RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Pierce writes: "This is a man who has lived a good, long, rich and decent life, and who has been slandered in history by people not morally fit to tie his shoes."

Jimmy Carter during the 1980 Democratic National Convention in New York, N.Y. (photo: Reuters)
Jimmy Carter during the 1980 Democratic National Convention in New York, N.Y. (photo: Reuters)


The Overlooked History of Jimmy Carter, Who Fights for His Life

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

13 August 15

 

The man, the life, the legacy.

w, goddammit to hell.

"Recent liver surgery revealed that I have cancer that now is in other parts of my body," the former president, 90, said in a statement today. "I will be rearranging my schedule as necessary so I can undergo treatment by physicians at Emory Healthcare�A more complete public statement will be made when facts are known, possibly next week."

This is a man who has lived a good, long, rich and decent life, and who has been slandered in history by people not morally fit to tie his shoes. I admit, my first exposure to him was in the frustrating stern chase in the 1976 Democratic primaries on behalf of Mo Udall. (Don't ever mention the 1976 Wisconsin primary to me. I will nail your head to the floor.) But watching what was done to him during the 1980 campaign � including what I believe was the international ratfcking involving the Reagan campaign and the Iranian hostages � and subsequently during the following eight-year national amyloid cascade got me on his side. I don't believe he was a good president, and it can be argued that the stick up his ass was the size of a Louisville slugger and that his talking about "ethnic purity" in our neighborhoods presaged what was coming with DLC politics. Nevertheless, this was a tough man, despite what you may have heard. He was tough enough to win a very hard primary season and then whip a sitting president in the general election. He was tough enough to hand a Kennedy the worst electoral drubbing anybody in that family ever suffered. And, more relevant to our current situation, he was a lot tougher on Iran than Ronald Reagan ever was.

In the existential crisis of his presidency, Carter made two mistakes: first, he listened to that old vampire, Henry Kissinger, and allowed the deposed Shah of Iran into this country for medical treatment, and second, he launched the ill-fated rescue mission instead of pursuing the patient strategy of squeezing the Iranian economy until it screamed. Other than that, he embargoed their oil and he froze their American assets. Whether or not you believe that William Casey was engaged in monkey-mischief during the 1980 presidential campaign � and I do � there seems little doubt that the Iranians released the hostages when Reagan was sworn in not because they were terrified of the man who would: a) unfreeze their assets; b) leave 243 Marines unprotected and cause them to be slaughtered by Iranian-backed terrorists, and, c) ultimately sell the mullahs some missiles, but rather as a final flip-off to Carter, whom they genuinely hated. Who was the tough guy there? Reagan's myth has been built on the reputation of a better man, who now fights for his life. Godspeed, Jimmy, but we still should have beaten you in Wisconsin.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-4 # PhiloKvetch 2013-05-13 22:18
Come on, Matt. The saying is "When you mess with the bull, you get the horns." Deer have antlers, bulls have horns.
 
 
+11 # dickbd 2013-05-14 14:58
I think that was deliberate, as it was the kind of thing Friedman would use. (I don't know why everyone is giving you a thumbs down!)
 
 
+1 # Skyelav 2013-05-16 13:31
I think that was his point!
 
 
+5 # xAlger 2013-05-14 01:34
Matt=Kudos to "Debbie Does Davos". At least on a par with my BRE* plot to relocate SALT II Talks to Deseret's SaltPalace.
Best/Noel [ xAlgerine.Noel@AOL.Com ]
*"Before Romney Era"
 
 
+27 # Artemis 2013-05-14 02:43
Just another day with Matt Taibbi raising the spirit of cool, never forgetting the fire in the lake.
 
 
-4 # WestWinds 2013-05-14 04:22
Sorry, guess I'm too straight to get this.
 
 
+19 # IAMMe 2013-05-14 05:01
You friggin rock n roll, Matt Taibbi.
 
 
+14 # RLF 2013-05-14 05:14
Ick! I feel all dirty just reading that little Freidman passage!
 
 
+14 # Robert Berner 2013-05-14 07:58
Matt--How about a contest for the best David Brooks Moral Scolding?
 
 
+21 # librarian1984 2013-05-14 08:16
Matt, how awesome are you? Not only do you often fill me with informed rage, but you also make me laugh heartily, and oh! does this world need both! Thank you so much for fighting the good fight. Your mother must be very proud.
 
 
+1 # humanmancalvin 2013-05-14 08:20
This ain't yogurt...on my hand. It is a specimen of some type of seed that appeared after viewing the referee & the midwife while in Syria.
 
 
-12 # mvb 2013-05-14 14:28
I was revolted by Matt Taibbi's Friedman porn article, and am considering stopping my small monthly contribution to RSN. This is not censoring; it's just that RSN seems to have decided it no longer wants to be what it originally promoted itself to be--a source of intelligent, substantive reporting and analysis on current issues, from a variety of open-minded, liberal sources. I had thought that was the purpose of RSN. Taibbi's article is neither substantive reporting nor analysis, and it will neither educate nor change anyone's mind about anything (except, perhaps, mine as I re-consider my support for RSN); actually, other than vitriol (your word, and I thought you were against that), I don't even find a point of view spelled out in this piece. An unfortunate, unenlightened choice by RSN.
 
 
-7 # Henry 2013-05-14 16:32
Yes, it is crass. But it looks as if some people here think it's REALLY clever! Bubbas.
 
 
-14 # Henry 2013-05-14 14:48
This is the stupidest idea & story EVER. Lame lame lame. Worst of all (nearly) there's nothing funny here.
 
 
-5 # Beckett 2013-05-15 07:45
I've consulted with several of the local church ladies and they agree with you completely. Thomas Friedman went to the same Christian university my son did and he's a fine upstanding boy. I wish he'd get rid of that mustache though. But if he did he wouldn't have much of a face, would he? Bless you all, even the heathen liberals. P.S. I will not be withholding my donation because I didn't make one in the first place.
 
 
+4 # anna shane 2013-05-15 13:57
I have a brag. I once figured out Tom's nyt email address, it was something like tfried@nytimes.com, took me quite a few tries to get it, and after that I would email him after his most offensive columns, chewing him out, particularly for his support of invading Iraq, he'd said something like, if we had only a 51 percent chance of winning, it would be worth it. This went on for a few months and I never heard back from him, but then he changed his email address and wrote a column about how depressing it was to get unsolicited emails and what a bother it is to change an email address (me, yeah yeah yeah).

I could not figure it out again, he must use his dog's name? (anyone know his dog's name?)
 
 
0 # frederico 2013-05-20 22:08
Matt, Have I missed it, or did you already have a Chris Wallace Famous Interruptions and Non Sequiturs Contest? This guy makes me physically sick. He's at least as obnoxious as Limbaugh. And what ever happened to Michael Savage? These three, and many others too numerous to mention, are the result of human GMO experiments gone awry. They drank too much Roundup and Atrazine. Too bad they missed out on the Kool Aid.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN