RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "ALEC provides 'model bills' to state legislatures, all of which are previously seen by ALEC's corporate board. These model bills are aimed at taking the teeth out of government regulation, giving lavish tax breaks to the wealthy, and using the resulting budget deficits to privatize institutions like schools and prisons."

House Speaker John Boehner at the White House, 11/30/11. (photo: Getty Images)
House Speaker John Boehner at the White House, 11/30/11. (photo: Getty Images)



ALEC: Democracy's Arch-Nemesis

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

18 July 11


Reader Supported News | Perspective

n an 1864 letter to Col. William F. Elkins, Abraham Lincoln warned, "... corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."

In the buildup to the bloodiest war of the 20th century, Benito Mussolini said, "Fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power." He is one of history's most reviled characters for good reason.

Now, corporations like Koch Industries are funneling money into the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a shadowy partnership between Republican legislators and corporate lobbyists. Essentially, ALEC's purpose is to pass laws that enrich corporate profits and investor returns by starving the government of revenue, rigging elections and union-busting.

Unlike the strictly bipartisan National Council of State Legislatures, ALEC's membership is rabidly partisan, with 103 Republicans and 1 Democrat. 98% of ALEC's funding comes from corporations, whereas NCSL is funded almost entirely through legislative dues. And though NCSL shares its views and advice on certain policy, it doesn't write legislation and forbids corporate influence on its activities.

ALEC provides "model bills" to state legislatures, all of which are previously seen by ALEC's corporate board. These model bills are aimed at taking the teeth out of government regulation, giving lavish tax breaks to the wealthy, and using the resulting budget deficits to privatize institutions like schools and prisons. These bills are introduced in multiple statehouses with no required disclosure about an outside group of corporate lobbyists originally crafting the legislation. Some of ALEC's notable alumni include Speaker John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Governor Scott Walker.

Some of ALEC's model budget bills would repeal capital gains taxes and estate taxes, fattening the pockets of millionaire hedge-fund managers and trust-fund brats while putting public goods and services under the knife. ALEC's 1995 "Sound Federal Fiscal Policy Resolution" falsely antagonizes higher taxes as the source of higher deficits (instead of the aforementioned tax breaks for the wealthy). This would steer lawmakers toward needless budget cuts that systematically starve the states of jobs and tax dollars, blow massive holes in the budget and create whopping revenue shortfalls.

ALEC's "Legislative Budget Audit Commission Act" would establish a panel in the event of one of these pre-packaged revenue shortfalls, tasked with specifically recommend privatizing or eliminating state agencies, and to present these proposals on January 15. Effectively, this bill would steer all initial legislative business, using revenue shortages as an excuse to eliminate public programs and public workers' rights to organize under the guise of "government efficiency."

By creating a unique legal grey area between lobbying for laws and writing laws, ALEC has enabled the plundering of our state coffers, leaving our tax dollars and public services at the mercy of corporate executives who aren't held accountable by the democratic process. ALEC is big business' tool to circumvent democracy, letting those with the most money write their own laws.

We should heed both Lincoln's and Mussolini's words, and not be afraid to point out fascism when we see it. ALEC's work is an affront to democracy, and its legislation must be soundly rejected in all statehouses if Lincoln's vision of the Republic is to prevail.


Carl Gibson, 24, of Lexington, Kentucky, is a spokesman and organizer for US Uncut, a nonviolent, creative direct-action movement to stop budget cuts by getting corporations to pay their fair share of taxes. He graduated from Morehead State University in 2009 with a B.A. in Journalism before starting the first US Uncut group in Jackson, Mississippi, in February of 2011. Since then, over 20,000 US Uncut activists have carried out more than 300 actions in over 100 cities nationwide.


Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+20 # Activista 2011-08-27 19:28
What can be classified after 10 year? Only incompetence.
It is time to start samizdat - not difficult in Internet age.
USA became TOTALITARIAN system.
 
 
+6 # rf 2011-08-28 07:38
Time for Anonymous to hack his computer and put only the excised parts on the internet!
 
 
+15 # AngryMan 2011-08-27 23:50
This is why Bradley Manning rots in prison and why Julian Assange is universally hated by the US gubmint: These two are willing to reveal the naked truth before it has been spun into something it is not.

It has become obvious to a casual observer that our clandestine agencies, military leaders, and most politicians require "spin" to whitewash various acts of malfeasance. Why? They aren't held accountable anyway, so why bother to cover-up anything? It is a result of wanting to "appear" as being pure and not a criminal. Actuality be damned. Appearance is everything ... substance is unimportant.

It is important that history records that our gubmint didn't screw the pooch on 9/11 and everybody did exactly what they were supposed to do and what we citizens are paying them to do. Those clever Saudis merely out-smarted us and that is what caused 9/11. But we are smarter now and that is why you cannot know the secrets we have put into place to preclude any such future events. We will keep you safe. We intercept all of your email to keep you "safe". We'll even open your snail mail to keep you "safe". And we listen to your telephone calls to keep you "safe". And we took away some of your constitutional rights to keep you safe. Now you did stock up on duct tape, right? Pigs.
 
 
+10 # Patricia Chang 2011-08-28 00:11
As a child, I thought the FBI was a protector of the good, fought for justice, and fought crime. Now, I see it as one more corrupt agency, trying to hide its failures, its incompetence and its dirty linen from the public. The more they attempt this, the dirtier they appear. Their arrogance is disgusting. Their desire appears to be to stifle the truth, destroy justice, and threaten anyone who believes in peace. What a shame. Obama and Holder have made it worse, not better. So much for change.
 
 
+2 # tomo 2011-08-28 12:37
I agree with you entirely, Patricia. Those who mindlessly repeat that Obama is trying manfully to do good but that the bad Republicans are holding him back, should reflect on his betrayal of his promise to bring transparency to government. No sooner was he in office than he began fronting for the CIA. No, he would not let photos of CIA interrogation techniques come to light; it would not be good for us to see them.
And, yes, if Bradley Manning has had a part in letting us see "Collateral murder by helicopter" in Iraq, he has done a very unpatriotic thing and should not only be prosecuted but should be persecuted before he is prosecuted. In the very spirit of the Mad Queen of Hearts, we hear Obama squealing: "Sentence first, verdict later!" What a fraud the man is! Anyone who defends him should be ashamed of themselves. Anyone who promotes his renomination will deserve the ruin it would promote.
 
 
+6 # angelfish 2011-08-28 01:52
Gee, and I always thought it was the TRUTH that sets us free. Silly me. Historical revisionists are on the March! I think everyone should be keeping a personal Diary so that, after they're gone their children and Posterity can get a glimpse of what it was REALLY like before our Brave New World morphed into the Planet of the Apes!
 
 
+9 # Ralph Averill 2011-08-28 04:50
What the CIA, (and perhaps the FBI as well,) may really be trying to suppress is not evidence of incompetence, but complicity. "Harsh interrogation" techniques are the least of it. A terrorist attack on American soil of the fear-inducing magnitude of 9/11 would not only justify the CIA's existence, a tough sell with the end of the Cold War, but would cow enough of the American public into allowing the kind of big-brother domestic spying techniques that did indeed come to pass. Free, legally unfettered access to all communications would be of enormous political and economic advantage to those few nameless, faceless individuals with access to it. What a coup! What a crime!
 
 
+8 # Glen 2011-08-28 05:54
Citizens may do their own research on these matters. "Apology of an Economic Hitman" the documentary and book is a good start. There is much research. We don't need the CIA to explain it all to us. Many of us know who the true hitmen and villains are.

Link TV is showing "Apology" as I write.
 
 
+6 # Roastchicken 2011-08-28 08:37
Whether or not there was foreknowledge of the 9.11 attack or of whom financed the operation behind the scenes. The result was all that was needed by the Bush administration in concurrence with Daniel Pearle's (Wolfowittz, Rumsfeld, etc, etc.), Project for a New American Century (PNAC) to project United States military power and political "Democratizatio n" of the region composed of failed iron curtain states filled with despotic rulers. This was the point of Bush's election which is why Gore was removed from the loop. Obama is also a symptom of similar CIA inspired pressures on external governments concerning the "Arab Spring". Oil is simply used as a front for the further security of israel.
 
 
-3 # tomo 2011-08-28 12:24
You are right, Roastchicken. For this reason those who say we must renominate Barack Obama "lest something really bad happen" are wrong. Something really bad HAS happened. It's called "Barack Obama."
 
 
+3 # feloneouscat 2011-08-28 13:29
Quoting tomo:
Something really bad HAS happened. It's called "Barack Obama."


When people say that the first question (if they are conservative) is what policies did Obama change or eliminate as compared to the Bush Administration. They can not come up with anything.

If they are liberal I ask the who would they choose to be the leader of the United States? And to that there is silence.

Many are disappointed with Obama because they didn't know that he was slightly right of center to begin with. I had hoped that he would have pulled a little more to the left but am not terribly surprised he has not.

But compared to the list of idiots on the Republican side, he is a far more sane proposition. Personally, I LIKE clean air and clean water. I prefer that CDC remains to do its work. However, I would like to see a reduction in our military - we are not the policemen of the world (and if we are, we've really done a bad job of it).
 
 
-1 # rtrues54 2011-08-28 15:23
AMEN!!!
 
 
+2 # rgreen@uwo.ca 2011-08-28 08:57
Why should an author have to provide evidence that names and facts are not classified? Shouldn't the CIA have to provide evidence that something IS classified?
 
 
+1 # fredboy 2011-08-28 09:21
Of course they do.
 
 
+4 # tomo 2011-08-28 12:21
There's the inability of Condoleezza Rice (now happily giving America's youth an expensive miseducation at Stanford) to explain why the Al Qaeda memo never registered with Junior. There's the inability of the FBI to explain why the abundant information they had on what we're told were two of the 9/11 terrorists never reached the national security apparatus at all. There's the inability of NORAD to give any account of all the things it didn't do on 9/11. There is Richard Clarke's account of the resolute inattention of our government as 9/11 loomed. In the name of Occam and the "economy principle" (a kind of foundation stone for all modern science)
is it not obvious that the most uncomplicated way to explain this catastrophic failure of government in the exercise of its responsibilitie s is that there was a stand-down order in place? Reading FAA and other intergovernment al communications of 9/11, I find indications of this order everywhere.

Some find it comforting to say "only a conspiracy theorist would say such a thing." Let me suggest that what such people are left with is more extreme than the theory they dismiss out of hand. They must belief some great arcane force--the Wicked Witch of the
West perhaps--cast a spell over the entire government of the United States and made all routine functions of government impossible to perform as 9/11 came.
 
 
0 # Pagan Priestess 2011-08-28 16:30
Magical thinking! I prefer to go with Voldemort-after all only Fiend fyre (Book 7!) could melt all that steel-hydrocarb ons like kerosene could never do it without a blastfurnace! Black smoke is indication of badly burning cooler fire! so it was Voldemort or....?
 
 
0 # AndreM5 2011-08-28 16:37
Not that I disagree with you, but if we are going to speak truth to power we have to keep our facts straight. The Wicked Witch was of the East, not West.

After all, the Commies-Sociali sts-French-Radi cal Islamists-Brown People-AntiChri sts-East Coast Elitist Democrats-quich e eating Boston Red Sox-et al. are of the "East" and only we purehearts are of the "West."
 
 
+1 # Oligarch 23 2011-08-28 16:27
Just another occasion for hiding or obscuring some puzzle pieces which, if recognized and correectly assembled woul reveal the truth of all of this. for those of you who don't believe in the opposite world constructed by the secret agencies in their 'wilderness of mirrors' you will probably continue to believe the Official History-all of it right back to the JFK assassination. We oligarchs have most of you exactly where we want you-powerless, economically broke, divided against each other and conquered. Only by destroying your faith in the Official History can you begin to reclaim your spiritual, emotional, political freedoms!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN