RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "By continuing to push and prod we give hope to countless Americans on the verge of giving up. We give back to them the courage of their own convictions, and thereby lay the groundwork for a future progressive agenda - to take back America from the privileged and powerful, and restore broad-based prosperity."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Don't Be Silenced

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

18 September 11

 

The Election of 2012: Why the most important issues may be off the table (but should be on it).

e're on the cusp of the 2012 election. What will it be about? It seems reasonably certain President Obama will be confronted by a putative Republican candidate who:

Believes corporations are people, wants to cut the top corporate rate to 25% (from the current 35%) and no longer require they pay tax on foreign income, who will eliminate capital gains and dividend taxes on anyone earning less than $250,000 a year, raise the retirement age for Social Security and turn Medicaid into block grants to states, seek a balanced-budged amendment to the Constitution, require any regulatory agency issuing a new regulation repeal another regulation of equal cost (regardless of the benefits), and seek repeal of Obama's healthcare plan.

Or one who:

Believes the Federal Reserve is treasonous when it expands the money supply, doubts human beings evolved from more primitive forms of life, seeks to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and shift most public services to the states, thinks Social Security is a Ponzi scheme, while governor took a meat axe to public education and presided over an economy that generated large numbers of near-minimum-wage jobs, and who will shut down most federal regulatory agencies, cut corporate taxes, and seek repeal of Obama's healthcare plan.

Whether it's Romney or Perry, he's sure to attack everything Obama has done or proposed. And Obama, for his part, will have to defend his positions and look for ways to counterpunch.

Hence, the parameters of public debate for the next fourteen months.

Within these narrow confines progressive ideas won't get an airing. Even though poverty and unemployment will almost surely stay sky-high, wages will stagnate or continue to fall, inequality will widen, and deficit hawks will create an indelible (and false) impression that the nation can't afford to do much about any of it - proposals to reverse these trends are unlikely to be heard.

Neither party's presidential candidate will propose to tame CEO pay, create more tax brackets at the top and raise the highest marginal rates back to their levels in the 1950s and 1960s (that is, 70 to 90 percent), and match the capital-gains rate with ordinary income.

You won't hear a call to strengthen labor unions and increase the bargaining power of ordinary workers.

Don't expect an argument for resurrecting the Glass-Steagall Act, thereby separating commercial from investment banking and stopping Wall Street's most lucrative and dangerous practices.

You won't hear there's no reason to cut Medicare and Medicaid - that a better means of taming health-care costs is to use these programs' bargaining clout with drug companies and hospitals to obtain better deals and to shift from fee-for-services to fee for healthy outcomes.

Nor will you hear why we must move toward Medicare for all.

Nor why the best approach to assuring Social Security's long-term solvency is to lift the ceiling on income subject to Social Security payroll taxes.

Don't expect any reference to the absurdity of spending more on the military than do all other countries put together, and the waste and futility of an unending and undeclared war against Islamic extremism - especially when we have so much to do at home.

Nor are you likely to hear proposals for ending the corruption of our democracy by big money.

Although proposals like these are more important and relevant than ever, they won't be part of the upcoming presidential election.

But they should be part of the public debate nonetheless.

That's why I urge you to speak out about them - at town halls, candidate forums, and public events. Continue to mobilize and organize around them. Talk with your local media about them. Use social media to get the truth out.

Don't be silenced by Democrats who say by doing so we'll jeopardize the President's re-election. If anything we'll be painting him as more of a centrist than Republicans want the public to believe. And we'll be preserving the possibility (however faint) of a progressive agenda if he's reelected.

Remember, too, the presidential race isn't the only one occurring in 2012. More than a third of Senate seats and every House seat will be decided on, as well as numerous governorships and state races. Making a ruckus about these issues could push some candidates in this direction - particularly since, as polls show, much of the public agrees.

Most importantly, by continuing to push and prod we give hope to countless Americans on the verge of giving up. We give back to them the courage of their own convictions, and thereby lay the groundwork for a future progressive agenda - to take back America from the privileged and powerful, and restore broad-based prosperity.


Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "The Work of Nations," "Locked in the Cabinet," "Supercapitalism" and his latest book, "AFTERSHOCK: The Next Economy and America's Future." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+18 # jon 2011-09-18 20:35
Do you mean we have been divided and conquered!
 
 
+11 # nice2blucky 2011-09-18 21:35
Divided, infiltrated, and conquered... by our chosen leader. But that's how it is with sheep.

Einstein said, imagination is more important than knowledge.

FDR said, The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

Winston Churchill, paraphrasing George Santayana, said, Those who fail to learn from the mistakes of their predecessors are destined to repeat them.

G.W. Bush, attempting to remember what appears to be a Chinese Proverb, said, There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. ... ... [bewildered expression] ... ... Fool me ... you can't get fooled again.

How I heard it in California: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

So why are some Democrats so stuck on Obama? It appears, more than anything else, to be fear. Fear of a Republican Presidency.

This is ironic, because it appears that that is where we are heading with Obama as the Democratic nominee.

What imagination are Democrats lacking?

It appears to be of another Democrat running against Obama in the Democratic Primaries, all the way to the White House.

If not, history will repeat, and shame on us.

Click away, all you anonymous thumbsters of nay, with nothing to say.
 
 
+11 # Glen 2011-09-19 04:34
What continues to be of concern is why there are only two parties. Certainly we know American history relative to political parties, but what we all also know, is that not everyone fits into simply either/or. We also now know who actually controls those parties, and that presidents aren't necessarily calling the shots.

So - what would truly come about if a Perry were to be elected? How much cooperation would he get in congress or do the corporations et al. WANT a revolution?

It appears to me we have already been divided and conquered a long time ago, thanks to limited choices in political parties.
 
 
+1 # pbbrodie 2011-09-19 08:08
Especially when there is so little difference between the two parties. Other than social issues, there is very little difference between them at all. They also use these same social issues to keep us divided.
 
 
+2 # Glen 2011-09-19 13:50
pbbrodie, you got a thumbs down. Hmmm. I'm thinking it is because there is desperation among the troops, hoping the corruption has not infected everybody in the government. You are right, though - it has. Both parties are a mess and should be eliminated.
 
 
+4 # Merschrod 2011-09-19 08:07
Having a known alternative to Obama would be a relief. He has not done a decent job, time to recognize that and find a solid alternative.
 
 
+2 # pbbrodie 2011-09-19 08:12
You won't get any nay from here. I have been saying for a long time that Obama is little more than a centrist Republican. If you look at the vast majority of his economic proposals, they are the same ones the Republicans were proposing just a few years back.

The only hope seems to be for a progressive Democrat to mount a primary challenge or there is little reason for Obama to move from his extremely conservative positions.
 
 
+7 # gcharouhas 2011-09-19 08:41
Couldn't agree more. We're kidding ourselves if we think running someone to the left of Obama will hurt the progressive movement. It will force the president to come out and fight for his political life, showing us what he's really made of. It will force the media to split their resources as they'll be forced to cover this unexpected event, giving progressive ideas a more balanced airing. It will galvanize a somnambulant electorate already resigned to the end of our Progressive dream. Now is NOT the time for reticence. We're just about out of time.
 
 
+13 # giraffee2012 2011-09-18 23:53
Quoting jon:
Do you mean we have been divided and conquered!


Screwed from all sides of our "elected" government - and the Supremes' 2010 decision of "person hood" - gave our freedom the final solution: The best govt money can buy.

Vote 2012 -- DEM only (although they aren't clean but less bad) -- get everyone u know (& don't know in Dem districts & minority districts) registered with absentee ballots. We can turn these in early so they don't get lost in garbage cans/trunks of cars)

AND call ur congress persons several times / week and if they give you the line "they aren't on that committee" -- TELL them ur watching their voting record and if they don't vote FOR the people -- you'll campaign against them.

VOTE -- don't stay home as in 2010 -- and give it away.

We need a Dem in W.H. to replace the old ones who retire/die in the Supreme Court!
 
 
+2 # TrueAmericanPatriot 2011-09-19 05:20
Quoting giraffee2012:
Quoting jon:
Do you mean we have been divided and conquered!


Screwed from all sides of our "elected" government - and the Supremes' 2010 decision of "person hood" - gave our freedom the final solution: The best govt money can buy.

Vote 2012 -- DEM only (although they aren't clean but less bad) -- get everyone u know (& don't know in Dem districts & minority districts) registered with absentee ballots. We can turn these in early so they don't get lost in garbage cans/trunks of cars)

AND call ur congress persons several times / week and if they give you the line "they aren't on that committee" -- TELL them ur watching their voting record and if they don't vote FOR the people -- you'll campaign against them.

VOTE -- don't stay home as in 2010 -- and give it away.

We need a Dem in W.H. to replace the old ones who retire/die in the Supreme Court!

I ECHO your statements, giraffee2012: VOTE IN 2012! VOTE EARLY! VOTE ABSENTEE BALLOT!
 
 
+11 # giraffee2012 2011-09-18 23:55
BTW - Robert Reich - good article -- and I'll mail it to EVERYONE I know -- and I know some GOP/TP too! They may think they will be rich in this life-time --- but they need to hear the truth.

Thanks
 
 
+22 # balancingact 2011-09-18 21:53
Thank you Professor Reich for the reminder that a sense of urgency is appropriate and much needed these days.

Still, there's an issue that wasn't mentioned here which is exactly why 'waking up' is so urgently needed: Namely, our economic and physical well-being relies on the natural environment.

Where in the world are we suppose to go when the soil and water and oceans and forests and climate, etc., etc., begin in earnest to show us who's really the boss? Has our magnificent technology distracted us from seeing our essential connection to this planet?

"Ecology" deserves to be placed right up there with "economy" in our national discourse. Maybe it's about time for some economic humility.
 
 
+25 # Larkrise 2011-09-18 22:53
I will NOT be silenced. Those who sit by and do not work for change are enabling the mess we are now in. I am sick of corruption in government;Fat Cat corporate greed;and misinformation, no information and spin in the corporate-owned media. I am sick of vicious billionaires, who inherited their wealth, like the Koch brothers.I am weary of Obama's smoke and mirrors; the hatemongering and callousness of the Tea Party; the insanity of the Republicans; and the apathy of the Sheeple.I am tired of parrots and ostriches of the species Bubbus Americanus, who refuse to seek the facts and parrot nonsense; or hide their heads in the sand. I am weary of people who insist on thinking inside the box. They refuse to look at other options, other solutions, other directions. They are gatekeepers and go through life with blinders on.We are in deep, deep trouble in this country. Unless, the average citizens start actually using their brains, use critical thinking, and quit doing what they have always done, the problems of this country will destroy us. The Far Right Fanatics are not silent. They have taken power and aim to expand it. They are dangerous and extreme. If the public ignores this, these fanatics will lead us into ruin. If you do not believe me, read up on the origins of WWII.
 
 
+8 # genierae 2011-09-19 04:27
Well said, Larkrise. I would add that those of the peculiar species "Bubbus Americanus" always reinforce their ignorance with hostility. These people are determined to remain ignorant, and they will use violence to protect their delusions.
 
 
+6 # SundownLF 2011-09-19 00:41
My reading is he means: not yet. But yes, if we do nothing, then conquered we are.
 
 
+7 # Rara Avis 2011-09-19 03:11
The great question before the nation is whether or not either party yet believes in a strong Middle Class and a leg up for the poor in the context of what we used to call the "American Dream." There are more of us then there are of them. They have the money but we have more physical voices, feet, and can make more protest signs. We can write more letters to our elected representatives , get on talk radio shows of the right and simply as Mary Elisabeth Lease once said, "raise more hell and less corn." The debate must be steered away from straw man issues to what really sits in the pit of so many American stomachs. Is this the end of the line for the dream of getting ahead or just a slide all the way to the bottom never to return?
 
 
+12 # fredboy 2011-09-19 05:04
What has most amazed me in recent years is the cowardice of the American people. So few speak up at work, at school, even at home.

What are you afraid of?

As I see it, and live it, speaking up is a celebration of freedom. It goes to the very soul of who we are and all that we can be. And we are one of the nation's on Earth blessed with the freedom of speech. Please use it.
 
 
+7 # sharsand 2011-09-19 06:03
I've come to believe that even scarier than what's on the table in terms of jobs and the economy, is the ability of the Far Rightm neo-cons, and the corporate media to control the message, and groups like ALEC, and the Koch Brothers, Ailes, Rove, and others to literally steal the election with their voter ID scams, their manipulating the electoral college, and the lack of paper trails from their voting machines. Everyone has to be made aware of these maneuvers on the part of the Right--and then you add a corrupt Supreme Court who will throw any questionable election their way--and we're in even bigger trouble.
 
 
+1 # nice2blucky 2011-09-19 10:13
Yes, but don't be naive and think that they only control the message on the right.

Obama and Hillary were both the best-case scenarios for oligarchs. All other Democratic candidates were ignored or marginalized.

Controlling the message and framing the debate is the bread and butter of Republican politics, and it reaches, with complicity, to the Democratic side, as well.

Remember, literally, the day after the 2008 Elections, The talking heads were saying that Obama had better govern to the middle because it was Independents who elected him.

And who challenged that?

Where would Obama be without the progressives and the left?

Look at all the Obama apologia; and the only time the media picked up on the call for a Democratic Primary, who have been the chosen possibilities? It's all been preemptive mantra about the dangers of a Primary challenger; or all as possible challengers have been establishment choices.

Progressives and the left didn't take to their offerings. Well then... no more talk of primary challengers.
 
 
+2 # wcandler1 2011-09-19 06:19
nice2blucky

“What imagination are Democrats lacking?

It appears to be of another Democrat running against Obama in the Democratic Primaries, all the way to the White House.” Exactly!

So what do we need? At the very least, someone who announces they would accept a draft at the convention.

My personal choice would be Bill McKibben, but Denis Kuzinich, Russ Fiengold , Al Gore, would be candidates we could trust.

One name is all we need: Then we could register for election as State Delegates to the Democratic Nominating Convention.

We don’t need a third party. The key strength of the Tea Party is that it is NOT a political party, but rather has captured the Republicans. Democrats need to recapture their party.

Anybody but Obama!
 
 
+4 # Glen 2011-09-19 07:44
The Tea Party may have "captured the republicans" but it is not the republican party most grew up with. I'm not certain they can even be called republican even without the Tea Party.

Same with democrats. "Recapture" would be good, but you'd have to go back quite a while if you want to capture the best of them.
 
 
+2 # nice2blucky 2011-09-19 09:54
This is more like it, a conversation.

While agree with, "Anybody but Obama," and all your choices fit into that category, and they are all choices I would agree with, ... I guess, in terms of "trust," it's just a matter of degree, especially on Gore.

And to be clear, I relish the idea of any of them running, but after Obama, ... well, ... I will be holding off on trust for a while.

A preference over the alternative, comparative to other names, definitely.

Trust, ... ... I'm ... optimistic..., ... hopeful, maybe, ... but trust, not so much, with Gore.

Feingold and Kucinich say all the right things, and for instance, on the Patriot Act, when the vote would have otherwise been 99-0, Feingold was there with his intelligent and principled vote, but on Health Care Reform, ... when his vote, and even more needed, Kucinich's (in the House) when their votes could or would have been the difference, where were they? On the wrong side -- and Kucinich, with some pathetic, shameful rationale.

And Kucinich is one of my favorites. But trust. Let him do the job first, and be the difference -- not just part of the losing team who told us so.

And, just as a side note: don't be surprised, if one candidate emerges, another will crawl, smiling and proud, from the gutter to take votes away, and help Obama.
 
 
+5 # Todd Williams 2011-09-19 07:47
Wcandler1, I totally disagree with you. If we fracture the Democratic Party now, at this critical juncture in American history, we will be doomed with a Rethuglican president and possibly a Rethuglican controlled Senate. You don't think that the Rethugs want this to happen? What are you, a schill for the Toilet Papers? I say stand shoulder-to-sho ulder with our President, take back the House, solidify the Senate and battle on! Divided we fall, united we conquer!
 
 
+2 # Merschrod 2011-09-19 08:13
The essence of democracy is pluralism, if the Dems cannot debate the merits of the candidate, then they have lost the gumption to serve anyway.

The fear of rocking the boat is what got us into the mess in the first place - Obama went with the status quo in Defense and Finance, and missed the chance to reform the bankrupt (ethlically too) financial system. He has allowed himself and team to be boxed into the narrowly defined debate that Prof. Reich laid out.

Gumption is needed to be asertive or the decisions will be made by the Republicans for us.
 
 
+1 # bracero 2011-09-19 10:20
Professor Reich is spot on in his analysis of our present problem and what we can do about it.
We have sat on a well known part of our anatomy for so long there is nothing else for us to do as we watched the tide of Ultra Conservatism overwhelm us with out even showing up for the fight. Basically "we have shown up at a gun fight with a knife."
We have lost our will to fight for our principles and we have a leader who if he has belief's he is afraid to fight for them.
It is now too late for him and we need to fight for our principles with as much courage as we can muster while we look for a leader to take over the helm of our ship of state which has lost its moorings and is being tossed to an fro by the rampage of Ultra Conservatism.
 
 
+4 # soulsource 2011-09-19 10:58
You capitalist system is near meltdown. Jump.
 
 
0 # BattleBorn 2011-09-19 23:03
Quoting wcandler1:
nice2blucky


My personal choice would be Bill McKibben, but Denis Kuzinich, Russ Fiengold , Al Gore, would be candidates we could trust.

One name is all we need: Then we could register for election as State Delegates to the Democratic Nominating Convention.

We don’t need a third party...Democrats need to recapture their party.

Anybody but Obama!


I'd be very willing to go with a third party candidate, namely Bernie Sanders, one of the few voices of reason today. He's got a great following on KJFK Radio, and progressive TV stations. Dennis was blackballed by NBC/General Electric before the debate in Las Vegas. He won't run again.

I like your idea of capturing the Democratic party from the inside. Have you heard of the PDA http://www.pdamerica.org/ or Rebuild the Dream, http://rebuildthedream.com/. I believe there are other ideas afloat. Perhaps it's pick the most compatible one and hope others will climb aboard.
May the most viable platform keep us from sinking!

Last but not least, the youth who have spearheaded "Occupy Wall Street" are showing us all up. Keeping an eye out their way for an outcropping of progressive ideals we can all throw our support behind.
 
 
+1 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 18:02
Food for Thought.

Was Homeowner Society Financializatio n a giant stealth Ponzi Stimulus Scheme by Corporate Capital Interests and Government to cover up recession and depression of the U.S. Economy from offshoring, outsourcing, and deindustrializa tion of the U.S. Economy that started in the 1970's?

Again I say, "Food for Thought."

My impression is that Homeowner Society Financializatio n was indeed a giant stealth Ponzi Stimulus Scheme that resulted in the Collapse of the U.S. Economy and poisoned the World Economy with toxic capital that will have negative effects upon liquidity that will provide benefit to the populace of the United states and the World for the next fifty years at the very least.
 
 
+1 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 18:16
**Food for Thought.**

Was Homeowner Society Financializatio n a giant stealth Ponzi Stimulus Scheme by Corporate Capital Interests and Government to cover up recession and depression of the U.S. Economy from offshoring, outsourcing, and deindustrializa tion of the U.S. Economy that started in the 1970's?

Again I say, "Food for Thought."

My impression is that Homeowner Society Financializatio n was indeed a giant stealth Ponzi Stimulus Scheme that resulted in the Collapse of the U.S. Economy and poisoned the World Economy with toxic capital that will have negative effects upon liquidity that will provide benefit to the populace of the United states and the World for the next fifty years at the very least.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:04
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" (cont.)
Page 5 of 5

When I look at the events of offshoring, outsourcing, de-industrializ ation, financializatio n, changing the U.S. Economy from a Manufacturing Economy to a Mercantile Economy, and resultant collapse of the U.S. Economy and toxic contamination of the World Economy, I see purpose, connectivity, and the causality of intent, and I ask that ALL who are capable of doing so, look at these events and ask, ---- Was there intent and purpose? If there was, intent and purpose can be tracked by determining who got the benefit of that intent and purpose.

Those who had the intent, purpose, and power to implement and benefit from a process that was enacted over a period of time from the late 1960's to the present, that started with de-industrializ ation of the United States and ended with the collapse of the U.S. Economy, and the toxic contamination of the capital of the World Economy must not be allowed to walk free as an example to others that Moral Hazard on both a National and Global Scale is acceptable as a standard of American Capitalism and American Democracy.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:07
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" cont.
Page 4 of 5

A second element of proof with regard to my suspicions of "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" in housing and credit being a giant, stealth, stimulus Ponzi Scheme to enable a New World Order and a World Economy is the conversion of the U.S. Economy to a Service Based Mercantile Economy based upon internal consumption of cheap Asian imports. Cheap Asian imports are used to supplant the products of the U.S. Economy previously produced in the U.S., distributed in the U.S., and consumed in the U.S., with the surplus of U.S. manufacturing being used for export; the U.S. was led by its Corporatist Political Duopoly during the same period of "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" indicated previously to move to a Mercantile Economy and rely upon DEBT, borrowed back from Asian Suppliers, to reduce their tax burden for an infrastructure that served no purpose in a de-industrializ ed United States with a Mercantile Economy that was reliant upon cheap Asian Imports in support of Short Term Profit.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:09
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" cont.
Page 3 of 5

One element of proof with regard to my suspicions of "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" in housing and credit being a giant, stealth, stimulus Ponzi Scheme to enable a New World Order and a World Economy is the U.S. infrastructure; the U.S. infrastructure was left to deteriorate from the time that offshoring, outsourcing, and de-industrializ ation of the U.S. Economy started in the late 60's. If there had been any real intent upon a healthy U.S. Economy, the U.S. infrastructure could have been used as a stimulus project during re-industrializ ation of the U.S. Economy. The fact that a "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Market" in housing and credit was substituted to bleed the life's blood out ot the economy was enacted by the U.S. Corporatist Duopoly, rather than legitimate stimulus or rebuilding of the U.S. infrastructure in support of re-industrializ ation is proof of a lack of legitimate intent to foster a healthy U.S. Economy, and proof of real intent to realign the U.S. Economy with the World Economy in support of the New World Order.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:10
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" cont.

Page 2 of 5

The top 10% of the United States has imposed a great and enduring hardship upon the 90% MAJORITY population of the United States to bail them out of their self imposed financial crisis, that it will take generations of the American Populace to pay for out of their meager earnings, and the top 10% are aggrieved that they are expected to pay any small part to make good on the burden of debt that the top 10% have saddled the American Populace with.

I say that if the top 10% of the U.S. that created the September 18, 2008 Collapse of the U.S. Economy and poisoned the World Economy with toxic capital don't want to pay their FAIR SHARE to clean up their own mess, that they should be forced by law to pay all of the clean up costs for their mess and pay restitution to the 90% MAJORITY Common Population of the United States, the American Populace, who are truly aggrieved by the actions of the financial class and have been the cyclical victims of financializatio n scams since the origin of Capitalism. It is a Moral Hazard not to hold the top 10% responsible for their reprehensible behavior that is cyclical in nature, and will never end unless they have to bear the burden for their own behavior.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:13
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" cont,

Page 1 3/4 of 5

Are we willing, as a nation, to say that American Democracy is for the top 10% only, the Elite Capitalists, a 1% minority population of the United States and their Capitalist Cronies, a 9% minority population of the United States.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-20 20:14
"Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets"
Page 1 of 5 (6)

I suspect that "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" for toxic corporate securities were a giant stealth stimulus Ponzi Scheme by Crony Capitalists, Right-Wing Republicans, and "New Democrat" Democrats in support of a false sense of economic growth in the U.S. Economy that would mask their ongoing efforts, at the same time, to offshore, outsource, and de-industrializ e the U.S. Economy; a means of enabling the New World Order and realigning the U.S. Economy to match the standards of the World Economy; the September 18, 2008 Collapse of the U.S. Economy, and toxic capital from Corporate Bonds spread throughout the U.S. Economy and the World Economy as a result of "Borrow and Spend Financializatio n Markets" has been very effective with regard to realigning the U.S. Economy with the World Economy, and has served the interests of the top one percent of Elite Capital Interests of the United States admirably, but what of the 90% MAJORITY Common Population of the United States, the American Populace that will be paying for the scam for the next 60 years without knowledge of or benefit from the scam.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-24 06:42
Public Sector & Private Sector Parent/Child Relationship:
Page 3 of 3

Will the PARENT, the Public Sector, take control of the CHILD, Private Sector (Capitalism), until the CHILD, Private Sector (Capitalism) grows up and takes responsibility for the consequences of its own actions, or will the Public Sector PARENT let the Private Sector CHILD continue to lead the U.S. Economy into cyclical collapse? ---- This is the question of our time that is faced at present by the American People and the leaders of the American People in State governments and Federal government that are the PARENTAL AUTHORITY responsible for the Private Sector CHILD (Capitalism).
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-24 06:48
Public Sector & Private Sector Parent/Child Relationship (cont.)
Page 2 of 3

The proof of the Parent/Child Relationship between the Public Sector and the Private Sector (Capitalism) is that irresponsible behavior of the Private Sector (Capitalism), the CHILD, is always bailed out by the responsible power, authority, and monetary resources of the Public Sector, the PARENT.

If the Public Sector PARENT, will not lead the Private
Sector CHILD, the Private Sector CHILD (Capitalism) has, does, and will continue to be a MORAL HAZARD that cyclically misbehaves by irresponsibly chasing desire for wealth into collapse of the U.S. Economy without responsibility for cleaning up the mess, because the Private Sector CHILD (Capitalism) is cyclically rewarded by the Public Sector PARENT for chasing desire for wealth into collapse of the U.S. Economy without responsibility for cleaning up the mess.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-24 06:51
Public Sector & Private Sector Parent/Child Relationship
Page 1 of 3

What defines the PARENT and the CHILD in a Parent/Child Relationship? ----

The answer is RESPONSIBILITY!!!

The PARENT is responsible and the CHILD is irresponsible.

In the relationship between the Public Sector and the Private Sector (Capitalism), the Public Sector is the Responsible PARENT and the Private Sector (Capitalism) is the Irresponsible CHILD.

What defines the PARENT and the CHILD in a Parent/Child Relationship? ----

The answer is RESPONSIBILITY!!!

The PARENT is responsible and the CHILD is irresponsible.

In the relationship between the Public Sector and the Private Sector (Capitalism), the Public Sector is the Responsible PARENT and the Private Sector (Capitalism) is the Irresponsible CHILD.
 
 
0 # ThomasG 2011-09-24 07:30
I have been talking about political duopoly between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party that is nothing more than a false choice of backlash between two false choices of political duopoly that are united in purpose for over ten years now.

If the United States is going to ever regain any form of democracy, the United States will have to adopt a Multi-Party Political System, so that Coalition Governance can represent all that constitute the United States Electorate in government and provide representation in the making and enforcing of legislated law and order representative of all of "We the People," rather than just the "select few," as is presently the case.

Coalition Governance of a Multi-Party Political System is the answer that will provide all constituencies in the United States representation in the making and enforcing of legislated law and order in the United States; the time for dream world illusions and solutions is past.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN