RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Rich writes: "We have a president who doesn't know how a bill becomes a law and doesn't give a damn. With Bannon as his wingman, his aim is to blow up the Republican Party, purge it of a feckless and tired Establishment, and remake it with his own shock troops into a nativist and nationalist regime."

Sen. Jeff Flake. (photo: Tom Williams/Getty)
Sen. Jeff Flake. (photo: Tom Williams/Getty)


What Jeff Flake Couldn't Bring Himself to Say About Donald Trump

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

26 October 17


Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today: Jeff Flake’s revolt, what the latest Bill O’Reilly revelations mean for Fox News, and the ineffectiveness of John Kelly.

ith yesterday’s speech on the Senate floor, Jeff Flake becomes the third Establishment conservative, after Bob Corker and John McCain, to begin attacking the direction of the GOP in general terms — and just as the party puts its fundraising muscle behind Alabama’s Roy Moore. Will this trio’s rebellion have any impact?Flake’s powerful indictment of Trump has been viewed by many as a “Have you no sense of decency?” tipping point in fond memory of that moment when the lawyer Joseph Welch’s challenge to Joe McCarthy in a Senate hearing room sped McCarthy’s demise. Yesterday was the day when you could see “the ice beginning to crack,” in the widely repeated words of Peter Wehner, a longtime adviser to Republican presidents who’s a leading Never Trump-er.

But the notion that Flake’s words — or Corker’s or McCain’s — are going to change the mind of a single member of the Trump base, or that lame-duck senators might at last encourage an anti-Trump outpouring among their GOP colleagues on Capitol Hill, is preposterous. They can read polls. Some 80 percent of Republicans still support Trump. If those voters didn’t get off the reservation after “grab ’em by the pussy” or the health-care debacle (to take two of countless examples), the scales will not fall from their eyes now because of the jeremiads of a pair of retiring senators. These loyalists will react to Flake’s speech much as they react to any liberal pundit’s attack on Trump: They love to hear us squeal! Trump’s loyal base knows that all these critics are elitist pawns of the “fake news” network. Their own “news” sources, led by Steve Bannon’s Breitbart and Fox News’ Sean Hannity, tell them so every day.

Sitting Republicans remain as terrified of this base as ever. After all, Flake and Corker are retiring in part because that base was threatening to vote them out in favor of true Trumpists in the 2018 primaries.

The Vichy leaders Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan will remain as supine as ever, hoping they land their beloved deep tax cuts in the bargain. Yet even that aim is in jeopardy now that Trump seems determined to alienate some of the 50 senators he needs to get a bill to his desk. It looks like “repeal and replace” déjà vu all over again. But McConnell and Ryan are in too deep, too compromised morally, and too in hock to their donors to bolt now.

They still fail to concede that legislation is not Trump’s aim, not even classic conservative GOP legislation like tax cuts. We have a president who doesn’t know how a bill becomes a law and doesn’t give a damn. With Bannon as his wingman, his aim is to blow up the Republican Party, purge it of a feckless and tired Establishment, and remake it with his own shock troops into a nativist and nationalist regime.

The departure of Corker and Flake, like Roy Moore’s primary victory in Alabama and like the other announced retirements of Republicans in the House, all suggest that the purge is well underway.

Every congressional incumbent who steps down, of course, is a potential gain for the opposition party. What remains to be seen is if the Democrats will find new ways to screw it up.

On her NBC morning show on Monday, Megyn Kelly shared part of an email she had sent to Fox News executives about Bill O’Reilly’s behavior when they both worked at the network, rebutting O’Reilly’s constant refrain that there had been no internal complaints about him. What does news of the $32 million sexual-harassment settlement, or the revelation that Fox increased O’Reilly’s salary afterward, mean for Fox News?

What it means is that the Murdochs, despite their pious public protestations to the contrary, have not cleaned out the putrid culture of sexual harassment and assault that they allowed to metastasize under Roger Ailes for decades. Instead they keep trying to cover it up. The PR
release given to the Times in response to the latest O’Reilly exposé claimed that “21st Century Fox has taken concerted action to transform Fox News including installing new leaders, overhauling management and on-air talent, expanding training, and increasing the channels through which employees can report harassment or discrimination.” The release added that “these changes come from the top.” But one of the two executives Kelly said had ignored her own complaints about sexual harassment, Jack Abernethy, remains in place. So does the notorious Fox News media relations enforcer Irena Briganti, whom Kelly says even now “pushes negative articles on certain Ailes accusers.” And, as the Times reported, it was all three Murdochs who signed off on a $100 million contract extension for O’Reilly the month after he settled with Lis Wiehl for $32 million. That’s all you need to know about what’s going on at “the top” of 21st Century Fox.

The Murdochs survived the News Corporation phone-hacking scandal in the U.K. by denying, stonewalling, pleading ignorance and amnesia, and simply powering through. Maybe they will escape again. One of the more astonishing examples of how much they force their executives to tow the company line took place last week at a Wall Street Journal conference in California. Gerard Baker, the WSJ editor best known for his obsequious interview of Donald Trump earlier this year, conducted an onstage conversation with the Hollywood mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg during which Katzenberg implausibly claimed to be one of the few executives in Hollywood who never heard about Harvey Weinstein’s sexual history. Baker was incredulous. “How on Earth could powerful people, yourself included, not have known that he was behaving like this?” he asked.

When Katzenberg held firm, Baker wouldn’t let it go: “You say in all your encounters with Mr. Weinstein directly, you’ve never seen behavior like this. But you must have heard about it?” Which leads to the obvious question: Are we really to believe that Baker, as a top Murdoch executive and powerful journalist, never heard about the behavior of Ailes and O’Reilly? The Journal’s offices are in the same building as the Fox News studios. For years, the Journal has even had its own weekly show on Fox News, The Journal Editorial Report. Katzenberg didn’t have the presence of mind, unfortunately, to turn the tables on Baker.

For all the new revelations of sexual harassment that have cascaded into view since the Fox News and Weinstein revelations — from Hollywood to Wall Street to Congress to previous management of The New Republic to an esteemed restaurant empire in New Orleans — this much is clear: We’re not even close to unmasking and eradicating a misogynistic outlaw culture of sexual harassment and violence that has blighted America from the highest levels of society on down since the days of the Salem witch trials.

Donald Trump’s clumsy condolence call to Myeshia Johnson, the widow of one of the four soldiers recently killed in Niger, has become a weeklong slog of White House accusations and outright lies against Gold Star families, a slog that roped in John Kelly. Does Kelly’s inability to contain this feud change your idea of how he manages the White House?

I never believed that Kelly would have any impact on Trump or his White House. Nobody can put that big baby in a corner. The speed with which Kelly has debased himself is impressive even when compared to the likes of a Steven Mnuchin. His lies about Congresswoman Frederica Wilson still remain uncorrected. And that he would even think of casting himself as a noble defender of female virtue and military sacrifice while standing on a podium in Donald Trump’s White House suggests, quite honestly, that he has completely lost touch with reality. He is no more to be trusted with the nuclear codes than the president whose trigger finger he is supposed to be holding in check.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+18 # kath 2017-10-26 13:48
People "toe the line" as in, stand behind it; they don't "tow" or pull it. I think this is a new autocorrect thing, I see it all over and it is driving me batty.
 
 
+2 # Texas Aggie 2017-10-26 19:52
Me, too.
 
 
+23 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-10-26 15:03
The outbursts by Flake and Corker only show once more that the republican party is in as much disarray as the democrats are. Both parties are in free fall.

The democrats are circling the wagons around the establishment leaders in the Clinton, Pelosi, Podesta, et al. camp. They are pushing the rest out of the party.

The republicans all secretly hate Trump and wish he were gone but cannot say so if they hope to keep their jobs. When Trump does leave, they will have no center. Trump is hollowing out the party.

It is time for some decent, honest, and politically smart new political leaders to come along. Sanders is about the only one. If there were a democratic party primary now, Sanders would win by a mile. The party establishments are holding on by their fingernails. They will fall. The 2018 elections will be a total mess. Democrats will be massacred by white identity extremists. But 2020 is up for grabs. Trump won't be re-elected unless the Demo party re-nominates Hillary.
 
 
+13 # Texas Aggie 2017-10-26 19:57
"What remains to be seen is if the Democrats will find new ways to screw it up."

They are working diligently to screw everything up. Witness their actions with the DNC where they did a purge of their base of progressives and replaced them with lobbyists who "have been stalwarts of the party." And that after "electing" a Clintonite to the chairmanship under somewhat murky circumstances. They can't read polls that show that the voters are way to the left of the neoliberals who are running the show, and their illiteracy is bound to result in more of the same of the last 20 years.
 
 
+5 # Jim Rocket 2017-10-27 08:36
Second place must pay very well indeed. Nothing else makes sense.
 
 
+5 # mamtora 2017-10-27 04:44
Agree with ,unfortunately "cooking of frog" as Al Gore said has not reached at peak point.After All if you remember at time of 2003 Iraq War 79% people of US believed there were weapons of mass destruction to justify war or war crime .
 
 
+3 # Mtguide 2017-10-28 04:56
The Republicans, especially those in the leadership such as Ryan and McConnell, have effectively become exactly the same as the Nazis of WWII. Fanatical, hateful and unconscionably cruel, heedless, reckless, and ruthless, dogmatic, essentially morally unprincipled--e xpediency and self-preservati on above all else--and utterly, completely and totally spineless. They are all, including corporate and conservative Democarts, confusing rigidity and inflexibility, stubbornness and refusal to bend or compromise, with "spine" or character. In fact, their actions are completely motivated by fear. And no matter what they do, unless they do by some miracle turn away from the destructive path they're on, the darkness, pain and suffering they are working so hard to inflict on the masses of average Americans, will also come for them. The words of the old gospel folksong, "When The Ship Comes In", are prophetic and entirely fitting for this group of craven cowards and scoundrels: " And like Pharoah's tribe, they'll be drownded in the tide, and like Goliath, they'll be conquered."
 
 
+7 # Blackjack 2017-10-28 11:27
All comments are right on. Why is it that RSN readers see what most others do not? Could it be because others aren't paying attention, don't care, or have given up? I don't know, but Dems are indeed headed for another fall in 2018. Purging the progressives from the party was a mistake when they did it at the 2016 convention and it is going to be even more of a mistake for 2018. Ever wonder why Bernie chose to run for reelection to his Senate seat in 2018 as an Independent instead of a Dem (even though invited to do so by the Dem Party)? Because Bernie is a very savvy politician. He knew that all Dems really wanted from him was to carry their water to his supporters and to give up his large supporter list so the Dems could infiltrate that, too. He very wisely chose not to do that. He knows they used him in 2016 and he won't be used again. I had thought that he would not run for President in 2020, but now I'm not so sure. I started to change my mind when I saw his recent Westminster College war speech. He laid out, in no uncertain terms, what his
"foreign policy" stand is, something that he had been accused of ignoring in 2016. That speech made clear that he does not align himself with the war hawks, a place where most of the Dem Establishment resides. It is, after all, the money that generates the current stance on war policy that both parties endorse. Without it, they lose their jobs and the economy tanks. Bernie is looking to change that stance, not endorse it.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN