RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Boardman writes: "There is no logical connection between missile tests and missiles on a patrol boat. North Korea, a country flanked by two oceans full of nuclear-armed US Navy warships, has done something it has reportedly not done for three years, put two anti-ship missiles on one patrol boat."

Donald Trump. (photo: Getty Images)
Donald Trump. (photo: Getty Images)


Tweets, Leaks, Classified Information, and the Right to Know

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

09 August 17

 

“After many years of LEAKS going on in Washington, it is great to see the A.G. [Attorney General] taking action! For National Security, the tougher the better!”
Tweet by President Trump, August 5, 2017

“U.S. spy satellites detect North Korea moving anti-ship cruise missiles to patrol boat.”
Tweet by Fox & friends, August 8, 2017;
Re-tweeted by President Trump 6:50 a.m. same day

“I can’t talk about anything that’s classified and if that’s in the newspaper that’s a shame,... it’s one of those things I don’t know what’s going on. I will tell you it’s incredibly dangerous when things get out into the press like that….”
– Comment by UN Ambassador Nikki on Fox & friends,
August 8, 2017, when asked about Fox News story;
Tweeted by Fox & friends and re-tweeted by President

his bit of political circus hooha was briefly all over the news early in the week, with almost no news outlet getting it right: that the issue of “classified information” and “leaks” is largely a meaningless smokescreen designed to protect the power of government secrecy against the public’s right to know the truth.

Logically, this sequence of events should lead to an Attorney General investigation of Fox and President Trump for disclosing classified information, or at least an investigation of Fox News to learn the identities of its anonymous officials with access to intelligence data (perhaps in the White House). This is a perfect time for a test case that demonstrates real integrity. Does anyone expect anything like that to happen?

The underlying story from Fox News is relatively simple in substance, fundamentally illogical, and more important for its attitude than its presumed facts:

Despite the United States’ insistence that North Korea halt its missile tests, U.S. spy agencies detected the rogue communist regime loading two anti-ship cruise missiles on a patrol boat on the country’s east coast just days ago.

It’s the first time these missiles have been deployed on this type of platform since 2014, U.S. officials with knowledge of the latest intelligence in the region told Fox News on Monday.

So what’s the actual news here? There is no logical connection between missile tests and missiles on a patrol boat. North Korea, a country flanked by two oceans full of nuclear-armed US Navy warships, has done something it has reportedly not done for three years, put two anti-ship missiles on one patrol boat. Or as Fox News put it lower in its report: “North Korea loaded two Stormpetrel anti-ship cruise missiles on a Wonsan guided-missile patrol boat at Toejo Dong on North Korea’s east coast.”

Oh, no, North Korea has a threat that threatens no one

So what? According to the report, the patrol boat has not even left port. One of the leakers is quoted as calling this event part of “a trend that does not bode well for hopes of de-escalating tensions on the [Korean] peninsula.” What does that even mean? Are the South Koreans intimidated? Is the US Navy pulling back in fright?

This leak of classified information, limited as it is, complete with anonymous editorializing, is the actual destabilizing action raising tensions. The leak comes in the context of a broad US onslaught against North Korea – diplomatic, political, and militarily threatening. The real audience for the leak appears to be the North Koreans. The leak seems to be telling them: see, we have satellites so cool we can count the missiles you load on a patrol boat. Presumably the North Koreans already assumed as much, but just in case, this reminder is not designed to de-escalate tensions on the Korean peninsula or anywhere else.

The only significant political figure indicating any interest in de-escalating the Korean tensions is recently-elected South Korean president Moon Jae-in, a former human rights lawyer who has publicly invited talks with North Korea. The US has so far acted to prevent such talks from starting, even introducing anti-missile batteries into South Korea without the South Korean president’s knowledge, clearly a provocation to the North as well as a diss to the South. When President Moon Jae-in visited the White House in June, the two presidents did not hold a joint news conference and White House reports focused on keeping tension high in Korea. The following week, President Moon Jae-in offered to meet North Korea’s Supreme Leader Kim Jon Un “at any time, at any place” they could agree on. In Berlin at the time, President Moon also said:

To Korea, which is the last divided nation on this planet, the experience of Germany’s unification gives hope for unification, and at the same time shows us the path that we need to follow.

It is not a path the rest of the world seems to have much interest in. The US remains focused on North Korea’s threat to the US and “most countries around the world,” but the most threatened country by any rational calculus is South Korea. In the wake of the UN Security Council’s 15-0 vote to impose new sanctions on North Korea, President Moon Jae-in requested a call with President Trump. The two presidents spoke for 56 minutes; no transcript of their conversation has yet leaked. The official account from South Korea portrayed President Moon Jae-in toeing the American line, but also reported: “Moon, however, insisted the objective of putting new and stronger sanctions on North Korea must be to bring the reclusive state back to the dialogue table.”

There’s a Rashomon quality to US communications with the world

The White House version of the same conversation was more terse and bellicose, with no hint of supporting talks. At the meeting of ASEAN nations in the Philippines over the weekend, the US secretary of state reportedly went out of his way to avoid contact with the North Korean foreign minister, who apparently did the same to the US. Neither the US nor North Korea is a member of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), whose membership of ten nations comprises Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. The official, unsigned, 46-page joint communiqué of the meeting addressed the Korean issue in two sections. The first section (paragraphs 146-150) referring to South Korea (ROK, Republic of Korea) began:

We welcomed the ROK’s commitment to further strengthen ASEAN-ROK relations, as manifested by the President Moon Jae-in’s sending a special envoy to ASEAN upon his taking office in May 2017. We also agreed to further strengthen cooperation in the political and security issues of common concerns, including terrorism, violent extremism, maritime security as well as to exchange views on the situation in the Korean Peninsula. We also welcomed the ROK Government’s initiative to improve inter-Korean relations and to establish permanent peace on the Korean Peninsula, which was proposed in Berlin on 6 July 2017.

The section dealing with the US (paragraphs 152-162) is much less detailed and much more opaque. The second Korean section, “Developments in the Korean Peninsula” (paragraphs 201-204) says in its entirety:

201. We continued to express grave concerns over the escalation of tensions in the Korean Peninsula including the most recent testing by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) on 4 and 28 July 2017 in addition to its previous nuclear tests and ballistic missile launches.

202. Noting that these developments seriously threaten peace and stability in the entire region and beyond, we strongly urged the DPRK to fully and immediately comply with its obligations arising from all the relevant U.N. Security Council Resolutions.

203. We reiterated our support for the denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner and called for the exercise of self-restraint and the resumption of dialogue in order to de-escalate tensions and create conditions conducive to peace and stability.

204. We expressed support for initiatives to improve inter-Korean relations towards establishing permanent peace on the Korean Peninsula. [Emphasis added]

The US has a treaty-based obligation to seek nuclear disarmament — so?

A little more than an hour after tweeting the classified information about North Korean patrol boats loading a pair missiles dockside, President Trump tweeted in a vein roughly opposite in tone to the ASEAN communiqué:

After many years of failure, countries are coming together to finally address the dangers posed by North Korea. We must be tough & decisive!

This drew a remarkably varied assortment of reply tweets attacking the president for his efforts to undermine Obamacare, to attack Senator Blumenthal on his Viet Nam service, to ignore anti-Muslim terrorism in Minnesota, to attack the Statue of Liberty, to scapegoat Somalis, to block VoteVets.org from his Twitter account, but most pointedly to set up the possibility of bombing North Korea as a distraction from some unpleasant event “like … maybe when Bill Clinton takes the stand claiming you were trafficking young girls for sex from Russia.”

OK, the accusation about Trump sex trafficking is based on a leak of unclassified (but private) information purportedly from New York attorney general Eric Schneiderman’s investigation of Trump Model Management for sex trafficking as part of an “enterprise corruption” charge. Although the NY Attorney General’s office is apparently not commenting, Trump Model Management is a dubious enterprise that announced in April that it was closing.

Buried at the end of the Fox News story about missiles on patrol boats was a far more troubling development: the US is working with the South Korean military to expand the capacity of the warheads on South Korean missiles. The Pentagon confirmed this development, calling it part of “the defensive capabilities of South Korea,” a half-truth at best. The official South Korean version of the US-South Korean president’s phone call was more detailed, while also shifting the onus of escalation to President Moon Jae-in:

The South Korean leader also stressed the need to further enhance the joint defense capabilities of South Korean and U.S. troops stationed here. To this end, he asked the U.S. president to support a Seoul-proposed revision to the countries’ bilateral agreement on ballistic missiles….

Under the allies’ ballistic missile guideline, South Korea is currently prohibited from developing ballistic missiles with a range of over 800 kilometers [almost 500 miles, far enough to reach into China] and a payload of over 500 kilograms. South Korea seeks to raise the cap on payloads to 1,000 kg [one fourteenth the explosive power of the Hiroshima bomb].

In expectation of a future US strike on North Korea, the Chinese deployed some 150,000 troops in April along its roughly 840-mile border with North Korea, in case of a flood of North Korean refugees to China.

Is THIS what Russia, China and the rest expected from a 15-0 UN vote?

At mid-day August 8, another leak story broke, much more important than missiles on a patrol boat. The Washington Post reported, with more fear-mongering than factuality, first in its headline “North Korea now making missile-ready nuclear weapons, U.S. analysts say,” even though “now” is already a month ago, maybe, as the story says:

North Korea has successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead that can fit inside its missiles, crossing a key threshold on the path to becoming a full-fledged nuclear power, U.S. intelligence officials have concluded in a confidential assessment.

The analysis, completed last month by the Defense Intelligence Agency, comes on the heels of another intelligence assessment that sharply raises the official estimate for the total number of bombs in the communist country’s atomic arsenal. The United States calculated last month that up to 60 nuclear weapons are now controlled by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Some independent experts think the number of bombs is much smaller.

Leaked story, classified intelligence assessment, anonymous sources inside the administration, bring on the prosecutions? Don’t hold your breath. The leak pattern here is all too convenient to an administration that appears hungry for war, and especially this war. The leak pattern here is all too reminiscent of all those weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that didn’t exist in Iraq.

If you read beyond the scary hype of the Post’s opening, you’ll learn that the certainty of the headline is not certain at all and might well be yet another government fantasy scare tactic. The Post admits it has not actually seen the Defense Intelligence Agency report. Somebody unnamed read an excerpt to the Post and two “US officials familiar with the assessment” verified its broad conclusions. One of those conclusions, it turns out, is that no one is sure whether North Korea has even tested the warhead that the Post headline claims “North Korea now making.” Better still, and deeper in the story, other anonymous analysts say that North Korea’s ICBM burned on re-entry in last month’s test, which would mean that North Korea does not yet have a missile that can deliver a nuclear warhead. Maybe they’ll have one in a year. Nobody’s talking about how many years it will take for North Korea to have anything like a deterrent threat to counter the US nuclear arsenal of roughly 6,800 nuclear warheads and multiple delivery systems.

This is the arsenal that the US has been threatening the world with since it was much smaller in 1945. The US arsenal is the main reason Russia has an arsenal of equal size and other countries (France, China, Britain, Pakistan, India, and Israel at a minimum) have their own nuclear arsenals to provide some sense of safety that vanishes as soon as the arsenal is used. So North Korea is a rogue state only in the sense that all other nuclear powers are rogue states. The world could live with that; the US could live with that. But if the US chooses, out of pure self-involved tunnel vision, not to live with that, the question then becomes how much of the rest of the world will end up not living with that?

“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,” President Trump told reporters gathered at his New Jersey golf club. Speaking with his arms crossed on his chest, and using an unpersuasively tough tone of voice, he added: “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen. He has been very threatening beyond a normal state, and as I said they will be met with fire, fury, and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before. Thank you.”

Oh no, thank YOU, Mr. President, for the perfect remarks to commemorate the anniversaries of the fire and fury the world saw destroy the defenseless civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+12 # Kootenay Coyote 2017-08-09 15:38
Loosening the leashes of the eager Dogs of War: the lights are going out in America.
 
 
+12 # jwb110 2017-08-09 15:43
Fox News has become the US version of TASS News under the Communist Regime. It is an arm of propaganda. News has nothing to do with it.
If it is up to the trumpers Fox would be the only news service in American. That base of his and his own White House would break every Constitutional guarantee in order to be able to rob the country blind and get away with it.
I don't like Fox and the fake news that they broadcast but I wouldn't consider restricting their right to lie to their watchers. Ultimately it is up to the viewers to look at the news and then investigate it on their own. America now thinks that if it is on TV then it must be true. There is no news in truth and no truth in news. The individual must search on their own and not think that being spoon fed information meant to prevaricate. Informed means reading, looking for all the sides of an issue just not the ones that agree with our personal prejudices. I don't like Fox News but I have always thought it wise to know your enemies.
 
 
+12 # dascher 2017-08-09 17:00
Gotta love the dumb alliteration of "fire, fury, and frankly power".

That line must have come from Professor Gingrich. It has his dumb "what a really smart guy" signature,

Drumpfkopf probably thought Hiroshima has something to do with Pearl Harbor.
 
 
+12 # Femihumanist 2017-08-09 18:42
We have to keep talking up, to everyone, that we expect Cheetohead to stage aa attack in the US as an excuse to start a war and cover up. This is not just bullshit anymore, this is so dangerous.
 
 
+6 # Texas Aggie 2017-08-09 22:25
There is an article in Think Progress about how the president can launch nuclear missiles all on his own say so. It seems that during the Cold War when the USSR was our nuclear armed opponent, in order to ensure a second response to their first strike, the system was set up so that the president could order a retaliatory strike that would launch within less than 15 minutes after his order and no one had the authority to deny him. At the time no consideration was taken of the fact that if the president was a total asshole (see D. Trump), he could launch a first strike all by himself.

It's a very chilling article, and if drumpf wants to, he can launch a nuclear strike by himself, and the admiral of the South Pacific fleet said recently in an interview that he would absolutely obey drumpf's order to start a nuclear war. And if he continues making threats at NK, eventually they're going to get the idea that no matter what they do, drumpf is going to attack them (See Bush/Saddam and Iraq War) with nuclear weapons so they might as well attack first and take some of us along with them.
 
 
+9 # Texas Aggie 2017-08-09 22:27
Exactly! Anyone who thinks that drumpf would not start a nuclear war just to get the investigations off his back hasn't been paying attention. Someone needs to ask Ivanka if she can talk him out of starting a nuclear war.
 
 
+4 # tedcloak 2017-08-09 21:44
I recall that, shortly after the 9/11/2001 disaster, some congressman or senator said something to this effect: "The terrorists are turning airliners into missiles. The terrorists therefore have missiles. Therefore, we must proceed with our anti-missile defense program."
 
 
+5 # ericlipps 2017-08-09 22:54
Remember the good old days, when it was Hillary Clinton who was going to take us to war if she were elected, while Donald Trump supposedly wanted peace with all the world?

Face it, Hillary haters: you own this mess.
 
 
+2 # Femihumanist 2017-08-10 20:17
Hillary would have taken us to war, maybe not nuclear war.

Bush I took us to war (Iraq), B. Clinton took us to more war (Sudan, Iraq, Serbia, and more), W took us to more wars, I can't remember all the wars Obama (and his Sec of State) made, and Hillary would have continued the process. Cheetohead just is more dramatic about it and can't rationalize it as well to the public
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN