RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Al Franken writes: "Be proud to stand for Medicare and Medicaid. Be proud to stand with workers. Be proud to stand for a government that invests in America, a legal system that respects the rights of all individuals, and the progressive values we've fought so hard to defend. Be proud of who we are and what we've built."

Portrait, Senator Al Franken, 09/06/09. (photo: Jeffrey Thompson/Getty Images)
Portrait, Senator Al Franken, 09/06/09. (photo: Jeffrey Thompson/Getty Images)



The Attack on the Middle Class

By Sen. Al Franken, Reader Supported News

23 June 11

Fighting for America's Middle Class, Netroots Nation 2011

n Saturday, June 18th, I was given the honor of speaking at Netroots Nation 2011 in Minneapolis, the 6th annual convention of progressive grassroots leaders and activists. I was the opening speaker at Saturday's Morning Keynote session, which focused on how to save the middle class and build progressive infrastructure. I had an amazing time at the conference and met a ton of passionate activists and progressives.

It was fitting that Netroots Nation was in Minnesota this year. Minnesota is the state that sent Hubert Humphrey to the U.S. Senate, where he cheerfully waged - and usually won - great battles in the name of the young and the old, the poor and the vulnerable, the oppressed and the disenfranchised.

It's the state where Walter Mondale rose to become the living embodiment of common-sense Midwestern progressive values. And it's the state where Paul Wellstone became my hero - and the hero of a generation of progressives who believed, as he did, that we all do better when we all do better.

These Minnesotans were instrumental in establishing the America we know and love today - from building the social safety net to establishing workers' rights to investing in our manufacturing sector - they helped build the middle class. And defending those progressive values is crucial to saving the middle class today.

My speech, entitled: "The Attack on America's Middle Class, and the Plan to Fight Back," laid out some ideas on what we can do to preserve these values that began as 'progressive,' but have become simply American.

The full video and text of my speech is below. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4sIiTnY6d4

The Attack on America's Middle Class, and the Plan to Fight Back

Netroots Nation 2011, welcome to Minnesota!

This is the state that sent Hubert Humphrey, the middle-class son of a pharmacist, to the U.S. Senate, where he cheerfully waged - and usually won - great battles in the name of the young and the old, the poor and the vulnerable, the oppressed and the disenfranchised.

This is the state where Walter Mondale - who, at the age of 20, had helped to organize Humphrey's first Senate campaign - rose to become the living embodiment of common-sense Midwestern progressive values.

And this is the state where Paul Wellstone, a professor down at Carleton College in Northfield, became my hero - and the hero of a generation of progressives who believed, as he did, that we all do better when we all do better. We all do better when we all have health care. We all do better when we all can get a good education. We all do better when we all can earn a fair wage at a good job. We all do better when we all can find a good home and economic security and justice when we're wronged.

Today, 100 years after Hubert Humphrey was born, nearly half a century after Walter Mondale began his legendary career in public service, and two decades after Paul Wellstone won his first race for the Senate, we gather in Minnesota to take stock.

We all believe that we all do better when we all do better. The question is: How are we doing?

And if we're talking about the fate of ordinary families, the answer is clear: We're losing.

The American middle class is in trouble. Median family income is down. Jobs are scarce. Opportunities people thought they'd earned through hard work are disappearing before their eyes. Working families are falling further and further behind.

And that means it's hard for progressives not to feel like we're losing, too. Our movement is about putting the concerns of those working Americans at the forefront of our national agenda.

Now, you can argue that Democrats in Congress should be doing more to win legislative battles - although, as someone who is in the room every day, I can tell you that I don't doubt for a second my colleagues' commitment to moving our country in the right direction.

And you can argue that the Democratic Party should be using different tactics to win elections.

But the fact remains: We as a progressive movement are losing the argument. On issue after issue, we're playing defense.

We're ready to fight for cap-and-trade. But instead, we're forced into an argument about whether global warming even exists.

We're ready to fight for the Employee Free Choice Act. But instead, we're forced into an argument about whether workers should have any rights at all. As proud as we all are of the fight our movement has shown in Wisconsin and around the country in the face of Republican efforts to end collective bargaining, we know that these aren't the conversations we should be having in the year 2011.

And instead of having a debate about what the government should be doing to help the struggling middle class, we're having a debate about what parts of the social safety net we should sacrifice in order to preserve and extend giveaways to the wealthiest few, and to well-connected corporations.

We can urge Democrats in Congress to stand stronger when Republicans hold our government hostage. We can urge each other to work harder to win elections. And you won't hear any disagreement from me on either count.

But if we're going to win these fights, we have to start by reclaiming the upper hand in the argument over what our country should be about. And I want to suggest that conservatives might just have given us the playbook.

For decades, their argument against progressive policies hasn't just been about the substance of our ideas, but about the scope of our vision. They call us radicals. They say we want to do too much, too fast. They accuse us of wanting to remake the fundamental fabric of American society, as if we were proposing to rip a few dozen stars off the flag.

They understand that Americans don't like radical change. We love our country, and are rightly proud of its traditions. We revere our past.

And it's easy to offer people a return to the "good ol' days" - when the economy was growing, everyone was optimistic, and we went to bed at night secure in the knowledge that our kids would have better opportunities than we had.

What conservatives miss when they talk about those "good ol' days," of course, is that they were good for a reason.

Some of you might have heard me talk about my childhood here in Minnesota. My dad never graduated high school. He was a printing salesman. We lived in a two-bedroom, one-bath house in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. We weren't rich - but we felt secure.

I felt like the luckiest kid in the world. And I was. I was growing up middle-class in a time when growing up middle-class in America meant there would be jobs for my parents, good schools for me to prepare myself for a career, and, if I worked hard and played by the rules, a chance for me to do anything I wanted. Including being a comedy writer and then a Senator. In that order.

Between 1947 and 1977, we experienced three decades of incredible growth - growth that flowed to the middle class.

And as we grew, we grew together. Everyone benefited. Income for the top fifth of Americans grew by 99 percent, and the income of those in the bottom fifth rose by 116 percent. I know that's hard to believe. The wages of the bottom fifth grew more than the wages of the top fifth. Really. That happened.

Meanwhile, the middle class could afford to buy more, so there was more demand - and that meant there were more jobs.

And with the tax dollars that came from all this growth, the government built 40,000 miles of straight freeways that greatly reduced the cost of transporting goods, invested in education that prepared kids for the workforce and innovations that created entire new industries, and strengthened the social safety net so that everyone could aspire to the middle class.

Oh. And we sent a man to the moon. Actually, a number of them.

Which brings me to my wife, Franni. When she was seventeen months old, her dad - a decorated veteran of World War II - died in a car accident, leaving my future mother-in-law widowed at age 29 with five kids.

That family made it because of Social Security survivor benefits.

Every single one of the four girls in Franni's family went to college, thanks to Pell Grants and other scholarships. My brother-in-law, Neil, went into the Coast Guard, where he became an electrical engineer.

My mother-in-law got herself a $300 GI loan to fix her roof, and used the money instead to go to the University of Maine. She became a grade school teacher and taught poor kids, and so her loans were forgiven.

She and all five of those kids became productive members of society. They pulled themselves up by their bootstraps - but first, they had to have the boots. And the government gave Franni's family the boots.

These are stories about security and opportunity. These are stories about the American dream. These are stories about the country we are so proud to call our own, the one we all want to protect and preserve.

But they are also stories about a progressive America, one in which the government adopts the principle that we all do better when we all do better.

It was our vision that government should provide economic security for the middle class and provide the boots for people looking to pull themselves up into it.

It was our vision that America should be in the business of making things, and that we should invest in innovation and infrastructure so that we could have an economy where there's enough for everyone.

It was our vision that American workers should earn enough to buy what they produced.

It was our vision that everyone should have basic rights at work, no matter how powerful their employer, and that the law should be a place where anyone could turn for justice.

And although that vision has always remained a work in progress, Hubert Humphrey and Walter Mondale and Paul Wellstone and generations of progressives made this country what we dreamed it could be for millions and millions of families.

And while our vision was broad, the policies we fought for - from the social safety net to workers' rights to investment in our manufacturing sector - were grounded in values that began as "progressive," but have become simply American.

And having built that America we're all so proud of, it's now up to us to save it.

Progressives, in a way, are the new conservatives. We want to conserve what we fought to build. And the right-wingers who call themselves conservatives are the ones who want radical change in the way our government works, and the way our country works.

Newt Gingrich went on "Meet the Press" last month and said that the Ryan plan that would end Medicare was "right-wing social engineering," that it was "too big a jump." He has spent the month since apologizing - but for once in his life, Newt was right.

Actually, that's not fair. He was calling for electronic medical records years before the rest of the country got on board with the idea. So he was right the one other time. Gotta give a guy credit.

But ending Medicare, like privatizing Social Security, is astonishingly radical.

Part of the middle class promise is that, after a lifetime of hard work, you'll be able to retire and enjoy the fruits of that labor. Medicare was established to secure that promise. There was no private insurance market for people over 65 back in 1964. And if Republicans destroy Medicare, there won't be one now. The average Social Security benefit is $15,000. The average out of pocket health care cost for seniors under the Ryan plan would be over $12,000.

So if Republicans eliminate Medicare, America will become a country in which you can never retire - and once you physically can no longer work, you are desperately poor until you die. That is a radical change to our society.

The Republican agenda is a radical vision in which Medicaid is slashed to the bone - in which we start to balance the budget on the backs of, literally, our most vulnerable citizens. Say you have a parent who suffers from dementia and lives in a nursing home. If Republicans pass these Medicaid cuts, you'd better be ready to take that parent in. That is a radical change to our society.

The Republican vision is one in which we cut billions from job training and education and infrastructure - the things that enable ordinary Americans to find good jobs, enable businesses to find the customers and trained workers they need to grow, and enable middle class families to build real economic security. All these cuts, just to fund more tax cuts for people who are richer than any people have ever been in the history of the world.

It's a vision in which workers have no protections from their employers, ordinary Americans have no access to the courts when they're wronged, and big corporations control everything from our media to the Internet to our democracy.

After decades of fighting against any interpretation of the Constitution that secured basic rights for all Americans, conservatives have somehow found in that text special First Amendment rights for oil companies.

The growing gap between rich and poor, the failure of our generation to leave our kids the America we inherited from our parents, and the inability of our political system to respond to these crises - for today's Republican Party, these are features, not bugs.

The right wants America to be a nation of social Darwinism in which the powerful are protected by the government, and the rest of us are on our own.

To achieve it, they'll say things they know aren't true, disown ideas they used to support, contradict themselves on everything from how the legislative process should operate to how weather works. They'll let the government shut down, let us default on our debts, bring our country to its knees to fulfill their ideological fervor.

So how do we stop them? Well, I haven't been in politics my whole life. But I think we always win when we work together and stand on our values. Medicare, and Medicaid, and investment in infrastructure, and public education, and workers' rights, and civil rights, and equal rights under the law - these aren't just good progressive ideas, they're examples of traditional American values.

And when Republicans talk about destroying these things, they're talking about turning their backs on the America we've built. They're talking about ripping apart the fabric of our society. They're talking about a transformation of our country - about undermining our tradition so radically, they might as well be tearing stars off the flag.

And we should say so.

Here in the home of Humphrey and Mondale and Wellstone, I urge you all to stand up for the America our movement helped to build. Stand up for the principle that we should grow together instead of growing apart. Stand up for the principle that we all do better when we all do better.

Be proud to stand for Medicare and Medicaid. Be proud to stand with workers. Be proud to stand for a government that invests in America, a legal system that respects the rights of all individuals, and the progressive values we've fought so hard to defend. Be proud of who we are and what we've built.

We have a tough fight ahead. But it's one we have to win. It's not just the Democratic Party that's depending on us. It's the American middle class. And it's the American tradition, one that we helped to create - and one that we must now protect.

Thank you.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+52 # Kumari 2012-10-12 13:55
why does the richest nation in the world need to spend anything on food stamps? why cant americans afford to buy food?
it might be a rich country but as far as i'm concerned it's morally bankrupt
 
 
+8 # jlohman 2012-10-13 19:21
Of course free education makes sense, but there's no money in it for the politicians. They'd rather spend our tax dollars on things that draw campaign bribes (like defense weapons).

see http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
-7 # Luis Emilio 2012-10-12 14:23
In which states is the Green Party running? Maryland? Will e vote for the Green Party endanger Obama?
 
 
+5 # Muzzi 2012-10-13 11:14
Yes, it will split the vote. Obama is closer to the Green Party than the Republicans. Remember that jerk that Ronald Reagan appointed, and how he sold the environment and the animals down the polluted river?
 
 
+16 # dick 2012-10-12 14:40
ABC, NBC, CNN, & CBS do more damage than FAUX. They relentlessly portray an insane status quo as wonderful, natural.
 
 
+28 # bmiluski 2012-10-12 14:40
Is that a type (Ihope)....Pres ident Obama is pulling our troops out in 2014 NOT 2024.
 
 
+29 # cordleycoit 2012-10-12 14:53
We are scalping the children's education and heath to feed the war on terror-Drugs-an d protest to make our Masters rich.The election is a sham the winners will be the Wall Street bankers no matter who you vote for.
 
 
+11 # Muzzi 2012-10-13 00:06
Right. We should legalize a lot of the drugs to take the profit out of them. When you do that, you will lower the crime rates. One of the Mayors in Baltimore said that years ago and everyone laughed at him. They should have listened. What did prohibition do, except make money for the Mafia?
 
 
+37 # James Smith 2012-10-12 15:15
America only rates number one in military spending. That's because too many companies are making huge profits from it. Even with the billions wasted on the military budget our people are not always the best-equipped. That is a national scandal, too. Does anyone thing that the military-indust rial complex care about the lives wasted?
 
 
+6 # Regina 2012-10-13 17:57
Endless war is the Republican mantra for population control. Killing adults in battle is OK -- just don't get in the way of a fertilized human cell, or even an as-yet unfertilized one, two weeks early. They scream against contraception and enact crazy invasive laws against women's control of their own bodies. They join forces with religious interests in violation of the Constitution. The real driving fact underlying their malarkey is the profits they rake in from their military adventures -- they're so obsessed that they pass funding provisions for equipment that the military says they don't need or want. That's how they generate deficits that they then proceed to rant against. Who else demands support for two totally directly opposing sets of policies????
 
 
+2 # independentmind 2012-10-14 14:07
You notice too that not one of Mitt Romney's five sons is in the services, most of the kids that are in there came from less wealthy homes and do it to have their education paid for.
 
 
+20 # nancyw 2012-10-12 15:38
The age old dilemma of wanting to vote for what we believe in and is best for the country, but having to vote for a major party so the worse of possibilties can be prevented.

Just not right. But I don't want more destruction from a revolution... We need to think out of the box to fix this country.
 
 
+19 # worldviewer 2012-10-12 15:50
HOSTAGE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Does Obama really want US In Afghanistan until 2024? Or is he the hostage in the White House?
It's clear transnational business is trying to take over our government and our nation. They control the news and advertising that shapes how people think. And they would like to divide people--and the votes.
Remember what Gandhi and Martin Luther King understood--tha t each of us holds a bit of power. And if we the people join our power together we are more powerful than the 1%.
 
 
+8 # GGmaw 2012-10-13 06:10
Considering the transnational business interests working against him, Obama has done a very good job. People are fed a line of propoganda by the main media. Everything that has happened in our economy was carefully planned - read the Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein - she predicted the recession years ago.
 
 
+19 # Linwood 2012-10-12 15:55
The fundamental question is why Americans accept the status quo.
People in other western democracies would not put up with the status of working Americans. What happened to that revolutionary spirit?
 
 
+33 # Gordon K 2012-10-12 16:06
 
 
+22 # socrates2 2012-10-12 19:33
Gordon K, hear, hear!
I, too, happen to like the sly paragraph in Part 2, Chapter 9, from "THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM by Emmanuel Goldstein," to wit, "And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival. War, it will be seen, accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way."
Nothing like a little fear to block critical thinking and to "persuade" majorities to surrender every shred of freedom and dignity.
Viva, Orwell!
 
 
-10 # mangel 2012-10-12 16:57
I agree with you but you do not provide enough support for exiting Afghanistan. The fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons makes it a good idea the avoid having them under the control of a pro-Taliban government. This is an issue you need to address. You don't even address the possible consequences of leaving the area. It makes me wonder if you have even thought about it.
 
 
+12 # Nell H 2012-10-12 18:04
The future of America depends on graduating more scientists in mathematical fields -- mathematicians, engineers, biologists, computer scientists. If states would support these students (who are citizens) at their top state-supported universities with full tuition, room and board as long as they make satisfactory progress we would graduate the people we need to move our great country forward.
 
 
+15 # Bev 2012-10-12 20:08
Fundamental to all these issues is true education, not schooling. We have been dumbed down! We are not taught (by design) to think outside the box. Uneducated citizens are fearful of change and under duress, look back to the past (as in Tea Partiers) instead of looking to the future and with confidence to embrace innovation.
 
 
+15 # tazia@aol.com 2012-10-12 21:49
Quoting Bev:
Fundamental to all these issues is true education, not schooling. We have been dumbed down! We are not taught (by design) to think outside the box. Uneducated citizens are fearful of change and under duress, look back to the past (as in Tea Partiers) instead of looking to the future and with confidence to embrace innovation.

I have to agree..since "no child left behend", kids are taught to take the test rather than think what the lesson is about.
 
 
+7 # ladypyrates 2012-10-12 21:01
The comments here are dead on right but it's disheartening that so many Americans have no clue as to the economic heritage given us by the founders. If nothing else, go to normeconomics@att.net and try to get an idea of the economic structure that was the basis for our incredible prosperity. When one understands how unique the American system is, it's quite easy to identify how it's been dismantled and who the culprits are that have been working for it's demise.
 
 
+2 # 4yourinformation 2012-10-13 12:49
LIKE LIKE LIKE this article!

This is what the debates should be about. Joe Biden kicked Ryan's ass but he did it inside the parameters of established and allowable topics and information.

We need a REAL genuine debate about the entire menu of important concepts and facts.

Jill Stein would make those arguments.
 
 
0 # seefeellove 2012-10-14 11:53
What is one of the dumbest and most inhumane practices? That health and education, education being part of our health, are inaccessible for many.

In a world that is smart and compassionate, education and health care would be integrated systems and free for all. Also, every single person would have the best health care and education, accommodating everyone's needs. Privatization of this single system would be illegal, forever.

Who will pay for it? The people who believe they can never have enough money.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN