Excerpt: "The five-hour waits experienced this week by Arizona voters are extreme, but long lines have become a sad feature of U.S. elections. In the District this month, voters in the Republican primary had to stand in a three-block-long line before casting their ballots in an election the party was forced to pay for."
Voters wait in line to cast their ballots in Arizona's presidential primary election on March 22 in Gilbert, Arizona. (photo: Matt York/AP)
Arizona's Shameful Voting Delays Highlight a Wider Problem With American Elections
31 March 16
OME ARIZONA residents waited in line for as long as five hours before they were able to cast ballots in Tuesday�s primaries. Others were so discouraged by the long lines and parking lot gridlock that they gave up without voting. Grilled about the debacle, one election official suggested that voters might have brought it on themselves by not opting to vote early. Such nonchalance, combined with the fact that the areas most affected were predominantly Latino, is an embarrassment and should prompt Arizona officials � as well as those in other states � to assess how prepared their localities are for this year�s critical presidential election.
The problems that saw some Arizona voters still standing in line at midnight have been traced to decisions to cut back on the number of polling places as a way to save money. In Maricopa County, the largest in the state with about 4.2 million people and home to Phoenix, officials reduced the number of places to vote from 200 in 2012 to 60 on Tuesday. That�s one polling place for every 21,000 voters.
Critics were quick to fault the Republican-led state government for intentionally aiming to suppress minority votes. �It is no coincidence many poor and predominantly Latino areas didn�t get a polling place,� wrote Arizona Republic columnist Elvia D�az, reporting that Democrats for weeks had sounded the alarm about insufficient resources. Also lamented was the loss of federal protections for minority voters as a result of the Supreme Court decision in 2013 that gutted the Voting Rights Act by allowing Arizona and other states with discriminatory histories to change election procedures without federal oversight.
The five-hour waits experienced this week by Arizona voters are extreme, but long lines have become a sad feature of U.S. elections. In the District this month, voters in the Republican primary had to stand in a three-block-long line before casting their ballots in an election the party was forced to pay for. After the 2012 election, President Obama convened a commission that found that 10 million people waited longer than half an hour to vote. The Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law did a 2014 study that found a lack of poll workers, poor planning and low numbers of voting machines as key contributors to long lines. The study, which examined three states that had some of the longest waits in 2012, showed that precincts with more minorities experienced longer delays.
Representative democracy is the heartbeat of this country, so it makes no sense that with so much at stake, elections are conducted on the cheap with too few workers, with little training and using outmoded equipment. It�s time � before polls open in November � to make sure that the resources are in place so that every voter is able to cast a ballot in a timely manner.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
The second problem is that so few Americans understand what an oligarchy is or how they operate. They only understand that they are "billionaires," which is sometimes true but there are also oligarchical families.
Oligarchies work through institutions they control. These are the media, the intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies like the FBI, think tanks. They control social organizations and advocacy organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations or the Federalist Society or the Heritage Foundation. These groups are were people with social power meet and exchange ideas and take back plans of action to their own spheres.
The oligarchy is also deeply embedded into the military through weapons contractors and retired generals who retain a lot of influence over active generals.
Bezos' wealth is not particularly important. He's just a robber baron as capitalism has always hosted. His ownership of the Washonton Post is much more important.
Of all the politicians named above, probably Sanders is the only one who is not "wholly owned" by the oligarchs. The rest are probably just career climbers. They will do or say what is needed in order to get the next job.
Did you mean 'not "wholly owned"'? Otherwise this doesn't make sense.
In Russia, straight up bribery is still the most common way to influence government. In the US bribery is seldom needed. It is about networks and relations. It is about the people who belong to the right group. It is about institutions promoting their own.
How do you think the oligarchy works in the US? I'd be interested.
the Indonesian Trump golf course-amusemen t park China government ZTE scandal, involving the apparent of half a billion to a billion dollars; the Quatar blockade-Saudi- UAE-Michael Cohen-Kushner-6 66 5th Ave scandal involving a similar amount; the Russian oligarch-Michae l Cohen- oh I can't even remember. And the Trump Postmaster General attempted shakedown of Bezos. And of course Stormy Daniels. The point is that the M.O. is always the same: to Stormy, "cute little girl you got here, shame if anything happened to her mother". To Qatar: "nice little country you got here, shame if anything happened to it..." To China: "nice little economy you got here, shame if we had to put on tariffs or sanctions". That shakedown lasted throughout the election campaign, and ended in 3 days after the Chinese investment in Trump-Indonesia . The fact that Qatar is an important ally, that Palestinians deserve a homeland and that Kushner-Netanya hu-Adelson's policy is also terrible for Israel, that ZTE phones are a security risk, that ZTE violated Iran and North Korea sanctions, that the Iran deal was working and is infinitely better than anything Trump can hope to achieve with N Korea, that Putin kills journalists... carries no weight, when profits are involved. The tax cuts have almost sealed our fate, for that is a bribe to all the very wealthy to not let progressives threaten Trump's kleptocracy.
If Dems ignore this..
Yet--Bernie, a white kid who had been speaking out for human rights since high school, was arrested for civil rights activities in the early 70s when Hillary was primping as a Goldwater Girl to attend the 1964 Republican convention. (When I watched that on TV I was so nauseated I resigned membership in the Republican party!)
And Congressman Lewis had the gall to campaign for Hillary Clinton and say he didn't think much of Bernie. SHAME, Mr Lewis. SHAME. Until you apologize I will always wonder who got to you.
So when Republicans run blogs bearing his picture, it's to convince voters that the Sanders movement has taken over the Democratic Party, which Bernie supporters can only wish were true.
The center-right or neo-liberal/neo -conservative wing of the democratic party is dying. It is hated and distrusted. It will hang on with all its might, but it is not the future of the democratic party. What Sanders represents is the future. We should be grateful for his efforts in propelling the progressive/soc ialist/populist faction to the forefront.
You'd get your Hillary v. Trump rematch.
Me, please pass the oxycontin. I want to be comfortably numb for the whole election season.