Stern writes: "The camera loved Ingrid Bergman. Her Ilsa Lund, a melange of iridescent eyes, nourishing smile, and disarming vulnerability, glides across the screen like a seraph, bathed in celestial light. But Bergman, unbeknownst to her legion of adoring fans, possessed an untamable spirit."
Ingrid Bergman. (photo: Getty)
When Congress Slut-Shamed Ingrid Bergman
21 November 15
It was one of the more shameful moments in congressional history: A senator called out the iconic actress for having an affair, branding her a �powerful influence for evil.�
he camera loved Ingrid Bergman. Her Ilsa Lund, a m�lange of iridescent eyes, nourishing smile, and disarming vulnerability, glides across the screen like a seraph, bathed in celestial light. And so the Swede, with her turns in Casablanca, Gaslight, and Notorious, to name a few, reached the pinnacle of her profession. Bergman was the anti-Stanwyck; a wholesome beauty that proved an ideal fit for Hays Code Hollywood. According to a 1943 article in Life magazine, her brain surgeon husband, Petter Lindstr�m, �regards himself as the undisputed head of the family, an idea that Ingrid accepts cheerfully.�
But Bergman, unbeknownst to her legion of adoring fans, possessed an untamable spirit�one that is dutifully captured in the new documentary Ingrid Bergman: In Her Own Words. Directed by Stig Bj�rkman and narrated by countrywoman Alicia Vikander, the film is culled from Bergman�s home movies, diaries, and intimate letters to her friends and lovers.
It�s the tale of a gal from Stockholm who grew up obsessed with the story of Joan of Arc, marveling at how this young, rebellious woman followed the voices inside her head, social mores be damned.
�I don�t want any roots,� Bergman says in the film. �I want to be free.�
And, despite her marriage to Lindstr�m�which produced a daughter, Pia�Bergman lived freely, much like many of her male movie star contemporaries.
In June 1945, while on a lengthy tour entertaining American troops in Europe, she fell in love with legendary photojournalist Robert Capa. The tryst was short-lived, however, as Bergman recalls how the swashbuckling lensman �couldn�t tie himself down.�
She�d won an Oscar (for Gaslight) and purchased her family a luxurious home fitted with a gigantic pool in Benedict Canyon, yet still suffered from what she calls �a daily sadness.�
�I never understood the kind of happiness I was longing for,� she recalls in the film. �We finally got a house, fixed it up the way we wanted. But then that bird of passage started to flex its wings again.�
Not only did the camera love Bergman, but she loved it back. Perhaps this came on account of her father, a gifted photographer who�d regularly take her portrait, before passing away when she was 13. Bored with the fantasy of Hollywood, she became enamored with the grittiness of Italian neorealist cinema�most notably the films Rome, Open City, and Paisan. She penned a note to their director, Roberto Rossellini, expressing her desire to work with him. And shortly thereafter, as they filmed Stromboli on the titular volcanic island, far from the prying paparazzi, the two fell in love.
When word got out of their extramarital affair, as well as Bergman�s pregnancy, it became an international superscandal. Remember Hugh Grant and Divine Brown? Multiply that by 50. This was 1950, and as Bergman wrote, �In those days, it was a shock to leave a husband and a child and fall in love with a man, and openly show the world that she had fallen in love and not deny the baby to be born.�
Bergman, an A-list Hollywood actress, was eviscerated in the tabloids, who painted her as a wanton harlot. The insanity reached a fever pitch when, on March 14, 1950, Senator Edwin C. Johnson (D-CO), a rank moralist who opposed FDR�s New Deal policies, slut-shamed the actress on the Senate floor.
�Mr. President, now that the stupid film about a pregnant woman and a volcano [Stromboli] has exploited America with the usual finesse, to the mutual delight of RKO and the debased Rossellini, are we merely to yawn wearily, greatly relieved that this hideous thing is finished and then forget it? I hope not. A way must be found to protect the people in the future against that sort of gyp,� he proclaimed.
Sen. Johnson then proposed a bill wherein movies would be approved for licenses based on the moral compasses of those behind the picture, insisting that Bergman �had perpetrated an assault upon the institution of marriage,� and going so far as to call her �a powerful influence for evil.�
The irony in all this is that Bergman had been Johnson�s favorite actress, so he claimed to have felt deceived by her so-called lascivious behavior. He even sought to ban Bergman from ever appearing in a major Hollywood motion picture again.
�I was a danger for American womanhood,� Bergman recalls in the film. �Even my voice over the radio was supposed to be dangerous� Of course I was hurt, but I didn�t think that what I had done was so much other people�s business. I thought that you should look upon an actress as an actress. What she does on the screen or on the stage, that�s what you pay for, and that�s what you get. If you don�t like the performance you can walk out. But to criticize people�s private life I thought was wrong, to such an extent that even a senator in Washington gets on the floor: �Out of Ingrid Bergman�s ashes will grow a better Hollywood.��
Because of her public demonization, Bergman stayed abroad from 1949 until 1957, when she returned to the Big Apple to accept the New York Film Critics Circle Award for her dazzling performance in Anastasia.
�When the moment came when I had to face America again, to arrive alone and say, �Here I am, and you can throw your stones or you can accept me again,� I was very, very nervous, because I knew I was to meet the American audiences, the American press,� she recalls in the film.
When asked at her press conference in New York whether she has any regrets over the past few years, Bergman laughed.
�No, I have no regrets at all,� she said, unleashing that radiant smile. �I regret the things I didn�t do�not what I did. I have done what I felt like.�
Twenty-two years after Sen. Johnson�s disgusting tirade, on April 19, 1972, Senator Charles Percy (R-IL) read an apology to Bergman on the Senate floor.
�Mr. President, one of the world�s loveliest, most gracious and most talented women was made the victim of bitter attack in this Chamber 22 years ago. Today I would like to pay long overdue tribute to Ingrid Bergman, a true star in every sense of the word.
�I know that across the land, millions of Americans would wish to join me in expressing their regrets for the personal and professional persecution that caused Ingrid Bergman to leave this country at the height of her career,� he continued. �Miss Bergman is not only welcome in America; we are deeply honored by her visits here.�
Bergman, ever the class act, penned a letter to Congress from New York accepting the apology, writing, �Dear Senator Percy, my war with America was over long ago. The wounds, however, remained. Now, because of your gallant gesture with your generous and understanding address to the Senate, they are healed forever.�
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Fear can be healthy; it can get our attention, and nudge us to be exceptionally cautious. I learned that in combat, being one of the few who learned it before his fear sent him home in a cheap box. But where are the political leaders who can teach this to the nation?
Please, do not spare the Democrats (we all know the Republicans have nothing to offer the nation worth having). Help us encourage the non-partisans to take on the bipartisan hack parade (now obviously led by astonishingly corrupt Max Baucus, Orrin Hatch, and Mitch McConnel).
Now we move to the present: after 9-11 fear has returned, and again it has been stoked by right wing. Once again, the Dems have capitulated and gone along with such travesties as the NDAA.
The second is freedom of every person to worship money.
The third is freedom to want everything it buys, regardless of global repercussions.
The fourth is freedom to fear what you are told, to enable those quite literally banking on mass hysteria.
There you go. All updated for 2013.
Pray it bites them in the ass.
(And my family spoke Finnish, Swedish and Norwegian, but I forgot them all.)
(Push one for English?)
Basically, if one is different, one is kept out of the loop. The best education, food, jobs, housing, and statuses are reserved for the people who best embody the ideals of the group in power. If one wishes to become part of this group, one must jump through any hoops placed before him / her (without complaint - very important unwritten / unspoken rule!) and assist in keeping any "undesirable" outsiders - out.
See gated communities, suburbs, exclusive social clubs, denominational churches, minorities bringing property values and quality of life down just by breathing, etc. - all social constructs to keep insiders "in" and outsiders "out".
This is the core belief system of a Christian based society. There has to be "evil" to motivate the "good" to build and be better. It's really sick when one thinks about it because some people feel this dynamic needs to be reinterpreted and given a push (new laws that target specific groups of people) to speed things along.
When a society has the ability and resources to fix all that troubles it but chooses not to, one has to wonder why. I have my theories but that is for another day. But the "Us versus Them" dynamic in this country is all too apparent.
The old "Can-do" attitude I first admired so much when I came here in the mid-late 70's has been stifled and replaced with "What am I going to do?" or angry resignation.
Zionist terrorists blew up British hotel facilities in Palestine '47-'48...
https://www.facebook.com/TruthForTrapperKillsmany
Go to "Aug 8th incident" for what happened that day. The rest is evidence I broke no laws or did anything illegal.
There is tons more evidence, but we put up what is most important to show how serious this is & we need everyone's support in this to preserve everyone's rights to live free. Please make this go viral & get as many as we can to sign & comment if they want. We need many signatures to have a voice & fight back. Thank You to all my friends & family in this fight for our freedoms. Here is the site to sign the petition & get your voice heard & justice done for everyone. Please spread this link & the word! This is free to sign. Just stop at the part asking for money. That is a donation to facebook to keep these petitions going & is voluntarily. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/truthfortrapper/