RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Carter writes: “The harsh rhetoric from Washington and Pyongyang during recent months has exacerbated an already confrontational relationship between our countries, and has probably eliminated any chance of good faith peace talks between the United States and North Korea.”

Former US President Jimmy Carter. (photo: Bebeto Matthews/AP)
Former US President Jimmy Carter. (photo: Bebeto Matthews/AP)


We Must Assure North Korea the US Will Forego Any Military Action as Long as They Remain Peaceful

By Jimmy Carter, Fox 5

13 August 17

 

he harsh rhetoric from Washington and Pyongyang during recent months has exacerbated an already confrontational relationship between our countries, and has probably eliminated any chance of good faith peace talks between the United States and North Korea. In addition to restraining the warlike rhetoric, our leaders need to encourage talks between North Korea and other countries, especially China and Russia. The recent UN Security Council unanimous vote for new sanctions suggests that these countries could help. In all cases, a nuclear exchange must be avoided. All parties must assure North Koreans they we will forego any military action against them if North Korea remains peaceful.

I have visited North Korea three times, and have spent more than 20 hours in discussions with their political leaders regarding important issues that affect U.S.-DPRK relations.

In June 1994, I met with Kim Il Sung in a time of crisis, when he agreed to put all their nuclear programs under strict supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency and to seek mutual agreement with the United States on a permanent peace treaty, to have summit talks with the president of South Korea, to expedite the recovery of the remains of American service personnel buried in his country, and to take other steps to ease tension on the peninsula. Kim Il Sung died shortly after my visit, and his successor, Kim Jong Il, notified me and leaders in Washington that he would honor the promises made by his father. These obligations were later confirmed officially in negotiations in Geneva by Robert Gallucci and other representatives of the Clinton administration.

I returned to Pyongyang in August 2010, at the invitation of North Korean leaders, to bring home Aijalon Gomes, an American who had been detained there. My last visit to North Korea was in May 2011 when I led a delegation of Elders (former presidents of Ireland and Finland and former prime minister of Norway) to assure the delivery of donated food directly to needy people.

During all these visits, the North Koreans emphasized that they wanted peaceful relations with the United States and their neighbors, but were convinced that we planned a preemptive military strike against their country. They wanted a peace treaty (especially with America) to replace the ceasefire agreement that had existed since the end of the Korean War in 1953, and to end the economic sanctions that had been very damaging to them during that long interim period. They have made it clear to me and others that their first priority is to assure that their military capability is capable of destroying a large part of Seoul and of responding strongly in other ways to any American attack. The influence of China in Pyongyang seems to be greatly reduced since Kim Jong Un became the North Korean leader in December 2011.

A commitment to peace by the United States and North Korea is crucial. When this confrontational crisis is ended, the United States should be prepared to consummate a permanent treaty to replace the ceasefire of 1953. The United States should make this clear, to North Koreans and to our allies.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+10 # Wise woman 2017-08-13 22:28
Absolutely! I'm so sorry you're not in the WH now. If you were, the hatred and violence we are experiencing today wouldn't be. You are truly the last pro peace president this country had and in the vast minority, I'm afraid. May you be blessed for the enormous good you have brought to this country and the world.
 
 
+13 # tedrey 2017-08-13 22:42
As usual, Jimmy Carter speaks for sanity.
 
 
+7 # lfeuille 2017-08-13 22:55
That's what we should do alright, but how when Trump won't stop tweeting and won't think before he tweets?
 
 
+7 # janie1893 2017-08-13 23:16
Mr. Carter is absolutely correct. Since Mr. Trump seems to prefer games to policies, the US should ask the United Nations to open meetings with North Korea on behalf of the citizenry of the United States of America, explaining that the American President no longer represents the will of the majority of American citizens and that most Americans want peace and a peace treaty with North Korea.
Something must happen soon or there will be a lot of people needing urgent mental health care.
 
 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2017-08-13 23:26
Mr. Carter is operating under the assumption that the PTB consider killing hundreds of thousands of people to be a bad idea. Nothing could be further from their minds. As Graham said, thousands of people will die over there, so what's the big deal?

And think of not only the opportunities for the MIC, but think of the wide open opportunities for disaster capitalism. Starting a war is at the top of their to-do list. Besides, everyone knows that the only solution to every problem is to kill someone. Ask any of the wing nuts.
 
 
+8 # Stilldreamin1 2017-08-14 01:42
Our creditability was permanently destroyed when we invaded Iraq BECAUSE it didn't have nuclear weapons.
 
 
+12 # Henry 2017-08-14 09:18
The voice of reason (with a heart, too): Jimmy Carter
 
 
+1 # acomfort 2017-08-14 11:44
Any country that the US can not dominate is a national security threat. N. Korea is hard to dominate when the Rothschilds don't control their banking system. There is no chance of peace with North Korea when they wont even accept a Rothschild controlled Central Bank.

Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

The only countries left without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are: Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

These countries automatically become national security threats and are demonized.

acomfort
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN