RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Peters writes: "There are structural impediments to women taking their rightful place as citizens in the United States."

Women march in New York City for gender equality. (photo: J. Carrier/UN Women)
Women march in New York City for gender equality. (photo: J. Carrier/UN Women)


Some Women Are More Invisible

By Cynthia Peters, teleSUR

30 December 15

 

There are structural impediments to women taking their rightful place as citizens in the United States.

here are two countries in the world that have no laws mandating paid maternity leave. One is Papua New Guinea. The other is the United States of America.

This was one of the points made by the U.N. Working Group on discrimination against women, which visited the U.S. recently and expressed shock at their findings. After politely acknowledging the U.S.�s commitment to liberty, the report went on to lambaste the government for failing women on many levels, including:

- the U.S. ranks 72nd globally in terms of women�s representation in the legislature.

- working mothers account for two-thirds of household earnings, yet women earn 79 cents for every dollar that men earn.

- women do the majority of the care-giving work, but many cannot access Family Medical Leave, and those who can, must take the leave without pay.

- the rate of women�s poverty has increased from 12.1 percent to 14.5 percent, and poverty exposes women to more violence � through homelessness and pressure to stay with abusive partners.

As shocking as these statistics are, the situation is much worse for women of color and poor women. Within the United States, race- and class-based inequalities create countries within the country. Perhaps this is where the U.N. report is most helpful: it exposes the ways that demographics profoundly shape outcomes for women. It is a reminder for why it is essential to bring both a gender lens to our analysis of inequality in the U.S. and simultaneously a race and class lens.

Consider, for example, the largely invisible work done by women in bearing and raising children. Despite the fact that children are an obvious social good � a necessity even, assuming we want the human race to continue � U.S. society doesn�t do much to ensure that mothers get the proper supports to bring their offspring into the world. This special brand of American individualism (aka: �go ahead and have a baby if you want one; it�s your choice�), intertwined with sexism, textured by racism, and bolstered by extreme inequality, offers a window into just how dependent the U.S. is on dehumanizing people in order to rationalize how the system works.

It turns out that for women, the first job of giving birth is to survive it � which is harder to do in the U.S. than in almost all other OECD nations, but it�s even harder if you�re African-American, in which case you are four times more likely to die in childbirth or if you live in a state with a high poverty rate, in which case you have a 77 percent higher maternal mortality rate.

Once you survive the birth, you have to figure out how to support yourself and the baby. In the U.S., only women have access to any form of paid family leave, but this statistic looks even worse when you see how it is �concentrated among the wealthy: More than 20 percent of the top quartile earners enjoy it, while only 5 percent in the bottom quartile do.� Thus, those who most need the benefit have the least access to it.

How do moms manage? They borrow money, dip into savings, put off paying bills, and go on assistance. �Perhaps it�s little wonder that a quarter of `poverty spells� � an episode of poverty that lasts two months or more at a time � begin with the birth of a child.� Another strategy is to get free help from grandparents. Currently, 4.5 million children are being parented by grandparents, who are far more likely to be people of color who are living poverty. Of course, this help is not truly free but has a health cost. It comes as no surprise that �Grandmothers caring for or raising grandchildren suffer more stress and depression than grandmothers who aren�t caregivers.�

The average maternity leave is 10 weeks, but 16 percent of new moms took only 1-4 weeks and 33 percent took �no formal time off at all, returning to job duty almost immediately.� This is bad for baby and bad for mom. According to an article by Maya Dusenbery, shorter maternity leaves are linked to higher rates of maternal depression and lower immunization rates and as well as less breastfeeding. It�s not surprising, she says, �that poor mothers in the U.S. have double the rates of post-partum depression, are half as likely to breastfeed for the recommended six months, and are more than twice as likely to see their babies die within the first year.�

Who takes care of the babies while mothers go back to work? The U.N. report reminds us: �The estimated 2.5 million domestic workers in the U.S. are overwhelmingly women, frequently immigrant women many of whom are undocumented � these workers are vulnerable to verbal and physical abuse and to wage theft.� And who is taking care of these women�s children?

If you don�t have a nanny or a domestic worker taking care of your baby, perhaps you drop him or her off at a daycare center, where, according to Vox.com, the median pay for child care workers (in 2012) was only $9.38 per hour, significantly less than nonfarm animal caretakers, who made $10.82 and a lot less than the median pay for all workers, which was $16.87.

Pregnancy and childbirth are quintessentially female tasks, and they are of primary importance to the species. Yet here in the U.S., with one of the highest per capita income rates in the world, these tasks (and associated tasks, such as breastfeeding and bonding in the early weeks) are not honored in even the most minimal of ways. Of course, men can and should play a role, and to a certain extent they are, with men doing significantly more housework and childcare than they did in the past. However, it�s too bad men tend to be home with the children because they are sick or disabled or because they are looking for work, rather than home on paid parental leave.

The rich may hire nannies, but the task is so undervalued that they pay more to have their dog shampooed. They depend on their nannies (overwhelmingly women and women of color) to accept low pay and scant recognition even as they expect them to open their hearts to the babies in their care. We all know that practically pathological patience is essential to the care of our young, and that is impossible without love, the uncompensated heart-work that the whole society turns to women for, but refuses to recognize or pay us for.

The U.N. report summarizes its findings: �In global context, U.S. women do not take their rightful place as citizens.� Indeed, one of the significant structural impediments to women taking our rightful place as citizens is that much of the work we do is invisible. Wealthy women have the option to buy the supports they need, but that is not �taking a rightful place as a citizen.� Rather it is transferring the invisibility to someone else � not a just solution.

For the majority � women with fewer economic resources and women of color � reproductive work is punishable by increased poverty and even maternal mortality. It�s hard enough to take your rightful place as a citizen when you�re battling poverty. And it�s impossible when you�re dead.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+70 # mjc 2013-01-05 11:02
Now that Matt Taibbi has opened our eyes to the extremely close connection of banks to our national government, it is very hard to think of our society as anything but a precursor to some version of fascism. The two political parties apparently still have disagreements but the failure of the Republican Party with its strong Tea Party leanings is really not respectable enough to play on the same field with the Democrats. This is even more obvious when we consider the latest $1 trillion dollar coin that has been suggested as a way to solve our debt problems. We have a central government willing to free itself from any of the shackles of a responsible, democratic republic...no matter what. One party government with the help of the media can be portrayed as some sort of big brother, totalitarian control necessary for order and prosperity, prosperity for the corporate sector, something much less for the rest of us. Lying and the grand size of the sector that actually controls our national government seems to ensure the failure of any republican version of the United States of America. If Taibbi isn't worried about his existence in this country, it must be because there are too few conservatives/f ascists who believe that the public reads such articles or that the public prefers order to the pursuit of happiness.
 
 
+43 # letsfixit 2013-01-05 11:42
Fascism can take two forms...where the govt owns the means of production or...

the corporations own the government.
 
 
+13 # MHAS 2013-01-05 15:28
If the government is in fact a true democracy--is in fact controlled by its citizens and accountable to them with full transparency--a nd owns the means of production, that is not, by definition, fascism. If the gov't is in fact an oligarchy or dictatorship and has such control over production, it has much in common with fascism. There are historical instances of democratic control of industries.
 
 
+10 # Yakpsyche 2013-01-05 19:29
We've got the second type.
 
 
+4 # tm7devils 2013-01-06 13:16
The corporations and the banks have owned our government for well over 30 years...how long will it take the American people to wake up?
We have a democratic government in name only.
The American people, for the most part, are the most apathetic, self-serving and ignorant group on this planet. A bunch of gutless wonders who are willing to bury their heads in the sand so they don't have to put themselves out so as to not impinge on that soft and easy lifestyle they so relish.
The only mitigation to this is our Fourth Estate who, when it comes to giving the American public the information it needs to be able to create checks and balances on our government, are as useless as teats on a boar...and we are now paying the price.
The Executive branch and congress(except for maybe, maybe! 20 individuals) should be run off the hill and replaced with people who can think critically, aren't bought and have the well being of US citizens at the forefront thinking and actions...along with the well being of the rest of the World.
Right now, it's a case of the blind and the stupid leading the blind and the ignorant.
Under the oligarchic/fasc ist/police state we now have we won't last long.
ROME - The sequel!
 
 
+3 # DevinMacGregor 2013-01-06 15:43
We do remember that the Roman Republic lasted 500 years. The Western Roman Empire lasted 500 years more. The Eastern Roman Empire lasted 1000 years beyond that. So we could be seeing a lot more of this crap for a hell of a lot longer.

As much as I might agree with you otherwise I do not see that we are the most in any of that.
 
 
+4 # Vegan_Girl 2013-01-07 05:37
Yes but history seems to be accelerating, probably due to advances in technology. I think the end (or beginning) is near.
 
 
0 # Michael Lee Bugg 2013-01-10 15:40
Amen!
 
 
+10 # DevinMacGregor 2013-01-06 15:36
That is incorrect. Mussolini said it best: fascism should be considered corporatism.

If the govt owns the means of production we call that Communism.

People I think confuse totalitarianism with either system.

BUT ... govt run health care is not fascism. Forcing people to buy privately owned health insurance btw IS leaning towards fascism.

Republic means govt by people not owned by any elite class such as a monarchy OR the rich. This includes corporations. When those entities have a better voice than the general public then we move towards fascism.

But the Republic owning the commons is not fascism. The same as the govt owning the Post Office or Amtrak. Neither are fascism.
 
 
+3 # jmac9 2013-01-07 14:57
Though you might think it unrelated - we must have government - federal - start respecting state decisions - this petition asks Joe Biden and Obama to let the citizens vote stand in Colorado and Washington State - then we can also start to have state banks etc.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/tell-vp-biden-end-his-war-marijuana-users-and-respect-people-colorado-and-washington/m4fQdJ4H?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
 
 
+2 # CandH 2013-01-05 13:43
 
 
+6 # RLF 2013-01-06 07:50
There seems to be little to recommend the Democrats, seeing that they had control of the house and the senate for two years while this was happening and couldn't be bothered to read or understand the paperwork. The bunch of them are disgusting and Obama, who has bent over backwards to be a Republican, has been incredibly ineffectual at providing any sense that our government works for the people and not banksters. To busy checking out his own facebook page and asking for money from the same people he has screwed.
 
 
+56 # wantrealdemocracy 2013-01-05 11:04
Oh, shit! We are screwed. The government will keep pumping our money to the crooks and so it is up to us to stop this. Take all of your money out of the banks. They feed off lending your money out while they pay nearly nothing to you in interest. You lose money by the day to to the falling value of the dollar. Take your money out and pay your bills with cash. If you have money to save don't put it in the banks. Buy things of lasting value. It is all gonna crash and you can cover yer ass if you have things of value to use to barter in the new economy ahead. We can starve the beast that is eating us if we end their 'liquidity'---t hat means take our money out of the system.
 
 
+21 # Virginia 2013-01-05 12:05
The only way to correct the system is to starve it. And if you want your retirement funds you should take them out now before Congress increases penalties for early withdrawals to stave off bank runs - because right now there is not enough money to cover the majority of the fictitious funds - first come, first served.

Homeowners, whether in foreclosure or current, need to know where there loan is because it appears TARP funds may have been paying off the investors which may have kept MBS trusts current. If the trust is showing no losses, how can it claim damage and sue for foreclosure?

The big debate now is if my loan is in a trust and Uncle Sam made my mortgage payments (thank you very much) to keep the trust current - maybe some of the TARP money actually did help homeowners. It's just that the banks want their cake and eat it too.

If you don't know where your loan is run a Bloomberg Terminal search and request the excel that shows payments and losses for the tranche(s) where your loan is located. See www.doctelportal.com if you need help finding your mortgage loan.
 
 
+43 # Skeptical1247 2013-01-05 11:33
I knew it was bad, but these additional details pretty much nauseate me. The unbelievably corrupt behavior on the part of ALL concerned - bankers, regulators, administration officials of both parties and Congressional representatives of both Parties is just sickening. And the prospects for this situation ever changing are dim indeed.

The only action to be taken would appear to be an emotional one rather than a "solutional" one, although it might contain the seeds of a solution, and that is to withdraw and divest one's self from every possible connection with a "system" of banking and governance that is corrupt beyond imagining.

Withdraw your money AND your debt from the big banks, eschew debt, especially credit card debt. If your credit rating is shot anyway and you are on the brink, declare bankruptcy. Downsize your lifestyle voluntarily instead of letting the next national or personal catastrophe do it for you. (less painful by far) If you have any assets in the market, withdraw them from ANY corporation in which the CEO's have committed themselves to screwing you politically as well as financially. Biotech industries, war-mongers, armament manufacturers, banks and securities firms, resource extraction firms, all of which are dedicated to your slow death or impoverishment, need to be withdrawn from. Both Parties need to be withdrawn from.

I believe it does holds the seeds of a solution, but if not, it might make you feel better.
 
 
+15 # barkingcarpet 2013-01-05 11:47
Legitimate rapist bankers and corrupt corporate beholden selfserving politicians.... Endless wars, Fukushima still spewing, etc, etc.
When is the public going to put an end to the stupidity?
We ARE the power folks, and can change the world with every waking $$. What ARE we choosing, allowing, and going along with?
I am ashamed to be an Amerikan, and proud of it.
 
 
+4 # Yakpsyche 2013-01-05 19:36
Hello? We ARE the power? Would you care to describe just exactly HOW we are the power? I declare, I don't think I'm the only one that feels rather powerless. What do you recommend we DO to exercise our power, overthrow the plutocrats and take back our country?
 
 
+5 # Vegan_Girl 2013-01-07 05:40
Occupy...
 
 
+13 # gdp1 2013-01-05 11:49
...I must commen Matt on his relentless research into these arenas....when the Big Fail comes, he will be the 'historian' of note, the only (surely not!) one doing his homework....but .....what can be done?The inertia of this corruption is Too BigTo Overcome...what can a little guy do....but watch?....
 
 
+9 # to be 2013-01-05 11:57
Thanks as always for your pro taxpayer articles. The only thing the federal government has really ever done directly for me is to help me out lower my mortgage rate to 2% and drop my monthly payment 400 bucks a month. I'm told I'm an anomoly, but whatever, it's good to still be in my house!
 
 
+23 # ladypyrates 2013-01-05 12:07
...what a busy fellow you are to have uncovered the sordid details of the Fed's behavior, my dear boy. It's obvious that you haven't read paragraph 28 of the original Federal Reserve Act because if you had, you would not be so astonished. There was a very capable economist back in the 30s and 40s (who happens to have been a woman) who researched the structure of the Fed and reported to the public the danger that the private-banker- owned Fed posed to the American system of government. Perhaps you can imagine what the banker cabal did to that woman's career...but in any event, her warnings were ignored and we now have a bankrupt country. Don't misunderstand the isses here...an elastic currency is essential for our economic vitality but that currency has to be controlled by Congress and not the private bankers. Sadly, the cover-up continues on a daily basis wih the media offering up silly reasons for our situation and not one bit of it even begins to point at the causation which began 100 years ago.
 
 
+5 # Quickmatch 2013-01-05 12:23
Skeptical1247, I'm writing to you from 2023. The nation read your 2013 piece about dropping out, etc and we the people got the heat and forged ahead. We constrained our lifestyles, quit buying clothes, quit buying more food than necessary, bicycled or walked everywhere (we all look slim and fit now)quit our jobs, emptied our bank accounts and brokerage accounts. Today everybody is unemployed. Nobody is producing anything. All farming is none by hand and animal power--we're producing 1/4 the required foor to live on (did I say we all look slim?). I'm writing this to you to suggest that, before you go off half cocked on some simpleminded quest you should study up on the situation and try not to kill the patient through simpleminded cures. Good luck, though. I'm here; I see the future, and if you should live so long, you're screwed!
 
 
+11 # Eliza D 2013-01-06 15:02
Quickmatch, read Skeptical1247's post more carefully. The writer did NOT say we should quit our jobs. His/her suggestions are the least of what we should all do. We should (and my family has) transfer all our money from banks to credit unions, transfer mortgages to credit unions and starve these demon banks. I agree with many others on this site who feel we are headed for a time of horrendous "austerity" and suffering. In that case, it would be wise to learn how to live more simply for our own financial health as well as the health of the planet. Furthermore, because of the drenching of our farms with pesticides and GMOs, many of us are already doing small scale farming and raising food animals to avoid being poisoned by Big Food. I say to Big Food,Big Pharma, Big Banks,Big Oil: "We've had enough of you!" Fall into the sewer of history.
 
 
+8 # Smokey 2013-01-05 12:29
For a lot of Americans, the Great Recession is still in progress. Many more are waiting for the economy's house of cards to collapse. Maybe that happen before the 2014 elections.
(How do you spell "shellacking"?)

Shell lacking? More like Shell gaining. Although it's not alone.

Unemployment? The official figures went down because many workers stopped searching for work. Many settled for "underemploymen t" and various part-time and even illegal arrangements.
 
 
+29 # tomtom 2013-01-05 12:39
Yeah, all the middle class and poor withdraw all their extra money from the banks. What extra money? Hand to mouth, day to day, week to week, month to month. Everone's money is tied up in a garage sale on their front lawn.
 
 
+29 # Tiffany49 2013-01-05 12:45
Give Matt Taibbi a pulitzer!
 
 
+2 # Old Man 2013-01-05 13:03
Credit Unions are a much better place to bank.
Wish, hope and think are all procrastinating words, so I'll say it this way, when Elizabeth Warren gets to the bottom of this fiasco something will get done.
I respect Matt, but he sounds a little like chicken little.
 
 
+10 # Shorey13 2013-01-05 13:05
Larry Summers "explained" all of this early on, when he said "We have to make the bondholders good. If we don't, the whole system will collapse." In other words, taxpayers, shareholders, consumers, in short, everyone except the "bondholders" are screwed, have no skin in the game. Quickmatch may be exaggerating the consequences, but the general point is well taken. Yet, continued cancer-like "growth" is a death sentence for the planet. The House of Cards we call a financial system will eventually collapse, so the main responsibility of Progressives is to lay out an alternative economic system. It can be done.
 
 
+8 # elmont 2013-01-05 13:27
Anyone who knows someone who has tried to get help with a mortgage loan modification is well aware of the fact that the Feds and the banks are doing doodly-squat to help the people most hurt by the 2008 crash. Matt, thanks for explaining the how and the why.
 
 
+6 # DaveM 2013-01-05 13:30
I'd like a bailout. Problem is I do not need or want enough to justify the paperwork (and also have no lobbyists). Around $100,000. I would not ask for that money without strings attached: in return I would offer the use of the product(s) purchased with the proceeds as a living laboratory for the testing and evaluation of green technologies.

I would expect no salary and be happy to provide ongoing data which would in due course yield millions of dollars in benefits to the government and to the people of the United States. The grant would also put an end to certain government "subsidies" I currently receive, which over my expected lifetime would more than offset the $100,000.

I am purposely being vague here, but....just at a glance at least portions of this must appear to make sense.

You know what the major problem is? The government doesn't think in numbers that small any more.
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2013-01-05 13:58
"Goldman CEO Blankfein later dismissed the importance of the loans" [quote from article].
Ah well, he was doing, by his own words "God's work" wasn't he?
Poor ol' God, it gets dragged into and through all kinds of reeking shit dunnit?!
 
 
+9 # Big Jake 2013-01-05 14:56
Great piece, Matt. Sadly, it is reflective of the sewer that our nation's capital has become. We, the people, are barely noticed as even existing. Lincoln explained this long ago. Labor must precede capital and in fact, capital cannot come into existence without labor. We have completely abandoned this absolute truism.
The writer has given us insights into just how corrupt the whole system is. However, I doubt if he or any major journalist understands that this is the natural consequence of a bad money system. Not merely corrupt but inherently bad.
It has taken us 100 years to see the real consequences of our political leaders abandoning their responsibility and violating the Constitution by transfering our monetary system to private banking interests. Like in the political cartoon/speech, when you put the cats in charge, they just do what comes natural to cats. They are devouring our nation. Can it be rescued? I think so but our window is not infinite. It is truly up to "We, the People." and we do not seem to have suffered enough as yet. I hope I am wrong.
 
 
+9 # Big Jake 2013-01-05 15:03
I forgot. We have 2 recent trial runs for the bailout. Both in the mid-80's. The collapse of the Savings and loan system once it was allowed to use Fed style money creation and loan endless amounts on ficticious values, and the Farm Credit system that did the same thing---loaned massive amounts of money raised by bonds to lend to farmers while the real need was to prop us the balance sheets of the Bank. FCS threatened Congress directly to default on their bonds and send the nation over the fiscal cliff. Congress caved in but instructed the Bank to assist its borrowers. Not one farm in the nation was helped. As in interesting note, the Farm Credit System is doing at this moment the exact same thing. They are lending amounts based upon massively inflated real estate values and it will end the same way. The taxpayer will be expected to bail out the bank and screw the borrowers.
 
 
+5 # brux 2013-01-05 16:01
Yeah, well written.
 
 
+8 # GDC707 2013-01-05 19:12
Another tremendous piece, Matt. I am sharing it as widely as i can. Unfortunately most people just don't know enough and really don't care. Sheep, lined up for shearing.
 
 
+8 # seniorcitizen 2013-01-05 19:51
There is one person who will fight the big banks, and that is newly elected Senator, Eliz. Warren from Mass. She understands banking and hopefully will help undo this travesty. This mess is worse than I thought. It makes me madder than anything that has taken place in the last 4 years. We the people need to let President Obama know that we expect him to do everything that can be done to get money moving for loans to business and to help homeowners with mortgages. I have moved my money to a credit union and I refuse to borrow from banks or use credit cards, except the one from my credit union. Some others who have posted have urged that we remove our money from the big banks. If enough people do it, it will send a message that we mean to take our nation back out of the control of the "banksters". More people need to be informed about what the bailout is all about. Thanks for this article, Matt.
 
 
+5 # jayvee 2013-01-05 21:38
Thank you Matt for much needed enlightenment on this dark and taudry subject. It was always [an unexplained] mystery to me how within a year, the largest recipients of TARP and Stimulus
handouts -- with no loans to businesses, no mortgage assistance to the millions of underwater and bankrupt homeowners, yet millions in bonuses to CEOs, execs, and similar misdeeds -- could so soon pay off billions in goverment handouts. At least part of the answer came in two obscure articles that appeared in the last year: The largest recipients quickly bought US treasury bonds with the huge taxpayer handouts, at handsome interest rates. Upon maturity, the big recipients repaid the government handouts and pocketed lucrative interest payments (again at taxpayer expense) with not a modicum of assistance to the ailing US economy. How could such an obvious "slight of hand" escape the eyes of government overseers ? PBS' Frontline" ran an excellent documentary on the bailout and the political playout in realtime. The Frontlines documentary should be required viewing for every US taxpayer.
 
 
+5 # MainStreetMentor 2013-01-05 21:55
If Matt Taibbi's investigative reporting finds these things - and they can be verified, why isn't there a flood of indictments against these miscreant financial rapists? It leaves one to believe that our legislative and judicial systems may be owned, lock, stock and barrel by the ethically bankrupt and the morally decayed.
 
 
+9 # adickinson 2013-01-06 03:18
Matt Taibbi is amazing. What a great writer, and how brilliant at research! We all need to know these things that he reports. Someone above, in the comments, questioned how the people are powerful. we are the ones who vote, not the corporations, and not the banks. Just like unions, back in the day when they organized, when people stand together, they win. Ideas suggested about taking money out of banks and corporations is one way. Also, being careful how we spend. Only invest in enterprises that support people rather than crush them. Boycott Walmart, for an obvious example. Use credit unions. Buy local produce, organic. All these ways will starve the beast, as someone pointed out. And keep reading writers like Matt Taibbi, watching Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman (or listening on the radio or going to democracynow.or g.
It's tough not to get discouraged. If you have money in the market, ask your investment person to make sure you are not investing in weapons and other horrible enterprises, at least. Share ideas. I'd like to hear other ideas. Yes, this country has drifted toward fascism. "Rage against the dying of the light."
 
 
+1 # FDRva 2013-01-06 09:49
Outstanding piece by Tabibi.

But there is one obvious question he neglected to address.

Where was the sainted Barack Obama when all this was going on? Admiring himself in the mirror while Geithner, et al called the shots?!?

Sounds like the Commander-In-Ch ief was no better than 3rd in command behind Geithner and Bernanke.

And just like that noted genius GW Bush--BH Obama was perfectly happy with that arrangement.

Lesser evil arguments in politics seldom get less than evil results.
 
 
+3 # grouchy 2013-01-06 10:43
Sounds like, as I long ago concluded, the banks already own us!
 
 
+2 # hammermann 2013-01-06 15:01
Wow. This is how I explain my deep disquiet at the organized criminality that has been institutionaliz ed throughout the banking/investm ent business.. and my feeling that it's going to lead to another crash where no one gets up again. "One nation under justice", eh? Taibbi is the most important reporter in the world.
 
 
+3 # treadlightly 2013-01-06 20:34
I am not familiar with Propublica but from the looks of it they have managed to do a good job of tracking the bailout money.

http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/

Very current too, December 19 2012
 
 
+3 # Kwamined 2013-01-07 06:30
 
 
+3 # Shermerville55 2013-01-07 18:02
If you have a mortgage and you belong to a credit union, check out refinancing with them. We thought we couldn't refi because the banks/mortgage lenders all charged such high fees that it wasn't worthwhile to refinance. BUT the credit union's fees are much lower. It probably helps that our mortgage balance isn't very high. And it is such a relief to be free of the evil banksters.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN