Peters writes: "There are structural impediments to women taking their rightful place as citizens in the United States."
Women march in New York City for gender equality. (photo: J. Carrier/UN Women)
Some Women Are More Invisible
30 December 15
There are structural impediments to women taking their rightful place as citizens in the United States.
here are two countries in the world that have no laws mandating paid maternity leave. One is Papua New Guinea. The other is the United States of America.
This was one of the points made by the U.N. Working Group on discrimination against women, which visited the U.S. recently and expressed shock at their findings. After politely acknowledging the U.S.�s commitment to liberty, the report went on to lambaste the government for failing women on many levels, including:
- the U.S. ranks 72nd globally in terms of women�s representation in the legislature.
- working mothers account for two-thirds of household earnings, yet women earn 79 cents for every dollar that men earn.
- women do the majority of the care-giving work, but many cannot access Family Medical Leave, and those who can, must take the leave without pay.
- the rate of women�s poverty has increased from 12.1 percent to 14.5 percent, and poverty exposes women to more violence � through homelessness and pressure to stay with abusive partners.
As shocking as these statistics are, the situation is much worse for women of color and poor women. Within the United States, race- and class-based inequalities create countries within the country. Perhaps this is where the U.N. report is most helpful: it exposes the ways that demographics profoundly shape outcomes for women. It is a reminder for why it is essential to bring both a gender lens to our analysis of inequality in the U.S. and simultaneously a race and class lens.
Consider, for example, the largely invisible work done by women in bearing and raising children. Despite the fact that children are an obvious social good � a necessity even, assuming we want the human race to continue � U.S. society doesn�t do much to ensure that mothers get the proper supports to bring their offspring into the world. This special brand of American individualism (aka: �go ahead and have a baby if you want one; it�s your choice�), intertwined with sexism, textured by racism, and bolstered by extreme inequality, offers a window into just how dependent the U.S. is on dehumanizing people in order to rationalize how the system works.
It turns out that for women, the first job of giving birth is to survive it � which is harder to do in the U.S. than in almost all other OECD nations, but it�s even harder if you�re African-American, in which case you are four times more likely to die in childbirth or if you live in a state with a high poverty rate, in which case you have a 77 percent higher maternal mortality rate.
Women's rights in the US fall behind global standards, according to UN report. Read more: https://t.co/HwxI84iZuh pic.twitter.com/DIOduELbUK
— The Stream (@AJStream) December 16, 2015
Once you survive the birth, you have to figure out how to support yourself and the baby. In the U.S., only women have access to any form of paid family leave, but this statistic looks even worse when you see how it is �concentrated among the wealthy: More than 20 percent of the top quartile earners enjoy it, while only 5 percent in the bottom quartile do.� Thus, those who most need the benefit have the least access to it.
How do moms manage? They borrow money, dip into savings, put off paying bills, and go on assistance. �Perhaps it�s little wonder that a quarter of `poverty spells� � an episode of poverty that lasts two months or more at a time � begin with the birth of a child.� Another strategy is to get free help from grandparents. Currently, 4.5 million children are being parented by grandparents, who are far more likely to be people of color who are living poverty. Of course, this help is not truly free but has a health cost. It comes as no surprise that �Grandmothers caring for or raising grandchildren suffer more stress and depression than grandmothers who aren�t caregivers.�
The average maternity leave is 10 weeks, but 16 percent of new moms took only 1-4 weeks and 33 percent took �no formal time off at all, returning to job duty almost immediately.� This is bad for baby and bad for mom. According to an article by Maya Dusenbery, shorter maternity leaves are linked to higher rates of maternal depression and lower immunization rates and as well as less breastfeeding. It�s not surprising, she says, �that poor mothers in the U.S. have double the rates of post-partum depression, are half as likely to breastfeed for the recommended six months, and are more than twice as likely to see their babies die within the first year.�
Who takes care of the babies while mothers go back to work? The U.N. report reminds us: �The estimated 2.5 million domestic workers in the U.S. are overwhelmingly women, frequently immigrant women many of whom are undocumented � these workers are vulnerable to verbal and physical abuse and to wage theft.� And who is taking care of these women�s children?
If you don�t have a nanny or a domestic worker taking care of your baby, perhaps you drop him or her off at a daycare center, where, according to Vox.com, the median pay for child care workers (in 2012) was only $9.38 per hour, significantly less than nonfarm animal caretakers, who made $10.82 and a lot less than the median pay for all workers, which was $16.87.
Pregnancy and childbirth are quintessentially female tasks, and they are of primary importance to the species. Yet here in the U.S., with one of the highest per capita income rates in the world, these tasks (and associated tasks, such as breastfeeding and bonding in the early weeks) are not honored in even the most minimal of ways. Of course, men can and should play a role, and to a certain extent they are, with men doing significantly more housework and childcare than they did in the past. However, it�s too bad men tend to be home with the children because they are sick or disabled or because they are looking for work, rather than home on paid parental leave.
The rich may hire nannies, but the task is so undervalued that they pay more to have their dog shampooed. They depend on their nannies (overwhelmingly women and women of color) to accept low pay and scant recognition even as they expect them to open their hearts to the babies in their care. We all know that practically pathological patience is essential to the care of our young, and that is impossible without love, the uncompensated heart-work that the whole society turns to women for, but refuses to recognize or pay us for.
The U.N. report summarizes its findings: �In global context, U.S. women do not take their rightful place as citizens.� Indeed, one of the significant structural impediments to women taking our rightful place as citizens is that much of the work we do is invisible. Wealthy women have the option to buy the supports they need, but that is not �taking a rightful place as a citizen.� Rather it is transferring the invisibility to someone else � not a just solution.
For the majority � women with fewer economic resources and women of color � reproductive work is punishable by increased poverty and even maternal mortality. It�s hard enough to take your rightful place as a citizen when you�re battling poverty. And it�s impossible when you�re dead.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
the corporations own the government.
We have a democratic government in name only.
The American people, for the most part, are the most apathetic, self-serving and ignorant group on this planet. A bunch of gutless wonders who are willing to bury their heads in the sand so they don't have to put themselves out so as to not impinge on that soft and easy lifestyle they so relish.
The only mitigation to this is our Fourth Estate who, when it comes to giving the American public the information it needs to be able to create checks and balances on our government, are as useless as teats on a boar...and we are now paying the price.
The Executive branch and congress(except for maybe, maybe! 20 individuals) should be run off the hill and replaced with people who can think critically, aren't bought and have the well being of US citizens at the forefront thinking and actions...along with the well being of the rest of the World.
Right now, it's a case of the blind and the stupid leading the blind and the ignorant.
Under the oligarchic/fasc ist/police state we now have we won't last long.
ROME - The sequel!
As much as I might agree with you otherwise I do not see that we are the most in any of that.
If the govt owns the means of production we call that Communism.
People I think confuse totalitarianism with either system.
BUT ... govt run health care is not fascism. Forcing people to buy privately owned health insurance btw IS leaning towards fascism.
Republic means govt by people not owned by any elite class such as a monarchy OR the rich. This includes corporations. When those entities have a better voice than the general public then we move towards fascism.
But the Republic owning the commons is not fascism. The same as the govt owning the Post Office or Amtrak. Neither are fascism.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/tell-vp-biden-end-his-war-marijuana-users-and-respect-people-colorado-and-washington/m4fQdJ4H?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
Homeowners, whether in foreclosure or current, need to know where there loan is because it appears TARP funds may have been paying off the investors which may have kept MBS trusts current. If the trust is showing no losses, how can it claim damage and sue for foreclosure?
The big debate now is if my loan is in a trust and Uncle Sam made my mortgage payments (thank you very much) to keep the trust current - maybe some of the TARP money actually did help homeowners. It's just that the banks want their cake and eat it too.
If you don't know where your loan is run a Bloomberg Terminal search and request the excel that shows payments and losses for the tranche(s) where your loan is located. See www.doctelportal.com if you need help finding your mortgage loan.
The only action to be taken would appear to be an emotional one rather than a "solutional" one, although it might contain the seeds of a solution, and that is to withdraw and divest one's self from every possible connection with a "system" of banking and governance that is corrupt beyond imagining.
Withdraw your money AND your debt from the big banks, eschew debt, especially credit card debt. If your credit rating is shot anyway and you are on the brink, declare bankruptcy. Downsize your lifestyle voluntarily instead of letting the next national or personal catastrophe do it for you. (less painful by far) If you have any assets in the market, withdraw them from ANY corporation in which the CEO's have committed themselves to screwing you politically as well as financially. Biotech industries, war-mongers, armament manufacturers, banks and securities firms, resource extraction firms, all of which are dedicated to your slow death or impoverishment, need to be withdrawn from. Both Parties need to be withdrawn from.
I believe it does holds the seeds of a solution, but if not, it might make you feel better.
When is the public going to put an end to the stupidity?
We ARE the power folks, and can change the world with every waking $$. What ARE we choosing, allowing, and going along with?
I am ashamed to be an Amerikan, and proud of it.
(How do you spell "shellacking"?)
Shell lacking? More like Shell gaining. Although it's not alone.
Unemployment? The official figures went down because many workers stopped searching for work. Many settled for "underemploymen t" and various part-time and even illegal arrangements.
Wish, hope and think are all procrastinating words, so I'll say it this way, when Elizabeth Warren gets to the bottom of this fiasco something will get done.
I respect Matt, but he sounds a little like chicken little.
I would expect no salary and be happy to provide ongoing data which would in due course yield millions of dollars in benefits to the government and to the people of the United States. The grant would also put an end to certain government "subsidies" I currently receive, which over my expected lifetime would more than offset the $100,000.
I am purposely being vague here, but....just at a glance at least portions of this must appear to make sense.
You know what the major problem is? The government doesn't think in numbers that small any more.
Ah well, he was doing, by his own words "God's work" wasn't he?
Poor ol' God, it gets dragged into and through all kinds of reeking shit dunnit?!
The writer has given us insights into just how corrupt the whole system is. However, I doubt if he or any major journalist understands that this is the natural consequence of a bad money system. Not merely corrupt but inherently bad.
It has taken us 100 years to see the real consequences of our political leaders abandoning their responsibility and violating the Constitution by transfering our monetary system to private banking interests. Like in the political cartoon/speech, when you put the cats in charge, they just do what comes natural to cats. They are devouring our nation. Can it be rescued? I think so but our window is not infinite. It is truly up to "We, the People." and we do not seem to have suffered enough as yet. I hope I am wrong.
handouts -- with no loans to businesses, no mortgage assistance to the millions of underwater and bankrupt homeowners, yet millions in bonuses to CEOs, execs, and similar misdeeds -- could so soon pay off billions in goverment handouts. At least part of the answer came in two obscure articles that appeared in the last year: The largest recipients quickly bought US treasury bonds with the huge taxpayer handouts, at handsome interest rates. Upon maturity, the big recipients repaid the government handouts and pocketed lucrative interest payments (again at taxpayer expense) with not a modicum of assistance to the ailing US economy. How could such an obvious "slight of hand" escape the eyes of government overseers ? PBS' Frontline" ran an excellent documentary on the bailout and the political playout in realtime. The Frontlines documentary should be required viewing for every US taxpayer.
It's tough not to get discouraged. If you have money in the market, ask your investment person to make sure you are not investing in weapons and other horrible enterprises, at least. Share ideas. I'd like to hear other ideas. Yes, this country has drifted toward fascism. "Rage against the dying of the light."
But there is one obvious question he neglected to address.
Where was the sainted Barack Obama when all this was going on? Admiring himself in the mirror while Geithner, et al called the shots?!?
Sounds like the Commander-In-Ch ief was no better than 3rd in command behind Geithner and Bernanke.
And just like that noted genius GW Bush--BH Obama was perfectly happy with that arrangement.
Lesser evil arguments in politics seldom get less than evil results.
http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/
Very current too, December 19 2012