RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robert Reich writes: "This great switch by the super rich - from paying the government taxes to lending the government money - has gone almost unnoticed. But it's critical for understanding the budget predicament we're now in. And for getting out of it."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



The Great Switch by the Super Rich

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

18 May 11

 

orty years ago, wealthy Americans financed the US government mainly through their tax payments. Today wealthy Americans finance the government mainly by lending it money. While foreigners own most of our national debt, over 40 percent is owned by Americans - mostly the very wealthy.

This great switch by the super rich - from paying the government taxes to lending the government money - has gone almost unnoticed. But it's critical for understanding the budget predicament we're now in. And for getting out of it.

Over that four decades, tax rates on the very rich have plummeted. Between the end of World War II and 1980, the top tax bracket remained over 70 percent - and even after deductions and credits was well over 50 percent. Now it's 36 percent. As recently as the late 1980s, the capital gains rate was 35 percent. Now it's 15 percent.

Not only are rates lower now, but loopholes are bigger. 18,000 households earning more than a half-million dollars last year paid no income taxes at all. In recent years, according to the IRS, the richest 400 Americans have paid only 18 percent of their total incomes in federal income taxes. Billionaire hedge-fund and private-equity managers are allowed to treat much of their incomes as capital gains (again, at 15 percent).

Meanwhile, more and more of the nation's income and wealth have gone to the top. In the late 1970s, the top 1 percent took home 9 percent of total national income. Now the top 1 percent's take is more than 20 percent. Over the same period, the top one-tenth of one percent has tripled its share.

Wealth is even more concentrated at the top - more concentrated than at any time since the Gilded Age of the late 19th century.

So what are America's super rich doing with all this money? They're investing it all over the world, wherever they can get the best return for any given level of risk. Treasury bills - essentially loans to the US government - have proven good and safe investments, particularly during these last few tumultuous years.

You hear a lot of worries about foreigners dumping Treasuries if they lose confidence in the dollar because of our future budget deficits. What you hear less about are these super-rich Americans, who are just as likely to abandon Treasuries if spooked by future budget deficits.

The great irony is if America's super rich financed the US government the way they used to - by paying taxes rather than lending the government money - that long-term budget deficit would be far lower.

This is why a tax increase on the super rich must be part of any budget agreement. Otherwise the great switch by the super rich will make the income and wealth gap far wider.

Worse yet, average working Americans who can least afford it will either lose the services they depend on, or end up with a tax burden they cannot bear.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+47 # PGreen 2011-05-18 17:57
A government, "by the people, for the people," cannot exist under these conditions of inequality. What Reich says is very true. The super-rich are now more powerful than at any time in the past century. But what has shocked me (and perhaps this imbalance accounts for it) is the growing strength of their praetorian guard. Many executives, management, and professionals who manipulate the wealth owned largely by 5% of our population have become more strident in their defense of the rich and the status quo. Unfortunately, others get into line behind them like good foot soldiers. If the public ceases to be "tea-partied," and recognizes that it is a private oligarchy that is every bit as much to blame for our financial trouble as government, then we may see some principles of real change enacted. It will mean a massive break with our current national narrative, however.
 
 
+6 # LY Fong 2011-05-19 03:12
Your analysis of our contemporary compradors or petit bourgeoisie is accurate. The super-rich are served by those who carry their water, and are happy doing so! The smarter ones, like Dylan Ratigan and Cenk Ughur (sp?), Rachel Maddow, Ed Schulz on MSNBC and Thomm Hartman et al on progressive green 960 AM radio, and even more mainstream stations like KGO 810 AM (San Francisco)need to talk up Reich's #s and points. I'd like to hear you and Reich tete-a-tete on this subject...
 
 
+18 # jlohman 2011-05-19 05:31
Quoting PGreen:
... the growing strength of their praetorian guard???

It is now and always has been because the rich share their booty with the politicians that make it all happen. Only public funding of campaigns will reverse the damage.

Jack Lohman
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
+4 # Dave W. 2011-05-19 08:34
jlohman, "Only public funding of campaigns will reverse the damage." Ah! Therein lies the rub. Our politicians, beholden to the rich for their campaign financing, create the laws. And the Supreme Court has already proven they'll work for a little extra "honorarium" themselves. Wall Street cretins have walked away unscathed, aided and abetted by the Obama "justice" dept. Obama's economic advisers are proof "change" is only metaphorical and that "change" will soon be the only thing left for Americans to beg for. Americans may have been better off in some ways in the era of the "ward healer." At least Boss Tweed provided his "subjects" with some measure of protection.
 
 
+5 # tanis 2011-05-19 05:55
thank you Robert Reich for being here. You are consistently giving support to the truth which is sorely needed by anyone who can read in this country. Please don't stop.
 
 
+13 # Fraenkel.1 2011-05-19 07:25
To add insult to injury the undertaxed rich spend their ill gotten gains to invest in government securities the interest coming from our taxes. Sooner or later the whole system will collapse.
Actually during the days of high marginal tax rates (established by both Democrats and Republicans) when government built the freeways and invested in research and education the economy prospered and the assets of the rich increased enormously. What they don't understand is that the extra taxes they might need to pay now would be more than made up by the enhancement of their assets.
 
 
+15 # AndreM5 2011-05-19 07:58
The rich do not understand that they are sitting atop a house of cards, that starving the middle class, pocketing money from the commons needed to improve the infrastruture and to educate Americans will create a very poor USA. They do not understand this because so few of them actually earned their wealth by doing or creating something. They are wealthy by inheritance, by privilege, by money manipulation, by fraud, by almost nothing.
 
 
+6 # VSweet 2011-05-19 15:38
I could never understand why the poor are taxed more, and the rich are taxed less.
What happen to America?
 
 
+1 # Dave W. 2011-05-19 20:55
VSweet, "I could never understand why the poor are taxed more, and the rich are taxed less." 85 U.S. Senators at last count are millionaires. Over 220 House members are in the same club. Kind of clears up the situation doesn't it?
 
 
+3 # 3rdM-3rdE 2011-05-19 22:39
No offense, but I'm not sure if Dr. Reich can answer your question (not that Dr. Krugman could, either. Maybe Matt Taibbi).
In regards to monetary-fiscal policy, what happened to America was (I'll call it) The Money Trust, formerly known as the (Europe based) Gold Syndicate during the 19th century/Robber Barron/Gold Standard days. The problem we are discussing (inequality in a capitalist/priv ate central bank society) goes deeper than the 1970s, or even the 1870s for that matter.
At (or at least near) the root of the issue is one's presumption (or lack thereof) that 'it is good' for governments to delegate their right to 'coin money' to unaccountable groups of private individuals (from who knows where), who then charge the government a substantial interest fee for this sub-contracted service of providing a 'national' currency. Why- one may ask- is the middle man there? Is he really necessary for providing a stable and uncorrupted national currency? Or is it more like something of an old/ancient trick that we just haven't been clever or capable enough to grow out of?
I personally have a favorable impression of Reich and Krugman as individuals; but any so-called reform or supposed revisioning that fails to address the 'private central bank' and 'fractional reserve lending' issues is just rearranging chairs on the Titanic. Clear thinking citizens should know this.
 
 
+2 # timeraveler 2011-05-20 06:32
What 'by the people, for the people'? It is now 'by the corporations, for the corporations' because the Supreme Court is now filled with the most activist judges that have ever sat on that esteemed court and they are seeing to it that these corporations get exactly what they want at the expense of the people.
The people that control these corporations have spouted 'we make jobs' for so long that people have lost the common sense to see those jobs are nowhere around here.
I believe these American people owning these foreign companies and not repatriating their profits without extorting freedom from taxes should be run out of the country on a rail and never let back.
The military is protecting these corporations in these foreign countries - NOT US. They should be paying the taxes to sustain the military.
If you think differently, you are being willfully ignorant and blindly faithful to the propaganda spouted as news today.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN