Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

"Newt Gingrich has done it again. With his new tax plan he has raised the bar from irresponsibility to recklessness.... First off, Newt's plan increases the federal budget deficit by about $850 billion - in a single year!... This might be amusing if Newt were just being old Newt - if this were another infamous hot-air bubble emerging from an always provocative, sometimes clever, often bizarre mind. But it's the tax plan of the leading candidate for president of one of the two major political parties of the United States."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Newt's Colossally Stupid Tax Plan

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

14 December 11

 

Newt's tax plan, and why his polls rise the more outrageous he becomes.

ewt Gingrich has done it again. With his new tax plan he has raised the bar from irresponsibility to recklessness.

Every dollar estimate I'm about to share with you comes from the independent, non-partisan Tax Policy Center - a group whose estimates are used by almost everyone in Washington regardless of political persuasion.

First off, Newt's plan increases the federal budget deficit by about $850 billion - in a single year!

To put this in perspective, most forecasts of the budget deficit cover ten years. The elusive goal of the White House and many on both sides of the aisle in Congress is to reduce that ten-year deficit by 3 to 4 trillion dollars.

Newt goes in the other direction, with gusto. Increasing the deficit by $850 billion in a single year is beyond the wildest imaginings of the least responsible budget mavens within a radius of three thousand miles from Washington.

Imagine what Standard & Poor's or Moody's or Fitch would do if it became law. We'd go directly from a triple-A credit rating to triple X - the veritable porn star of fiscal mayhem. Interest on our debt would become larger than most of the rest of the budget.

Most of this explosion of debt in Newt's plan occurs because he slashes taxes. But not just anyone's taxes. The lion's share of Newt's tax cuts benefit the very, very rich.

That's because he lowers their marginal income tax rate to 15 percent - down from the current 35 percent, which was Bush's temporary tax cut; down from 39 percent under Bill Clinton; down from at least 70 percent in the first three decades after World War II. Newt also gets rid of taxes on unearned income - the kind of income that the super-rich thrive on - capital-gains, dividends, and interest.

Under Newt's plan, each of the roughly 130,000 taxpayers in the top .1 percent - the richest one-tenth of one percent - reaps an average tax cut of $1.9 million per year. Add what they'd otherwise have to pay if the Bush tax cut expired on schedule, and each of them saves $2.3 million a year.

To put it another way, under Newt's plan, the total tax bill of the top one-tenth of one percent drops from around 38 percent of their income to around 10 percent.

What about low-income households? They get an average tax cut of $63 per year.

Oh, I almost forgot: Newt also slashes corporate taxes.

I'm not making this up.

This might be amusing if Newt were just being old Newt - if this were another infamous hot-air bubble emerging from an always provocative, sometimes clever, often bizarre mind.

But it's the tax plan of the leading candidate for president of one of the two major political parties of the United States.

And it comes at a time when America's super rich are raking in a larger portion of total income and wealth than at any time over the last eighty years, and when their marginal taxes are lower than they've been in three decades; a time when the nation's long-term budget deficit is causing cuts in education and infrastructure which will impair our future and that of our children, and when safety nets and social services are being slashed.

Can Newt get away with this?

Probably - because his plan also comes at a time when Americans are so cynical about the major institutions of our society that someone who offers huge, outrageous plans holds a special fascination: The whole system is so awful, people tell themselves, why not just jettison everything and start from scratch? Let's throw caution to the winds and do something really big - even if it's colossally stupid.

This is why the more outrageous Newt can be, the better his polls. The more irresponsible his bomb-throwing, the more attractive he becomes to a sizable portion of Americans so fed up they feel like throwing bombs.

History is full of strong men with dangerous ideas who gain power when large masses of people are so desperate and disillusioned they'll follow anyone who offers big, seemingly easy solutions.

At times like this a nation must depend on its wise elders - people who have gained a reputation for good judgment and integrity, and who are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology - to call out the demagogues, speak the truth, and restore common sense.

The great tragedy of America today is the paucity of such individuals when we need them the most.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+53 # mwd870 2011-12-14 08:59
"Newt's Colossally Stupid Tax Plan"

Couldn't have said it better myself.
 
 
+40 # portiz 2011-12-14 10:19
At present the tax structure encourages business owners to PULL OUT their profits since the top marginal tax rate was so low. The net effect of this short-term decision is bad for the long-term health of the business as the usual investments in infrastructure and employee hiring/development don't occur. If the top marginal tax rate were higher, business owners would do better to reinvest in their businesses since business expenses (salaries, capital improvements, etc.) are 100% tax deductible [any CPAs who read this, PLEASE correct me if I misunderstand tax law]. Thus, by lowering the tax rate the net effect is weakening of businesses... thus, raising taxes would HELP businesses, even if the IRS didn't collect an extra dollar.

And, yes, raising the top marginal tax rate would encourage people to donate to charity, i.e., invest in their communities.

IMHO, the lowering of the highest marginal tax rates undermines businesses and it undermines communities... it undermines America!
 
 
+20 # wsh 2011-12-14 11:50
Portiz, lower tax rates also disincentivize the wealthy from TRYING to make more money (through investing) to make up for the extra taxes they would pay.

This is why whenever we lower taxes, unemployment goes UP instead of down, like we've been promised.
 
 
+6 # Michael Lee Bugg 2011-12-15 13:01
You hit the nail on the head - the rich don't have to produce as much to make what they want when tax rates are so low, and when so many set up off-shore entities to avoid U.S. taxes, or just cheat with impunity because of a weak, understaffed IRS. From 1944 till Nixon came along the top marginal tax bracket was 91% on all income over $200,000 for individuals and $400,000 for married couples filing jointly, with no distinction between earned income (wages) and capital gains. Principal owners and top management didn't make 600 times, or 400 times, or even 50 times as much as their average worker because so much would have gone to federal income taxes. Instead they put more company profits back into their company to increase its value or they shared some of the profits with common stockholders to make the company more attractive to investors and therefore make the stock more valuable! Those days are gone along with Ronald "the government is the problem" Reagan!!! Top management, prefered stockholders, and corporate raiders (like Romney was) are just leeches, NOT job creators!
 
 
+20 # LiberalLibertarian 2011-12-14 13:35
Why is that any stupid idea that a Republican throws over the wall gets the full media attention? Why aren't the proposals made by Democrats, especially the Progressives, given token coverage at most. These plans repeatedly are inventive, meet the critical short term needs of our economy and lay out a roadmap to a future that the Republican plans only claim to accomplish.

Non-partisan analysis repeatedly show that Progressive plans accomplish what they claim.

As long as these plans are not even talked about, how can the American people make a choice? Most Americans never hear about them. The Republicans reject them out of hand, not based on any analysis, but upon ideology. And the left is engaging class warfare?

NEVER VOTE FOR A PARTY THAT DOES NOT RESPECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN.

Have some self respect.
 
 
+54 # artful 2011-12-14 09:01
Newt represents the greatest threat to this Nation in at least the past 50 years.
 
 
-10 # America 2011-12-14 14:06
What???? What does that really mean. I don't care how many pluses you get. You need to qualify what your statement means. That is a broad sweeping statement albeit meaningless to me.
 
 
+38 # Klanders 2011-12-14 09:12
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out just who Newt is pandering to. I do not wish to believe that Americans will accept this bullsh#$.
 
 
+22 # bugbuster 2011-12-14 09:12
Old sayings are old sayings for a reason--people keep rediscovering their truth. "All good things must come to an end" is an old saying. If you agree with me that the USA is on balance a good thing, then it too will come to an end. Nobody knows how or when, but it will probably involve reckless demagogues with crazy ideas.
 
 
+24 # boston02139 2011-12-14 09:27
Bob, you just don't get it. A $1.9 million tax cut for the super rich is needed to goose the economy by creating lots of new $8.00/hour jobs detailing cars, cleaning pools, and otherwise allowing the beneficiares to focus on "wealth creation."
 
 
+18 # Todd Williams 2011-12-14 13:20
And don't forget all those young, inner city janitors we need to hire for $2 or $3 an hour in order to teach them the principals of capitalism, Newt style!
 
 
+19 # Bill Clements 2011-12-14 09:54
"At times like this a nation must depend on its wise elders - people who have gained a reputation for good judgment and integrity, and who are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology - to call out the demagogues, speak the truth, and restore common sense."

Isn't it astounding that, at least when it comes to the political arena, there is such an absolute dearth of "wise elders" in America? There may be a small number of such people out there, but they, for the most part, don't choose politics as a career path. Which is terribly disappointing, though not surprising given the utterly broken (and corrupt) system we have presently.

The one thing in the above quote by Reich I may take issue with: they "are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology..." Given our highly politicized culture, it is extremely rare for BOTH sides to come to a consensus on a single political figure. We, as progressives, might regard Elizabeth Warren, for example, as an extremely good candidate for "wise elder," but you aren't seeing any Republicans willing to regard her similarly.
 
 
+28 # MainStreetMentor 2011-12-14 10:13
This is an excellent article, however the problem isn't in Gingrich's plan - the problem is: The readers of his plan believe it. The RepubTeacans do NOT question him - they just blindly accept. The mainstream media does NOT try to educate the populace with truth - then only want to sell newspapers or broadcast air time for commercial payments. Give the "boot-to-Newt" is what they should be saying - but the rank and file RepubTeacan voter is so so anti-liberal, anti-Obama, the will not listen to the truth.
 
 
+15 # Todd Williams 2011-12-14 13:22
Sadly true. Shows you what a lack of intellect and curiosity coupled with a poor education will get you - a dumbed down voter.
 
 
+26 # latebloomer 2011-12-14 10:15
it's ridiculous, yet will he be ridiculed? only by us over here on the left. somehow, the conservative right talking heads will probably make it all sound like the BEST IDEA ever. AMERICA PLEASE WAKE UP.
 
 
+5 # angelfish 2011-12-14 10:30
Oh, Mr. Reich, if ONLY some "good judgment and integrity" were in evidence in our elders these days. On the ReTHUGlican side they have all gone underground or are STILL at the "Tea Party" in Wonderland. The few Democrats with these attributes are decreasing in number, sadly, through voluntary retirement. Those that remain, however, do throw some light at the end of the tunnel. I have faith that, by Election Day 2012, Sanity will return and the likes of "newt" Gingrich, should he win the nomination, will be utterly TROUNCED by Americans who are STILL imbued with good Judgment and Integrity. Justice DEMANDS the return of sanity to Congress, along with the judgment and integrity that was almost annihilated by the Bush Administration! The People, UNITED will NEVER be defeated! Justice WILL be served!
 
 
+4 # goodsensecynic 2011-12-14 10:47
Aw c'mon, since when has irresponsibilit y and recklessness been harmful to a Republicanista?

Amd besides, in case anyone is worried about the maintenance of predatory capitalism, let's NEVER forget that Mr. Obama leads all Republican candidates in terms of Wall Street donations.

Do people in your republic even imagine how much you are mocked around the world?

Never mind the various countries you paln to invade ... Iran, Venezuela, Saskatchewan [just kidding]

Even those of us living in the Anglo-American liberal democracies (Australia, Canada and New Zealand) refuse to take our obeisance to plutocracies seriously. Your president is a corporate toady and the others are the same with a swath of hideously stupid ideals and ideals.

It's not (honest) that we're any better than you are; it's just that you have the biggest military, the most Walmarts and the only people yet to turn your own "reality show" ...
 
 
+7 # TomDegan 2011-12-14 11:09
"The great tragedy of America today is the paucity of [wise elders] when we need them the most."

Umm....What are you doing for the next eight years, Robert Reich? Just curious.

http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

Tom Degan
 
 
+5 # America 2011-12-14 11:28
Nice article pointing out the hard facts. But hold on...... we will never get anywhere by standing by as a group just griping. The real action is to publicize the facts. There has to be a way to make people aware of the implications. It is not just about Newt. Newt is trying to win the nomination and we can call him all the names in the world it will not do us any good.
Ther are two sides to evey equation and so we need to present the other side we need a surrogate at a high level to do it.
You see the whole potlical system is broken and certainly after Newt is confirmed Obama gets the time to challenge him and show up the folly of the Newt plans and that's Obama's job.
But Obmam too has to provide a viable alternative which will show job growth and a better economy and if the small but positive trend now does not continue then woe be us.
 
 
+3 # jwb110 2011-12-14 11:36
I question the Standard and Poor's threat of dropping the Bond Rating. After watching what happened in the Belgium's this week with the possible of division of the Flemish from the Walloons it looks like Standard and Poor's have put themselves into the role of King Makers. In an article in the CSMonitor it was portrayed that the threat of dropping the Bond Rating brought the opposing forces together to finally form a workable gov't for the Belgium.
S&P would never turn on a GOP/TP in the White House. We know what side they come down on in this political climate. S&P is giving us a very good look at what the New World Fascism is going to look like. A financial system that will run the world, very much like the system that exists in Red China. That article is also in the CSMonitor which as time goes on looks more like a mouthpiece for the 1% and less like the mouthpiece of Truth intended by Mary Baker Eddy. I wonder what Mary B. Eddy would do?
 
 
+1 # MidwestTom 2011-12-14 12:14
I do not believe that Republicans are choosing someone because they would be a good President, I think that they have watched how the debates have catapulted Gingrach to the top of the heap, and they a only seeking someone to counter Obama in a debate. We may all disagree with Gingrich, but I would hate to debate him, he is smart and quick, and very good at twisting facts.
 
 
+8 # Todd Williams 2011-12-14 13:27
Smart? Quick? I hardly think so. Very good at twisting the facts? Yes, until he gets caught with his pants down and his fat, white ass gleaming in the spotlight. Obama is going to shred this dude like my wife's coleslaw. He's gonna be toast!!!!
 
 
+5 # heraldmage 2011-12-14 12:40
So why not present the voters a 99% program that will help them using a 3rd party to take over the Congress. Create a new 3rd Party from all the progressive independent parties using their national ballot access.
What about a plan that provides 100% debt forgiveness to all people with gross incomes of $200,000 or less while continuing unemployment, pensions & social security payments. This would not only cost less than the wall street bail out but jump start the economy due to the availability of spendable income rather than debt service. It will create jobs & increase tax revenue due to increased demand for products & services.
While we are at it why not return water & mineral rights to individual property owners? Then instead of receiving a % of the profits, the preprocessing product revenue be used to fund infrastructure, health care & education. Why should the 1% receive all of the profit from the mineral, water & gas reservoirs under our homes? Especially when our taxes are used to extract, transport & process it?
Then how about an uncapped payroll tax & a tiered flat tax a with personal exemption & excludes the cost of food & medication from taxation.
Of course we must publicly fund political campaigns & limit PAC access to Congress. Then to ensure the truth is reported news & current events must be broadcast as public service with discussion programs label "opinion, commentary" throughout.
This could be a winner & get 90% to vote.
 
 
+12 # Manacha 2011-12-14 12:53
Excellent article, as usual with Reich. I can think of an elder: Jimmy Carter. I saw a long interview done by the BBC and he is sharp, honest and principled. No one would call him though, he is avoided by Democrats too. One of the most painful shots I've seen was when Obama, newly in office invited all previous presidents to the White House. While Obama was chatting in a very friendly manner with the Bushes, Carter was left alone, to the left, somewhat like a pariah. That really hurt!, since I deeply respect the man.
 
 
+8 # Ken Hall 2011-12-14 16:19
Yes, he was the last president who stood up for and tried to help the common man.
 
 
+6 # dcholley 2011-12-14 12:59
Hopefully the "THUGS" will nominate the lizard - want very badly to see him up against present POTUS!
 
 
+6 # LiberalLibertarian 2011-12-14 13:22
I recently had a "conversation" with an otherwise intelligent Republican woman. She claimed that her company was unable to hire 2 persons that they needed due to the additional paperwork created by the Romney/Obama Health initiative.

Since it was essentially a monologue, where just like a TV Republican talking head, I was unable to get a word in edgewise; I was unable to get an answer to the obvious question.

How the hell is there so much paperwork that it absorbs even 80 hours a week, every week of minimum wage salary? Did she mean that her company had to pay Health Care for everyone? That could absorb 80 hours.

It totally amazed me the disconnect with reality. And how I can now totally identify with the token liberal when they are shouted down.
 
 
+5 # womensworkusa 2011-12-14 13:30
The greatest threat we face is the attempt by the City of London, DC and Vatican to create a New World Order to advance the interests of the 1% without any care for the interests of the 99%. The planned destruction of our economy has been long in the making, along with that of Greece... One centralized bank may well benefit the banking families but it is not in the interest of entrepreneurs to have only ONE option for funding. The price of everything will skyrocket as the few in charge extract the highest allowable profit. It will not matter if children are hungry or the elderly need healthcare... sociopaths who think only of self have no motive to help neighbor as self. Their least favorite word in the English language is altruism.
 
 
+6 # wilhelmscream 2011-12-14 14:55
$63? how will that help the poor?
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2011-12-14 16:27
This is Newt self-destructing. He's shooting himself in the head. The majority of Americans are on to the game now. They know that the tax cuts for the very wealthy are the main cause of the deficit and Newt will only make it worse. Yes, he will probably fix the huge deficits his campaign is running by getting huge contributions from the 1%. That will resolve his problem. But then he will lose voters, even conservatives who know that this plan is the problem, not the solution to the USG deficit problem.
 
 
+4 # KittatinyHawk 2011-12-14 20:39
Could have left it at Newt's Collossally Stupid!
Nough said right there...no one has a tax plan because no one has to budget their own lives like the blue collar and poor so time we get them to do some cuts in spending...bet they will start at the top
 
 
+3 # leedeegirl 2011-12-14 22:51
it dawns on me that this is ALL by design! make the "frontrunning" Republican candiate SO unviable that handing the election to the Democrat (unfortunately, Obama) is a "no brainer"
 
 
+2 # John Somebody 2011-12-15 03:23
Hang on, if the U.S.goes down the tubes, and becomes less able to shit on the rest of the world, won't that be good for the rest of the world ? And maybe the U.S. population would have a strong memory then, of what happens when such nutters get their way, and blame repug mentality, for the hard lesson.

But then, I suppose the environmental destruction going far beyond U.S. borders, may outweigh any benefits.
 
 
+4 # pernsey 2011-12-15 04:14
Newt's Colossally Stupid in everything he says and does. Hes self serving, self indulgent and selfish...enough said!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.