Mackey writes: "For months now, Donald Trump has been complaining about the level of violence inflicted on protesters at his campaign rallies. Complaining, that is, about protesters - who have been tackled and kicked, pushed, spat on, and sucker-punched - not being subjected to nearly enough violence."
Donald Trump. (photo: AP)
ALSO SEE: A History of Donald Trump Inciting Violence Against
Protesters at His Rallies and Campaign Events
ALSO SEE: Rachel Maddow With a Video History of Trump's Ugliness
Trump Concerned His Rallies Are Not Violent Enough
13 March 16
or months now, Donald Trump has been complaining about the level of violence inflicted on protesters at his campaign rallies. Complaining, that is, about protesters � who have been tackled and kicked, pushed, spat on, and sucker-punched � not being subjected to nearly enough violence.
In the latest instance, at a rally in St. Louis on Friday, Trump complained about the overly gentle treatment of protesters being dragged from a theater and things got ugly outside, as his supporters faced off with protesters.
At a rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, on Wednesday, during which a black protester being led out by the police was elbowed in the face by a Trump supporter, the candidate voiced his regret in words he has used again and again.
�See, in the good old days this doesn�t happen,� Trump told his fans, �because they used to treat them very, very rough. And when they protested once, you know, they would not do it again so easily. But today they walk in and they put their hand up and they put the wrong finger in the air at everybody and they get away with murder because we�ve become weak, we�ve become weak.�
Two weeks earlier in Oklahoma, after he had to wait for the ejection of a protester wearing a yellow star with the word �Mexican� written on it, and a shirt reading �KKK Endorses Trump,� he returned to the same theme.
�You see, in the good old days, law enforcement acted a lot quicker than this, a lot quicker,� he said. �In the good old days, they�d rip him out of that seat so fast. But today, everybody�s politically correct. Our country�s going to hell with being politically correct.� The police, he speculated, were �afraid to move� because of concerns that they could get sued and lose their jobs. �We are really becoming a frightened country and it�s very, very sad,� he added.
Four days before that, in Las Vegas, Trump was more direct about the kind of response he really wanted to see. After claiming, falsely, that a protester was ejected for �throwing punches,� Trump lamented: �We�re not allowed to punch back anymore. I love the old days � you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They�d be carried out on a stretcher, folks.�
�I�d like to punch him in the face, I tell ya,� he added.
Given that Trump never tires of telling us that there was a golden era when protesters in America knew their place � or were too terrified to speak up � the question of when, exactly, these good old days began and ended has become the subject of speculation.
Readers are invited to share their own guesses, but since it is common for conservatives to harken back to simpler days when they were children � and Trump has been complaining that America has gone soft since at least 1987 � the smart money is on sometime early in his youth.
Could Trump, who was born in 1946, be thinking of his teenage years, when the police were notoriously quick to resort to violence against peaceful black men, women, and children marching for civil rights?
Or perhaps he�d like to return us to the year he graduated from Wharton, 1968, when protesters at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago were battered by the police on national television?
Given Trump�s obvious fondness for the presidency of Richard Nixon, though � the posters evoking �the silent majority� of Americans who support him, the decades of advice from dirty trickster Roger Stone � my own guess is that he might be harking back to a moment in early 1970, when dozens of antiwar protesters in Trump�s own city did indeed require stretchers, after being attacked and beaten by construction workers loyal to Nixon.
The incident, which became known as �the hard-hat riot,� took place in May 1970, when a student demonstration against the killing of four protesters at Kent State University in Ohio by members of the National Guard was broken up with extreme violence by union members from nearby construction sites.
As the New York Times reported the next day:
Helmeted construction workers broke up a student antiwar demonstration in Wall Street yesterday, chasing youths through the canyons of the financial district in a wild noontime melee that left about 70 persons injured.
The workers then stormed City Hall, cowing policemen and forcing officials to raise the American flag to full staff from half staff, where it had been placed in mourning for the four students killed at Kent State University on Monday.
At nearby Pace College a group of construction workers who said they had been pelted with missiles by students from the roof, twice invaded a building, smashing windows with clubs and crowbars and beating up students.
The Times also reported that one of the construction workers, �who said he wished to remain anonymous for fear of his life,� said the attack on the anti-Nixon protesters was not spontaneous but had been organized by their employers and union leaders, who even arranged for the workers to be paid a bonus if they agreed to �break some heads.�
Nixon, who would go on to encourage Donald Trump to run for office, later gave tacit blessing to the attack on the protesters, by inviting the leaders of New York�s construction unions to the White House to thank them for their support.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
By the way, wikipedia says, "Boiga is a large genus of mildly venomous, rear-fanged, colubrid snakes typically known as the cat-eyed snakes or just cat snakes. They are primarily found throughout southeast Asia, India and Australia, but due to their extremely hardy nature and adaptability have spread to many other suitable habitats around the world."
I didn't immediately get the reference, even though used Wimpy in my analogy.
I agree with most of what you said.
I do not agree that it takes all the money to get elected. Statistics heavily correlate with money and winning, but that would not be the case without vertical integration (consolidation) of the media -- thanks to Clinton's Tele-communicat ions Act of 1996 -- and other election-relate d issues; you mentioned Diebold; and another is Dem Party's hierarchical politics and corporate affiliation, which besides dispensing money to their preferred candidates -- regardless of non-progressive ideology -- includes (poor) strategy and consultant advise.
The answer, of course, is Primary Elections... getting rid of incumbents.
If Obama has a shred of decency, he'll bow out before the Democratic Primaries, which should help non-incumbent Congressional Democrats and turnout for the General Election.
The light shining is on the question... the question of fairness and equality -- in regard to prosecution rules of law and adoption of fair laws that represent the peoples' interest, accountability for greed-driven economic crimes and environmental devastation, and honest, clear -- no excuses -- political representation. .. ... ... in essence, sanity.
And the question for the light is WHEN.
... and how much? ... for the balance and peace of mind of justice.
The OccupyWallStree t movement has the potential of shaking the whole system up and making it perfectly clear that it isn't just change that is needed, but the application of the laws and justice that keep things equitable for all.
more later.
While businesses and businessmen and women do have basic civic and societal responsibilitie s related to their doing business, as long as they follow the law, how they serve society with their profits is their business.
People aren't interested in being punitive, for the sake of punishment pleasure or to introduce pure socialism, it is to bring justice to those who took a chance on criminal greed.
In regard to short-selling, if you are talking about curbing insider-trading or taking away advantages that large-scale traders have over regular traders, that is fine; insider trading is all ready illegal and there are no good reasons to disadvantage smaller traders.
Since only the Progressive-Dem ocrats and Democratic-Soci alist Bernie Sanders (& maybe Ron Paul) are not corrupted by Wall Street, they are the only elected federal officials not being protested against.
And because he was so effective, they just go la-la-la when he talks. We just have to hope that the mainstream corporate Clintonian Democrats, in office, out of office, and just plain folk will understand what is going on.
They didnot advise him or oppose his signature on NAFTA which benefited GOP and the Clinton Family also.
There is very little left of Democratic Party, and a shadow of Republican Party.
The only thing I see are the Puppet Masters, these tyrants were given free reign in the early 70's, now they are the Monsters we were all warned about.
Problem is our parents didnot recognize them any better than people today.
We are Marching, Protesting, signing Petitions and I believe this is just a beginning. If Democrats want to prove something, perhaps they better realign Homeland Paranoia. When they put the demons back in their place, perhaps the Corporations will see that we will either win or bury them.
When I say bury, I mean we will put our money in other Countries that do not depend on them. So Europe, perhaps this is a time to look at the Future of America,new generation of Investing.
Wall Street is hollow like an Chocolate Easter Bunny,they have nothing. They have debt, property no one pays for or can afford. Housing is down, Corporations are selling out to Asia, Middle East so Europe where does that leave you? Time we remind GOP the True Meaning of Tea Party "Let's sink their Ship'. Buy Organic. Buy American.
Critics say they are not focused, how can a movement like this be focused on one specific thing when the problems to fix are so numerous. Wall Street is a perfect place to start.
Tonight they can sleep tight. There are some very brave and incredibly bright protestors here and running things very Democratically.
Interesting to see how they've had to form a mini government within. See, we do need a government, it just has represent the people.
At this point the movement is progressive and inclusive.