Levine writes: "Ayn Rand helped make the United States into one of the most uncaring nations in the industrialized world, a neo-Dickensian society where healthcare is only for those who can afford it, and where young people are coerced into huge student-loan debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy."
Ayn Rand's influence spans 60 years, with Alan Greenspan, Ronald Reagan, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) among her notable acolytes and devotees. (photo: Barnes & Noble Review)
Ayn Rand Made US a Selfish, Greedy Nation
17 December 11
Thanks in part to Rand, the United States is one of the most uncaring nations in the industrialized world.
Ayn Rand's "philosophy" is nearly perfect in its immorality, which makes the size of her audience all the more ominous and symptomatic as we enter a curious new phase in our society.... To justify and extol human greed and egotism is to my mind not only immoral, but evil. - Gore Vidal, 1961
nly rarely in U.S. history do writers transform us to become a more caring or less caring nation. In the 1850s, Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896) was a strong force in making the United States a more humane nation, one that would abolish slavery of African Americans. A century later, Ayn Rand (1905-1982) helped make the United States into one of the most uncaring nations in the industrialized world, a neo-Dickensian society where healthcare is only for those who can afford it, and where young people are coerced into huge student-loan debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
Rand's impact has been widespread and deep. At the iceberg's visible tip is the influence she's had over major political figures who have shaped American society. In the 1950s, Ayn Rand read aloud drafts of what was later to become Atlas Shrugged to her "Collective," Rand's ironic nickname for her inner circle of young individualists, which included Alan Greenspan, who would serve as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board from 1987 to 2006.
In 1966, Ronald Reagan wrote in a personal letter, "Am an admirer of Ayn Rand." Today, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) credits Rand for inspiring him to go into politics, and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) calls Atlas Shrugged his "foundation book." Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) says Ayn Rand had a major influence on him, and his son Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is an even bigger fan. A short list of other Rand fans includes Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas; Christopher Cox, chairman of the Security and Exchange Commission in George W. Bush's second administration; and former South Carolina governor Mark Sanford.
But Rand's impact on U.S. society and culture goes even deeper.
The Seduction of Nathan Blumenthal
Ayn Rand's books such as The Virtue of Selfishness and her philosophy that celebrates self-interest and disdains altruism may well be, as Vidal assessed, "nearly perfect in its immorality." But is Vidal right about evil? Charles Manson, who himself did not kill anyone, is the personification of evil for many of us because of his psychological success at exploiting the vulnerabilities of young people and seducing them to murder. What should we call Ayn Rand's psychological ability to exploit the vulnerabilities of millions of young people so as to influence them not to care about anyone besides themselves?
While Greenspan (tagged "A.G." by Rand) was the most famous name that would emerge from Rand's Collective, the second most well-known name to emerge from the Collective was Nathaniel Branden, psychotherapist, author and "self-esteem" advocate. Before he was Nathaniel Branden, he was Nathan Blumenthal, a 14-year-old who read Rand's The Fountainhead again and again. He later would say, "I felt hypnotized." He describes how Rand gave him a sense that he could be powerful, that he could be a hero. He wrote one letter to his idol Rand, then a second. To his amazement, she telephoned him, and at age 20, Nathan received an invitation to Ayn Rand's home. Shortly after, Nathan Blumenthal announced to the world that he was incorporating Rand in his new name: Nathaniel Branden. And in 1955, with Rand approaching her 50th birthday and Branden his 25th, and both in dissatisfying marriages, Ayn bedded Nathaniel.
What followed sounds straight out of Hollywood, but Rand was straight out of Hollywood, having worked for Cecil B. DeMille. Rand convened a meeting with Nathaniel, his wife Barbara (also a Collective member), and Rand's own husband Frank. To Branden's astonishment, Rand convinced both spouses that a time-structured affair-she and Branden were to have one afternoon and one evening a week together-was "reasonable." Within the Collective, Rand is purported to have never lost an argument. On his trysts at Rand's New York City apartment, Branden would sometimes shake hands with Frank before he exited. Later, all discovered that Rand's sweet but passive husband would leave for a bar, where he began his self-destructive affair with alcohol.
By 1964, the 34-year-old Nathaniel Branden had grown tired of the now 59-year-old Ayn Rand. Still sexually dissatisfied in his marriage to Barbara and afraid to end his affair with Rand, Branden began sleeping with a married 24-year-old model, Patrecia Scott. Rand, now "the woman scorned," called Branden to appear before the Collective, whose nickname had by now lost its irony for both Barbara and Branden. Rand's justice was swift. She humiliated Branden and then put a curse on him: "If you have one ounce of morality left in you, an ounce of psychological health-you'll be impotent for the next twenty years! And if you achieve potency sooner, you'll know it's a sign of still worse moral degradation!"
Rand completed the evening with two welt-producing slaps across Branden's face. Finally, in a move that Stalin and Hitler would have admired, Rand also expelled poor Barbara from the Collective, declaring her treasonous because Barbara, preoccupied by her own extramarital affair, had neglected to fill Rand in soon enough on Branden's extra-extra-marital betrayal. (If anyone doubts Alan Greenspan's political savvy, keep in mind that he somehow stayed in Rand's good graces even though he, fixed up by Branden with Patrecia's twin sister, had double-dated with the outlaws.)
After being banished by Rand, Nathaniel Branden was worried that he might be assassinated by other members of the Collective, so he moved from New York to Los Angeles, where Rand fans were less fanatical. Branden established a lucrative psychotherapy practice and authored approximately 20 books, 10 of them with either "Self" or "Self-Esteem" in the title. Rand and Branden never reconciled, but he remains an admirer of her philosophy of self-interest.
Ayn Rand's personal life was consistent with her philosophy of not giving a shit about anybody but herself. Rand was an ardent two-pack-a-day smoker, and when questioned about the dangers of smoking, she loved to light up with a defiant flourish and then scold her young questioners on the "unscientific and irrational nature of the statistical evidence." After an x-ray showed that she had lung cancer, Rand quit smoking and had surgery for her cancer. Collective members explained to her that many people still smoked because they respected her and her assessment of the evidence; and that since she no longer smoked, she ought to tell them. They told her that she needn't mention her lung cancer, that she could simply say she had reconsidered the evidence. Rand refused.
How Rand's Philosophy Seduced Young Minds
When I was a kid, my reading included comic books and Rand's The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. There wasn't much difference between the comic books and Rand's novels in terms of the simplicity of the heroes. What was different was that unlike Superman or Batman, Rand made selfishness heroic, and she made caring about others weakness.
Rand said, "Capitalism and altruism are incompatible....The choice is clear-cut: either a new morality of rational self-interest, with its consequences of freedom, justice, progress and man's happiness on earth-or the primordial morality of altruism, with its consequences of slavery, brute force, stagnant terror and sacrificial furnaces." For many young people, hearing that it is "moral" to care only about oneself can be intoxicating, and some get addicted to this idea for life.
I have known several people, professionally and socially, whose lives have been changed by those close to them who became infatuated with Ayn Rand. A common theme is something like this: "My ex-husband wasn't a bad guy until he started reading Ayn Rand. Then he became a completely selfish jerk who destroyed our family, and our children no longer even talk to him."
To wow her young admirers, Rand would often tell a story of how a smart-aleck book salesman had once challenged her to explain her philosophy while standing on one leg. She replied: "Metaphysics-objective reality. Epistemology-reason. Ethics-self-interest. Politics-capitalism." How did that philosophy capture young minds?
Metaphysics-objective reality. Rand offered a narcotic for confused young people: complete certainty and a relief from their anxiety. Rand believed that an "objective reality" existed, and she knew exactly what that objective reality was. It included skyscrapers, industries, railroads, and ideas-at least her ideas. Rand's objective reality did not include anxiety or sadness. Nor did it include much humor, at least the kind where one pokes fun at oneself. Rand assured her Collective that objective reality did not include Beethoven's, Rembrandt's, and Shakespeare's realities-they were too gloomy and too tragic, basically buzzkillers. Rand preferred Mickey Spillane and, towards the end of her life, "Charlie's Angels."
Epistemology-reason. Rand's kind of reason was a "cool-tool" to control the universe. Rand demonized Plato, and her youthful Collective members were taught to despise him. If Rand really believed that the Socratic Method described by Plato of discovering accurate definitions and clear thinking did not qualify as "reason," why then did she regularly attempt it with her Collective? Also oddly, while Rand mocked dark moods and despair, her "reasoning" directed that Collective members should admire Dostoyevsky, whose novels are filled with dark moods and despair. A demagogue, in addition to hypnotic glibness, must also be intellectually inconsistent, sometimes boldly so. This eliminates challenges to authority by weeding out clear-thinking young people from the flock.
Ethics-self-interest. For Rand, all altruists were manipulators. What could be more seductive to kids who discerned the motives of martyr parents, Christian missionaries and U.S. foreign aiders? Her champions, Nathaniel Branden still among them, feel that Rand's view of "self-interest" has been horribly misrepresented. For them, self-interest is her hero architect Howard Roark turning down a commission because he couldn't do it exactly his way. Some of Rand's novel heroes did have integrity, however, for Rand there is no struggle to discover the distinction between true integrity and childish vanity. Rand's integrity was her vanity, and it consisted of getting as much money and control as possible, copulating with whomever she wanted regardless of who would get hurt, and her always being right. To equate one's selfishness, vanity, and egotism with one's integrity liberates young people from the struggle to distinguish integrity from selfishness, vanity, and egotism.
Politics-capitalism. While Rand often disparaged Soviet totalitarian collectivism, she had little to say about corporate totalitarian collectivism, as she conveniently neglected the reality that giant U.S. corporations, like the Soviet Union, do not exactly celebrate individualism, freedom, or courage. Rand was clever and hypocritical enough to know that you don't get rich in the United States talking about compliance and conformity within corporate America. Rather, Rand gave lectures titled: "America's Persecuted Minority: Big Business." So, young careerist corporatists could embrace Rand's self-styled "radical capitalism" and feel radical - radical without risk.
Rand's Legacy
In recent years, we have entered a phase where it is apparently okay for major political figures to publicly embrace Rand despite her contempt for Christianity. In contrast, during Ayn Rand's life, her philosophy that celebrated self-interest was a private pleasure for the 1 percent but she was a public embarrassment for them. They used her books to congratulate themselves on the morality of their selfishness, but they publicly steered clear of Rand because of her views on religion and God. Rand, for example, had stated on national television, "I am against God. I don't approve of religion. It is a sign of a psychological weakness. I regard it as an evil."
Actually, again inconsistent, Rand did have a God. It was herself. She said:
"I am done with the monster of 'we,' the word of serfdom, of plunder, of misery, falsehood and shame. And now I see the face of god, and I raise this god over the earth, this god whom men have sought since men came into being, this god who will grant them joy and peace and pride. This god, this one word: 'I.'"
While Harriet Beecher Stowe shamed Americans about the United State's dehumanization of African Americans and slavery, Ayn Rand removed Americans' guilt for being selfish and uncaring about anyone except themselves. Not only did Rand make it "moral" for the wealthy not to pay their fair share of taxes, she "liberated" millions of other Americans from caring about the suffering of others, even the suffering of their own children.
The good news is that I've seen ex-Rand fans grasp the damage that Rand's philosophy has done to their lives and to then exorcize it from their psyche. Can the United States as a nation do the same thing?
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Absolutely agree. Humans are all responsible for their own actions.
What is this above, the "Svengali defense" ?
Whether one is reading Any Rand or Lewis Carroll, or Charles Schultz, one is still personally culpable in thought action and deed.
The "greed is good" crowd weren't pushed into their avarice by any author. They simply love Rand because she gives them a good, if distorted, "story" to tell themselves when they are forced to look into the mirror, or when they must "justify" their actions in the world to their spouses and children.
Ayn Rand is no Svengali, no Charles Manson, et al, she simply offers "good" excuses for doing bad things. It is the actual people doing the bad things that need concern us, not their long-dead fantasy apologists.
This author places the cart before the horse.
How heartless an answer is that ?
He lives in the same greed motivated mindset as Ayn Rand did ! Did he help his so called friend when he could have with all the money he has ? No ,,instead he figured he made his bed now sleep in it .
Anyone who thinks this man will champion the poor and middle class is sadly mistaken . Under a Ron Paul presidency you could expect to be thrown to the wolves if you are poor or middle class without enough money saved for retirement and any unexpected emergencies that came up.
Vote wise not stupid and don't vote Republican be it Tea party Libertarian or generic ! We can't afford any more Republican justices on the bench vote Democrat in 2012 and then you can look for someone else in 2016 .
I think this is why we are now seeing these very large right wing christian groups promoting laws which go against their own biblical teachings. They twist words to mean what they want them to mean because in their hearts they were greedy and heartless and they needed to convince themselves they were right . Who you are at the core is who you are and you gravitate to those who think like you do .
Add fear to the equation - there is some other "foreign" culture underneath - that can not be analyzed in the present political system.
She did NOT grew up in Russian culture/family.
Zero sum game is our US imperialism game.
Russian people I met were very open, friendly, hospitable - their life did NOT revolved around money, greed, profit.
Also very Republican.
Rand also spoke at great length on the nature of American corporations and what their proper role was, contrary to what you've written here.
This article basically amounts to defacement through gossip. You spread third hand/difficult to verify accounts of her personal life and even manage to sneer at her tastes in culture.
Plato because his philosphy and the FORMS representing Universal Truth, justice, beauty, courage, love which all culminate into "The Good" is based on ethics and morality which is toally antithetical to her relativistic ethics, self-centered, non-altruistic and power driven philosophy, if you can call it that. Plato's "Philosopher Kings" would have a great time debating Rand using the "Socratic Method."Heidegg er, a great Existentialist would say that Rand has great anxiety about death because we all know we are incontingent and she thinks she's some kind of a God.
That doesn't mean Objectivism is value-free, but it does mean that intense skepticism is called for.
Similarly for somebody who denies evolution or climate change.
Maybe evolution never happened, there is no climate change, Objectivism is the pinnacle of human thought, and smoking tobacco is harmless, but to reasonably demonstrate that it will take an extremely convincing proof. And denying widely observed reality is not a good starting point.
I think what Levine's article shows is that in addition to all the logical and scientific weaknesses of Objectivism and other Rand ideas, their author was a con artist as well.
Do you really want to be standing up for a con artist??
Your use of the term "proper role" bothers me. Corporations, like any other human invention, can be used for any number of purposes. The same goes for religions. To insist that there is only one, "proper", role is to insist on a single reality. Since any reality is a function of one's point of view, and since there are an infinite number of points from which to view a thing, there is an infinite number of realities. In short, there is no single "truth" about anything. I know this complicates things awfully, but there you have it. From my point of view, it's best that we be decent and kind to one another, and to acknowledge that we all live in a separate reality. Gracias, Carlos Castenedas.
Well the government had some pity for her in that she did collect social security /medicare benefits. She did pay into them but this was as hypercritical as some pacifist condeming force but calling the cops to save them
Now when will the empire collapsing? Before or after the next US election.
For a nation which prides its self in it Judea-Christian roots, the question "Am I my brothers keeper?" is sadly forgotten as is the story from which it comes. As is the answer to question 'Who is my neighbor?"
Time for a reformation.
Levine sure confirms what a turd Rand was.
I remember when i read "Atlas Shrugged" (which was an incredibly long novel) that she had her hero say something like "I am therefore I think, not the other way around as one of your philosophers put it". That philosopher was Descartes, of course, and this means that the businessman-her o of the Rand novel was showing contempt for and ignorance about the inventor of cartesian coordinates and therefore indirectly of every piece of technology in the hero's railroad business.
So i think there's no doubt Rand was an uneducated nut, and not even in touch with the technology of her own time.
But i still think it's a mistake to try to pin our problems on her followers, or to try to pin our problems on evolution-denyi ng evangelicals or climate change deniers or any other group which is so demonstrably out of touch with reality.
These loons have been around for decades but never in power.
Until now, that is, when the Arab and Muslim hating powerful neocons controlling the media have just let the Randians rise, instead of chopping them off at the knees as they would have in the 1960s.
The neocons want to choke off all social services to provide more money for their wars, and Rand helps them do it.
Also, I am quite familiar with Keynes. His theories legitimized the policies that have prolonged every economic slowdown in the U.S. since 1929. Since you took the liberty of recommending me a book, perhaps I should in turn direct you towards Milton Friedman. "Free to Choose" demonstrates how government entities justified by Keynes prolonged the Great Depression.
it appears that you have swallowed the Chicago School of economics hook, line, and sinker. As Paul Krugman points out in an essay on Milton Freedman and his influence on contemporary economic theory, homo econimicous (economic man), a tool at the heart of Freedman's approach to socio-economic theory, is an interesting and often useful concept; however, the actuality of what is in one's 'self-interest' becomes very problematic when trying to predict or understand real world actions. Even Freedman started to back away from this concept in later writings. If you truly think that FDR's Keynesian policies prolonged the Great Depression, I suggest you re-examine the factual chronology of events between 1928 and 1940. Keep reading and broaden your library.
Moreover, as general systems theory demonstrates, all livng things are interconnected and mutually supportive. The great god "I" that she invoked is no different. No sense of self can develop in a social vacuum or in radical isolation. The self sense is a socially constructed and conditioned faculty.
There is an "I" that can be seen as transcendent of social constuction and conditioning, but it is not a personality, an ego-self. It is found in a state of higher consciousness and is the source consciousness out of which all things come.
In its grounded and centered form, it does assume personality and personal history, but this limited ego-self is not to be confused with what the esoteric Vedic Hindu philsophers call the cosmic self. Rand simply conflates the grounded personal self with the cosmic self, an absurdly sad and narcissistic error.
Her philosophy is in truth not a legitimate philosophy at all; it is a childish and shallow excuse for plain selfishness and greed. QED.
Frankly I wondered why anyone would ever take what she said seriously !
Seems you like nit picking at what people say here !
LINDA: I know you were answering ORGANIZER who miscontrued Hillel's quote as you did.
"If I am only for myself, what am I?" by Hillel is the best ANSWER to Ann Rand's self-centered, meglomanical philosophy
one could come up with. Do you need a literary road map to understand this?
Most poor folks are living simply and are still bogged down in debt and working more than one job with as much overtime as they can muster !!! Try not having the latest over priced electronic gadetry or going out in public in cheap sneakers AKA bo bos in some areas and you be taunted to no end and if the poor were to be as frugal as you demand they would be the first to be blamed for causing a recession!!
While Generosity is nice nobody wants to be played for a chump. So she took people's fear of being played for a fool ,and made selfishness a virtue ,and took people's fear of not being appreciated and made altruism a vice. No society really could function without the law enforcement ,or military showing some level of altruism.
Now I know why many of the things Ron Paul says about the government's role in the lives of Americans sounds so anti human.
All governments belong to the people. If the people decide that their government must look out for the needs of the most helpless ones in the society then that is what the government must do.
Selfishness will lead to our destruction.
This surely sheds light on the origin of the mentality we see in so many today who worship at the altar of business and money. ME first!
Ayn Rand's work appeals to people in the stage of moral and intellectual development of high school and some college. Some people never develop beyond that and they fixate on some simple and convenient analysis such as the one Rand provides. Once you get a little more morally and intellectally mature, Rand's work is just silly and a fantasy. But this silliness has been sold to Americans like a cult. See Adam Curtis' The Century of the Self to see its broader application.
Rand's Objectivist Epistemology goes back to the middle ages in a particularly juvenile way. She cannot live without Truth and, of course, her Truth is the Truth for all.
The fact that some of our worst political leaders -- Greenspan, Reagan, Paul, Ryan, etc. -- really just shows the poverty of intellect that the US has devolved to -- or really has always been. In a better culture -- let's say Europe including the USSR -- Rand would simply be ignored as a Hollywood Kook.
Look up the meaning of to devolve.
Best regards.
The teachings of Rand and her followers actually have had a detrimental effect and do not encourage personal responsibility. Those attitudes and philosophies do encourage right and might of money - not personal responsibility.
Overreacting to people being so called moochers by with holding the most meager aid is just as amoral as saying you require a police state because crime exist .To be honest despite her hypercritical Simon says game , nobody should have known she received social security/ medicare benefits. It's one thing if they are running for public office to know if received said benefits and it is another altogether if they are a private citizen
Vicious. Hateful. Vengeful. Repressive. The pathway to their beloved collective evil.
Mold flourishes in a damp environment, Rand flourished in the American mind.
How pathetic are we? I read Ayn Rand when she first was published. I never remember thinking, "wow, this woman is remarkable and I will devote my life to her philosophy." What crap. She was a fascist who wrote books read by many. The fact that pathetic republicans now continue to cite her is simply a sign of how degraded they are.
You must lead VERY sheltered life if you stop at the surface of our "Bleak protestant culture" -which is not a culture at all. I find color, vibrance and fascinating characters (they just never write books or declaim from on high) every day and learn something every time. Those who shun by their very natures and beings the "Road Most Traveled" are all around you if you open up to them and are mostly NOT self-absorbed egotists who wish control over others. My favorite American example is perhaps Bix Biderbecke, natively Crazy Horse, and John Trudell -of course there are many thousands of others (Frank Lloyd Wright's mother taught him that he was"Born for greatness" at an early age -his genius was never in doubt by him at least).
As Bob Dylan wrote "No matter how great you are boy, you'll never be greater than yourself"!
Sounds like the role-model for the Thatcher-(Reaga n) era, what? -Oh aye, and a Wall Street/Trump/Re publican ego dream bolstered by the Lobbyist industry inside the beltway and Military-Indust rial-Prison-War On The Rest Of The World Complex.
I've never understood if these people want a regional Warlord-Militia -run nation financed by those who can afford them with no government but that which is at the behest of the power-wielders and perhaps reinforced by a supervising military-police -surveillance structure?
Come to think of it -that's not to far from the current truth, way things are goin'!
Come to think of it
anything more than a 'collective?' I think that is exactly what it is, as is a church denomination. No action group can be maintained by any other approach. Naturally, no one wishes to be characterized as a Stalinist, but being hard core comes with the territory
You may find the dialogue in the article interesting but your comment is not. You
mention Stalinism and say "but being hard core comes with the territory"...
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Her basic premise is an inaccurate and very Russian estimation of" objective reality." And philosophers and thinkers have come down on her hard, rejected her, and thrown her out of the intellectual neighborhood.
My guess is she kept her "Collective" from reading all the adverse criticism just like religions tell their converted not to read anything but the bible.
The real problem is ignorance. The ignorance of not being widely read, of not knowing how to research ideas, of taking for granted that your own inclinations are "true" without subjecting them to analysis.
We do not talk openly about such things. We don't teach this in school until you get to higher ed. But even there you can get a business degree without studying history or humanities. And these are the people who need a broad education the most.
Anyone can learn accounting. That does not make you a person who should have any special dispensation from developing a world view that teaches human interconnectedn ess and compassion.
We can never let our schools get so bad again.
Go figure!
Well actually this is the readers' list. Modern Library's own list does not include Ayn Rand at all.
Their readers go on to shower praise upon Ms Rand by having 3 more novels in their top 10 - while the M.L. Board does not have a single one of them in their list of 100. "Go figure!"
Telling? Sure, it tells me the "reader's poll" was a highly unscientific, typical internet poll in which each voter could vote as many times as he or she wanted. A smallish gang of Randroids, acting quite contrarily to their espoused ideals of individual self-sufficienc y and eschewal of collective enterprise, conspired to vote her pseudo-intellec tual claptrap up to the top.
TELLS something, to be sure. Tells us a lot about the propensity for intellectual dishonesty and charlatanism of the dead woman's followers.
political values and strategies.
People like Scott Walker, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are working very hard to roll back decades of social progress, as incomplete as it was, in favor of a new gilded age, sans unions, civil rights or economic justice. It's really an old story: the few who want to tyrannize the many for fun and profit.
The Occupy folks are on the right track, and we should support their efforts or even join them, if we are able. I am not able to get out on the streets, but I do what I can through my written work. My hope is that the OWS folks, through listening to each other, learning from each other, and just being with each other will forge some new kind of social conract that has as its informing insight that we are all reflections of each other, all centerings of a universal source consciousness that is not God Almighy--long past time to get free of that childish notion--but an immanent energy that is the origin of us all.
aboutt your "dissing" Rand philosophy and reminding me to keep my energy and thoughts focused on the 2012 election.
From what I have read here, she should be charged with High Treason as she has indeed contributed -- if not inspired -- all this corporate selfishness, self-centrednes s and totall insatiable greed and avarice, that has thrown this country and indeed the whole "Human Experiment" into a severe tailspin!
Seeing her picture, "inspired" me only to give her a new name; The Wicked Witch of Planet Earth! (She's simply aweful -- BEYOND awful)!
But when the perfect storm came along in the form of the thug Repugs and their policies crashing our economy, they latched on to anything to get and keep people in their sway. The last party who failed so miserably sat out 20 years before they again had a chance at power. The ignorant among the disenfranchised fringe were just waiting for the Repugs to stick Rand in their hands and give voice to people, in many cases, unsuccessful in our system or who felt they had done alright but harbored peeves at having less help than they wanted as well as all those who for the first time had become acquisitive and were scared of things changing. And I would be willing to bet Rand was one of the first books many of them had ever read.
So I still think that ignorance has a lot to do with the Rand phenom.
I would also bet that many Tea Partiers were the first generation to pass through schools with badly educated parents as well. They were sitting ducks for the thugs too *thugish* to just admit they had caused the crash and try to help clean up the mess as a gentleman would.
I think that if our schools had been in good shape, the Tea Party group may never have fallen hook, line, and sinker for all the lies thrown at them by these old failures. Educated opinions since I watched and read it as it was happening.
Much we are seeing take place today is pure emotion and reaction, rather than analysis and steady decisions on the part of citizens. Many know they are being played but have nowhere to go with it. Citizens often see life as a football game. Only two sides. Rand promoted one of the teams and their pattern of play.
If they were to act on their hatred they would quickly go from a cult to a terrorist cell. They really belong in the same category as Roswel Eric Von dankien 911 truthers Bermuda Triangle devotees and conspearcy mongers of all stripes
Which universe do you live in? Either we are in a world where the laws of physics prevail, in which case the 9/11 Truthers are incontrovertibl y correct or we live in a world of Evil Magicians who can use magick (probably Fiend Fire as the insightful JK Rowling wrote) to melt and explode those massive buildings. Either way, we have a metaphysical choice-do we serve Good or Evil? Because the old ways are not working, will not work and are coming to smash. Ann Rand and all her ilk are no solution and are certainly part of the problem.
Hi, I used to call myself "Lone Wolf", but I realized the name is something of a misnomer. I am a published writer, and writing is a lonely craft; however, if one shares work with others and invites dialog, then one is longer a lone wolf.
My new user name is "Travlinlight," which has a double meaning: I like to think of myself as someone who has dropped off the heavy baggage of conformity and conventionality . Beyond that, in a metaphysical sense, I am light in my essential being, as are we all, just a wave of light trying to stay on the beam, so to speak. So, folks, lighten up and learn to shine!
(Meant to type "androcratic" but I can't get the the spacing function to work.)
Another piece is titled "FAREWELL NARCISSUS," but you have already read that and given me a very generous comment on it.
There is a third essay, pulished under another name. That one is the most recent one published; its title is "FAREWELL ANDROCRACY," and it makes the case that the old male god and male dominant culture, which has a top-down command and control pyramid, is crumbling and will collapse at some future point. The writing is somewhat whimsical, and the second paragraph is actually an old poem of mine ("A SHORT HISTORY OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION"), interpolated into the essay in prose form
I have always been a maverick in my thinking, as Joe Campbell said about himself. Example: always loved modern jazz and classical music. In my old blue-collar, no there, there neighnorhood of Archie Bunker adults and doo op teen peers, I was a very odd lone wolf with few friends. Hence, my origiinal choice of a user name for RSN.
TTFN, dorian
By the way communism did not plan on a one world dictatorship. It stated once equality was established government could be done away with. If that is not idealism I do not what is ! Also trying to be a constitutional purest does not work since that document was penned in the 18 th century where voting was restricted to white property owning males, debtor prisons were in place ,slavery ,and indentured servitude no minimum wage ,over time pay, and child labor was common ,and workers the enviroment and the consumer had no protection and no safety net was in place. Poor Ayn Rand would have died a bit sooner with out that draconian oppressive safety net that only helps out the irresponsible and inferior folks
But his indictment omits three facts essential to understanding how United States became not “one of the most uncaring nations in the industrial world” but – whether at home or abroad – the global archetype of moral imbecility: the most murderously greedy nation in history.
Mr. Levin's first omission is his failure to acknowledge the toxic influence Rand had on the U.S. variant of second-wave feminism, divorcing it from its socialist roots, perverting it into a new and predictably sociopathic rationale for run-amok capitalism. Thus – surely not by accident – we are denied the humanitarian influence by which feminism has elsewhere ameliorated the savagery of capitalism.
He also fails to recognize that Rand's doctrines have reshaped U.S. Christianity. While it is true Rand was venomously anti-religious, it is also true the fundamentalist church has adopted Randist selfishness as a new expression of godliness, with the mainstream churches signaling approval by complicit silence.
But Mr. Levin's greatest omission is his failure to note that Rand's credo is ultimately capitalism reduced to its purest distillate: infinite greed elevated to ultimate virtue – not just the overthrow of every principle of ethics or morality ever uttered, but (precisely as Gore Vidal implied), Absolute Evil.
First of all, Rand was a novelist. She certainly had an interest in philosophy, and may have even preferred to think of herself that way, but she's a novelist. An artist. And she created great art. Her novels are brilliant. However, the quality of her art says nothing about the quality of her character. Many great artists have been awful people.
Great art is refracted through the mind of the beholder according to the perspective of the viewer. A greedy, selfish, amoral person reading Rand will find his greed validated. But kind-hearted people reading Rand will not be transformed into selfish, amoral exploiters. The idea that Ayn Rand or her novels turned nice people into assholes is ridiculous. By the time a person is capable of reading Ayn Rand, their character is already formed.
I think her novels are great. My radical egalitarianism isn't threatened by Howard Roark or John Galt, and when I hear Rush Limbaugh, I think of Ellsworth Toohey. If you feel progressive politics is threatened by Ayn Rand, you miust not have very firm progressive convictions.
I find it impossible to believe that Rand shaped a system which was operating in this country long before she was born and which, by the time she began writing, was well on the way to being legislated out of existence.
Exactly true - Atlas was a warning of where she saw we are headed .. sadly she seems to of gotten a lot of it right.
If you want to see her inspiration for the gangster government looter officials remember what she lived through - FDR.
But What then are we to call those who believe in sacrificing and enslaving some for the sake of others?
Ayn Rand was an anarcho-capital ist. Her philosophy was not new, it was already well developed before she created her cult. And it was a cult, with all the trimmings.
Her teachings did not spread wide, but they influenced people who would go on to be very important, including Milton Friedman, who was the evil guru of the Chicago School of Economics, which trained Alan Greenspan.
Everyone should read Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine: Rise of Disaster Capilism" to understand exactly how powerful Ayn Rand's lunacy really was.
are selective about socialism witheir it is bank bailouts or the military industrial complex!!!
Also she championed fuedalism which is simply scaled back fascism . Fascism is when the corporations are in charge of the government so less government only gives sacled back Fascism. Did the corporators in 19th century behave in a democractic humane and generous maner in either nineteenth centurty Us or Britan?Just look at any Dickens novel and see how humanely bussiess owners were . Also how many corporate goons killed workers trying to unionize and look at countries in Africa and how barbarous corporations have behaved towards native populations
Tax breaks deregulation gutting the safety net and sending jobs abroad has not lead to a utopia or even produced individuals of superior status. It has only sent this nation further towards third world status. By the way MS Rand looks like either a patron from the Mos isley Catina from Star Wars some creature from Buffy the vampire slayer some villians from Bat man Dck Tracy, or some 4 year old feeble attempt to draw a character in some Dr Sesus story !!!!
The only people with the power to control the actions of others are people who wield unjust laws and force backed institutions against other people. Not a refugee with a good vocabulary and the ability to express herself.. what a fundamentally flawed premise of an idea, saying one person can make a whole country selfish. I will go as far as to say it is stupid.
Yes, it can - at least the majority of the comments posted here reveal such tendency. I think that's very good news too.
RSS feed for comments to this post