RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Robinson writes: "Presidents don't win fights with the FBI. Donald Trump apparently wants to learn this lesson the hard way."

Donald Trump. (photo: Getty)
Donald Trump. (photo: Getty)


Trump Has Picked a Fight With the FBI. He'll Be Sorry.

By Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post

02 February 18

 

residents don�t win fights with the FBI. Donald Trump apparently wants to learn this lesson the hard way.

Most presidents have had the sense not to bully the FBI by defaming its leaders and � ridiculously � painting its agents as leftist political hacks. Most members of Congress have also understood how unwise it would be to pull such stunts. But Trump and his hapless henchmen on Capitol Hill, led by Rep.?Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), have chosen the wrong enemy. History strongly suggests they will be sorry.

The far-right echo chamber resounds with wailing and braying about something called the �deep state� � a purported fifth column of entrenched federal bureaucrats whose only goal in life, apparently, is to deny America the greatness that Dear Leader Trump has come to bestow. It is unclear who is supposed to be directing this vast conspiracy. Could it be Dr. Evil? Supreme Leader Snoke? Hillary Clinton? This whole paranoid fantasy, as any sane person realizes, is utter rubbish.*

The bureau has no political ax to grind, and the attempt by Nunes and others to portray it as some kind of liberal cabal is comical. But it does have great institutional cohesion, a proud sense of mission, and a culture that inculcates the �us vs. the world� attitude that is so common among law enforcement agencies.

I�m old enough to remember the days when J. Edgar Hoover ran the place like his own private Stasi � wiretapping civil rights leaders such as the Rev.?Martin Luther King Jr., infiltrating anti-Vietnam War groups with informers and provocateurs, seeking or manufacturing damaging �evidence� against those he targeted, keeping copious files on the peccadilloes of the politicians who were theoretically his masters. Presidents from Franklin D. Roosevelt through Richard Nixon coexisted warily with Hoover, afraid to fire him for fear of all the beans he might spill.

Harry S. Truman was an especially bitter opponent. �We want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction,� he said. �They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. .?.?. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him.�

But when Truman left office, Hoover was still FBI director. He held on to the job from the FBI�s founding in 1935 until his death in 1972six weeks before the Watergate break-in.

The day after what Nixon�s spokesman would call �a third-rate burglary attempt� took place, the FBI�s major-crimes duty officer, a supervisor named Daniel Bledsoe, opened a federal wiretapping investigation. According to Bledsoe, he received a phone call from Nixon aide John Ehrlichman ordering him to shut down the probe. His simple reply: �No.�

It was another FBI man � Mark Felt, then an assistant director � who became the famous source Deep Throat, secretly meeting Post reporter Bob Woodward in a parking garage to guide the paper�s illumination of the president�s crimes.

In 2004, according to journalist Tim Weiner�s book �Enemies: A History of the FBI,� President George W. Bush was confronted by the man he had appointed to lead the bureau: Robert S. Mueller III. In Weiner�s telling, Mueller threatened to resign unless Bush curtailed some aspects of the domestic electronic surveillance that was taking place in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Bush reportedly agreed to put the program on a more legal footing.

Now comes Trump. His oafish attempts to neutralize the FBI director he inherited, James B. Comey � trying to extract a Godfather-style loyalty pledge, asking him to drop the investigation of Michael Flynn, ultimately firing him � are potential fodder for what may be an obstruction-of-justice case against Trump being assembled by Mueller.

Comey wrote everything down. The FBI always writes everything down.

Do you see a pattern here? The idea that the likes of Trump and Nunes are going to put a scratch on the FBI with ludicrous innuendo � we�re supposed to believe the bureau is a nest of Bolsheviks? � and selectively edited memos would be laughable, if Mueller and his team were the laughing kind. Which they�re not.

The Trumpists were so proud of themselves when they found evidence that Peter Strzok, an FBI agent originally on Mueller�s team, thought Trump would be a bad president. Now, however, someone has leaked to CNN that Strzok drafted the �October surprise� Comey letter that reopened the bureau�s investigation into Clinton�s emails � without which Trump probably would have lost the election.

Trump and his minions seem to think they can out-leak the FBI. Obviously they haven�t been paying attention.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+9 # ReconFire 2017-06-14 17:20
Forget about Russian hacking, I think we just discovered how Repug's have been winning elections in democrat areas.
Sounds like everyone is onboard.....Sec . of State, FBI, Judge Adams.
 
 
+15 # grandlakeguy 2017-06-14 18:41
Yes the Republicans have been stealing our elections since the 2000 Judicial coup d'etat!
While they still have their ROB GEORGIA" software in place (look it up!) my guess is that they will allow the Democratic candidate to win this one to prevent the chance that the spineless Democratic party might finally do something about our fake elections.

I will never give another dime to the Dems until they call out and fight the fraud that is laughingly labelled as elections in this country and demand real elections rather than the "election theater" that is now the norm.
 
 
+9 # futhark 2017-06-15 01:16
Paper ballots! Paper ballots! Paper ballots! Are any politicians out there listening?
 
 
+1 # Texas Aggie 2017-06-15 08:36
There was an interesting theory about one reason why Putin would be so interested in hacking our elections. Russia is economically moribund with oil and gas being its ONLY source of foreign exchange. It doesn't produce anything else that anyone needs and very little that it needs itself.

Therefore the whole Russian economy is threatened by renewable energy which has been shown to be economically superior, not to mention environmentally and socially superior, to fossil fuels. If a strong movement for renewable energy gets going, Russian has had it. They needed someone like Pruitt and drumpf to be in office to forestall the inevitable, and that's what they got.

There are likely other reasons for supporting drumpf, like his penchant for totalitarianism and his dependence on Russia for financial support, but this is an important reason for them to interfere as much as possible in the US.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN