RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpts: "[F]or all the talk about accountability, there has been little action when it comes to holding large financial institutions accountable for breaking the law. Look at the latest foreclosure fraud scandals. For more than a year, one story after another has come to light exposing how some of America's largest financial institutions broke the law. In some cases, their blatantly illegal behavior in the foreclosure process pushed families out of their homes. In some others, families gave up and moved away under the threat of foreclosure."

Elizabeth Warren says Congress must confirm Richard Cordray to lead the CFPB. (photo: AP)
Elizabeth Warren says Congress must confirm Richard Cordray to lead the CFPB. (photo: AP)



Where Is Wall Street Accountability?

By Elizabeth Warren, Politico

08 December 11

 

Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns

 

he law applies to everyone. Wall Street protesters should be held accountable if they engage in illegal activity - and so should Wall Street banks. There is no excuse for protesters to violate public safety laws - and no excuse for powerful financial institutions to defraud their customers or investors.

Yet for all the talk about accountability, there has been little action when it comes to holding large financial institutions accountable for breaking the law.

Look at the latest foreclosure fraud scandals. For more than a year, one story after another has come to light exposing how some of America's largest financial institutions broke the law. In some cases, their blatantly illegal behavior in the foreclosure process pushed families out of their homes. In some others, families gave up and moved away under the threat of foreclosure.

The revelations about robosigning - in which mortgage servicers falsified legal documents to foreclose on homes faster and more cheaply - were followed by stories about illegal home foreclosures against military personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, cases of mistaken-identity foreclosures, cases of foreclosures caused by bad record keeping and on and on.

Credit unions and most small banks followed the law. But the biggest mortgage lenders and servicers swamped the system with bad practices.

As stories of illegal behavior in Massachusetts and across the country tumbled out, Wall Street plotted its strategy. Instead of owning up, huge financial services companies took a different approach: They set new spending records hiring an army of lobbyists to shift attention away from their wrongdoing.

The big banks and their allies followed a now-familiar game plan: Launch an offensive against anyone trying to enforce the law with rigor; work overtime to block serious investigation of illegal activity; and persuade the government to accept a slap-on-the-wrist settlement to absolve their violations of the law.

But there has been some pushback recently. On Nov. 28, a federal judge rejected a government settlement with Citibank over accusations that it misled investors in the run-up to the financial crisis. Why? The judge said there hadn't been enough investigation.

Just last week, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley filed a lawsuit against the five largest mortgage servicers, bringing to a halt here in Massachusetts the stalling tactics that banks have used for more than a year as they dodged responsibility for foreclosure practices.

Does this mean the tide is turning toward real accountability - a full and fair investigation of the biggest financial institutions? A test case now lies before Congress.

New laws were put in place more than a year ago to provide some accountability over Wall Street. The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created with the power to help consumers get the clear, useful information they need to make the best decisions on their financial futures. By enforcing some basic rules, the agency can help level the playing field between families and the giant Wall Street banks that sell credit cards, mortgages and other financial products.

But to have its full powers to insist on real accountability, the agency must have a director. And here's where a showdown is coming.

Last summer, President Barack Obama nominated Richard Cordray, the former Ohio attorney general, to the post. But Wall Street's friends in Congress seized on a blocking maneuver: Forty-four Republican senators promised to stop any vote on a new director to thwart the new agency.

In other words, those who broke our economic system with crazy, dangerous mortgages aren't subject to full scrutiny because their allies in Congress are blocking Cordray's nomination.

With all the clout that Wall Street and its lobbyists have, real accountability won't be easy. But the first steps are pretty obvious.

First, confirm Cordray, and allow the consumer finance bureau to do its job. Efforts to weaken the agency before it can call a single Wall Street firm to account are shameful.

Second, demand that our state attorneys general and federal enforcement officials do more - not less - to push back against the big banks and their lobbyists and to investigate those whose illegal actions have broken the economy. And when evidence warrants, bring public prosecutions.

Third, stop the late-night budget tricks and other maneuvers designed to weaken agencies that enforce the laws. Put real cops on the financial beat in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, cops with the resources they need to patrol for fraud and sustain tough prosecutions.

It has been more than three years since the greatest financial crisis in three generations. It is past time that we stop talking about accountability and start demanding it from those who broke the system.

Fighting for the middle class means more than talk. It means across-the-board, consistent accountability for anyone who breaks the law - no matter where they work or who their friends are.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+88 # BradFromSalem 2011-12-08 11:46
Prof. Warren. Keep talking like that and I will be right in line behind John Stewart, wanting to make out with you.

The only item you missed is the extraordinary lengths the Republicans are going to to block AG Cordray's nomination. Not only do they refuse to even interview him, but they have effectively blocked President Obama from utilizing the recess appointment to put Cordray and others into critical jobs.

The next time we hear the MSM proclaim that Congress is on recess, know that it is not true. Congress has not gone into recess in nearly a year. They have no respect for the institution of the Senate, they have no respect for the President of the United States. They will lie when they say what they will do when in power, they are totally deaf to the will of the people while claiming otherwise.

All this and more are more reasons to:
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!

Prof. Warren, keep up the race in MA, you will win hands down AND you will drain their resources.

XXXXX
 
 
+60 # Barbara K 2011-12-08 14:01
I'm with you, Lib. The dirty tricks the Republibaggers have been pulling ever since Obama took office have been inexcusable. They are a bunch of spoiled rich kids who need to pick up their toys and go home. While they are doing all this blocking, they are not working and therefore, should have their pay docked. Why should we pay them to sit on their duffs and do nothing. When they want to filibuster, then make them stand there and filibuster. Otherwise go ahead and do the job without them. Go Elizabeth!

NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
 
 
+65 # gentle 2011-12-08 12:14
With the DHS claiming OWS can be considered and treated like terrorists, where are they with the wall street criminal actions? Terrorism defined as criminal acts against a populace designed to spread fear & unrest. When I hear that bankers and CEOs are residents of Gitmo for undefined length of time without trial, I will feel safe again. Oh, and a little pepper spray couldn't hurt.
 
 
+28 # jon 2011-12-08 16:40
"Oh, and a little pepper spray couldn't hurt"

Indeed, it is, according to FOX News, a "food product".
 
 
+21 # Regina 2011-12-08 19:02
That's in the same league as the claim that carbon dioxide can't be harmful because it's "natural."
 
 
+21 # nice2blucky 2011-12-08 12:34
After Democrats to over Congress in 2002, Republicans cried foul when Democrats blocked a handful of Bush's judicial nominees.

Republicans, with all their feigned sincerity, said that it was wrong when they did it, and it was, therefore, wrong for Democrats to do it; as if they; as if they wouldn't do it again, the first chance the got.

And such the noble fellows (suckers) Democrats are, they agreed.

So here we are as history repeats itself.

Other than those noble fellows, is anyone surprised.

----------------------------------------------------------

What is interesting, is how being such the noble chaps allowed Democrats to feign being representatives of the people.

----------------------------------------------------------

Message to future U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren: One and out. One term as U.S. Senator (or two-thirds of a term) and one term as President.
 
 
+4 # Regina 2011-12-08 19:04
So you want rotating greenhorn novices forever in Congress? Sez the K Street big bad wolf: "The better to orient and direct you, my dears."
 
 
+6 # nice2blucky 2011-12-09 04:49
There are too many dynamics in play and unknowns about the greenhorn novices to answer your question about whether they will be pushed around by long-serving staff and K-Street lobbyists.

I think greenhorn novices like Elizabeth Warren are worth a try, rather than most Republicans and most Democratic incumbents, essentially Democrats in name only -- failures by design.

What I want is representation or consequence for lack of representation. I want leadership or consequence for lack or leadership. It's not that the issues I believe to be important lose, it's how they lose.

I don't want to be told how much politicians tried, or wanted, or believed. I want to see it for myself -- not just hear it.

I no longer fall for the threats or fear of what is marginally worse to maintain what we have, nor the specious, contrived excuses that follow, as sure as the sun rising. There are no more rationalization s or comparisons that will convince me that what is not working will some how work if given another chance.

Even the best Incumbent Democrats are ineffective or worse. They are craven, venal, and disingenuous; they spout lofty, but hollow rhetoric, yet are empty suits beholden to beliefs or interests different from those they claim, and they facilitate the corporate and industry interests down the line.

Keep doing what you're doing and see if that gets you something different. Good luck with that. Thanks for helping.
 
 
+5 # jimyoung 2011-12-10 03:36
You have some of the best comments I've read but I wouldn't say Democrats took over Congress in 2002. Gingrich and Hastert were Speakers following the 1994 election until after the 2006 election. Armey, DeLay, Blunt, and Boehner were the House Majority Leaders during that time (with the infamous DeLay taking over following the 2002 election). Democratic control (Senate only) during the period was only when Vice President Gore tipped the balance with an evenly split Senate. That was 17 days between Jan 3 to Jan 20, 2001 when Cheney tipped the balance. Jeffords then quit the Republicans and briefly tipped it back to Democrats.

There is nominal control then there is rope-a-dope control my old party uses to frustrate attempts to end "temporary" Bush tax cuts, etc, hypocritically claiming tax cuts pay for themselves (unless they are tax cuts for working people)

Cheney was the 546th man, the "controller," that trumped Charley Reese's famous 545 people responsible for America's woes on items like Medicare Part-D unpaid for benefits in April 2001 and 7 other tie breakers on tax cuts, etc, that produced the worst job growth since the Great Depression. The last time taxes on the wealthiest were so low was during 1927, when reduced to only 2% of Americans paying any income taxes. They were at least the wealthiest 2% then. Should we go back to the Harding, Coolidge, Hoover tax distribution but raise the revenue intake to the Clinton percentages?
 
 
+3 # jimyoung 2011-12-10 04:05
If your reference to Democrats in control of congress in 2002 was in regard to Senate approval of appointees, I think there is so much more to the control issue that I can only guess at. Far too many appointments are controlled by holds than by making it to the floor for votes, so the minority has quite a bit of hidden ability to "control" the appointment nominees. I believe my old party abuses this more than Democrats, but sometimes I do appreciate the ability. A case in point would be Robert Bork for the Supreme Court. He was the third in line after Elliot Richardson and William Ruckelshaus (both of whom resigned rather than fire Archibald Cox) and proceeded to fire Cox (the first strike against him in my view, though I'd like Robert Reich's opinion that incident, since Bork hired him). The second strike, and the decider for me, was his views on anti-trust laws (opposed to all of them). His theories may be intellectually impeccable but the real world crumbles when they try to implement them.
 
 
0 # nice2blucky 2011-12-10 08:54
Democratic politicians have been pathetic for so long that much of it is just a pitiful blur. What I was trying to convey was simply the gist, which was intended to be accurate, as well.

I was referring to Democrats in committee holding up a nominal amount of judicial nominees.

It was likely Orrin "Shutchure" Hatch who did his insincere song and dance of righteousness and contrition, ... maybe Mitch McConnell, but I doubt it, he is much more in-your-face clear about being partisan and obstinate, although little is beneath him. I cannot remember all the judiciary committee members from year-to-year.

That's why I appreciate your detail oriented recollections. I've forgotten more than I remember, but I try to stay clear on theme and remember details relevant to my being objective on conclusion; and I usually know or check facts and specifics prior to commenting.

I see you are one of the, I-didn't-leave- the Party,-the-Part y-left-me people -- like my dad, a conservative of years long past.

Good choice. You could have simply gone with the flow. Just shut down the old brain, soak in Fox News, parrot back talking points, point fingers of blame at immigrants, liberals, and the Democrat Party, and talk about the sanctity of life and freedom, and wave a flag.

But I guess it would be a shame to let all those details go to waste.
 
 
+1 # jimyoung 2011-12-11 12:17
Amen to, "I try to stay clear on theme and remember details relevant to my being objective on conclusion."

I am a rank amateur by comparison, but have been influenced by my mother-in-law's neighbor, Mickie Edwardson, Professor Emeritus of UF's, College of Journalism and Communication. I never took any courses, but the chance meetings and her thoughtful words at a service for my WWII USCG Veteran mother-in-law (who amazed us holding on until Dec 7th 2009) at the Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, made me start looking at the bigger picture of what others and I put out in comments (and what real journalists should be doing). Simply click on the icon and check their/your profile and "My Recent Comments."

My own mother had a great influence in always wanting to see "The Devil's Advocate" information , and to find it myself if no one else would seek it out.
 
 
+65 # artful 2011-12-08 12:46
Since corporations are now "persons" under the Scalia-inspired corruption, someone needs to figure out a way to convict and send corporate-perso ns to prison.
 
 
+16 # independenteye 2011-12-08 14:32
In the words of our friend Bessie the Plumber (no relation to Joe), "Guilt is reserved for those who do not wear neckties."
 
 
+9 # MainStreetMentor 2011-12-08 20:51
It's easy. Sue them as individuals, not corporations. Doing that vacates the legal shields corporations currently use to "hide" behind.
 
 
+36 # Doubter 2011-12-08 13:20
Re. "Congress"
If it's not broke you don't fix it; but if it's 'broke' beyond repair....
(Corrupt beyond imagining)
THROW IT OUT!
If you guys (I'm 86) wanna salvage something out of the ruins of your country it's going to take a complete overhaul or a systemic change.
Patching it up ain't gonna work no more.
Occupy Wall Street!
Occupy your whole country!
Throw the bums out!
 
 
+31 # pernsey 2011-12-08 13:27
Yeah I said this a few times in other articles. If we are accountable to the law then corporations, who are now considered people, should be too. The way things are going though...money is above the law, and everyone else is not, that should not be!!

It doesnt surprise me at all the GOP is blocking someone that will hold corporations accountable.

GOP stands for Greedy One Percent!

NEVER EVER VOTE REPUBLICAN!!
 
 
+4 # panamericans 2011-12-08 14:15
Now why can't we find Presidential Candidates of the caliber of Elizabeth Warren? There are over 300 million Americans and the best we can do is an 'Obama' and his sick elk.
 
 
+19 # Janice 2011-12-08 16:07
Stop it!.. President Obama has met with blatant opposition at every turn. With cooperative people in the house and senate allowing his policies to come to fruition it would raise America out of this mess we allowed the Republicans to put us in.....Vote the Republicans OUT of office.
 
 
+16 # Jerry 2011-12-08 18:06
Yes, Obama was facing huge odds. I don't hold him responsible for failing. I hold him responsible for not trying for pprogressie causes. Also, you are overlooking the following:

•Obama began by announcing Guantanamo would be closed within a year. It's still open.
•In the financial realm he surrounded himself with Wall Street insiders like Lawrence Summers and Tim Geitner, both advocates of deregulation of the financial industry whose reckless, fraudulent excesses caused the sub- prime mortgage bubble to burst and with it the financial meltdown and subsequent great recession. These appointments were a clear nod to favor Wall Street financial interests whose largesse contributed the most money to Obama's campaign in the general election of 2008.
•To date Obama's Justice Department has brought NO criminal investigation and prosecutions of any of the Wall Street banks or any other of the financial mortgage speculators, especially "Countrywide Financial" who was the biggest underwriter of suspect sub prime mortgages.
•No members of the Bush administration which authorized torture have been brought to justice.
•Drone strikes and missile attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen have increased under the Obama administration.
•The war in Afghanistan has been expanded.
•The policies of extraordinary rendition, warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention of suspects and denial of habeas corpus continues unabated.
 
 
+8 # Jerry 2011-12-08 18:12
and: • Assassination of American citizens has been authorized and carried out.
 
 
+1 # jky1291 2011-12-10 12:50
If the Obama supporters want to split the progressive vote and give the White House to the Republican terrorists that is on them, because there are enough Independents who will not vote for Obama, as well as disenchanted Democrats that he has zero chance of being reelected. But, a true Progressive could enjoy a landslide victory, by leveraging the 90% and growing dissatisfaction with Congress. While I will never vote for another Republican as long as I live, the tax reduction extension welfare entitlement bailout for millionaires and billionaires, following the health care capitulation, forfeited my support for President Obama. It is one thing if one does not know what is right, but it is inexcusable when one knows what is right and still refuses to uphold those principles. If one only votes for the lesser of 2 evils the result still cannot be acceptable. It is essential that a candidate that genuinely supports and will fight for the fundamental issues presented in the Rebuild the American Dream movement is identified, recruited, and elected as a 3rd party President to wrestle our country out of the death grip of the multinational corporations.

http://contract.rebuildthedream.com/?rc=rtd_home

If President Obama wished to run in 2016, I would wish him well, hoping he had learned what is required to truly represent all of the citizens of this nation, not just the wealthy 2%.
 
 
+8 # futhark 2011-12-08 21:18
Obama was portrayed in his campaign as being 180 degrees away from Cheney/Bush and won the election on that basis. Once he took office, he started pursuing a political program almost parallel to that of his not-so-illustri ous predecessor: more war, more inhumane weapons, more security-state mentality, more protection for the big financial institutions... Where do we find a "constitutional scholar" who actually understands the Constitution and the political philosophy upon which it is based?

"Obama is facing huge odds..." One can "face" huge odds while still walking backwards. That is what seems to me to be happening. Did Barack Obama ever justify his vote in the Senate in 2008 for the infamous FISA bill that let big telecommunicati ons companies off the hook for violating the right of privacy of American citizens? Did he ever justify Constitutionall y his May 21, 2009, proposal for extra-judicial "indefinite detention"? If he has, I never heard it.
 
 
+2 # Regina 2011-12-09 19:38
And which of those clowns in the"debates" do you think would be better for us than Obama??? We can't punish him for his shortcomings without punishing ourselves a helluva lot worse.
 
 
+29 # Hank 2011-12-08 14:49
I live in Michigan but I have contributed to Ms Warren's campaign since I believe strongly in what she says and does.
 
 
+12 # Janice 2011-12-08 16:03
I'm with you Hank!
 
 
+31 # walt 2011-12-08 14:50
How can any American sit idle and not demand accountability for the crimes that ruined people's pensions, home mortgages and lives in general. We sentence poor kids for possession of marijuana or bust some demonstrators at "Occupy Wall Street" movements, but we let the big crooks go free ( and more often than not-WITH BONUSES!)

People need to speak out. Take to the streets with the demonstrators and let their voices be heard.

Demand the guilty be held accountable!
 
 
+24 # activdot 2011-12-08 14:53
You are right on, candidate Elizabeth Warren. The Republicans do not deserve to win. Their actions in Congress have been disgraceful. On all important issues they have obstructed progress and in some large measure caused the economic distress that Pres. Obama inherited.
 
 
+1 # bugbuster 2011-12-08 14:56
Keep up the good work, Ms. Warren, and please win your election. Hire Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney, Lee Atwater, David Ploufe or *anybody* who can turn in a win for you. It doesn't matter *how* you win. Just win.
 
 
+19 # MainStreetMentor 2011-12-08 15:15
Diversions to focus attention AWAY from the true issue at hand is a Karl Rove specialty - and one adopted whole heartedly by the RepubTeacans. They did it with ACORN - they did it with John Kerry - they did it with the debt ceiling (when the REAL focus should have been on job creations). Dr. Warren knows the "ins-and-outs" of how the opposition plays ball - and she has the abilities, the wherewithal and the backbone and "know how" to deliver some legal punches that they WILL feel - all we gotta' do is make certain she becomes the next US Senator from Mass.!
 
 
+13 # angelfish 2011-12-08 15:30
God Bless you, Elizabeth Warren! JUSTICE IS coming on Election Day 2012! The People, UNITED, will NEVER be defeated!
 
 
+15 # Janice 2011-12-08 16:02
You are my hero. I know you are going to win the senate seat in Massachusetts (my old home). Massachusetts people are above the fray and know a good candidate when they see her. On to the presidency!!!!
 
 
+4 # Kootenay Coyote 2011-12-08 16:14
Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Thursday, December 8, 2011 -- 12:43 PM EST
Corrected: Senate Republicans Block Obama Pick to Lead Consumer Panel

Because of an editing error, an earlier e-mail alert incorrectly reported the Senate vote as 55 yes, 45 no. The vote was 53-45.

The Senate blocked President Obama’s nominee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as filibustering Republicans who oppose the very powers of the new agency successfully challenged one of the administration’ s main responses to the financial crisis. The nomination of Richard Cordray was rejected after Democrats failed to achieve the 60 votes they needed to move his nomination forward. The vote was 53 yes, 45 no. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, said his party had made clear for months that it would not approve a leader for the watchdog consumer agency until the law that established it was amended.
 
 
+27 # jon 2011-12-08 16:46
We need to find out which Democrats voted with the Republicans and replace them.
 
 
+24 # BellBuoy 2011-12-08 16:58
Mitch McConnell is an embarrassment to this nation! He is the first person who should be voted out, then put in leg irons for his sedition. If there is a god, she will make sure Elizabeth Warren is our next president.
 
 
+21 # jon 2011-12-08 18:49
"Mitch McConnell is an embarrassment to this nation!"

More than an embarassment, a Quisling !!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN