"The core problem isn't outsourcing. It's that the prosperity of America's big businesses - which are really global networks that happen to be headquartered here - has become disconnected from the well-being of most Americans."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Global Corporations Don't Give a Damn
19 July 12
resident Obama is slamming Mitt Romney for heading companies that were “pioneers in outsourcing U.S. jobs,” while Romney is accusing Obama of being “the real outsourcer-in-chief.”
These are the dog days of summer and the silly season of presidential campaigns. But can we get real, please?
The American economy has moved way beyond outsourcing abroad or even “in-sourcing.” Most big companies headquartered in America don’t send jobs overseas and don’t bring jobs here from abroad.
That’s because most are no longer really “American” companies. They’ve become global networks that design, make, buy, and sell things wherever around the world it’s most profitable for them to do so.
As an Apple executive told the New York Times, “we don’t have an obligation to solve America’s problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible.” He might have added “and showing profits big enough to continually increase our share price.”
Forget the debate over outsourcing. The real question is how to make Americans so competitive that all global companies — whether or not headquartered in the United States — will create good jobs in America.
Apple employs 43,000 people in the United States but contracts with over 700,000 workers overseas. It assembles iPhones in China both because wages are low there and because Apple’s Chinese contractors can quickly mobilize workers from company dorms at almost any hour of the day or night.
But low wages aren’t the major force driving Apple or any other American-based corporate network abroad. The components Apple’s Chinese contractors assemble come from many places around the world with wages as high if not higher than in the United States.
More than a third of what you pay for an iPhone ends up in Japan, because that’s where some of its most advanced components are made. Seventeen percent goes to Germany, whose precision manufacturers pay wages higher than those paid to American manufacturing workers, on average, because German workers are more highly skilled. Thirteen percent comes from South Korea, whose median wage isn’t far from our own.
Workers in the United States get only about 6 percent of what you pay for an iPhone. It goes to American designers, lawyers, and financiers, as well as Apple’s top executives.
American-based companies are also doing more of their research and development abroad. The share of R&D spending going to the foreign subsidiaries of American-based companies rose from 9 percent in 1989 to almost 16 percent in 2009, according to the National Science Foundation.
What’s going on? Put simply, America isn’t educating enough of our people well enough to get American-based companies to do more of their high-value added work here.
Our K-12 school system isn’t nearly up to what it should be. American students continue to do poorly in math and science relative to students in other advanced countries. Japan, Germany, South Korea, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Sweden, and France all top us.
American universities continue to rank high but many are being starved of government funds and are having trouble keeping up. More and more young Americans and their families can’t afford a college education. China, by contrast, is investing like mad in world-class universities and research centers.
Transportation and communication systems abroad are also becoming better and more reliable. In case you hadn’t noticed, American roads are congested, our bridges are in disrepair, and our ports are becoming outmoded.
So forget the debate over outsourcing. The way we get good jobs back is with a national strategy to make Americans more competitive — retooling our schools, getting more of our young people through college or giving them a first-class technical education, remaking our infrastructure, and thereby guaranteeing a large share of Americans add significant value to the global economy.
But big American-based companies aren’t pushing this agenda, despite their huge clout in Washington. They don’t care about making Americans more competitive. They say they have no obligation to solve America’s problems.
They want lower corporate taxes, lower taxes for their executives, fewer regulations, and less public spending. And to achieve these goals they maintain legions of lobbyists and are pouring boatloads of money into political campaigns. The Supreme Court even says they’re “people” under the First Amendment, and can contribute as much as they want to political campaigns – even in secret.
The core problem isn’t outsourcing. It’s that the prosperity of America’s big businesses – which are really global networks that happen to be headquartered here – has become disconnected from the well-being of most Americans.
Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital is no different from any other global corporation — which is exactly why Romney’s so-called “business experience” is irrelevant to the real problems facing most Americans.
Without a government that’s focused on more and better jobs, we’re left with global corporations that don’t give a damn.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "Locked in the Cabinet," "Reason," "Supercapitalism," "Aftershock," and his latest e-book, "Beyond Outrage." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
What we are seeing today is the fruit from the trees planted 30 years ago. The tree is the phrase, "Government is not the solution, its the problem". Seems that plan hasn't quite worked out the way most people expected. But, what could they expect when you unbalance the power the worker has at his workplace in favor of the employer? Or weaken the education system by imposing irrelevant, archaic based standards on not only the students but also the teachers. Or force college students into careers that are designed for wealth only, since the debt for that education leaves them no choice. Or when after empowering the employer, weaken the legal constraints on irresponsible greed by "flattening" the tax code, removing safety barriers such as Glass-Steagal.
The list goes on and on.
"are no longer really “American” companies. They’ve become global networks that design, make, buy, and sell things wherever around the world it’s most profitable for them to do so".
Now, while it is certainly true that today it is difficult if not impossible to talk about a large "American" Corporation (e.g., are US car companies that manufacturer most of their cars/trucks abroad but assemble them here "US companies?") it is simply historical revisionism to talk about the good old golden age days when large "US corporations" ever gave a damn about US workers. Just look at US labor history. ALL of the gains made by labor and the US working class more broadly have always come about due to the demands of workers (and their unions which at one point really did represent their best interests) and over the kicking and screaming objections of their employers. Were their "enlightened" employers (and more broadly members of the ruling class) that understood that it was in their interest to pay workers a decent wage so that they would have enough disposable income to buy their stuff? Sure. But this was hardly representative of capital as a whole that has always looked to keep wages as low as possible and the work day as long as possible.
The USPS, the largest employer after Walmart, has decreased their career employees from 752,949 in 2002 to 551,570
in 2011 yet, even though the Post Office generates it's own income to break even and isn't supported by taxes, some people think it's supported by taxes even though they pay for stamps,mailing parcels etc.
This means less union members which weakens the union. Add to that the fact
that the APWU has agreed that the USPS can hire up to 20% temporary employees.
http://www.staffingtalk.com/post-office-temporary/ (Copy and Paste in Google to view) as well as videos which document how some members of Congress are making laws to do away with Postal Jobs and scuttle some of the mail services for the public.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09ybkkiH2Ho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am4wez1ShPY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsPIY9bFFZY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-chx0j3_8IU
If the US gov can "remove and insert" uncooperative dictators, I see no reason why the same cannot be done to uncooperative CEO's and big business owners. Who's going to step in? China? Europe? Please, they have their own problems to contend with and would love nothing more than for the competition to just vanish.
It's either brave or stupid to test the might of a piece of paper you "hope" someone bothered to read. These corporations would do well to consider that.
An old saying says it all...they are cutting their noses off to spite their face!
America did manipulate germany.... its educational system and society in a manner after the war for good purpose...to prevent a culture of war from reoccurring which seemed part and parcel of that area prior.
With success.....was not the american educational system then not manipulated to effect social changes of another sort..to produce "better citizens"...... for another good purpose?
I suspect so...but the ultimate result of this social educational manipulation for good purpose also had as result....a nation of stupid peoples...who may memorize things but not ever think things through......
So we find little use for corporations... needing critical rational thought ability in their technologically advanced workforce to utilize american citizens..... they have not that ability.
Educated to consumerism, not really educated at all...good corporate citizens are they...abeit... .quite stupid as result...
and america now reaps what it has planted.....for good purpose initially endeavored of course....as are most things with bad outcomes planted.
Ever wonder why every american public school has a fighting symbol and sport teams of the school, are most important.....c lue....it is to lead you in a direction...whi ch is a stupid direction.
They do not have to have those things...educat ional institutions(ju st one example). Education is their purview, not fighting.
It may be true that American education has room to be better. Why do we have pep rallies and cheer leaders for the football team and not the robotics team? However, companies that used to be American are replacing employees here for others who are not quite as good but cheaper. We already have a whole lot of biochemists trained with government encouragement who are not finding jobs in their fields.
Just as a thought experiment, what would happen if America said that in order to be protected by the American military a company had to be located in American territory, and that foreign subsidiaries are not protected?
What you are pointing out is the commoditization of technological and knowledge based workers. Knowledge workers are discouraged from experimenting and innovating, something that was dynamite for America's growth for the 50's 60' and into the early 70's.
The article however is mentioning the factual basis of a lower than the norm educational system and product in america. Not that we are being replaced by less educated not quite as good employees elsewhere but that our educational system is not up to par tight the others and producing enough of the required amounts in necessary fields of advancement.
Low income base labor...actuall y vietnam has supplanted china in that regard.....
Aircraft engineering in american per example.....no qualified engineers can be found.. The market for jets is here, but the qualified engineers....not.
So you import engineers or..move your engineering facility.
If your jet requires FAA approval it is way way better to have your facility here...but if it does not, or you can work out that difficulty....y ou would never locate such a facility here...
We are talking scale here beyond evident perhaps in antidotal experience.
The idea is not to have pep rallies at all...as pep is not education at all..not what to have them for.
We are taught it is education, pap and such things and inherent to the process of education and being of that age...it is not...other places do not have them...at all.
"The way we get good jobs back...guarante eing a large share of Americans add significant value to the global economy"
Would this be the same economy that is killing all life on the planet?
Getting anything "Back" is the wrong direction. We need to move forward, not backward, and fast. Jobs are completely irrelevant. What we need are Air, Water, Food, & Shelter. We can secure all these ourselves, locally by decoupling from a dead government and psychopathic corporations.
Greasing the wheels and making the kids head towards the bottom of the education careers. ei. minimum wage jobs or criminals are about all they will be suited for, and nobody cares, what happened to people that can see beyond the next paycheck?
Locally this are in a historical context could sustain maybe ten thousand, on a good day and year.
i am not saying there is no other way than corporatism but locally we can look at native populations in many areas to see what local populations are sustainable.... .we are in a fix..many would die if we went local.
"Locally this are in a historical context could sustain maybe ten thousand, on a good day and year.i am not saying there is no other way than corporatism but locally we can look at native populations in many areas to see what local populations are sustainable.... .we are in a fix..many would die if we went local."
Thanks to this administration, there are grants available for beginning local food programs -- greenhouses, farmer's markets, co-ops. Won't feed a million, to start with, but worth the effort anyway --
I, too,live in a desert -- not just a food desert, but a real desert. A crossroads in the middle of nothing. The one store within 30 miles,a gas-station mini-mart, could get away with charging $2.00 for a single shriveled-up apple -- many seniors and all student-age kids, were stuck, with nowhere else to go. Thanks to local activists and Barack Obama, we now have a flourishing weekly Farmer's Market, all local produce, honey, and eggs, which can take SNAP or senior coupons. We have a co-op which is working hand in hand with a brand new food pantry and a backpack program for kids during the school year.
We have to start somewhere. Start small & conquer the world!
Very well said, but also the "real" real question is don't regular people all over the world deserve some kind of support and rights to benefit from and fit in and contribute what they can to the global economy?
This idea that only those on top add value is very wrong, because as we can see all over the world that is where the weakness and corruption is coming from, as well as the political pushes to always do the wrong thing, and ultimately to war and death.
The people running our world seem to be doing so only out of greed and for the ability to ignore and abuse others. We will never get anywhere if we do not do something about those core leaderships … both public and private. It is time for a Global New Deal that would detail exactly when a country is not following human rights, a system that monitors and acts against incompetent or evil governments or private interests, and raising taxes is what we need to do to pay for it all.
Sp we ;loose the engineers the upper middle class constituents of the present.....we loose their comparative benefits and salaries as well....and remain with the lower paid occupations only and we loose more than just those individual jobs.....
Truth is....due to increases in transportations costs(oil for instance)....jo bs of the lower lower sort are not necessarily not coming back to the US.....but to what benefit these the US compared to what they replace?. Those that compare real wages find US unskilled labor rates continually declining compared to other counties....muc h must be added to that calculation beyond just hourly wages...health care or lack of for instance.....se rves much in that calculation.
All are workers and all are equal in that but the US becoming a low income place of unskilled workers is not something to be desired.
Yes engineers and such do get paid well and get health care by their employers...if they are not here...to who do we compare those who do not? And what impetus to provide any at all.....when all skilled are gone elsewhere.
But what is so hard to understand about needing education, innovation, efficient production and a healthy consumer class in a market-driven world? Arguments about globalism and corporatism aside, why doesn't the sheer weight of history, precedent, and logic mean ANYTHING to those who fight against their own interests, generation after generation?
SO frustrating!
In short, Keynesian economic policies need to be instituted immediately.
Like thinking producing oil in the US provides energy security and lower prices.....this , the idea, corporations are US or other national interests.... is all complete delusion furthered only by the corporate media.
They are almost all...global citizens. Why work to our benefit. When china is paramount and we are not..chinese companies they will be thought.
China per example is buying US energy assets( a chinese oil company bought chesapeak oil assets in appalacia just two years ago).....is this chinese company now a american company with citizens rights as determined by the supreme court....certai nly yes they are...
RSS feed for comments to this post