RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Cole writes: "A shouting match has been provoked this week by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, which issued a report this week concluding definitively that Israel is guilty of Apartheid practices toward the Palestinians."

Palestinians march along the wall marking the edge of the Israeli settlement in the West Bank. (photo: Abbas Momani/AFP)
Palestinians march along the wall marking the edge of the Israeli settlement in the West Bank. (photo: Abbas Momani/AFP)


Why the UN Branded Israel an Apartheid State

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

17 March 17

 

shouting match has been provoked this week by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, which issued a report this week concluding definitively that Israel is guilty of Apartheid practices toward the Palestinians. The report is careful to say that it is not using the term merely as a pejorative but is rather appealing to a body of international law with precise definitions, definitions that Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians easily and transparently meet. Here’s the short blog version of the report, which runs to 76 pages.

Apartheid is a Dutch word meaning “apartness” and was used to describe the system of racial segregation deployed by the ruling Afrikaner minority in South Africa 1948-1991. In international law, however, it has been generalized to any government practicing systematic racial domination.

Article II of the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (1973) defines it this way:

“The term “the crime of apartheid”, which shall include similar policies and practices of racial segregation and discrimination as practiced in southern Africa, shall apply to… inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

The 2002 Rome Statute, which has 150? signatories among the nations of the world, and which established the International Criminal Court, contained a definition of Apartheid.

‘The crime of apartheid’ means inhumane acts . . . committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime…

Apartheid is one of the listed “crimes against humanity” along with enslavement, torture, war rape, and forcible deportation. A crime against humanity is the systematic and continuous commission of war crimes

Because of these international law instruments (the Rome Statute is a multilateral treaty), Apartheid now refers to a generalized crime, not just the policy of the old South African government.

As a result, the Court can under some circumstances charge individual politicians with the crime of Apartheid. Those circumstances are that 1) the country has signed the Rome Statute or 2) that the UN Security Council has forwarded the case of a war criminal to the ICC. Neither of these circumstances fits Israel, since it is not a signatory and the US would veto any attempt to charge a major Israeli politician at the International Criminal Court. This inability to bring Israeli officials to the Hague, however, is merely procedural. As a matter of law, Israel can still be guilty of Apartheid practices.

The UN report is concerned with specific legal infractions as spelled out by international law, and with the intention behind those infractions. Intent to dominate another people is important to the definition of Apartheid.

The report points out that:

“The Israel Lands Authority (ILA) manages State land, which accounts for 93 per cent of the land within the internationally recognized borders of Israel and is by law closed to use, development or ownership by non-Jews.”

Going back to the colonial Jewish National Fund, there has been a practice that once land is owned by Zionist institutions, including the Israeli state, it can never be sold to a non-Jew– it is permanently taken off the market on a racial basis.

The Law of Return is another discriminatory practice. Any Jew anywhere in the world can emigrate to Israel. But no Palestinian family expelled in 1948 can return to their ancestral homeland.

Jewish councils may reject applications for residence from Palestinian-Israelis. An Israeli Jew who married an American Christian is allowed to bring the spouse to Israel; but an Israeli Jew who married a West Bank Palestinian may not.

The report argues that in the Israel-Palestinian context, Palestinians are a “race.” I would add that the exclusion of Palestinian spouses of Israeli citizens underlines this definition, since one characteristic of race is endogamy or marrying within the in-group.

Other UN decisions have recognized the Palestinians as a people entitled to self-determination (and indeed such recognition goes back to the correspondence of League of Nations states overseeing the British Mandate over Palestine in the 1920s).

The document says:

“This report finds that the strategic fragmentation of the Palestinian people is the principal method by which Israel imposes an apartheid regime. It first examines Israeli Practices towards the Palestinian People and the Question of Apartheid how the history of war, partition, de jure and de facto annexation and prolonged occupation in Palestine has led to the Palestinian people being divided into different geographic regions administered by distinct sets of law. This fragmentation operates to stabilize the Israeli regime of racial domination over the Palestinians and to weaken the will and capacity of the Palestinian people to mount a unified and effective resistance.”

As for the specifics of Apartheid in the Occupied West Bank, the UN document observes that this territory is virtually a textbook case in Apartheid governance:

“Domain 3 is the system of military law imposed on approximately 4 .6 million Palestinians who live in the occupied Palestini an territory, 2 .7 million of them in the West Bank and 1.9 million in the Gaza Strip. The territory is administered in a manner that fully meets the definition of apartheid under the Apartheid Convention: except for the provision on genocide, every illustrative “inhuman act” listed in the Convention is routinely and systematically practiced by Israel in the West Bank. Palestinians are governed by military law, while the approximately 350,000 Jewish settlers are governed by Israeli civil law. The racial char acter of this situation is further confirmed by the fact that all West Bank Jewish settlers enjoy the protections of Israeli civil law on the basis of being Jewish, whether they are Israeli citizens or not. This dual legal system, problematic in itself, is indicative of an apartheid regime when coupled with the racially discriminatory management of land and development administered by Jewish – national institutions, which are charged with administering “State land” in the interest of the Jewish population.”

The Executive Summary is here.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+50 # mashiguo 2017-03-17 17:10
None of this comes as even the slightest of surprises to anyone who has been on the ground there and seen it.

The only question is what took them so long.
One of the few improvements under obama was the weakening of ties to israel which may have contributed in some small part to allowing this.
 
 
+29 # Activista 2017-03-17 22:36
Israel is apartheid - building wall on US southern border puts USA on the same track -
 
 
+1 # bubbiesue 2017-03-20 22:49
No, Mexico is a sovereign nation. The Palestinian territories are hardly sovereign. They are what's left when adjacent nations say, "We don't want them, either!" It leaves Israel free to treat Palestinian territories and Bedouin areas as the U.S. treated the American Indians--they live on a reservation. I dislike it.
 
 
+14 # draak 2017-03-18 03:34
The report has been disappeared, as expected, tho the link to the exec. summary still works. Where can I find the text of this vital report?
 
 
+5 # Salus Populi 2017-03-18 13:49
Electronic Intifada has a copy at "https://electr onicintifada.ne t/sites/default /files/2017-03/ un_apartheid_re port_15_march_e nglish_final_.p df". [Linked by a commenter at the ESCWA's facebook page.]
 
 
+1 # draak 2017-03-19 08:51
I found a copy here:
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/un-official-resigns-after-pressure-withdraw-israel-apartheid-report
 
 
-35 # Salburger 2017-03-18 04:02
Not the un just a part composed of mostly Arab countries that have always refused to recognize Israel and which started to boycott it even before it declared its independence-- in other words this is pure propaganda from Israel's enemies and not a in position
 
 
+16 # Jim Rocket 2017-03-18 10:46
No. There's a new documentary out now called "The Settlers". It's made by a Zionist Israeli who is very concerned at the actions led by complete religious fanatics will ultimately cause great harm to Israel.

If you give a hoot about the truth you should watch it.

http://m.democracynow.org/stories/15907
 
 
+24 # Texas Aggie 2017-03-18 05:34
You really can't argue with the report on its merits. The only way is to distort and to distract from what the report says and the laws that it is based on. But you can bet that this will be the whole game plan of those who would defend the indefensible.
 
 
+22 # Nancy Jakeman 2017-03-18 06:46
How wonderful it would be if all national borders were open for people to come and go. Before the partition Palestinian and Israeli people were living side by side in harmony.
 
 
+12 # Kootenay Coyote 2017-03-18 08:44
Thanks for this very helpful outline. As for the OT claim of God’s gift of the Promised Land cited by the Israeli government: does not the same OT, which has an honest reaction to oppression, also demand: ‘You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt. You shall not abuse any widow or orphan. If you do abuse them, when they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry; my wrath will burn, & I will kill you with the sword, & your wives shall become widows & your children orphans.’ (Exodus 22/21-24, NRSV).
 
 
+16 # Aliazer 2017-03-18 14:39
What the report, doesn't say, though, and which should have been said is that the Great United States of America, the land of liberty and freedom for people in the world, along with its Judiciary, Legislative and Executive have been for the last three generations, all guilty of criminal accessory to a most heinous, persistent crime perpetrated against another people!!!
 
 
+5 # Jaax88 2017-03-18 17:30
To claim land belonging to another people based on what the OT says is ludicrous. A book of fables used to justify stealing land from other and to justify a regime of apartheid does make so. Only Israeli force and power supports the claims and Israeli regime.
 
 
-1 # Jaax88 2017-03-20 10:23
To claim land belonging to another people based on what the OT says is ludicrous. A book of fables used to justify stealing land from others and to justify a regime of apartheid does not make so. Only Israeli force and power supports the claims and Israeli regime.
 
 
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-03-21 07:20
The UN called Israel an apartheid state because it IS an apartheid state and always has been. The disappearance of this report from the web (except for on alternative media sites) shows that Israel is more powerful than the UN. It gave an order and the UN obeyed. That's how apartheid states operate. They don't tolerate challengers or the truth about them.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN