parts of the city were burned.
It took close to 50 years for Race Relations to be somewhat mended.
What a class response from Rep. Lewis!
Any attempt to challenge them leads them to dig their heels in, and get angry. Fear does that to people.
LETTER to the EDITOR-- MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE
Let's look at what we have learned from this election:
Twenty-one of 22 incumbent senators were re-elected, and 353 of 373 incumbent members of the House were re-elected. The American people have re-elected 94 percent of the incumbents who were running for re-election to an institution that has an approval rating of about 9 percent. This indicates, as an electorate, we are a nation of idiots. We're now stuck with the useless, dysfunctional government that we deserve.
You can't fix stupid......... ..........
Your assessment of the state of electoral politics is right on the mark, with this additional bit of crazy fact: only 50% of the eligible voters take the opportunity to vote. Can you imagine what would happen if 100% of eligible voters actually voted? I'm going for a 100% because I believe that if I'm going to imagine I'm going to imagine BIG!
We have been living the script of "1984" since January 1981 when the former host of "Death Vally Days" took on his finest role as B picture actor, in his longest running, best scripted, sublimely directed epic titled "POTUS."
I firmly believe that the free popcorn we were given to watch this saga was laced with something that was detrimental to our health and well-being, and enabled our national soul to be sold to the highest bidder.
The NRA, Limbaugh and much of the political/relig ious right wing of America are deluded if they really think guns would have been anything but incendiary. Not only are they dim witted in their literalist interpretation of Bible and Constitution but also they lack the creative imagination to foresee disaster - as in Vietnam, as in Iraq, even as in imagining the disaster of MLK with a gun.
The Black Panthers did exercise their Second-Amendmen t Rights, They sent carloads of riflemen to follow police cars on patrol to discourage racist brutality. They claimed the police were a foreign army of occupation and demanded to patrol their own streets as a volunteer militia.
But they did not gain much traction in the Black Community or the general public and their armed resistance position did not prevail over the use of nonviolent means of protest.
Haven't seen or heard him in years!
So I am fascinated by how a slave should have managed to buy a gun? Who would have sold it to him in the community he was enslaved in? Would his owner be so "liberal" as as to say to his slaves, "Go ahead and buy guns if you wish."
I am often told to stop insisting that right wingers were raised by their parents to ignorant fools. If that is true how did they get that way? How is it they are oblivious to the obvious disconnect between being a slave and being a gun owner? Would slavery have been possible? Should each slave have been issued a musket as soon as he set foot on noth American soil? Bah Humbug!
This is an incredibly crass, stupid and racist statement to make. Showing no understanding of history or humanity.
This walking talking malignant tumor of adipose tissue that masquerades as a quote human unquote being possesses neither the courage to appear at said bridge unarmed nor the intelligence to see its necessity.
Kick back and pop another oxy fatboy, it could only serve to widen your untelligence.
Rush is possibly all of the above, but he clearly provides entertainment/" truth" to any number of good folks in small towns and rural communities. Decent people, even, who believe in the dangers he spouts and his ideas. They don't know better - or just don't want to find out more. But some of us do end up "fact checking" and no longer listening.
This perhaps is the last true area that needs serious work, the rights of the POOR as to escape thebonds of poverty (and thus not be poor any longer)!
Our lack of gun control is definitely allowing guns to get into the wrong hands
Of parents preferring to be friends rather than disciplinarians and allowing the schools to treat their children as criminals & using the criminal justice system instead of parenting to discipline children who are only doing what children are suppose to do in the process of becoming adults, test the limits.
The economy is also at fault forcing parents to work instead of caring for their children.
We need to re think our nation determine what is important. Is it more important to fund drones attacks, assassinations, multiple war, militant terrorist mercenaries, colonizing of sovereign nation to enhance corporate profits, punish nation for refusing to follow USA policy or for overthrowing USA puppet government or should we be funding schools, health care, infrastructure, creating jobs in USA rebuilding our crumbling nation so that our children can have a home where at least 1 parent is available for advice & discipline when required.
It's time the 99% were given the choice in the direction of this nation not the 1% wealthy rulers.
It's time to end corporate USA & the militaries quest to conquer the world using our taxes to fund it.
How many more children must die or become murderers before we as a nation take action to return us to civility?
He will say what makes him look good, or, at least, doesn't make him look bad. As has been said, most people love the lie (or half-truth) that saves their pride, but never the unflattering truth.
His audience must be in need of having their egos stroked. Flattery would gain no traction with those listening were it not for the vanity and ignorance of the listener.
He is BEYOND mentaly ill, his brain (if one could conceivably call that grain of wheat size brown matter between his ears a 'brain', I suppose one is entitled to their opinion!) is decrepit, ailing, full of dementia, and simply out of order, a sad malfunctioning unit!
Really, he has no business ever to have been on the air in his pathetic but sad mental state.
Rush, PLEASE! You may leave the studio now -- uh... for good! Allow me to show you the soundproofed door! Thank you Rush for all the vile mental poisoning you have spewed out contributing to the air pollution out there over the years!
The mere thought gives me the strange, dual, simultaneous feeling of both disgust and glee. I could live with that...no problem!
Guns are not weapons of peace. Putting guns into the hands of more people will not stop gun violence.
Even the sanest person can snap. Family problems, job loss, financial problems, classroom of rowdy children, resentment, harassment,envy , illness or death can suddenly be to much to bear. Even the most devote religious person can snap. There is no way to predict who or when some one will lose it & choose a gun to solve the problem.
We need a national reset where violence & killing are not acceptable. We must return to a time of respect, where children are taught to respect their elders. Where parents are in charge & violence is punished not glorified.
We must change our governments approach to dissent. End drone attack, assassination, torture, funding of militant terrorist & wars for profit. We must end the dehumanizes peoples of different religions or national origins by our military.
The USA is not under threat if it has enemies it is due to the unjustified military actions to impose USA & USA corporate will on other nations. To replace the leadership & economic policy in order to expand USA corporate control over natural resources of the world.
It is time our taxes were spent at home rather than funding corporate expansion.
It's time to end the influence of Limbaugh & other like him replacing them with truth