RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Krenzinger writes: "On March 25, 2017, two professors from Rio de Janeiro's Federal University accompanied a group of 13 students from the School of Social Work to visit the location of their upcoming internship: Casa das Mulheres da Mare, or Mare Women's House, a community space for women in one of the largest favela complexes in Rio de Janeiro."

Frequent police brutality has undermined the trust of residents of Rio de Janeiro's Mar� favela in law enforcement. (photo: Reuters)
Frequent police brutality has undermined the trust of residents of Rio de Janeiro's Mar� favela in law enforcement. (photo: Reuters)


With Tanks, Grenades and Guns, Police Wage War on Rio de Janeiro's Poorest

By Miriam Krenzinger, teleSUR

08 April 17

 

Research shows that warlike invasions by the military police create widespread fear, injure or kill innocent bystanders, and kill people.

n March 25, 2017, two professors from Rio de Janeiro�s Federal University accompanied a group of 13 students from the School of Social Work to visit the location of their upcoming internship: Casa das Mulheres da Mar�, or Mar� Women�s House, a community space for women in one of the largest favela complexes in Rio de Janeiro.

The Mar� neighbourhood, in the northern part of the city, is home to approximately 140,000 people who live in 16 different communities. Because it�s located along three of the city�s main expressways � the Avenida Brasil, Linha Amarela and Linha Vermelha � all international travellers drive past it, or past the wall that hides Mar� from tourist eyes, on their way to the Gale�o airport.

When the students gathered at their meeting point in the Parque Uni�o area, spirits were high. In neighbourhood shops and squares, locals were getting ready for a sunny Saturday and setting up for a yellow fever vaccination campaign.

Some students had mentioned that their families were concerned about them working in Mar�. Armed gangs operate openly in this informal settlement, and in one seven-day period this year, a series of five conflicts left six people dead and three wounded, according to the community group Redes da Mar�, which monitors public safety in the neighbourhood.

But the women felt confident. They were told that they would only enter the favela if it was safe, the walk to the Casa das Mulheres was uneventful and they were warmly greeted by the staff.

The �big skull�

About 90 minutes into a lively meeting, shots rang out nearby. The locals seemed calm, but WhatsApp messages pinging on mobile phones alerted Casa staff of a surprise police raid in Parque Uni�o.

The Special Operations Batallion of the military police (known by their Portuguese acronym, BOPE), arrived at around 11am. Now gun shots were replaced by bursts of machine gun fire and explosions.

The group tried to stay calm and continue the meeting, despite frequent interruptions. When the gunfight got most intense, they took shelter under the stairs and in the back of the newly installed industrial kitchen.

Upon leaving the community centre safely at 3pm, the group passed several tanks, which locals call the caveir�o (or �big skull�), and 30 heavily armed men in uniform: BOPE officers.

When they got home, they learnt that four Mar� residents had died that day, not far from the Casa das Mulheres.

'An Ordinary Day'

I was one of the two professors and I was distraught. But March 25 was just an ordinary day for the thousands of people who live in the conflict zones of Brazil�s second-largest city.

According to the Forum Brasileiro de Seguran�a P�blica, a public safety research group, 4,572 people were murdered in the state of Rio de Janeiro in 2016, an increase of almost 20% over the year before. In February 2017 alone, the state registered 502 murders, which was 24.3% higher than February 2016.

Brazil�s national homicide rate is ninth in the Americas, according to a 2016 World Health Organization report, with 32.4 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants. That�s worse than Haiti (26.6), Mexico (22) and Ecuador (13.8) but better than homicide-beset Honduras (103.9), Venezuela (57.6), Colombia (43.9) and Guatemala (39.9).

But in this country of 200 million, the sheer numbers are staggering. More people were murdered in Brazil in the five-year period from 2011 to 2015 (279,567 victims) than those killed in the war in Syria (256,124 victims). Also notable is the profile of the people dying: in 2015, 54% of Brazilian homicide victims were young people between the ages of 15 and 24, and 73% were black or brown.

Police violence figures are even more stunning. Between 2009 and 2015, law enforcement killed 17,688 people. Figures from the Forum Brasileiro indicate that in 2014, 584 people died as a result of �resisting a police intervention�. In 2015, 645 out of a total 58,467 violent deaths were at the hands of police. And last year, 920 people were killed by the same forces that, in theory, are supposed to protect them.

In the Mar� neighbourhood, law enforcement�s death toll last year was 17, the result of 33 police operations. This rate of 12.8 deaths per 100,000 is eight times higher than in the rest of Brazil and three times that of Rio de Janeiro state.

Safe for whom?

Already this year, Mar� has already seen 12 brutal police operations similar to the one on March 25. So far, 11 people have been injured and five killed, including four residents and a police officer, according to the group Redes da Mar�. These figures do not include results from yet another raid that happened while this article was in production.

Like the university professors and students who witnessed that day of violence in March, the residents of Mar� and other Rio de Janeiro favelas are terrified by the city�s spike in violence.

Rio police are clearly not helping. Research shows that warlike invasions of places like Mar� � primarily carried out by the military police � do not provide any positive or sustainable results. Instead, the raids create widespread fear, injure or kill innocent bystanders, and kill people: both suspects and police officers.

The day after the invasion, the old �order� is restored. Nothing changes, it only deteriorates.

Such raids leave not only a trail of blood in their wake, but also create hatred, resentment and a deep distrust of government institutions. Little by little, the image of the Rio police has become dissociated from the notions of justice and protection.

Brazil has been trying unsuccessfully to quell crime with militarised law enforcement for decades, but governments remain immune to criticism from the local population and international human rights organisations.

Of course, there is no easy solution. Definitive change in Mar� would require profound socioeconomic and cultural changes across Brazil. This involves addressing the country�s structural racism, abysmal inequality and social stigma that all but justifies abusive state treatment of its poorest.

As the author Luiz Eduardo Soares has pointed out �police brutality wouldn�t exist if society didn�t allow it�. Public opinion and the media sanction these killings, otherwise the government could not keep deploying its resources against its own people. The same holds for prosecutors and justice officials who let police violence go unpunished.

Will the children of Mar� get vaccinated safely this Saturday? Will the interns return to the Casa das Mulheres next weekend without fear? At this point, we can only hope.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+28 # coberly 2020-07-25 10:01
I've been trying to tell you: don't turn over statues. Turn over voting machines. Demand paper ballots in a box in front of witnesses. With cops to evict "challengers."

Hint: if Trump/Burr can have their own police force, so can the citizens of Flint, Detroit...

Elections MUST be held in full public view "on the same day." Sorry about that Covid thing. wear a mask. With enough voting place, a hand count can be completed in time for the "networks" to have their story, so we can go to sleep... or not.
 
 
+13 # lfeuille 2020-07-25 18:52
We can do both.
 
 
0 # coberly 2020-07-28 13:14
probably we can't.

knocking down statues costs us votes.
 
 
+24 # johnescher 2020-07-25 10:14
I live in Michigan and want my vote against Trump to count. The downside of this well-researched article is that it tends to erode that hope.
 
 
+25 # miffed 2020-07-25 10:32
Harvard Kennedy School of Government scholar Alex Keyssar has a book that shows how the abominable US election system is a cancerous growth spurred by incumbents. New democracies after WW2 never even considered the US system because it's undemocratic in its very structure.
 
 
+11 # 1dfnslblty 2020-07-25 10:36
 
 
+15 # davehaze 2020-07-25 10:40
RSN is on a roll. Providing its community with empowering information.
 
 
+23 # davehaze 2020-07-25 10:59
Uh, what happened here? If Palast is correct than it wasnt the Russians who handed Trump the election but Republican lawyers while under the "watchful" eyes of Democratic lawyers.

If what palast says is true than putting all of your energy into the million hours of Russia gate is a mistake that needs to be acknowledged.

All of your trump-hating would have been unnecessary because he never would have set foot in the White House if the Democratic party had demanded the recount. Hey, you want someone to blame blame Hillary herself and the Democratic party itself and you might want to ask them why they did not want to win.
 
 
-4 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-07-25 13:22
dh -- Palast has never been a Russia blamer. That role goes to democrats, esp. people like soon-to-be-vice -president-nomi nee Susan Rice or Hillary Herself. The elite media are Russia-did-it true believers as well.

You are right. The Russiagate was a total mistake, a distraction from the real issues we needed to be talking about, and a strategy to blame Trump for something he did not actually participate in.
 
 
+17 # davehaze 2020-07-25 16:28
RR
Yes reality-based Palast never a Russia conspiretalist. Because I have followed him for near 20 years, originally Democracy NOW and bought his books, I have shouted at unregenative Democrats: it is not NaderGreensLeft istsRussians (whatever current scapegoat) it is electorial cheating initiated and allowed to proliferate by both parties and the Supreme Court.

And ignored by most political discussion -- so kudos to RSN.
 
 
+11 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-07-26 05:21
dh -- yes, kudos to RSN for publishing Palast. I think he is definitely worth listening to.
 
 
+6 # livanlern 2020-07-25 17:19
Even Biden and the DNC wouldn't be stupid enough to name Rice or Clinton for VP.
The Don doesn't need to directly participate in anything for it to happen.
 
 
+9 # dquandle 2020-07-25 14:44
The "Democrats" couldn't be bothered. Just like they couldn't be bothered when Gore tried to pretend he was a "gentleman". All they were interested in was ginning up war, hot or cold, with Russia Russia Russia, and making sure Wall Street got its ton of flesh.
 
 
+3 # livanlern 2020-07-25 17:21
Huh? The war that followed Gore's defeat was with Iran, not Russia.
 
 
+5 # Salus Populi 2020-07-26 15:16
You mean Iraq. And it wasn't really a "war with," since Iraq had never so much as threatened the United States, and the "coalition of the killing" had ninety-five [not a misprint] times the total GDP of Iraq; rather, under the Nuremberg terms, it was a war of aggression, and, like all the other wars the U.S. has been involved in over the last three-quarters of a century -- that is, has initiated -- was both a war crime, a crime against the peace, and a crime against humanity. If Obama, the Constitutional scholar, was serious about his oath of office, he would have prosecuted [or sent to the Hague] all the high-level administrators of the Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Reagan administration, as well as Brzezinsky and Carter, under Article VIII of the Constitution. But of course, he was getting set to carry out his own war crimes, and therefore chose to "look forward, not back."
 
 
0 # Observer 47 2020-07-27 15:34
Outstanding comment!
 
 
+29 # Street Level 2020-07-25 11:26
And why was Hillary not screaming about this? I don't believe for one minute that she'd rather go on a world-tour whining and blaming Bernie no matter how much money her book made.

And why are the county registrars still allowed to confuse voters with cross-over ballots, absentee ballots or instructing volunteers to "not say anything" forcing voters to "ask" for the right ballot if they're lucky enough to know better? What happened to exit polls? Why are antique machines even allowed anymore? The country would riot if the Super Bowl was broadcast on unreliable and antique machinery.

Observing the count (during the election) was a joke. Sample ballots were drawn from piles in a private room out of public view.

The only thing about voting that's changed is that the Republicans have made it harder and the Democrats have done nothing but sit back and count their Wall St. cash because they don't loose no matter who's in the Oval. It's the same corporate party.

Only people like Greg who's doing the heavy lifting doing the research to educate the public will bring about any change.
Voting matters in that it serves as a legitimate cover for whoever gets installed and is why we need to change it.
 
 
+19 # dascher 2020-07-25 11:43
 
 
+7 # Robbee 2020-07-25 13:26
1,913,369 Ballots Thrown Away, How Trump Did - and Will - Disqualify Your Vote
By Greg Palast, Reader Supported News
25 July 20

"This little chapter from How Trump Stole 2020 tells you how they did it in 2016 and can do it again in 2020:"

whereas of 2018 michigan has a dem secretary of state - (attorneys general and governor too)

robbee declares -

these outrages could not have happened, unless abetted by repukes, up and down the line

this will not happen again in 2020 - not in my state

note that the refusal to count votes in michigan happened under a repuke secretary of state (attorneys general and governor too)

this year there's a new sheriff in michigan - and she's all dem!

ps - greg is also an expert on cross-check - and who knows how many MILLIONS OF votes by folks with latino names? - repute secretaries of state threw out? destroyed? - no record kept?

voting in america is a shell game, expressly approved by sbcouts

but it's the only game we have

despair is no political strategy

V O T E !

pps - ifeuille's great idea is a federal mail-in voting rights law, backed by a one-day army of onsite federal inspectors at each local polling site? if i have that right? - i would add inspectors, at each s o s office

ppps - meanwhile we man polling sites with independent poll watchers!
 
 
+18 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-07-25 13:27
Palast has seen this story play out over and over again. He must think he is in the Groudhog Day movie. Wake up to a new election, same old story of ballot spoilage, mis-counts, and rigged elections.

What this shows is that repubicans have become masters of this technique, especially challenging votes that don't go their way. They also have zip coded voter lists so they car rule out places like east Detroit.

And the Democrats always behave the same way. They just throw their hands up in the air and make some profound expression like "darn it." And then they move on to collecting cash from their big donors -- who they don't know also backed the republican side.

The billionaire donors win at this game. They get the candidates they want. Democrat party bosses get a lot of money. Republicans get the elected offices and the bills they want passed. Everyone is happy. The american people get screwed -- again, and again, and again.
 
 
+20 # vt143 2020-07-25 13:29
And it's the bible-thumping flag-waving love-America "patriots" who sabotage the very foundation of their "American" greatness. What a fu*%ing joke!
 
 
+14 # livanlern 2020-07-25 13:39
I knew at the time, from online information, that the election results in Flint, Detroit, Milwaukee, etc. were bogus. But the mainstream media clamped down on this news, and they made Jill Stein into a figure of ridicule.
There were/are a bunch of computer experts some of whom came out of Princeton, who have been trying for years to put out the word about how easy it is to hack e-voting.
 
 
0 # Observer 47 2020-07-27 15:37
See www.blackboxvoting.org
 
 
+5 # coberly 2020-07-26 14:56
well, now that everyone has git that off ther=ir chest, we can go back to winning friends and influencing people by knocking down statues. instead of doing something about voting machines and voter registration ripoffs.

a word of warning though. Trump-hate of mail-in vote, is "please don' throw me in dat brier patch Br'er Fox. Please. Please.

I don't know if there has ever been mail-in voting fraud, but there easily could be, the point is that it is not transparent.

do we really need to get the television stations the results before midnight at the expense of never knowing who "really' won?
 
 
+1 # Inspired Citizen 2020-07-27 19:16
In a word, no.

Accuracy is all that matters, not speed. It's the difference between a legitimate election and an illegitimate one.

The Republicans suppress the minority voters in the general election. The Democrats suppressed the (young) Bernie voters in the primaries.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN