Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robert Reich writes: "Make no mistake. Lurking here is another giant bailout of the Street. The United States wants Europe to bail out its deeply indebted nations so European banks don't implode. And they don't want European banks to implode because they don't want the Street to crash again like it did three years ago. Full circle. In other words, Greece isn't the real problem. Nor is Ireland, Italy, Portugal, or Spain. The real problem is the financial system - centered on Wall Street."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Another Giant Bailout of Wall Street?

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

04 October 11

 

Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns


Follow the Money: Behind Europe's debt crisis lurks another giant bailout of Wall Street.

oday Ben Bernanke added his voice to those who are worried about Europe's debt crisis.

But why exactly should America be so concerned? Yes, we export to Europe - but those exports aren't going to dry up. And in any event, they're tiny compared to the size of the US economy.

If you want the real reason, follow the money. A Greek (or Irish or Spanish or Italian or Portugese) default would have roughly the same effect on our financial system as the implosion of Lehman Brothers in 2008.

Financial chaos.

Investors are already getting the scent. Stocks slumped to 13-month low on Monday as investors dumped Wall Street bank shares.

The Street has lent only about $7 billion to Greece, as of the end of last year, according to the Bank for International Settlements. That's no big deal.

But a default by Greece or any other of Europe's debt-burdened nations could easily pummel German and French banks, which have lent Greece (and the other wobbly European countries) far more.

That's where Wall Street comes in. Big Wall Street banks have lent German and French banks a bundle.

The Street's total exposure to the euro zone totals about $2.7 trillion. Its exposure to to France and Germany accounts for nearly half the total.

And it's not just Wall Street's loans to German and French banks that are worrisome. Wall Street has also insured or bet on all sorts of derivatives emanating from Europe - on energy, currency, interest rates, and foreign exchange swaps. If a German or French bank goes down, the ripple effects are incalculable.

Get it? Follow the money: If Greece goes down, investors start fleeing Ireland, Spain, Italy, and Portugal as well. All of this sends big French and German banks reeling. If one of these banks collapses, or show signs of major strain, Wall Street is in big trouble. Possibly even bigger trouble than it was in after Lehman Brothers went down.

That's why shares of the biggest US banks have been falling for the past month. Morgan Stanley closed Monday at its lowest since December 2008 - and the cost of insuring Morgan's debt has jumped to levels not seen since November 2008.

It's rumored that Morgan could lose as much as $30 billion if some French and German banks fail. (That's from Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, which tracks all cross-border exposure of major banks.)

$30 billion is roughly $2 billion more than the assets Morgan owns (in terms of current market capitalization.)

But Morgan says its exposure to French banks is zero. Why the discrepancy? Morgan has probably taken out insurance against its loans to European banks, as well as collateral from them. So Morgan at least feels safe.

Should it? Does anyone remember something spelled AIG? That was the giant insurance firm that went bust when Wall Street began going under. Wall Street thought it had insured its bets with AIG. Turned out, AIG couldn't pay up.

Haven't we been here before?

Republicans and Wall Street executives who continue to yell about Dodd-Frank overkill are dead wrong. The fact no one seems to know Morgan's exposure to European banks or derivatives - or that of most other giant Wall Street banks - shows Dodd-Frank didn't go nearly far enough.

Regulators still don't know what's happening on the Street. They don't know whether Morgan is telling the truth. They have no clear picture of the derivatives exposure of giant US financial institutions.

Which is why Washington officials are terrified - and why Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner keeps begging European officials to bail out Greece and the other deeply-indebted European nations.

Several months ago, when the European debt crisis became apparent, Wall Street banks said not to worry. They had little or no exposure to Europe's problems. The Federal Reserve said the same. In July, Ben Bernanke reassured Congress the exposure of US banks to European nations in trouble was "quite small."

Now we're hearing a different tune.

Make no mistake. Lurking here is another giant bailout of the Street. The United States wants Europe to bail out its deeply indebted nations so European banks don't implode. And they don't want European banks to implode because they don't want the Street to crash again like it did three years ago.

One of the many ironies here is some European nations went deeply into debt bailing out their banks from the last crisis.

Full circle.

In other words, Greece isn't the real problem. Nor is Ireland, Italy, Portugal, or Spain. The real problem is the financial system - centered on Wall Street.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+95 # noitall 2011-10-04 20:30
Iceland did the right thing. The people voted 93% to not bail them out but instead, ordered their arrest and began investigations. I believe they said that they'd rather live like Cubans than like Hatians. We apparently have chosen to live like Hatians. Soon as we bail out the banks they'll come back and bail us out...surely they won't pull the same crap they did the last time! Hey, wanna buy a good used car? again?
 
 
+18 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:06
its inevitable that Wall Street will ultimately crash again this was twice now and they still haven't learned...
 
 
+6 # robertsgt40 2011-10-05 10:21
All European central banks as well as our Federal Reserve are just branch banks of the Rothschild's dominated Ponzi scheme. They're just shuffling more paper into a big tumbler and calling it liquidity. When all this crap comes down around our ears, it's gonna be real ugly
 
 
+13 # robertsgt40 2011-10-05 10:23
Iceland still observes the rule of law. We don't. Over 90% of America opposed the bailouts. Didn't phase those in Congress who are owned by Wall Street and the Fed
 
 
+2 # PiscesCurveUS 2011-10-05 12:04
Activist Bill Still's SR#18 (Iceland; Ireland) is an excellent introduction to the current monetary controversies there.

http://s6.zetaboards.com/Bill_Still_Reforum/topic/8750462/1/#new
 
 
+49 # DaveM 2011-10-04 20:33
Why should we the taxpayers throw good money after bad? Let some of those firms which cannot seem to balance their books go out of business. Someone who can handle money competently will step in to take their places. Meanwhile, get your money out of the stock market while you still can, and for the foreseeable future, do not expect any "investment" (including a bank account) to pay any significant dividend. Get your money in cash and deposit it in The Bank Of Under The Mattress. It won't accrue interest (if indeed what is paid on current accounts can be called "interest" at the moment), but you won't lose it either, and it'll be yours and private besides (no credit companies tracking your spending). Do your business in cash and you'll never need to worry about being maxed out on a credit card.
 
 
+22 # Ralph Averill 2011-10-05 00:31
I agree with you, but....
Let "some" firms go down? The reason for the fear everywhere is that it's all tied together. Pull out one or two cards and the whole house of cards goes down; the good with the bad. That's one point of Reich's essay. The other point, implied, is that maybe that is exactly what needs to happen, so we can lay to rest the absurd abstraction known as the "free market."
A lot of people, myself included, can't "get our money out of the stock market." We get a pension and have no control over the pension fund's investments.
Any way you look at it, it's a hard rain that's gonna fall. Maybe that's what needs to happen.
 
 
+16 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:09
Yes the system MUST collapse for most Americans to finally see through the veil the corruption has been ongoing for so long people have accepted it as normal...
 
 
+4 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-05 08:16
They will not they will blame Ob
 
 
+3 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:07
Good advice
 
 
+42 # giraffee2012 2011-10-04 20:42
1. The Supremes MUST take back their 2010 "person hood" decision - so "we the people" have some say in "who runs our country" and 'how we regulate' those who are stealing while actually "preventing" job creation!

2. Carl Rove has entered the GOP to setup the negative (twisted) ads that he did before the 2000 and 2004 elections (yes, he's already begun - twisting the "job bill" with rhetoric that it's a ploy to raise taxes)

3. Carl Rove & Koch & etc will spend about a Billion (Rachael Maddows gave exact amount)

4. Several MILLION Americans will not be able to vote because of the laws GOP/TP governors have passed (along with not including democratic registered people getting ballots, etc.)

5. J.P. Morgan gave the N.Y. P.D. several hundred $$$ (gift?) NO -- those are the "white shirts" you see at the Brooklyn Bridge etc.

If the USA cannot control our government -- the whole world will be bought up by these pigs (Koch Bro, Rove, etc)


VOTE DEM + VOTE OBAMA + get other dems to go with you to poor, minority, etc dem neighborhoods to insure those people get IDs and mail-in ballots. Our elections are free and so are those IDs -
This is the most important election ever! Do NOT NOT vote DEM

This double negative = VOTE DEM!
 
 
+4 # lightsout 2011-10-05 03:05
giraffee2012, is that a vote FOR Dems....
or DO NOT vote FOR Dems?
 
 
+62 # Susan W 2011-10-04 21:12
Isn't it time to just let the "too big to fail" go ahead and fail? Enough already.
 
 
+12 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:11
It is past that time...they should have been allowed to fail before, but the problem is that our elected officials care more about the Banks and the campaign contributions they get from them than the 99%
 
 
+3 # PaineRad 2011-10-05 15:57
The calamity from the failure of "too big to fail" would make the 30s look like Club Med.

The solution is to split up the too big into nice and small, into human scale sized entities. Then the failure of some of them would be no big deal, no great disaster.
 
 
+18 # postpen 2011-10-04 22:26
Scariest thing I've read yet. If we can pass the Jobs Bill, create a million new jobs (and the new businesses and hiring their spending will lead to), we will right the deficit at the same tax level we pay today and right the Ship of State as well. Which will lead to restoration of services and infrastructure-- and more jobs.
Without this turnaround, this "bailout" of the entire American economy, there's no hope.
And the hedge fund managers at the banks are running with their current license to print money and stash it.
With that investment in our *people*, and the spending that will lead to, worldwide *confidence* will return. And investments in the businesses that still survive, the businesses that employ people.
Is it too late, though?
Put the trillion into jobs, not banks. Then the banks will survive, as a consequential benefit, again, because both bank confidence, and the public's, will return.
Phone your congressperson now and urge passage of the Jobs Bill immediately. Obama isn't kidding around. This is the moment; we are about to plunge off an unimaginable cliff, after which money itself will lose its value. . ,
Reich isn't kidding either.
 
 
0 # bluebluesdancer 2011-10-08 13:04
That's all fine and dandy, but the problem lies in the banking system itself. We borrow money from a private company (The Fed) to whom we gave permission to make our money. Then we pay them interest for it, and the money that pays that interest comes from our taxes. We need to make our own money instead, and then when you or I borrow money, the interest we pay will go straight to running the country, instead of into the deep pockets of the bankers. We would no longer need to pay taxes and we would be more wealthy than we would know what to spend it on! Lincoln was assassinated trying to make the above system permanent (he had used it throughout the Civil War) but as soon as he died the banks moved-in and set-up our current 'debt-system'.
The banks are in deep sh**, and now is the time to change the system. Just two days ago Dennis Kucinich put forward a bill to do this very thing!! Check out:
http://cromalternativemoney.org/index.php/en/media/news/new-bill-introduced-by-dennis-kucinich-hr6550-end-the-fed.html
kucinich.house.gov/.../NEED_Act_Fact_S heet_09232011.pdf
 
 
+28 # jlohman 2011-10-04 23:17
no more bailouts, only nationalization . If we are going to spend the money I want to own the bank and control the CEO.
 
 
+12 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:11
and the Bonuses!
 
 
+15 # angelfish 2011-10-04 23:44
Maybe it's time for the Koch sucking brothers and their buddies to start bailing out their friends instead of having US do it all again. Let THEM put their money where their Mouths are and save THEMSELVES for once in their puny, little lives. We've been there, done that, so now it's THEIR turn to bite the bullet, don't you think? Let Main Street have a free ride for a change!
 
 
+5 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:13
Obama gave the banks a free pass he allowed them to foreclose on American homes when he should have declared a 2 year moritorium on foreclosures, Obama's ignorance and loyalty to the banks is our real problem...
 
 
-15 # sanrose3 2011-10-05 00:09
Prof. Reich is a man of great sympathy. But I suspect that his exposition confuses Morgan Stanley assets, which approximate one trillion dollars, with its capital, which is about $60 billion.
What's more, there is nothing inherently wrong with diffusing credit risk by using the credit default swap market, provided that, unlike AIG, which insured but retained its mortgage exposure, one appropriately lays off that exposure with another counterparty.
 
 
+12 # John Locke 2011-10-05 06:16
You are incorrect, these swaps are not insurance policies but act like them, there is NO required reserve like an insurance company must have, when these swaps collapse guess who bails out the counterparty?
 
 
+1 # Ken Hall 2011-10-06 13:08
Just to add to what John Locke wrote. CDOs are not insurance, and they are not regulated as insurance is. That is one of the reasons that CDOs were used for the questionable transactions in the shadow markets, they would not have passed the test for insurance. CDOs were used to get around the regulation and scrutiny that insurance would have involved. We heard an awful lot, around the time of TARP, about the sanctity of contracts, but if a contract is not regulated, why should taxpayers be responsible? The quid pro quo put in place after the bank bailout of the 30's was that if you want the US gov't to bail you out, you'll have to accept regulation so it can keep an eye on you and make sure it doesn't happen again. The deregulation of Wall St and financial markets that was pushed by conservatives under the guise of "smaller gov't" is directly responsible for our Great Recession. There is also a basic problem with a financial system where bets can be made on an outcome in which the bettors have no ownership or principal, but that's another subject.
 
 
+5 # SeriousCitizen 2011-10-05 03:18
I very nice explanation of the pending crisis. And then there are blind-side events to push the mess into the vortex, for example, a California earthquake, or another nuclear reactor melting, or a new war on Iran causing oil to spike. Any business that is said to be "too big to fail" is necessarily a monopoly that the government should have broken up. Oh, and in 2012, vote for any party that is NOT Democrat and is NOT Republican.
 
 
+2 # Lolanne 2011-10-05 14:50
Quoting
I very nice explanation of the pending crisis. And then there are blind-side events to push the mess into the vortex, for example, a California earthquake, or another nuclear reactor melting, or a new war on Iran causing oil to spike. Any business that is said to be "too big to fail" is necessarily a monopoly that the government should have broken up. Oh, and in 2012, vote for any party that is NOT Democrat and is NOT Republican.

Unfortunately, a vote that is NOT Democrat is automatically FOR Republican. In this age of money-controlled elections, there is no third or Independent candidate who will be able tor raise enough to have even a prayer of winning an election. I do not like it that it's this way, but IT IS. It's the reality we live with currently. Better to hold your nose and vote Democratic than to let the Repugs back into the White House. Let's not forget those god-awful 8 yrs under bushco!
 
 
-15 # Martintfre 2011-10-05 04:07
Only a big nanny socialist state does bail outs.
 
 
+3 # PaineRad 2011-10-05 16:11
On what distant planet have you been living over the last, oh say 3500 years?

The British govt. bailed out the East India Company in 1773 by cutting taxes on its overflowing surplus of tea and putting all the American colonists at a huge price disadvantage. Thus ensued the Boston Tea Party.

Every teapot dictator over the last two or three centuries has bailed out his buddies with favors and preferences.

Every dynasty and monarch from the pharaohs to the Mings to the Ceasars, Khans, Tudors, Borbons, Hohenzollerns, Hapsburgs, etc. supported/bailed out their court allies whenever possible.
 
 
+2 # Ken Hall 2011-10-06 13:18
Not true, the big nanny capitalist state of the US does bail outs, too, while not holding any of the perpetrators of the financial collapse responsible for their actions. But then, small gov't can't be expected to stand up to its large corporate masters, can it?
 
 
-7 # sanrose3 2011-10-05 04:09
The problem with AIG is not that it used the market for credit default swaps, but that it did not lay off its exposure, as Morgan Stanley may have done with its European bank exposure. That's because almost the whole country was "long" on mortgages at the time, a problem that is related to regulatory permissiveness in allowing financial institutions to make so many mortgages to such questionable borrowers. The Federal Reserve could have acted to restrain this practice, as it was duty bound under the HOEPA law. It just didn't. Thus primary responsibility for the AIG debacle, which is being at least partially re-echoed in the European bank crisis today, resides not with Wall Street, but with the US Government.
Sanford Rose
 
 
+6 # Todd Williams 2011-10-05 04:29
I'm telling you people, if this shit happens again, there WILL be a revolution. And it won't be peaceful. The days for talk and voting are just about over. I'm prepared are you?
 
 
+19 # video4315 2011-10-05 04:32
This was all predictable. We didn't follow through the last time to setup safeguards and regulations. We let the Republicans slash the Dodd-Frank effort in order to get something passed. President Obama capitulated early on by allowing Larry Summers and Tim Geitner to run his economic policies. These two had direct ties to Goldman Sachs. In fact, Mr. Reich fails to mention Goldman Sachs role in the Greek debt crisis. Maybe we deserve this for letting our elected officials get away with all that they do and don't do. The Wall Street Occupation is not savvy enough to see all of the inner workings, but they do sense that there is a certain rot or infection in the workings.
 
 
+29 # Carolyn 2011-10-05 04:48
Bailing out a sinking global financial ship is not a solution. We are all going down together. Our government would rather cut the programs our society depends and use the money for bailing out the banks.
the first step is to reinstate FDR's Glass-Steagall Act with which he saved America in 1933, separating the world's big bank system from our own local banks. Ask your representatives to pass the Glass-Steagall Act that the Bush Adminstration got rid of.
 
 
+13 # in deo veritas 2011-10-05 06:03
Glad to see a voice of sanity! Glass-Steagall is the only solution to the crisis. Passing HR1489 is the answer. We are teetering on the precipice right now and all it will take is a little push from the Tea Party nitwits to push us all over the edge. They are topo stupid to realize that they too will end up in the abyss.
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-05 08:21
Perhaps the GOP/TP and whatever Dems need to go into that abyss permanently as many Americans have.
 
 
+1 # PaineRad 2011-10-05 16:31
While enacting a new Glass-Steagall is a necessary component in solving our current financializatio n of the economy, it is by no means sufficient to solve anything. The causes go far deeper than this simple regulation.

We have to deal with the systematic theft of worker productivity and its diversion into coprporate CEOs' hands over the past 35+ years. We have to deal with the deindustrializa tion of the American economy through the hoax of "free trade". We have to deal with the systematic starvation and privatization of the commons. We have to deal with the expansion of corporate personhood into the rights of citizens. We have to deal with the glorification and deification of militarism and war profiteering. We have to deal with the monopolization of the US economy.

The list could go on for pages. But we have to start and we have to look beyond simple, one shot answers that are insufficient to solve the underlying problems.
 
 
+7 # in deo veritas 2011-10-05 06:09
No more bailouts! If another one takes place, then everyone who voted for it should be removed from office by whatever legal means possible. If that doesn't work then leave it up to your fertile imaginations. The American people are not the same passive victims of corporate greed that were fortunate to have FDR to save them. There is not a person in the political spectrum that can or will come through this time. If the people themselves cannot prevail then they deserve whatever befalls them. It is time for the Messiah Syndrome to be cast aside!
 
 
+4 # PaineRad 2011-10-05 16:21
Actually, it was Clinton, at the behest of Summers and Rubin and others, who signed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Clinton also signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 that perpetuated derivatives trading in the dark and without regulation and oversight.

While George W Bush was an unmitigated disaster, war criminal, domestic law breaker, deserter and all around evil and corrupt dude, he was not the only recent president whose administration did bad things for corporate cronies and did genuinely stupid things to round out his failures.
 
 
+8 # fredboy 2011-10-05 05:43
Makes perfect sense, as we are approaching Wall Street annual bonus season...
 
 
+3 # wcandler1 2011-10-05 05:44
Again, when will someone challenge Obama in the primary?
 
 
0 # Lolanne 2011-10-05 14:53
Quoting
Again, when will someone challenge Obama in the primary?

Never, likely, because I think (at least I HOPE) the Dems do realize that a primary challenge would just split the Dem vote and give the election to the Repug -- a fate worse than death IMO.
 
 
+2 # Capn Canard 2011-10-05 06:14
The whole monetary system is the problem. It is not based on anything of value, but there should be some examination of what "value" is and how is it defined. I guess my major point is that scarcity is the problem with trying to assign value.
 
 
+8 # lindyb 2011-10-05 06:21
The problem with letting some go down, is they will all go down in a domino effect (that was the problem in 08 with letting the troubled banks/investment firms go down and why all the banks had to accept TARP money). If this happens, it will cause chaos, no money (or money will be worthless), no way to buy food, grocery shelves will be empty.

Things need to change, but we need to do it in a controlled way. The problem is we've elected too many people who are invested in trying to save the system (the Street) and who don't care what happens to the other 90%+ of us struggling to make a living.

Carolyn, much to my dismay, it was the Clinton Administration that got rid of Glass-Stegal, to appease the republican majority in the House.
 
 
+1 # in deo veritas 2011-10-05 10:24
Regardless of who axed Glass-Steagall it MUST be reinstated. AZs far as appeasing the Repug House majority by Clinton or Obama, it is tantamount to the gutless Brits appeasing Hitler in the late 30's. They are of the same nonexistent moral fiber and true fascists in practice. If this crew of fascists disguised as Republicans is allowed to succeed in their nefarious schemes then the graves of every man or woman who died fighting to defeat them in WWII has been desecrated.
 
 
+7 # Gary in Midwest 2011-10-05 07:12
Mr. Reich doesn't surprise me. Every few years in this country the upper class feeds on the middle/lower classes like the Morlocks on the Eloi. Usually, it's done with a phony war or a bailout, like the savings and loan fiasco of a few years back (I'll loan my son-in-law a ton of money and we'll let the government pay it back) Then they got really greedy and used scare tactics to fool a befuddled Nancy Pelosi and there were NO consequences. Any wonder they'd try it again? They must still be laughing literally all the way to the bank!!
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2011-10-05 08:24
SNL should have been a sign of what was going on. When those in Government and their Families could do a Pyramid scheme we are all still paying for and get away with it...shame on America.
Wonder why there is no respect on any level for the Law, not I. Bush's should have been made an example of not voted into Government Positions. Never thought people were as stupid as they are.

I am off to an Occupy Wall Street Afternoon How about You?
 
 
+3 # Todd Williams 2011-10-05 10:21
My observation is that maybe, just maybe, Karl Marx was correct. Capitalism will collapse upon itself. Up the Revolution!
 
 
+3 # dyannne 2011-10-05 10:22
Mr. Reich, Does the White House ever call you for advice? They should.
 
 
+5 # lorenbliss 2011-10-05 13:17
As Mr. Reich says, "the real problem is the financial system centered on Wall Street."

In other words -- though it seems he still dare not say it outright -- the problem is capitalism and the capitalist mode of governance.

What is capitalism? It is infinite greed elevated to maximum virtue.

And what is capitalist governance? Absolute power and unlimited bail-outs for the Ruling Class, total subjugation and ever-worsening poverty for all the rest of us: the slave-state tyranny earlier generations knew as fascism.

But maybe -- just maybe -- we are beginning to awaken.
 
 
0 # giraffee2012 2011-10-06 07:02
Get the $$ out of politics - Supremes' "person hood" decision should get them impeached (cuz they are bought and paid for -- Scalia/Thomas for sure)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dylan-ratigan/get-money-out-join-100000_b_983427.html

VOTE DEM VOTE OBAMA - a non-vote = support for TP/GOP.

Go to your Dem headquarters + find others to go out with you to the poor, minority, etc neighborhoods. Get them and u registered and get mail-in ballots.

Our elections are FREE -- thus the IDs required are free = even though Walker (WI Gov) wants to charge $28.

If u're in a GOP/TP governed state, make sure you get registered and if rejected - then go to ur REP (It is their duty to deal with FED matters - elections are a FED matter - and outlined in constitution)

VOTE DEM VOTE OBAMA.
2012 is the most important election we have ever had. VOTE or you give the GOP/TP th power to take us worse than u can imagine
 
 
0 # BVA 2011-10-06 11:10
A question for every Republican presidential candidate:

"The Obama administration appears to have delayed (deferred, suspended, or slowed) prosecution and civil litigation against executives of banks, mortgage companies, and other financial entities presumably until the economy recovers sufficiently so as not to interfere with that recovery.

"Do you, sir, plan to reinstitute and/or reinvigorate these deferred investigations, prosecutions, and civil litigations against financial executives and entities implicated in causing the economic collapse when the economy recovers?"
 
 
+1 # Martha Luehrmann 2011-10-06 15:10
Excellent article, Bob. What do you think we should be doing about it? Should we let Greece and Italy fail? Should we let The Street fail? Is there any way we could couple a bailout with real concessions to prevent further risk-taking?

Martha Luehrmann
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.