Robert Reich begins: "Next time you hear an economist or denizen of Wall Street talk about how the 'American economy' is recovering, watch your wallet. There are two American economies. One is on the mend. The other is still coming apart."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
America's Two Economies
05 November 10
America's Two Economies, and Why One Is Recovering and the Other Isn't.
ext time you hear an economist or denizen of Wall Street talk about how the "American economy" is doing these days, watch your wallet.
There are two American economies. One is on the mend. The other is still coming apart.
The one that's mending is America's Big Money economy. It's comprised of Wall Street traders, big investors, and top professionals and corporate executives.
The Big Money economy is doing well these days. That's partly thanks to Ben Bernanke, whose Fed is keeping interest rates near zero by printing money as fast as it dare. It's essentially free money to America's Big Money economy.
Free money can almost always be put to uses that create more of it. Big corporations are buying back their shares of stock, thereby boosting corporate earnings. They're merging and acquiring other companies.
And they're going abroad in search of customers.
Thanks to fast-growing China, India, and Brazil, giant American corporations are racking up sales. They're selling Asian and Latin American consumers everything from cars and cell phones to fancy Internet software and iPads. Forty percent of the S&P 500 biggest corporations are now doing more than 60 percent of their business abroad. And America's biggest investors are also going abroad to get a nice return on their money.
So don't worry about America's Big Money economy. According to a Wall Street Journal survey released Thursday, overall compensation in financial services will rise 5 percent this year, and employees in some businesses like asset management will get increases of 15 percent.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is back to where it was before the Lehman bankruptcy filing triggered the financial collapse. And profits at America's largest corporations are heading upward.
But there's another American economy, and it's not on the mend. Call it the Average Worker economy.
Last Friday's jobs report showed 159,000 new private-sector jobs in October. That's better than previous months. But 125,000 net new jobs are needed just to keep up with the growth of the American labor force. So another way of expressing what happened to jobs in October is to say 34,000 were added over what we need just to stay even.
Yet the American economy has lost 15 million jobs since the start of the Great Recession. And if you add in the growth of the labor force - including everyone too discouraged to look for a job - we're down about 22 million.
Or to put it another way, we're still getting nowhere on jobs.
One out of eight breadwinners is still out of work. Most families in the Average Worker economy rely on two breadwinners. So if one out of eight isn't working, chances are high that family incomes are down compared to what they were three years ago.
And that means the bills aren't getting paid.
According to a recent Washington Post poll, more than half of all Americans - 53 percent - are worried about making their mortgage payments. This is many more than were worried two years ago, when the Great Recession hit bottom. Then, 37 percent expressed worry.
Delinquency rates on home loans are rising. Distressed sales are up as a percent of total sales.
Most people in the Average Worker economy own few shares of stock, if any. Their equity is in their homes. But with all the delinquencies and distressed sales, the housing market has a glut of homes for sale. As a result, home prices are still dropping. So the net worth of most Americans is still dropping.
And even though interest rates are falling, most people in the Average Worker economy can't refinance their homes. They can't get home equity loans. Banks don't want to lend to the Average Worker economy because people in it are considered bad credit risks. They still owe lots of money, their family incomes are down, and their net worth has fallen.
And according to the Reuters/University of Michigan survey of American consumers, expectations about personal finances are at an all time low.
Inhabitants of the Big Money economy are celebrating Republican wins last week. They figure financial regulations will be rolled back, environmental regulations will be canned, the Bush tax cut will be extended to the top 1 percent, and it will be harder for workers to form unions.
Inhabitants of the Average Worker economy aren't so sure. The economy has been so bad they're angry at politicians. They showed their anger at the ballot box. They took it out on incumbents.
But if nothing changes in the Average Worker economy, there will be hell to pay.
Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written twelve books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Big business "invested" heavily in 2010 election - with cheap FED money available - what irony.
Bank of America, Morgan-Chase, Goldman Sachs ... bought media and the "people".
Today, right in front of Bank of America was Impeach Obama petition stand - with president's picture aka Hitler mustache.
One blue color older guy and young oriental were signing.
It was not TP - Tea Party aka Toilet Paper gang. But it fits - nazi group at the front door of the Bank of America - 2010
I hope the greedy "conservatives" are happy - for the rest of us know who to blame.
Did make sense and tax did not pass. Now the poor - FOX crowd -(who voted mostly against) will take hit in social services.
On the other hand, it is intersting to note that, although Obama had only been in the US Senate for 2 years when he ran in 2008, he had taken over the #2 spot in contributions received from Fannie/Freddie (from 1989-2008) - ahead of John Kerry, and second only to Sen. Dodd.
Obama's #2 contributor was Goldman Sachs.
housing bubble was contain to the 2002 - 2006 - Bush administration - and financial speculators. Real value of 100 - selling for 300%. Greed -
rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/franchise-value-of-banks-and-the-effects-of-deregulation/
banks profits are growing exponentially after deregulation ... and they want stop Obama ...
I have no ldea of what U are trying to say? But, I certainly agree with your "greed" summary. Just as the dot.com bubble (the Enron era of the late 90's) increasing depended on greed to propel the bubble upwards into new uncharted terrority, so did the housing bubble.
But, the housing bubble was born of HUD actions mostly between, 1995 and Oct, 2000. Perhaps, on the deregulation side, you should watch the PBS Frontline presentation of "The Warning." That should be easy to find. The left claims that was partly to blame for for a piece of wall streets role in the latter stage of the housing bubble.
It's important to understand, that had HUD not pushed the regulations, there would have been no housing bubble taking off in the fallout of the recession caused by the March 2000 rather historic market crash.. and in the aftermath of 9/11.
Perhaps Wall Street would have found something else to do - I'll give you that.
housing bubble maximum 2002 - 2006 - Bush administration - compared to bank profits in the same period
rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/franchise-value-of-banks-and-the-effects-of-deregulation/
my conclusion is that banks were driving the housing bubble (supply economy) NOT DEMAND. Low income people were not calling banks to buy "American dream" - but banksters were pushing loan and refinance (cash machine) on them to make a quick profit. And boy they did .. till ..
And then (before Obama) FEDs bailed "too big to fail" friends out. Where is a risk and responsibility of free market? More like big banks socialism.
But it was HUD who ordered that Fannie/Freddie and the banks were to lower lending standards and set the goal to push 28.1 million poor - mostly minorites - into buying properties, with $trillions in loans guaranteed to be purchased by Fannie/Freddie. That is a Demand economy - it resulted in a shortage of supply, which fueled the rampant price acceleration openning up the door for more greed.
Here's but one little piece of regulation by HUD:
Oct. 2000 - HUD ANNOUNCES NEW REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE $2.4 TRILLION IN MORTGAGES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR 28.1 MILLION FAMILIES
http://archives.hud.gov/news/2000/pr00-317.html
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtUFokaOaLE
joke is that this is a fringe of democratic party - Larouche PAC protests for Obama impeachment in Kohler, WI
- very sick and antisemitic
Ferdinand Lundberg in the excellent tome "The Rich and the Superrich" clearly set out the premise that Mr. Reich speaks to.
Yes we are a 2 percent and 98 percent nation. The "Finpols" demand that the "Pubpols" do their bidding and dish out any kind of hogwash in order to get elected and much of it is pure nonsense. By the way Finpols are the Master rich with mega billions and mega millions and Pubpols are the lowlife garden-variety politicians and both parties have their fill of them. Many of the Finpols are Communist Chinese. Bet you did not know that.
If you are an American voter thou shall not just vote with your official ballot but with thy purse. So many lament the Fox system of misinformation dissemination yet pay their cable bill happily and thus support this wicked system.
continued in next posting
I want to see what their reaction is when the Republicans- who they voted for- take over all aspects of government even the presidency. That is the only way the Sheeple will "Get it"
Absolutely true! And, include "None of the Above" on the ballot. That way if "None of the Above" wins a whole new slate of candidates must come forward next time. None of the previous candidates can run.
The right wing is winning the culture wars, and its victims have willingly joined the ranks of the conquerers. It doesn't matter if we're unemployed, broke, about to be kicked out of my houses, and without medical care options,We voted for the ones who will make sure that gay marriage is never legalized.
We could redistribute the money back from the interests it was originally redistributed to.
Mostly a rhetorical comment
Result, the people in the government who recently did more than anyone else for average Americans lost voters.
Nevertheless, across the country among ALL the people there is strong support Democratic efforts. It's not "the economy, stupid," it's "ALL the people, stupid."
obviously you do not work hard and you are not rich - one need also IQ over 100. Most of the new rich are in financial sector - get rich quick speculators (Madoff etc.)
Selling houses for 300% value - making $30 -$60K on a "transaction".
People with brains stopped to use Bank of America, Chase etc. Let us use small community banks.
$4 billion spent on elections - who and why - this is the question .. (Hint: it was not small business)
This is my issue with "economists" - take more systemic and global view. We do not have capacity to out produce Chinese - we must feed military - going way of CCCP.
www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm
Our school discussion has shifted from disturbing to calm after we worked on our own partial solution. This is a trailer for our short student film we try to encourage the world to follow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjXfpJZGlog
This feels like a valuable hedge that in its own tiny way contributes to the world.
that Republicans are even more incompetent,
and then we'll do what should have already
been done:BREAK OUT THE PITCHFORKS AND
TORCHES.It's the only thing any of them
understand
How do we keep jobs here? I am trying to get printing quotes on a children art education book that has been frustrating.
My quest to find a local printer is not at the 9th quote, their quotes leave no room for distribution never-mind profit. My entrepreneur venture has been eye opening. This is Capitalism??? What are our children going to do, work live?
.
Average Worker doesn't do that. Unless Mr Reich is referring to the increased popularity of voting Republican since Average Worker may be equating to white-angry America.If we have lost minorities and young adults to apathy and alienation then perhaps we are already in hell.
I have found a way to understand statements such as "US is spending X millions per month on war in say country Y". What they are actually saying is that to conduct the war, one US economy is paying X million to the other. Using terminology of this article, it is saying that the "Average American Economy" is paying X millions per month to the "Big money economy".
Everyone needs to watch (or record it for later) the Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC. It comes on in Texas at 3pm weekdays (4pm in Calif?). He's been having MTV's Jenks on recently, and has gently suggested that the average young person is quietly allowing their future to be ruined by the banksters while they do nearly nothing to try to stop it. There is no one on TV anywhere making the powerful, authoritative statements about how Wall Street and big corporations are destroying this country for their own personal benefit than Dylan Ratigan. His remarks would be slanderous if they weren't true. (Note that the top 25 hedge fund managers in America averaged $1 billion in income in 2009 while most of us were in recession.) He dares them to prove him wrong. We are in for total gridlock over the next two years. Then we'll see if people will finally get off their asses and seriously try to change our whole system to give at least some---any---help to the Average Worker.
I'm sure the loop holes are clear and "we the people" say nothing.
RSS feed for comments to this post.