"Newt Gingrich has done it again. With his new tax plan he has raised the bar from irresponsibility to recklessness.... First off, Newt's plan increases the federal budget deficit by about $850 billion - in a single year!... This might be amusing if Newt were just being old Newt - if this were another infamous hot-air bubble emerging from an always provocative, sometimes clever, often bizarre mind. But it's the tax plan of the leading candidate for president of one of the two major political parties of the United States."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Newt's Colossally Stupid Tax Plan
14 December 11
Newt's tax plan, and why his polls rise the more outrageous he becomes.
ewt Gingrich has done it again. With his new tax plan he has raised the bar from irresponsibility to recklessness.
Every dollar estimate I'm about to share with you comes from the independent, non-partisan Tax Policy Center - a group whose estimates are used by almost everyone in Washington regardless of political persuasion.
First off, Newt's plan increases the federal budget deficit by about $850 billion - in a single year!
To put this in perspective, most forecasts of the budget deficit cover ten years. The elusive goal of the White House and many on both sides of the aisle in Congress is to reduce that ten-year deficit by 3 to 4 trillion dollars.
Newt goes in the other direction, with gusto. Increasing the deficit by $850 billion in a single year is beyond the wildest imaginings of the least responsible budget mavens within a radius of three thousand miles from Washington.
Imagine what Standard & Poor's or Moody's or Fitch would do if it became law. We'd go directly from a triple-A credit rating to triple X - the veritable porn star of fiscal mayhem. Interest on our debt would become larger than most of the rest of the budget.
Most of this explosion of debt in Newt's plan occurs because he slashes taxes. But not just anyone's taxes. The lion's share of Newt's tax cuts benefit the very, very rich.
That's because he lowers their marginal income tax rate to 15 percent - down from the current 35 percent, which was Bush's temporary tax cut; down from 39 percent under Bill Clinton; down from at least 70 percent in the first three decades after World War II. Newt also gets rid of taxes on unearned income - the kind of income that the super-rich thrive on - capital-gains, dividends, and interest.
Under Newt's plan, each of the roughly 130,000 taxpayers in the top .1 percent - the richest one-tenth of one percent - reaps an average tax cut of $1.9 million per year. Add what they'd otherwise have to pay if the Bush tax cut expired on schedule, and each of them saves $2.3 million a year.
To put it another way, under Newt's plan, the total tax bill of the top one-tenth of one percent drops from around 38 percent of their income to around 10 percent.
What about low-income households? They get an average tax cut of $63 per year.
Oh, I almost forgot: Newt also slashes corporate taxes.
I'm not making this up.
This might be amusing if Newt were just being old Newt - if this were another infamous hot-air bubble emerging from an always provocative, sometimes clever, often bizarre mind.
But it's the tax plan of the leading candidate for president of one of the two major political parties of the United States.
And it comes at a time when America's super rich are raking in a larger portion of total income and wealth than at any time over the last eighty years, and when their marginal taxes are lower than they've been in three decades; a time when the nation's long-term budget deficit is causing cuts in education and infrastructure which will impair our future and that of our children, and when safety nets and social services are being slashed.
Can Newt get away with this?
Probably - because his plan also comes at a time when Americans are so cynical about the major institutions of our society that someone who offers huge, outrageous plans holds a special fascination: The whole system is so awful, people tell themselves, why not just jettison everything and start from scratch? Let's throw caution to the winds and do something really big - even if it's colossally stupid.
This is why the more outrageous Newt can be, the better his polls. The more irresponsible his bomb-throwing, the more attractive he becomes to a sizable portion of Americans so fed up they feel like throwing bombs.
History is full of strong men with dangerous ideas who gain power when large masses of people are so desperate and disillusioned they'll follow anyone who offers big, seemingly easy solutions.
At times like this a nation must depend on its wise elders - people who have gained a reputation for good judgment and integrity, and who are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology - to call out the demagogues, speak the truth, and restore common sense.
The great tragedy of America today is the paucity of such individuals when we need them the most.
Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Couldn't have said it better myself.
And, yes, raising the top marginal tax rate would encourage people to donate to charity, i.e., invest in their communities.
IMHO, the lowering of the highest marginal tax rates undermines businesses and it undermines communities... it undermines America!
This is why whenever we lower taxes, unemployment goes UP instead of down, like we've been promised.
Non-partisan analysis repeatedly show that Progressive plans accomplish what they claim.
As long as these plans are not even talked about, how can the American people make a choice? Most Americans never hear about them. The Republicans reject them out of hand, not based on any analysis, but upon ideology. And the left is engaging class warfare?
NEVER VOTE FOR A PARTY THAT DOES NOT RESPECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN.
Have some self respect.
Isn't it astounding that, at least when it comes to the political arena, there is such an absolute dearth of "wise elders" in America? There may be a small number of such people out there, but they, for the most part, don't choose politics as a career path. Which is terribly disappointing, though not surprising given the utterly broken (and corrupt) system we have presently.
The one thing in the above quote by Reich I may take issue with: they "are broadly respected by all sides regardless of political affiliation or ideology..." Given our highly politicized culture, it is extremely rare for BOTH sides to come to a consensus on a single political figure. We, as progressives, might regard Elizabeth Warren, for example, as an extremely good candidate for "wise elder," but you aren't seeing any Republicans willing to regard her similarly.
Amd besides, in case anyone is worried about the maintenance of predatory capitalism, let's NEVER forget that Mr. Obama leads all Republican candidates in terms of Wall Street donations.
Do people in your republic even imagine how much you are mocked around the world?
Never mind the various countries you paln to invade ... Iran, Venezuela, Saskatchewan [just kidding]
Even those of us living in the Anglo-American liberal democracies (Australia, Canada and New Zealand) refuse to take our obeisance to plutocracies seriously. Your president is a corporate toady and the others are the same with a swath of hideously stupid ideals and ideals.
It's not (honest) that we're any better than you are; it's just that you have the biggest military, the most Walmarts and the only people yet to turn your own "reality show" ...
Umm....What are you doing for the next eight years, Robert Reich? Just curious.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Ther are two sides to evey equation and so we need to present the other side we need a surrogate at a high level to do it.
You see the whole potlical system is broken and certainly after Newt is confirmed Obama gets the time to challenge him and show up the folly of the Newt plans and that's Obama's job.
But Obmam too has to provide a viable alternative which will show job growth and a better economy and if the small but positive trend now does not continue then woe be us.
S&P would never turn on a GOP/TP in the White House. We know what side they come down on in this political climate. S&P is giving us a very good look at what the New World Fascism is going to look like. A financial system that will run the world, very much like the system that exists in Red China. That article is also in the CSMonitor which as time goes on looks more like a mouthpiece for the 1% and less like the mouthpiece of Truth intended by Mary Baker Eddy. I wonder what Mary B. Eddy would do?
What about a plan that provides 100% debt forgiveness to all people with gross incomes of $200,000 or less while continuing unemployment, pensions & social security payments. This would not only cost less than the wall street bail out but jump start the economy due to the availability of spendable income rather than debt service. It will create jobs & increase tax revenue due to increased demand for products & services.
While we are at it why not return water & mineral rights to individual property owners? Then instead of receiving a % of the profits, the preprocessing product revenue be used to fund infrastructure, health care & education. Why should the 1% receive all of the profit from the mineral, water & gas reservoirs under our homes? Especially when our taxes are used to extract, transport & process it?
Then how about an uncapped payroll tax & a tiered flat tax a with personal exemption & excludes the cost of food & medication from taxation.
Of course we must publicly fund political campaigns & limit PAC access to Congress. Then to ensure the truth is reported news & current events must be broadcast as public service with discussion programs label "opinion, commentary" throughout.
This could be a winner & get 90% to vote.
Since it was essentially a monologue, where just like a TV Republican talking head, I was unable to get a word in edgewise; I was unable to get an answer to the obvious question.
How the hell is there so much paperwork that it absorbs even 80 hours a week, every week of minimum wage salary? Did she mean that her company had to pay Health Care for everyone? That could absorb 80 hours.
It totally amazed me the disconnect with reality. And how I can now totally identify with the token liberal when they are shouted down.
Nough said right there...no one has a tax plan because no one has to budget their own lives like the blue collar and poor so time we get them to do some cuts in spending...bet they will start at the top
But then, I suppose the environmental destruction going far beyond U.S. borders, may outweigh any benefits.
RSS feed for comments to this post.