RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Reich writes: "I have no idea whether all this grass-roots activity will take Bernie all the way to the White House, but I do know it's real and it's important - and it's under the radar of Washington insiders and pundits who look only at how many organizers are on a campaign's payroll or how many dollars a campaign has raised."

Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)
Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)


The Secret to Bernie's Campaign

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page

04 September 15

 

hat's the secret of the @berniesanders campaign, beyond Bernie himself? Today I counted another 14 groups that have sprung to life over the last several months -- all appearing in my email or phone mail, or I discover from friends or former students. And all are engaged in one way or another in building support for Bernie around the country,

I'm always wary of "astroturf" groups designed to resemble grass roots, but these are the real thing. I've spoken with several organizers who hadn't had any contact with the official campaign but felt they "had to help organize" for Bernie, as several of them told me.

I have no idea whether all this grass-roots activity will take Bernie all the way to the White House, but I do know it's real and it's important -- and it's under the radar of Washington insiders and pundits who look only at how many organizers are on a campaign's payroll or how many dollars a campaign has raised. The Sanders campaign isn't like any other campaign I've witnessed since Eugene McCarthy's anti-Vietnam War presidential insurgency -- which didn't get McCarthy elected but gave birth to a national grass-roots movement that ultimately ended the war. Peaceful change of the magnitude we need can come about only when millions or people are organized and mobilized to demand it. Bernie's presidential run is catalyzing such a movement.

What's the secret of the @berniesanders campaign, beyond Bernie himself? Today I counted another 14 groups that have...

Posted by Robert Reich on Thursday, September 3, 2015

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+116 # Radscal 2015-09-04 12:42
Yep. I've seen grass roots organizing rise up even in the VERY conservative area I now live.

Of course, not only is that exactly what Sanders is calling for, but is also the only way he has a chance. With not much cash and little to no positive corporate media coverage, if we're going to nominate and the elect Sanders, it will be because we, the people make it happen.
 
 
+48 # Inspired Citizen 2015-09-04 14:24
The revolution behind the revolution is the grassroots campaign being waged by Revolt Against Plutocracy. We are creating a write-in campaign to serve as leverage against #CorporateClint on. Take the #BernieOrBust pledge today.

http://citizensagainstplutocracy.org/
 
 
+34 # jcdav 2015-09-04 20:15
Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way.
GO BERNIE!
 
 
+18 # john.schoonover 2015-09-05 14:28
I started a grassroots group in central NC in June. We have 400+ members now, all people who will at least vote, probably work on the campaign. Many have already started, recruiting friends and neighbors, holding meetings their homes to consolidate new recruits.

One recruiting trick is to always wear a Sanders campaign button (we had our own made and sell the so we can make more). People want to talk to you when they see it.

At Costco, the greeter wanted me to stop and "talk politics" with him. The upshot was "better Sanders than Clinton." At the checkout the Latino cashier saw the button and said, "Bernie's my man."

People are out there begging to get involved the this political revolution.
 
 
+57 # davidr 2015-09-04 12:44
Strictly in terms of grass roots support, the McCarthy/Sander s analogy makes sense. But so does a McCarthy/Trump analogy. And taking the trope further, of the two major party conventions in 2016, it seems likelier that the GOP convention will be the one that more nearly resembles Chicago '68. The GOP is broken & prone to shatter in ways that the Dems are not. Bernie chose to run as a Dem because, as he's said, it's instrumentally useful — i.e., it is a vehicle sufficiently strong to carry him to office. Trump chose to run as a Rep for a nearly opposite reason — a clown car suits him better than anyone. In the final analysis, he doesn't care that it runs poorly, because for him it's just a plaything.
 
 
+73 # reiverpacific 2015-09-04 13:17
Actually, in tens of $ donated, I'd like to see the figures of what Sanders has raised from the mass of grassroots donations -last I saw it was $35.00 per head on average -we gave him $50.00-, as against Clinton the Second's total from courting socio-political elites and corporate "Moderate" or "Liberal" sources.
It might be closer than we are led to think.
The selective media can't ignore him for ever, in spite of the attempts to bury Bernie's populist stances -the LAST thing that THEY want!
 
 
+78 # dheiser41 2015-09-04 13:17
Bernie's campaign is also well covered in the September/Octob er issue of Mother Jones. The article is titled "We're not Crazy" and subtitled "Maybe a wild-haired socialist from Vermont won't win the presidency, but Bernie Sanders' run just might change politics forever." This progressive San Diegan is hopeful. Run, Bernie, Run! Keep biting at their heels and it keeps them paying attention!
 
 
+17 # Radscal 2015-09-04 16:09
I haven't read that article yet, but it's been disappointing to me that MoJo - once a proudly lefty publication - has been promoting HRC and marginalizing Sanders. Your quote suggests this one may be more of the same.
 
 
+75 # Carol R 2015-09-04 13:28
This is a quote from a headline {"Legion of Tech Volunteers Lead a Charge for Bernie Sanders"} in the Sept. 4, 2015 New York times:

"Throughout the summer, a largely unseen legion of technology professionals across the country — software developers and designers, product managers and more — have been moonlighting online on Mr. Sanders’s behalf. They have been applying their initiative, creativity, organizational skills and, above all, technical prowess in their off hours to support an underdog candidate who has been more than grateful for the help....Like so many online minutemen, they have given Mr. Sanders an enormous lift in his campaign for the Democratic nomination. But this is no ragtag militia: The people who have enlisted include top-flight digital talent."
 
 
+15 # Saberoff 2015-09-04 18:29
I LIKE it!
 
 
+72 # Street Level 2015-09-04 13:49
People are fed up with what's been ignored and washed over. Even in Silicon Valley where the complacent tech job holders usually sit with their thumbs up their Starbuck's are getting involved and coming out to engage the public.
I co-lead a table at markets 3x a week and the numbers keep growing. Teens drag their parents over to learn about Bernie, College students are fired up now and starting Bernie clubs on campus. Our volunteer demographic is not limited to the white-retired voters, it's everyone.
People are demanding change and leadership that we all "hoped" for in Obama.
Get on board, go to berniesanders.c om and search "events" near you
 
 
+9 # Saberoff 2015-09-04 18:30
I LIKE it again!
 
 
-7 # lewagner 2015-09-04 19:41
What's being ignored and washed over is America's subservience to Israel, the ONLY country that is profiting and even EXPANDING from the War on Terror that America is financing.
Has no one even noticed that so-called "Muslim" ISIS has attacked almost every country in the Middle East EXCEPT for Israel? That the 19 Arab hijackers who managed to penetrate New York City and Washington D.C.'s most heavily guarded airspace in the world and even hit the Pentagon smack in the Budget Office have never even tried to fly any Boeings into Tel Aviv (which would be a little closer, seems to me).
Yet every candidate, including Grass-roots Bernie nonchalantly "believes" that ISIS is really Muslim, that airplanes CAN meld right into buildings, that 9 people can be shot and killed in a church and the church be open for business the next day -- and even the "alternative" sites like RSN and its sophisticated readers who don't accept the MSM (even though that's about all that's linked to on this site) don't notice anything wrong with the picture either.
It's a little beyond belief, sorry, Robert Reich, Rhodes Scholar and CFR member.
 
 
+10 # jcdav 2015-09-04 20:21
so what exactly IS your point?
 
 
+1 # old codger 2015-09-05 02:34
yeah, right !
 
 
+61 # bullslam 2015-09-04 13:55
To put it another way, I am astounded at the huge number of authoritarian stupids in this country! People unable to see that one man is moral, ethical, truthful and compassionate. And the other has no moral compass, is narcissistic to an extreme, and whose every whim is brutal. But then the authoritarian stupids really liked that about Bush/Cheney and the rest of the neocons.
 
 
+48 # dusty 2015-09-04 13:57
While in general this article is right on the point there is one thing that ought to be clarified: Eugene McCarthy's candidacy did not originate the movement, many many thousands of us had already been working from 1963 on to mobilize against the war. In the Spring of '68 there had been active demonstrations around the nation building momentum and clean "Gene" was to some degree the result of the movement. Many of us shifted gears and worked for McCarthy but found that the HHH people and the other pro-war people still controlled the Democratic Party. Now, we must build so strong outside the party as well as within it that the force for change becomes very powerful.
 
 
+18 # Radscal 2015-09-04 16:21
Thank you for making this point.

I have to admit that after RFK was murdered, I pretty much gave up hope for the Democratic Party. I was not convinced that McCarthy was really "with us." I did protest for the anti-war plank, and got my first whiff of tear gas for that.
 
 
+30 # bardphile 2015-09-04 14:30
Seems like only yesterday I was standing on street corners in D.C. handing out McCarthy fliers. Neat and clean for Gene. He wasn't a dynamic leader, just a reserved, rather vague, thoroughly decent establishment politician who stood up and told the truth about Vietnam. (Brief historical note for you younger folks: McCarthy's early primary success brought RFK into the race, and here to LA where he was gunned down. Eugene was a different McCarthy from the infamous Joseph.) The grass-roots movement Reich refers to was actually already there, waiting for a leader with access to power to move us ahead. We felt about Gene the way you all feel about Bernie. Inspired.

So, go Bernie. But, followers and foot soldiers, don't go overboard with hate rhetoric, as many leftists did back in '68. The fringe that supplied a lot of the energy back then unfortunately also helped make George Wallace into 1968's Donald Trump, with the result that a lot of the white working class got peeled away from the Dems, helping to bring us Nixon, and later Reagan. The Republicans absolutely rely on Bernie's natural constituency to help them keep the people down and the 1% on top. You--we--can expect some really nasty stuff if Bernie gets the nomination. Be ready.
 
 
-47 # MidwestTom 2015-09-04 15:14
What are Bernie's plans for the poor. Today we had another indication just how our support mechanisms and illegals are effecting the American labor force. Ask yourself, how can unemployment be down to 5.1% and wages not be rising? The obvious answer is illegals; they are not in the statistics, but they are supplying the labor market with additional bodies to keep a surplus of available workers large enough that employers do not feel the need to raise wages to get the people they need.

The other odd thing in today's employment numbers, we only created 177,000 jobs, the lowest number of jobs in many months, yet the unemployment rate dropped from 5.3% to 5.1%; how can that be? The simple answer is the labor force shrank statistically. Why? Why would 21% of the able-bodied Americans between 21 and 65 have dropped out of the labor market? Probably because not working pays almost as much, if not more, than working. Yet there are Help Wanted signs everywhere.

Simple answer to solve labor problems and raise wages: make it illegal to hire non-citizens. Suddenly the labor market would tighten, employers would be forced to pay more, and as wages rose, people should chose working over living off of benefits.
 
 
+33 # newell 2015-09-04 15:32
who would pick your food, roof your houses, clean your bathrooms?
 
 
+29 # jimallyn 2015-09-04 16:36
Quoting MidwestTom:
Simple answer to solve labor problems and raise wages: make it illegal to hire non-citizens.

That would destroy agriculture here in Washington State where I live, and probably in a lot of other states, too. A few years back I worked in my friend's cherry orchard during harvest. There must have been 20 times that someone - or a group of people - stopped to ask if we were hiring. How many of them do you think were Anglos? I'll tell you: not a single one of them. And it's not because they are willing to work for less, either; a good cherry picker can make as much as 35 dollars an hour. And agriculture isn't the only industry that would collapse without immigrant workers.
 
 
+3 # bingers 2015-09-06 16:59
Back when I was stationed at Yakima Firing Center I picked apples and hops as a side job, since my Army pay was $78 a month. It's damn hard work and not a lot of us gringos did it.
 
 
+25 # reiverpacific 2015-09-04 16:53
Quoting MidwestTom:
What are Bernie's plans for the poor. Today we had another indication just how our support mechanisms and illegals are effecting the American labor force. Ask yourself, how can unemployment be down to 5.1% and wages not be rising? The obvious answer is illegals; they are not in the statistics, but they are supplying the labor market with additional bodies to keep a surplus of available workers large enough that employers do not feel the need to raise wages to get the people they need.

The other odd thing in today's employment numbers, we only created 177,000 jobs, the lowest number of jobs in many months, yet the unemployment rate dropped from 5.3% to 5.1%; how can that be? The simple answer is the labor force shrank statistically. Why? Why would 21% of the able-bodied Americans between 21 and 65 have dropped out of the labor market? Probably because not working pays almost as much, if not more, than working. Yet there are Help Wanted signs everywhere.

Simple answer to solve labor problems and raise wages: make it illegal to hire non-citizens. Suddenly the labor market would tighten, employers would be forced to pay more, and as wages rose, people should chose working over living off of benefits.

As a long time "Non-citizen" myself, you're full of wind and piss!
Your well-worn prejudices are showin' through the gaps in y'r reasoning powers once again.
As for the rest, we've only got y'r specious -at best- word for it.
 
 
+24 # Radscal 2015-09-04 17:01
OK. It is true that undocumented workers do slightly depress wages. That's why they've been permitted and even deliberately invited and why their employers are not the targets of legal crackdowns.

Hence, I actually agree that if we started arresting employers, then the jobs would dry up.

Make those workers already here legal, and they will no longer be exploited to increase profits and lower wages.

Of course, the principle reason for low wages is decisions by the 0.01%. Offshoring jobs. Refusing to pass living wage laws. Squandering ever greater percentages of the fruit of our labors. etc.

"Illegal aliens" are scapegoats. The number of undocumented workers has been dropping for years. Net immigration from Mexico has actually been zero or negative since 2009.

That is, it's largely a non-issue used to divide and rule.
 
 
+20 # oryoki 2015-09-04 17:24
"Probably because not working pays almost as much, if not more, than working."

Just a bunch of lies from The Cato Institute. Clearly debunked here, http://authority.scientopia.org/2013/08/21/no-cato-welfare-doesnt-pay-more-than-minimum-wage/
 
 
+11 # ericlipps 2015-09-04 18:49
Quoting MidwestTom:
The other odd thing in today's employment numbers, we only created 177,000 jobs, the lowest number of jobs in many months, yet the unemployment rate dropped from 5.3% to 5.1%; how can that be? The simple answer is the labor force shrank statistically. Why? Why would 21% of the able-bodied Americans between 21 and 65 have dropped out of the labor market? Probably because not working pays almost as much, if not more, than working. Yet there are Help Wanted signs everywhere.

Simple answer to solve labor problems and raise wages: make it illegal to hire non-citizens. Suddenly the labor market would tighten, employers would be forced to pay more, and as wages rose, people should chose working over living off of benefits.

Tom, Tom, Tom . . . think it through. "Make it illegal to hire non-citizens" and you've got a flood of new unemployed people--legal immigrants who haven't become citizens yet as well as illegals. Assuming, of course, that employers don't just provide these people with bogus papers.

And if you really think not working "pays almost as much, if not more, than working," why don't you try it yourself for awhile. You'd find it eye-opening.

As for those "Help Wanted" signs, you can only hire so many people to clean toilets and wash dishes before you run out of toilets and dishes.

And oh, yeah--it already IS illegal to hire undocumented ("illegal") immigrants.
 
 
+9 # WestWinds 2015-09-05 02:04
#Midwest Tom:

Study after study it has been demonstrated that people prefer to work rather than live on the dole.

I had a friend who was on social services and I used to go with her to babysit her child while she went through the process (of being mauled for a few measly bucks to survive on.) Let me tell you, it's NO picnic but the way you describe it, like it is some kind of Club Med.

This Right-wing meme re people "choosing" to live off of benefits is a proven fiction. You mean to tell me that these blood red states are mindlessly giving out benefits to anyone who comes their way? Balderdash!

Employment is down and wages are not rising because the small businesses that do most of the hiring in this country have been driven out of business by big box businesses like Wal-Mart, and because the government under the auspices of our Right-wing president and Congress, are doing what it takes for this to happen. Both the POTUS and the COTUS support supply-side economics at this point and the results are self evident; disastrous. Why else are we seeing such a ground-swell for the likes of Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders???

Wake up, Tom. Stop listening to El Rusbo and the other ditto heads. It makes you look blind and out of touch.
 
 
+8 # kath 2015-09-05 07:02
It is illegal to hire non-citizens WHO ARE IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY. (An important distinction.) If this law were enforced, and factory owners taken to jail, the problem would disappear overnight. Of course, the "wrong" people would be arrested, and we can't have that. The other thing that would happen is that a lot of our food crops would rot in the fields.
 
 
+7 # john.schoonover 2015-09-05 14:34
Rebuild crumbling infrastructure. That will produce 13 million new jobs. The labor market would tighten, wages would rise, illegals would earn more, too, and they would still be here to pick our food, etc.

PS: Rebuilding infrastructure is the first item in Sanders' 12 point program.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/agenda/
 
 
+7 # Vegan_Girl 2015-09-05 15:01
It is strange that the so-called 'illegals' bother you, but not tax-dodging billionaires that causes austerity - which causes recession/depre ssion and not companies outsourcing jobs which causes massive unemployment.

The 'illegals' - and please find another word to refer to fellow human beings are not causing low wages. Outsourcing does.
 
 
+1 # bingers 2015-09-06 16:56
A better answer would be to jail corporation executives that underpay them.
 
 
+20 # harleysch 2015-09-04 16:36
Remember, McCarthy's success in New Hampshire in 1968 (he didn't win) helped convince LBJ to step down. Bobby Kennedy came in, and was electrifying voters, and was murdered, which left the door open for Humphrey (HHH), who lost to Nixon.

As Bernie is utilizing a strong anti-establishm ent, anti-Wall Street focus, the Wall St. Democratic favorite, Hillary, is collapsing. The danger I see is Biden as today's HHH, who was waiting in the wings, chosen to fulfill LBJ's legacy.

To prevent this, it is necessary to uproot the Wall St. mainstream in the party today, which includes ending the absurd idea that the 2016 is about Obama's legacy, a legacy that includes continuing Bush's corporatism, the defense of Wall St. speculators, regime change, and endless wars.

Bernie is right, to win, the party must become anti-establishm ent.
 
 
+22 # angryspittle 2015-09-04 14:36
With all due respect McCarthy's campaign did nothing to end the war. It went on as long as they wanted it to. If McCarthy's campaign had an effect the damn war would have ended in 1968. And in fact LBJ had the deal to end it except for the fact that that dirty treasonous bastard Nixon scuttled it and kep the damn thing going for another 4 years and 30,000 more American and countless VN deaths.
 
 
+11 # bardphile 2015-09-04 15:10
I think that "did nothing" is too harsh. If you look at Congressional voting patterns, as the truth about the war percolated up from reporters and returning vets, more and more people questioned our involvement in SE Asia. Senators and reps, mostly Dems, got the message, and support for the war changed from bi-partisan to mostly Republican. Nixon ran for re-election in '72 on a pledge to end it. McGovern picked up the anti-war mantle, but his campaign was badly bungled, and lost in part for reasons I hinted at above. If he'd won, many lives would have been saved, even if "they" had wanted the war to continue.
 
 
+38 # PABLO DIABLO 2015-09-04 14:42
Bernie may be our "last chance". Vote Bernie.
 
 
+33 # oakes721 2015-09-04 15:42
Techs best get those voting machines honest before the count is down.
 
 
+27 # Mainiac 2015-09-04 15:42
MidwestTom. You write about people going to work instead of living off of benefits. Just what are those benefits of which you speak. If any of them had unemployment benefits they have long since run out. In order to qualify for AFDC, the parent has to work. So let me know, I am really curious. Or have you been listening to a lot of propaganda on FAUXNews?
 
 
0 # Robbee 2015-09-04 16:55
zomblican troll alert! # Inspired Citizen 2015-09-04 14:24 "The revolution behind the revolution is the grassroots campaign being waged by Revolt Against Plutocracy. We are creating a write-in campaign to serve as leverage against #CorporateClint on. Take the #BernieOrBust pledge today."

- a progressive write-in pledge is a pledge, if bernie loses the dem nomination, to write him in, in a plain promise to guarantee to defeat any other dem nominee - citizen promotes, not the revolution, but the zomblican radical counter-revolut ion!

the pledge rests on the bogus prop that there is absolutely no difference between any dem and any zomblican - so, if not bernie, it argues that we progressives are just as well-off electing a zombie, so we pledge to do just that, elect a zombie - pledgers want our country to go straight to hell, stop dawdling! - pledgers think that they can blackmail other dems to support bernie! - pledgers are bully boys, brownshirts, in the mold of trump's nationalist, separatist, totalitarian followers!

only if we demand our workers and students, poor and middle class, blacks and latinos, women and lgbt's, environment and workers of the world, suffer harsher than they have, faster, should we help elect a zombie to the white house, where he can gang up with a zombie congress and a zombie supreme court to end our safety net, boost our wage slavery and oppress us worse

the pledge is a pledge to be an a-hole! go bernie! - down with zomblican trolls!
 
 
0 # Robbee 2015-09-04 17:15
cat's out of the bag! zomblican troll unmasks! # jsluka 2015-08-30 17:22 "Don't care what you say, I will not vote for Hillary Clinton. Simple as that. It would be better for a Rethuglican to get elected, and bring on the revolution."

- zomblican trolls here are immature, childish brats, lacking any revolutionary discipline - if some revolt and we cannot overthrow our 1% masters, we accomplished nothing - then any brats who remain will say what? "oops! sorry! never mind! our bad!”

bernie proposes a political revolution - a constitutional amendment that gets all private money out of politics! public funding, only, of all federal, state and local elections! - if violent revolution does not accomplish public funding, it was not worth bloodshed! and will set us progressives back a hundred years! - bernie hates zomblicans and hates pointless gestures that get zomblicans elected! begone zomblican trolls! go hide under a bridge! go bernie!

bernie has a grassroots organization - he and his folks promote no a-hole pledge nor anti-dem tactics!
 
 
-1 # Robbee 2015-09-04 17:47
re : # GreenBee 2015-08-12 07:31
"I am so glad that there is so much enthusiasm for Bernie. But why do so many here assume that his attempts at change will not be obstructed in the same way as Obama's were by the same forces that obstructed them?

"I would love to see Bernie elected but he cannot change much unless Progressives, liberals and Dems start taking back the House and keep the Senate too. That means getting excited in the midterms and getting the base to the polls between presidential races something we do not seem to be motivated enough to do.

"We can get public funding of federal elections if we do this. That is the only thing will bring big change short of violent revolution."

- thank you, thank you, thank you, bee, for listening to bernie, and his demand for public funding, only, of all federal, state and local elections (if you followed his comments after rahm emanuel bought the chicago election, outspending his progressive opponent 4 to 1, i believe you will get why public funding, only, should extend to state and local elections, too!)

most folks here support bernie but don't bother to pay attention to what he says -

it's like citizen, above, who doesn't get why bernie caucuses with dems, votes with dems, runs as a dem, and so, citizen wants us to pledge to write-in bernie, to help elect a zomblican - begone zomblican troll!

too many here listen to bernie until he demands public funding or hates pointless gestures that get zombies elected!
 
 
+12 # leftcoast 2015-09-04 19:27
WTF is an 'illegal alien' anyway?!
What a hideous term for a human being.
 
 
-5 # capt400 2015-09-04 20:38
Too bad he is beholden to Israel. His foreign policy may be a reflection of his predecessor's. That's what really needs changing. So many problems this country has are a result of those insane policys.
 
 
+14 # Left Coast 2015-09-04 22:00
I just read about a lady who is 90 Y.O and she hangs out at a Walmart in Redding, CA. (which is near Oregon border). Two or three days a week she hangs out in front of store to had out Bernie info sheets. Imagine, if someone that age can promote Bernie, then damnit, so can we.
 
 
+7 # oldeky 2015-09-05 13:18
.....and Robert Reich - YOU helped. Thank you for all you do to teach and inform. #Bernie2016
 
 
+8 # Doc Mary 2015-09-05 17:24
Just want to add something I hadn't seen yet - everybody in the mainstream media - and mainstream politics - seems convinced that Bernie cannot win the Presidency because all Republicans will have to do is buy air time in which Bernie says he is a socialist. end of discussion.

But I have to wonder - does anybody under say, 55, even know what a "socialist" is? Even if they escalate the war by calling him a "Communist" (which he is not), does anybody too young to personally remember the Berlin Wall coming down have much of a conception of "Communist" any more? the boogeyman today is the religious terrorist.
 
 
+4 # Santacruzer 2015-09-06 14:16
I believe it was Gandi who said "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you and then you win"
If such is the case we are in the first stage of being ignored. However since Gandi's time there is a new element in the equation namely social media where we can talk to each other over the head of the mainstream media. Already this has had such an effect that 70,000 people showed up on the west coast when Bernie was out here. Lets use use it. Post Bernie articles and videos on your Facebook wall, Tweet about him, be creative in finding different ways to spread his message and know that all it really takes is for a person to listen and watch anyone of his speeches or interviews because what he says and the sincerity of his message resonates with the ring of truth that we all can recognize.
 
 
0 # iris.1 2015-09-06 23:48
>I would hope that some lawyer would sue the national radio and tv networks for not giving him equal time.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN