Excerpt: "Organized gambling is a scam. And it particularly preys upon people with lower incomes - who assume they can't make it big any other way, who often find it hardest to assess the odds, and whose families can least afford to lose the money. Yet America is now opening the floodgates."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Turning America Into a Giant Casino
03 April 12
nyone who says you can get rich through gambling is a fool or a knave. Multiply the size of the prize by your chance of winning it and you'll always get a number far lower than what you put into the pot. The only sure winners are the organizers - casino owners, state lotteries, and con artists of all kinds.
Organized gambling is a scam. And it particularly preys upon people with lower incomes - who assume they can't make it big any other way, who often find it hardest to assess the odds, and whose families can least afford to lose the money.
Yet America is now opening the floodgates.
In December, the Department of Justice announced it was reversing its position that all Internet gambling was illegal. That decision is about to create a boom in online gambling. Expect high-stakes poker to be available on every work desk and mobile phone.
Meanwhile, states are increasingly dependent on revenues from casinos, lotteries, and the "Mega Millions" game (in which 42 states pool their grand prize) to partly refill state coffers.
Given who plays, this is one of the most regressive taxes in the nation. In the most recent Mega Millions game - whose winning tickets were drawn last week and whose jackpot rose to $640 million - lottery ticket buyers shelled out some $1.5 billion, most of which went to state governments.
And then there's the "Jumpstart Our Business Startups" or "JOBS" Act, which President Obama is expected to sign into law Thursday. It allows so-called "crowd funding" by which people whose net worth is less than $100,000 can gamble away (invest) up to 5 percent of their annual incomes in any get-rich-quick scam (start-up) that any huckster (entrepreneur) may sell them.
Forget the usual investor disclosures or other protections. In the interest of "streamlining," Congress has streamlined the way to fraud. Although start-ups will have to market themselves through third-party portals approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, this is like limiting Bernie Madoff to making pitches over the radio. The SEC can barely keep track of Wall Street let alone thousands of Internet portals. Small wonder SEC Chair Mary Schapiro has been one of most outspoken critics of bill.
The bill was sold to Congress as a way to promote jobs (note the acronym) on the supposition that small start-ups create huge numbers of them. Wrong. That assumption comes from research by the Kauffman Foundation, which counted as a "start-up job" every laid-off worker who morphed into an independent contractor.
I'm all in favor of more entrepreneurship, and it's good to give investors another way to participate in emerging companies. But this bill doesn't do nearly enough to protect the vulnerable.
America's capital market was already a giant casino. Why now turn the rest of America into one?
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
It is only gambling when done poorly. I would only play with players at my own unskilled amateur level. Even entry level tournament players would clean my clock.
I believe in strong regulation to avoid outright fraud and deceptive practices in all business. Beyond that, I think that there is a limit to the legitimate need for a nanny state to protect me from my own stupidity.
Gambling is fun for some people and as a form of entertainment is should be OK. But as a mainstream form of government revenue, it really stinks.
Tax the rich. Why are investors who are also gamblers only paying 15% tax rate when workers pay 36%?
State-sanctione d gambling revenues should be tightly regulated, and it should help pay for gambling addiction treatment. States should not do it unless they do it right.
- A perfect tax raises money;
- A perfect tax discourages something we need to discourage.
Well, a lottery raises money by "punishing" the belief that a losing proposition is a winning proposition. In short, a lottery punishes stupidity.
There are few things in this world that need to be discouraged more than stupidity.
The fact that this is a "recessive" tax is accidental and irrelevant. A lottery is fundamentally a tax on stupidity. Smart people, however poor they may be, are not going to waste the money they have on a lottery.
RSS feed for comments to this post