RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Graham writes: "How comforting to be able to argue about language from these worn trenches, rather than to confront the raw, unfolding horror of the shooting itself."

A heavily armed officer sets up a perimeter near the site of a shooting that took place on Dec. 2, 2015 in San Bernardino, California. (photo: Frederic J. Brown/Getty Images)
A heavily armed officer sets up a perimeter near the site of a shooting that took place on Dec. 2, 2015 in San Bernardino, California. (photo: Frederic J. Brown/Getty Images)


"Prayer-Shaming" Isn't About Attacking Prayer

By Ruth Graham, Slate

06 December 15

 

It�s about calling out empty platitudes in the wake of tragedies such as San Bernardino.

ednesday afternoon, two shooters turned San Bernardino, California, into the site of the deadliest mass shooting in the U.S. since the 2012 attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School. Even considering the unusual early details�the husband-and-wife attackers, their escape from the scene�there was a grim familiarity to the way Wednesday�s events unfolded. The aerial maps, the police press conference, the worried relatives cleaving one by one into groups of the relieved and the grieving�Americans know these scripts by now.

One element of the post-massacre liturgy is getting fresh attention, however: the politicians who quickly offered their public �thoughts and prayers� to the victims. President Obama pushed back against �thoughts and prayers� in a press conference after the shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon in October. �Our thoughts and prayers are not enough,� Obama said back then. Two months and 57 mass shootings later, the apparent backlash against prayer has metastasized. �GOD ISN�T FIXING THIS� blared the New York Daily News�s remarkable front page Thursday morning.

The Daily News editors illustrated their point with tweets from GOP leaders who had quickly turned out near-identical statements. Indeed, several presidential candidates seemed to speak in unison: �Our prayers are with the victims ...� (Ted Cruz), �My thoughts and prayers are with the shooting victims ...� (Ben Carson), �My thoughts and prayers are with the victims ...� (Rand Paul), and so on. An editor at Think Progress retweeted a long series of �thinking and praying� politicians and appended information about their recent campaign donations from the NRA. The Washington editor of the Nation contrasted Republicans� �thoughts and prayers� with the Democratic candidates� calls to action:

Both politicians and plebes have been offering �thoughts and prayers� in response to tragedy for ages. It�s a stock phrase in both sympathy cards and verified tweets. So what�s going on with this new resentment? Emma Green, writing in the Atlantic, dubbed it �prayer shaming�:

There�s a clear claim being made here, and one with an edge: Democrats care about doing something and taking action while Republicans waste time offering meaningless prayers. These two reactions, policy-making and praying, are portrayed as mutually exclusive, coming from totally contrasting worldviews.

And with that, the battle lines were drawn. Conservatives took umbrage at the �prayer shaming,� liberals took umbrage at the umbrage, and the cycle took on familiar contours. How comforting to be able to argue about language from these worn trenches, rather than to confront the raw, unfolding horror of the shooting itself.

Green subtly put her finger on a real phenomenon: America�s declining patience for expressions of civil religion, particularly in elite quarters. (Full disclosure: I contribute regularly to the Atlantic.) Conservatives are exquisitely tuned to this long decline, but it�s not new, and it�s reflective of a country in which the fastest-growing religious identification is �no religion.� Almost one-quarter of Americans now say they are atheists, agnostics, or �nothing in particular,� according to Pew, so it�s to be expected that we�re hearing more skepticism over politicians� expressions of piety.

And let�s be clear: This week�s prominent �prayer shamers� aren�t really against prayer. They�re against platitudes. The problem is when �thoughts and prayers� are the only response to a public event that calls for political action. It�s hard to imagine that even the most dedicated atheist objects to Ted Cruz kneeling by his bed at night to pray for the victims of yesterday�s shooting. What Cruz chooses to do in his bedroom is his own business. The issue is that politicians like him continue to offer thoughts and prayers and nothing else: no assault weapons ban, no universal background checks, no federal gun registry.

And what about those tweeted assurances that a politician is praying? Here�s what Jesus himself said, in a passage in the book of Matthew introducing the Lord�s Prayer:

When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

Until now, �thoughts and prayers� has been a bipartisan clich�, and a harmless one. Going forward, it seems the phrase will become a politically inflected dog whistle in some quarters in the vein of Chik-fil-A and �Merry Christmas.� That�s a loss. But it�s nothing compared to the losses we endured this week, and last week, and the week before that, and the week before that, and the week before that.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+26 # swimdoc 2017-05-19 18:05
Go for it, Iowans! Demand Improved and Expanded Medicare for All! Don't prematurely "compromise" by accepting the promise of a public option before you even get started. Insist that your elected members of Congress sign on to HR 676 while still opposing dismantling of the ACA. It's time to move beyond the ACA to real national health coverage for everyone living in the U.S.
 
 
+3 # JCM 2017-05-19 18:56
 
 
+10 # Charles3000 2017-05-19 19:27
I wish everyone could learn that Medicare is NOT single payer; it is either two or three payers involved. We need "single payer" NOT Medicare for All!"
 
 
+13 # Scott Galindez 2017-05-19 22:18
You are right Charles...Medic are for All is a slogan but Conyers bill and Bernie's that is coming expand Medicaid to a single payer system. Medicare is popular with the American people so we are using that to sell universal healthcare.
 
 
+18 # diamondmarge7 2017-05-19 19:32
This is SUCH exciting news! I had heard of NY & CA moving towards single psayer; I have also contributed & fotwarded emails to contacts regarding the heavy efforts in CO. How fabulous that IA is moving in this marvelous direction, too. Mebbe we "exxceptional" Americans might finally join the rest of the industrial world & stop being gouged and screwed by for-profit
BigMed and BigPharma. I AM SO THRILLED.
 
 
+3 # elkingo 2017-05-19 23:07
Socialized Medicine Goddammit!
 
 
+15 # lamancha 2017-05-20 00:28
I find it almost criminal that the network pundits - CNN, MSNBC and others - are not taking up the cause of single payer. Even the so-called liberal network hosts & pundits ( no progressives in sight ), are not taking up the cause. All they report on is what the Republicans are proposing. What a waste!
 
 
0 # RNLDaWy 2017-05-20 10:28
Correct they make their money on whining about losing the election and mislead you with that. Also elected officials who work for our government have the best healthcare and salaries and guaranteed income of any person in the country same as high earners in the private sector. They don't want you to know the facts Medicare is not single payer .. at least a two tier system would be better .. Medicare for All .. unless you are a high earner then you can choose your plan .. because not a problem for those with the dough .. or WORKING IN GOVERNMENT .. wink wink wink!
 
 
+5 # virtualaudio 2017-05-20 16:45
Kudos to Bernie for planting the seed of Single Payer in the minds of most Americans. Though I'd prefer he had won the election, this profound shift of public sentiment justifies the time & money I put into his primary bid. If only the Dems in Congress and the 'progressive' news & opinion outlets would take up the cause.. Before the presidential race, I'd occasionally hear people like Chris Hayes talk about single payer. He also did a lot of segments on climate change. Since the election season started, I haven't heard a peep about these issues from him or others. There seems to be a an attitude of disdain toward Bernie from these guys.. During the primary, Maddow interviewed Sanders & Clinton on the same day, while Matthews did Trump; Trump made a stupid comment about punishing women for getting abortions, which Maddow used to ambush Sanders.. when asked, Sanders reiterated his commitment to women's rights, then dismissed Trumps comment as more B.S. Maddow then tracked down Clinton and told her only the 2nd half of what Sanders said, which gave Clinton the opportunity to slam Sanders for not being sufficiently pro-choice. Maddow had this smirk on her face when she talked to Clinton, like a little kid who knew they were doing something bad and getting away with it. What's wrong with these people? If you want the public's trust, be consistent! Otherwise Trump's assault on the media will continue to resonate. (sorry to digress, but it is annoying)
 
 
0 # futhark 2017-05-20 10:12
The government has no more business in providing medical insurance than it does providing fire protection and police services, educational opportunities for minors, roads and highways, or protection from foreign invasion. It seems that an increasing number of people are waking up to the fact that there is little justification to have any of these without the others.
 
 
+7 # Wise woman 2017-05-20 10:41
State by state looks like the only way single payer will be accomplished. If that's the way it has to happen, so be it. All the more reason we have to get on top of our elected officials to do the right thing for America. Here in CT, where I live, big med and big pharma rule. Blumenthal and Murphy have to get on the ball and change that. That and legalizing mj which is presently under the control of the state and the price gaugers as well as the criminal element.
 
 
-3 # Rain17 2017-05-21 20:00
The biggest obstacle to single-payer:

"I don't want my tax dollars going to pay for other people's healthcare ( i.e. illegal immigrants, minorities on welfare, or any other umpopular group) at my expense."

Too many Americans maintain that position. Until artitudes toward socisl programs chanfe for the better single-payer will remain politically a nonstarter in this country.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN