Reich writes: "We are in the most anemic recovery in modern history, yet our political leaders in Washington aren't doing squat about it."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
The Jobs Report, and Why the Recovery Has Stalled
01 February 13
e are in the most anemic recovery in modern history, yet our political leaders in Washington aren't doing squat about it.
In fact, apart from the Fed - which continues to hold interest rates down in the quixotic hope that banks will begin lending again to average people - the government is heading in exactly the wrong direction: raising taxes on the middle class, and cutting spending.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday that American employers added only 157,000 jobs in January. That's fewer than they added in December (196,000 jobs, as revised by the Bureau of Labor Statistics). The overall unemployment rate remains stuck at 7.9 percent, just about where it's been since September.
The share of people of working age either who are working or looking for jobs also remains dismal - close to a 30-year low. (Yes, older boomers are retiring, but the major cause for this near-record low is simply the lack of jobs.)
And the long-term unemployed, about 40 percent of all jobless workers, remain trapped. Most have few if any job prospects, and their unemployment benefits have run out, or will run out shortly.
Close to 20 million Americans remain unemployed or underemployed.
It would be one thing if we didn't know what to do about all this. But we do know. It's not rocket science.
The only reason for employers to hire more workers is if they have more customers. But American employers have not had enough customers to justify much new hiring.
There are essentially two sources of customers: individual consumers, and the government. (Forget exports for now; Europe is contracting, Japan is a basket case, China is slowing, and the rest of the world is in economic limbo.)
American consumers - whose purchases constitute about 70 percent of all economic activity - still can't buy much, and their purchasing power is declining. The median wage continues to drop, adjusted for inflation. Most can't borrow because they don't have a credit record sufficient to allow them to borrow much.
And now their Social Security taxes have increased, leaving the typical worker with about $1,000 less this year than last.
The Conference Board reported last Tuesday consumer confidence in January fell its lowest level in more than a year. The last time consumers were this glum was October 2011, when there was widespread talk of a double-dip recession.
The only people doing well are at the top - but they save a large part of what they earn instead of spending it.
Overall personal income soared by 8 percent in the final three months of 2012 compared to an increase of just over 2 percent in the third quarter, but this income didn't go into the pockets of the middle class. It went into the pockets of people at the top.
Wages and salaries grew a measly six-tenths of one percent.
Most of the rise in personal income in the last quarter was from companies rushing to pay dividends before taxes were hiked in 2013, and from an upturn in personal interest income. Both these sources of income went mostly to the well-to-do.
This explains why consumer spending is dropping. The Commerce Department said Thursday consumers' spending rose 0.2 percent last month. That's slower than the 0.4 percent increase in November.
So if we can't rely on consumers to stoke the economy, what about government? No chance. Government spending is dropping, too.
The major reason the economy contracted between the start of October and end of December 2012 was a major reduction in government spending in the fourth quarter.
Government spending has declined in nine of the last ten quarters, but it took a precipitous drop in the last quarter. This was mainly because military spending fell 22.2 percent. That's the largest fall-off since 1972 (mainly due to reduced spending on the war in Afghanistan, and worries by military contractors about further pending cuts). State and local spending also continued to fall.
Personally, I'm glad we're spending less on the military. It's the most bloated part of the government. Major cuts are long overdue. But the military is America's only major jobs program. Cutting the military without increasing spending on roads, bridges, schools, and everything else we need to do simply means fewer jobs.
What's ahead? More of the same. So what possible reason do we have to suspect the recovery will pick up speed? None.
Don't count on consumer spending. Wages and benefits continue to drop for most people, adjusted for inflation. States are hiking sales taxes, which will hit the middle class and the poor hardest. Deficit hawks in Washington are contemplating additional tax hikes on the middle class.
Housing prices are stabilizing, thankfully. But one out of five homeowners is still underwater, and the ranks of people renting rather than owning are rising. Health-care costs are also rising for most people in the form of higher co-payments, deductibles, and premiums.
Don't count on government, either. Government spending continues to head downward. The White House has already agreed to major spending cuts, some to go into effect this year. Coming showdowns over the next fiscal cliff, appropriations to fund government operations, and the debt ceiling will likely result in more cuts.
More jobs and faster growth should be the most important objectives now. With them, everything else will be easier to achieve - protection against climate change, immigration reform, long-term budget reform. Without them, everything will be harder.
Yet we're moving in the opposite direction - following Europe's sorry example of failed austerity economics.
Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
The one thing we could do to help the situation is to ensure every job that becomes available goes to a U.S. citizen. The "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" proposal legalizing 7 million illegal workers and opening the door for millions more should be dead on arrival. We need less immigration, much less to help put American citizens back to work. No amnesty, a timeout on legal immigration, and long-term reductions on immigration. Lets all get real.
Sadly, you have an efficient solution--mirro ring one I wrote in the article ABOUT that Amnesty--but it is not politically expedient.
Why, if Americans get outnumbered by foreign parasites, the Democrats can lock out all other parties, be they Republican or any other group that rises to challenge them in the future!
And if they're not swayed be economic terms now, or ecological terms in Clinton's era, what will possibly sway them? Rising crime rates don't really affect them, the people being "generous" with American resources have the high ground, gated communities, and bands of private security that outclass our police in every possible category!
Stabilization will not occur until a righteous administration and Congress convenes and stops the foreclosure and eviction movement that has been invading and taking our country's properties like Nazi storm troopers.
Frankly, it's not going to stop as long as politicians and the judiciary are lining their pockets with Wall Street investments. It has been like feeding the watch dogs tranquilizers and expecting them to guard the house...forget it - Congress is compromised and the judiciary is just as afraid to make decent law because they will be risking their portfolios.
It isn't jobs that will fix the economy. It's stopping the banks dead in their tracks! Iceland arrested their bankers and it hurt for a while but now they are on the road to recovery. We're nearly 6 years under water - facing another 10 years at the same pace...because, why?!
The wealthy are destroying the working class in this country by investing in countries that can provide higher return on investment. At what point will it completely destroy the wonderful system that took care of us for the last 50 or more years?
Even when Welfare was not time-limited most were on it for a relatively short period of time. Most were not immigrants. And, most welfare in this country is corporate and or "benefits" that go to middle- and upper income Americans via tax breaks (from the mortgage tax deduction to the lower tax rates paid on capital gains for individuals to huge subsidies that go to corporations from defense contractors to the big pharma to the oil industry etc).
Interesting and very tellling that you scapegoat low-income immigrants for our economic decline but are completey silent about the "Welfare Addict crowd" that exists among corporate America as well as middle- and upper income Americans.
Do you see, at the very least, no double-standard here?
Besides, consumption is killing the ecosystem. It has to stop.
Americans have had to borrow to support their standard of living beginnning in the early 1970s when wages began to stagnate (which they have now for 40+ years except for those at the top) and virtually all of the profit from productivity gains have gone to the top 1-2% as well.
And, just precisely how is providing "much less to help put American citizens back to work" supposed to help the economy overall not to mention those out of work?
Actually, I don't think any human being should be forced to work or live in such conditions. Pay a decent wage with benefits and good working conditions and Americans will do the work.
and then we will all pay 10 times as much for the items we now get dirt cheap ... watch as "American citizens" scream about THAT
The labor cost of most items is a small percentage of the total. I am willing to pay more.
I find your attitude disturbing, as you seem to think it is OK to exploit people to save a few bucks.
You have obviously never tried to live off of unemployment or had to seek a new job, after being laid off (fired for no reason). When you have had a decent job and are suddenly trying to pay your bills with about a quarter of what you were being paid, you are definitely busting your buns to find another job, whatever it takes. Just how much do you think they pay for unemployment, anyway?
You are the one who needs a kick in the butt!!!
the world has changed, but the world is still bilking millions from people by slick sales tactics that really have no merit. We can go online, for training, but you need massive training centers, that make access a priority...and a follow up pipeline that shows them a place to go after finishing the coursework...no w it's just a crapshoot.
Which- there are no guarantees, but now it's like being struck by lightning.
No one understands risk now and it's incredibly harder to compete with Asia. Case in point- a wood burning stove made in china shipped here with 40 to 50 percent profit is $235. A stove made in the USA and due to emissions capture requirements by EPA for cast iron is $2100. Which will you buy ? There is no decision to make no one throws away almost $2000.
THEN you see the article about the millionaire selling cans of air in Beijing where particulate amounts are twenty five times above safe levels. People will soon die making stuff for us because they don't care. There must be a balance between the extremes so we can produce and survive as a nation.
I should have said that increasing employment directly works to decrease the deficit, as well as providing the opportunity for further deficit reduction."
I should have said that increasing employment works directly to decrease the deficit, as well as creating the opportunity for further deficit reduction. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/opinion/krugman-looking-for-mister-goodpain.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130201&_r=0
I should have said that increased employment leads directly to deficit reduction, as well as creating the opportunity for further deficit reduction. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/02/paul-krugman-deficit-feedback-loop_n_2600378.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
Globalization and offshoring send good jobs overseas, thus reducing jobs for Americans. Mass immigration brings people in to compete for scarce jobs and push the wages of workers down.
Corporations and their puppet politicians push for both "free trade" and offshoring, and mass immigration to push down labor costs for corporations so that they can maximize profits.
Mass immigration is part of the problem and certainly isn't needed when we have 25 million of our own citizens unemployed, growing poverty, stagnant wages, and growing income gap between the haves and have nots.
Robert Reich writes a lot, but I haven't seem him address the impact of mass immigration on the unemployed and poor.
So Reich doesn't address your problem because it isn't one. Moving jobs out of the country, as you say, IS a problem. The biggest problem right now is that without government spending, we've lost a huge number of public sector jobs, & there are no programs to build a green economy or to repair infrastructure, etc.
The government currently issues about 125,000 work visas to foreign workers every month. This is about equal to the number of jobs being created each month. Hence, we are not making a dent in unemployment. This has happened for 3 years now. What is going to change? Where are all the jobs going to come from to help reduce unemployment for our current unemployed and provide jobs for 125,000 foreigners each month? It's not going to happen. So, what do you want? Do you want to help unemployed Americans - youth, minorities, unemployed tech workers, less educated Americans workers who especially hard hit. Or do you want to continue to flood the labor market with foreign labor? Something has to give.
and the media...while the jobs report used to be quoted and analyzed almost hourly (on the boob toob, that is), we're talking about the size of everyone's magazine clip (since statistics show we all are packing heat).
it no longer matters what the people need or want. it only matters what our congressional representatives want (as defined by what their major political contributors want). and the president, well...he's almost reached lame duck status and he evidently wants to go down as a republican president, it seems.
so the american people are stuck with squat. and don't fool yourself, if the spending continues to be curtailed, unemployment will continue to hover above 7.5 percent into god knows when.
we never had to be greece, never should have been greece...but now we are. we had a friend in john maynard keynes, but our "leaders" kicked him to the curb.
and with him, went the american economy.
Finance Directors, CEOs, Governors, union leaders and their investment agencies need to be interrogated because these bad investments might as well be considered terroristic acts. Unfortunately, if you follow the money, what isn't found in offshore accounts was probably funneled to the American war effort(s). Maybe that's why American banksters are being protected?
Those making so much that they do not need SS would get less - As it is now they take out money from ss to [ay for Medicare and if you are under 66 your ss is cut. It's very unfair. A person making making 110,000 or a million pay the same amount into ss.
And we know Medicare issues are just around the corner.
I know that the small businesses including mine where I live have had the WORST so-called "Holiday" season since I started here six years ago.
But the gun and military armament industries, big pharma, health non-care, insurance and the money laundering charnel houses named banks and investment houses (Wall Street should really move to 'Vegas) are doing fine, especially exporting to other countries allegedly called "allies" some of them quite dangerous to the US (as Saddam Hussein and Bin Laden's Mujahadeen became when they were no longer "our" bad guys).
And it's so obvious if common sense is brought into the equation that a massive injection of funds into infrastructure would put millions of people back to work from professionals to laborers.
Sometimes I want to bang my head on something solid in frustration!
And of course his needs to be accompanied by penalties for companies that offshore jobs. If you're based in the U.S., you must employ U.S. workers.
All else is just noise.
FDR knew what to do... .
We "buy" ourselves right out of jobs.
Eventually, we won't have enough to even buy imports.
RSS feed for comments to this post