Alter writes: "Like the Tea Party on the Republican side, Occupy Wall Street makes the party establishment nervous. It's not just that Democratic candidates have done well fundraising on Wall Street in recent years. The bigger problem is getting the activists to draw a distinction between bringing specific greedheads to justice and mocking those parts of Wall Street that are blameless in the 2008 crash and do plenty to invest in the future of the country."
Occupy Portland marchers occupy Lownsdale Square where their parade through downtown Portland ended earlier Thursday, 10/06/11. (photo: Randy L. Rasmussen/The Oregonian)
Why Occupy Wall Street Should Scare Republicans
07 October 11
n Florida this week, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was asked about the growing Occupy Wall Street movement. “I think it’s dangerous, this class warfare,” he said.
Romney’s right. It may be dangerous - to his chances of being elected.
Occupy Wall Street, now almost three weeks old, isn’t like the anti-globalization demonstrations that disrupted summits in the 1990s or even the street actions at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York, though some of the same characters are probably in attendance. With unemployed young protesters planning to camp out all winter in Zuccotti Park (with bathrooms available only at a nearby McDonald’s), it’s more like a cross between a Hooverville and Woodstock - the middle-class jobless of the 1930s and the hippie protesters of the 1960s.
With the help of unions and social networking, the movement has at least some chance of re-energizing Democrats in 2012 and pushing back against the phenomenal progress Republicans have made in suppressing voter turnout in several states.
Why? Because the tectonic plates of U.S. politics are shifting in ways we don’t yet fully understand. We don’t know whether Occupy Wall Street is a carnival party - a piece of left-wing street theater that gets old fast - or a nascent political party that revives a long-dormant tradition of class- based politics.
It’s possible that these demonstrations, which have now spread to about 150 cities and campuses, will be hijacked by extremists or dissipated by obnoxiousness; the American left has practice in committing suicide. The whole thing could fade as young people find a better way of hanging out offline.
Something Consequential
But my visits to Zuccotti Park made me think it’s the beginning of something consequential. So far it looks like a younger, lefty version of the early days of the Tea Party - a leaderless, mostly organic movement with a catchy symbolic name that captures the public imagination by channeling anger against elites.
Like the Tea Party on the Republican side, Occupy Wall Street makes the party establishment nervous. It’s not just that Democratic candidates have done well fundraising on Wall Street in recent years. The bigger problem is getting the activists to draw a distinction between bringing specific greedheads to justice and mocking those parts of Wall Street that are blameless in the 2008 crash and do plenty to invest in the future of the country.
Directing Anger
But a healthy rebalancing of the national conversation is nonetheless under way. The Tea Party directed public anger against the federal government in general and President Barack Obama in particular; Occupy Wall Street directs that ire against Wall Street in general and - inevitably - Romney in particular.
This will have no effect on Romney in the Republican primaries, of course, but in a general election it could make him the poster boy of the big banks that many see as the cause of their woes. The specifics of his record running Bain Capital LLC will be subsumed in the image of his rationalizing the actions (resisting any tax increases) of the “1 percenters.”
The arguments I heard from the often-articulate protesters in the park were economic, not partisan. None of the posters depicted Romney, House Speaker John Boehner or any other Republicans. Instead they said things like “Top 1% Want Everything,” “Listen to the Drumming of the 99% Revolution,” “Stop Off-Shore Tax Evasion,” and “Protect Medicare, Not Billionaires.”
It’s easy to denigrate the movement for simplistic sentiments that lack a clear agenda. But as the Tea Party demonstrations showed in 2009, that very shapelessness is a huge asset (to use the Wall Street term). If “We’re the 99 percenters” catches on, and the crazies can be marginalized, then the challenge will be to move from the streets to the ballot box, as the Tea Party did in 2010.
Voting Barriers Multiply
Lack of enthusiasm for Obama would be one problem. But the young people brought into activism by Occupy Wall Street may face other impediments. Today’s Republican Party is not just anti-Democratic but anti-democratic. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University just released a disturbing report showing that changes in state laws could make it much harder for more than 5 million eligible voters to cast ballots in 2012. Some states are putting barriers in the way of early voting and student voting, both of which are used heavily by the liberal base.
The most appalling laws make it almost impossible to vote without a driver’s license, which 11 percent of U.S. adults don’t have. College ID cards are not an acceptable substitute in several states. Texas Governor Rick Perry recently signed a bill saying you can vote with a concealed-handgun permit but not with identification from the University of Texas.
Discipline Needed
It isn’t hard to see what Republican-controlled legislatures are trying to do. They want to make sure that the kind of free-floating anger expressed by Occupy Wall Street doesn’t end up helping Obama’s reelection. The claim that the purpose of the new election laws is to prevent voter fraud is itself a fraud, given that there’s no widespread evidence of ballots cast under assumed identities.
To make something lasting of this movement, the left must move from legitimate moral outrage to a disciplined approach for electing candidates who want to make Wall Street more answerable for the mess we’re in. Even as they’re outspent by the Koch brothers and their corporate ilk, the 99 percenters will make 2012 a helluva lot more compelling.
(Jonathan Alter, a Bloomberg View columnist, is the author of “The Promise: President Obama, Year One.” The opinions expressed are his own.)
To contact the writer of this article: Jonathan Alter at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
To contact the editor responsible for this article: Timothy Lavin at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |











Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Wake up to this fact!
This is why there was, and apparantly successfully done, pre-emptive demonization of pursuing a Democratic Party primary challenger.
Every nitwit, blind, apologist Democrat has taken heed of the fright of a Primary challenger, lest we have a Republican President -- which will be little-to-no different than Obama. And to all the simpletons who have nothing to say, but grunt their little mouse-clicks of disapproval: you deserve Obama's betrayel -- not that anyone else does.
But for as long as I remember, the suffering fools have proven incapable of understanding little more than which side is (marginally) worse and are not worth the intellectual, nor the physical efforts, from truly independent people who look at actions objectively -- rather than as a constant comparative -- who offer real solutions, only to then be vilified by establishment Democrats, who are joined by the frightened, simpleton sheep who know nothing more -- and certainly about strategy -- than which is their chosen side.
And if the establishment Democrats co-opt this movement, and persuade protestors to work for them, rather than the other way around, then all this will be for naught, and this will turn ugly and fragment, rather than to coalesce and truly be effective.
THIS IS NOT A BIPARTISAN ISSUE, OBAMA IS IN WALLSTREET'S POCKET NO DOFFERENT FROM THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES AND IF WE END UP WITH A PERRY OR PALIN FUNDAMENTALIST, MYOPIC LEADER OBAMA PUT THEM IN BY HIS OWN INEPTNESS AND NARCAISSISM.
Democratic Establishment.It is refreshing
to read his perception of the present sit-uation. He is capable of rationalized thinking and bears listening to. Someone
must present the opposite and often correct
position of liberalism. Better get your shit together Dems, or we stand to lose it all in 2012.
I read this and am reminded of the assassination of Gregori Rasputin, the "Mad Monk" who virtually controlled Czar Nicholas II and his wife prior to the Russian Revolution.
A group of wealthy noblemen and right-wing extremists knifed, poisoned, beat, castrated and shot Rasputin. Then they wrapped his body in a rug and threw it into the Neva River. (The coroner determined it was the drowning that ultimately killed him!)
It's absurd to think it, but had he lived, he most likely would have described the attack in stronger terms than would be characterized as "moral outrage."
I suspect the people in Zuccotti Park could really identify with how Rasputin was treated by this collaboration of the wealthy and the Russian government.
I know I do...
Lets beware guys!
And while we are at it, let’s boycott sociopath Koch brother's products. Here is a short list of those that are commonly encountered:
Angel Soft toilet paper
Brawny paper towels
Dixie plates, bowls, napkins and cups
Mardi Gras napkins and towels
Quilted Northern toilet paper
Soft 'n Gentle toilet paper
Sparkle napkins
Vanity fair napkins
Zee napkins
Below is a link to a more complete list:
http://wemustchange.newsvine.com/_news/2011/03/08/6218429-koch-industries-products-to-boycott
Corporations Are NOT People! Money Is NOT Speech! Reinstate Glass-Steagall!
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN/TEABAGGER
But they won't be led to confront the gods on Mount Olympus by their Judas goats and media shills. David Rockefeller, Pete Peterson, Warren Buffett, David Koch and Henry Kissinger might be held up from lunch at 21.
For both supporters and opponents of the Occupy Wall Street protests who seek more incisive background in understanding what has been really going on behind-the-scenes with the Wall Street corporate and financial elites, Google the three items below:
"In a Relationship, and It's Complicated," by Anthony Gregory
"Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy," by Murray N. Rothbard
“Marx’s Tea Party,” by Anthony Gregory
All three articles "name names," are forthright, direct, and pull no punches.
http://www.newdemocracyworld.org/Thinking.pdf
I would trust the democrats as far as I can throw them. Remember, they where able to turn democratic majorities in both houses and the presidency into a liability. Remember how Obama himself sabotaged healthcare. Signed a bill to exetend tax cuts when the democrats still had majorities in both houses?
Alter is a sign of things to come. Let's me him with a refresher course in recent democratic compromise history. Then tell him, to tell his bossess to grow a spine first before giving any advice.
Here are more examples.
These particular items were chosen because of their representative character in demonstrating phenomena rife in the populace at the time:
The Haymarket Affair, The Pullman Strike of 1894, Coxey's Army, The Green Corn Rebellion, The First Red Scare, The May Day Riots of 1919, The Steel Strike of 1919, The Boston Police Strike of 1919, The Tulsa Race Riot of 1921, The Bonus Army, The 1934 West Coast Waterfront Strike, The Minneapolis Teamsters Strike of 1934, The Detroit Race Riot of 1943, The Zoot Suit Riots, Hollywood Black Friday and Communist infiltration of industry trades unions, The 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, The Watts Riots of 1965, The Detroit Race Riot of 1967, The Columbia University Protests of 1968, and the Million Man March of 1995. And now the Occupy Wall Street trojan horse, sucking in unsuspecting persons of good faith.
By their servitude and feality to the corporate welfare-warfare state, the Democrats have demonstrated which side of history they have been on -- the wrong side.
please read:
http://www.newdemocracyworld.org/Thinking.pdf
We are questioning on whose Authority, any of these Leaders have to destroy millions of People's. If they must go from the Park they will assemble elsewhere and Have the Right. If the Goverment doesnot allow than It will be a Call to Arms for all of you who do nothing but text on these blogs. Get up, get out there. Too Far, then start getting organized because we will leave you behind also.
This will not be about doing it for all.This is about strengthening this Country, your in or your out. We have risen up in over 150 Cities, I see you all still posting...correct me if I am wrong, you are not attempting to join in but rather like the GOP/TP revel in work done by the Few?
More Marches, More Protests are all joining together. Ignore those who come to instigate, they are the TP/GOP. They will try everything to get you arrested, cause smeared. Alice's Restaurant...agree with the Police, Follow the barricades, pedestrians and traffic have the Right of Way. Peace is the answer in any cause. We have time to carve our Battle Ground. Keep Europe and other Countries watching. They too need to see the Rich must go.
Democracy not Nazi.
We have Beautiful Days, use them wisely
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Thomas Jefferson 1802
“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power."
Franklin D. Roosevelt
(letter to Col. William F. Elkins):
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."
Here is the letter at this link:
http://www.ratical.org/corporations/Lincoln.html
RSS feed for comments to this post.