RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Galindez writes: "Free college for everyone? Did I hear that right? In the United States, a nonprofit higher education? I must have just woken up from a dream."

Barack Obama announcing his free community college plan in a video released by the White House. (photo: White House/YouTube)
Barack Obama announcing his free community college plan in a video released by the White House. (photo: White House/YouTube)


Finally, Change We Can Believe In?

By Scott Galindez, Reader Supported News

12 January 15

 

ree college for everyone? Did I hear that right? In the United States, a nonprofit higher education? I must have just woken up from a dream.

No, it�s true, the president has proposed free community college for everyone. Oh, but wait � John Boehner called it a talking point. Many Americans won�t take it seriously, according to Boehner. How will we pay for it, they will ask.

Well, how about the same way many Europeans get a free four-year education at top universities. If you live in Sweden, you can even go to a university in Norway and not pay a dime in tuition. They even give students welfare to live on while they are in school. The result is that upon graduation they are not burdened with debt.

In a fact sheet released by the White House Thursday night, the plan was summarized like this:

Today the President is unveiling the America�s College Promise proposal to make two years of community college free for responsible students, letting students earn the first half of a bachelor�s degree and earn skills needed in the workforce at no cost. This proposal will require everyone to do their part: community colleges must strengthen their programs and increase the number of students who graduate, states must invest more in higher education and training, and students must take responsibility for their education, earn good grades, and stay on track to graduate. The program would be undertaken in partnership with states and is inspired by new programs in Tennessee and Chicago. If all states participate, an estimated 9 million students could benefit. A full-time community college student could save an average of $3,800 in tuition per year.

In addition, today the President will propose a new American Technical Training Fund to expand innovative, high-quality technical training programs similar to Tennessee Tech Centers that meet employer needs and help prepare more Americans for better paying jobs. These proposals build on a number of historic investments the President has made in college affordability and quality since taking office, including a $1,000 increase in the maximum Pell Grant award to help working and middle class families, the creation of the $2,500 American Opportunity Tax Credit, reforming student loans to eliminate subsidies to banks to invest in making college more affordable and keeping student debt manageable, and making available over $2 billion in grants to connect community colleges with employers to develop programs that are designed to get hard-working students good jobs.

In a video also released on Thursday night, the president announced the proposal:

If this were to be implemented, it would be a nice first step. Our young people start out shackled by debt. While a free education from pre-school to college would need to be paid for by taxes, imagine the savings for parents with more than one child who needs to go to college.

It is the same with health care: Medicare for All would mean higher taxes, but the lack of out-of-pocket spending for health care would more than make up for the additional taxes.

It is time to invest in young people. Every election, we hear about candidates� commitment to education. Well, I haven�t noticed many major changes in my lifetime. If anything, a college education is further from reality for many young people than it was in the early eighties.

One of the reasons I believe Elizabeth Warren is the best candidate the Democrats have is her commitment to addressing student loan debt.

While Obama�s proposal is not likely to make much progress in this Congress, he deserves credit for starting the ball rolling.

We never expected legal same-sex marriages or legal marijuana 20 years ago. Maybe in 20 years our kids can have a free education, that is if it won�t give too many Republicans a stroke. I guess just in case, we should give everyone free health care first.


Scott Galindez attended Syracuse University, where he first became politically active. The writings of El Salvador's slain archbishop Oscar Romero and the on-campus South Africa divestment movement converted him from a Reagan supporter to an activist for Peace and Justice. Over the years he has been influenced by the likes of Philip Berrigan, William Thomas, Mitch Snyder, Don White, Lisa Fithian, and Paul Wellstone. Scott met Marc Ash while organizing counterinaugural events after George W. Bush's first stolen election. Scott will be spending a year covering the presidential election from Iowa.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-21 # MidwestTom 2011-08-31 21:59
A citizen of NY making $100,000 pays a very high State tax, sat 15%, but then he gets to deduct his state tax before figuring his Federal tax, which he pays on $85,000 in income.

The same person is a state charging 3% state income tax pays his federal taxes on $98,000. A possible higher bracket. The citizen in the low tax state pays considerably more in Federal taxes.

Why should state taxes be deductible for Federal Income taxes? I think to be fair, everyone should pay the some Federal income tax rate, and every state should receive back from the Federal government the same percentage of their contributions.
 
 
+12 # Billy Bob 2011-09-01 05:07
I'm just curious why your example refers to someone making $100,000 a year. Are you refering to yourself?
 
 
+14 # DPM 2011-08-31 22:29
Hey Tom, Does that mean corporations and millionaires, too? Just checking.
Rick Perry=back asswards.
 
 
+14 # giraffee2012 2011-08-31 23:29
I think (feel, want) the United States to split into 2 countries: The blue states = 1 country (i know the borders are problems) and let the red states be another country.

The Red states can have the current Supremes --- especially Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and we can decide on the others.

That is the only way I can see to save Democracy! This article is just one more reason why we, the people, who are not part of the Religious Right, gun-toting whatever, will lose what we believe is a Democratic Society (I think we're actually supposed to be a Republic) - but you get the idea -- can have the Freedom/Democra cy/etc we know CAN work without corporations running the government (thanks to the 2010 Supremes' decision to allow personhood give us "the best government money can buy"


HOW DO WE Accomplish this divide. We are going no place (except to hell) under the red/blue divide in the present United States government.

Vote 2012 -- if you're in a GOP/TP states - register ASAP and get mail-in ballots -- your governor has warned you that Dem districts will be screwed up (and from the past elections only blue ballots have been found in boxes, trunks, etc. NOT COUNTED)
 
 
+3 # WEWINYOULOSE 2011-09-02 11:34
FINALLY!!! SOMEONE WITH SOME COMMON SENSE!!!!
 
 
+23 # ericlipps 2011-09-01 04:08
Ah, yes. So Warren Buffett should pay the same percentage of his income in federal taxes as a waitress at McDonalds.

Even he doesn't agree with that. Mr. Buffett understands that the rich should pay more because they can afford to, and has publicly called for increasing tax rates on the wealthy, including himself.

In the conservative glory days of the 1950s, the top tax rate on income was 91%. It's just over a third of that now.
 
 
+9 # Pickwicky 2011-09-01 16:27
The rich, it should be noted, also use more resources than the poor. Ah, but you say: they pay for them. Actually, many things are not directly paid for: compared to the poor, the rich pummel our roadways and bridges with larger vehicles, pollute our waterways with big boats, our atmosphere with more air travel, and so forth.
 
 
+13 # pgobrien 2011-09-01 06:17
How can we get this into the mainstream press? I'd love to see this on Fox News! Or, at least the New York Times
 
 
+11 # Billy Bob 2011-09-01 07:09
I agree with your last paragraph though, that there shouldn't be ANY tax exemptions or deductions, except from sales tax on food, and personal taxes on utilities.

People should also be taxed a progressively larger percentage from their income, the more they make. To make it as fair as possible, it should be on a sliding scale, rather than in incremental "brackets".

ALL income should be taxable, not just income that was earned from working. There shouldn't be a cap on how much of any source of income is taxable either.
 
 
+5 # fullsock 2011-09-01 07:18
I have seen these statistics before, and my question is: What expenditures are included in "getting money back from the Federal government"? Defense industry, payroll for Federal employees living in each state, welfare, housing and urban development grants, national parks, agriculture subsidies, etc.?
 
 
+14 # fredboy 2011-09-01 07:35
Rick Perry despises the Blue States.
Remember, this is all about hatred and national division. That's what's fueling their movement.
Put simply, they want to cripple our nation.
 
 
-39 # Carolyn 2011-09-01 07:38
Mr Reich would do well to read what Steve Forbes has to say to NewMax today. At last, someone has put his finger on the real problem -- the president. None of the democrats seems to have noticed how weird it all is.
 
 
+32 # GeeRob 2011-09-01 09:07
Forbes sits on the board of The Heritage Foundation. He's as conservative as they come. Forbes hasn't "put his finger" on anyone but the middle class and the poor.
 
 
+18 # dr. labwitch 2011-09-01 12:21
forbes is one of the 2% and wants to keep it that way. of course, to him everything is the president's fault. what he doesn't tell you is that it's president bush's fault! don't hear him griping about the cadre that pulled off the biggest heist of the early 21st century by stealing the entire US treasury does he?

BTW, the repubs HAVE noticed how weird it is? they made it that way! obstructionist misers that want all the $$ because that means power. no it doesn't, all it means is you have all the money and likely got it through thievery.
 
 
+7 # ABen 2011-09-01 14:35
Why any rational person would listen to Steve Forbes is beyond me. If he hadn't inherited wealth and position from his father, he would be penniless.
 
 
+3 # dr. labwitch 2011-09-01 14:40
one question carolyn:

is perry going to part the red sea too? talk to a burning bush? (i get to set the bush on fire!)

oh and the real problem IS forbes and his ilk. you people that read headlines and think you know what your talking about really are annoying.
 
 
-2 # tanis 2011-09-01 08:12
Someone once categorized the U.S. as having 5 areas. New England, Mid-Atlantic, Southwest, Mexamerica, etc. Maybe that's the way the economy needs to be observed instead of 50 states that have to be red or blue or "united".
 
 
+16 # artful 2011-09-01 08:13
Gee, good thing Rick Perry is a moron. Otherwise, he might hate himself for promoting the cause of Blue States.
 
 
+21 # Midwestgeezer 2011-09-01 08:42
And, to add insult to injury, this collection of right-wing "Red" states (remember when that was a terrible name to be called?)include s those low population states who give them effective control of the Senate, enabling them to block ANY progressive reforms in America. Among them many western "he-man" states who like to extoll their rugged two-gun individualism. It turns out that most are on the "gummint" dole. Even "Marshall" Perry used $16,000,000,000 .00 of "gummint" largesse to bail out his own self-sufficient go-it-alone state's fiscal woes. If hypocrisy were painful thay'd all qualify for an unlimited oxycontin prescription.
 
 
+20 # boudreaux 2011-09-01 10:27
I live in TX and cannot stand RIck Perry. I am a democratic and hate the fact that this is a repug state. From all that I hear about Perry, there is no way in hell that I am voting for him, he thinks that he is a prophet and can and will do what he wants if he gets elected, just remember this one thing, NOTHING GOOD COMES OUT OF TEXAS, We have George Bush to thank for that and that alone should strike fear in the heart of voters.....He ain't nothing but a show person who knows nothing about running anything....He is only for show just like Bush was...never forget this...
 
 
+6 # dr. labwitch 2011-09-01 14:42
i was born and raised here. fortunately, for most of my medical education i was out of texas. when i returned i was devastated by the stupidity revolution that took place while i was gone.

texans revere stupidity. they love it and they breed it.
 
 
+6 # jjaaqq 2011-09-01 13:30
Ordinarily I appreciate the information and perspective you provide, Dr. Reich. In this one I'm bothered by your calling Montana a far right state. We have a Democratic governor, and two Democratic senators. That doesn't make us a liberal state as we're quite divided, but then so is the nation.
 
 
+11 # DLT888 2011-09-01 13:45
It's always been that way. The Red states really do run "in the red". For all their bad-mouthing about welfare, THEY are the welfare. And I'm sick of the Blue states bailing them out when they vote like *sses.
 
 
+6 # amye 2011-09-01 14:38
Parry is no closet liberal! He's just not a smart feller! Doesn't know what he's sayin'! Too bad us blue state liberals don't scream about giving to all those red states repubs! But then again we are a more gracious group. Not the petty stuff we keep seeing with that Tea party group!
 
 
-9 # WEWINYOULOSE 2011-09-02 11:26
WOW Robert! What a piece! Piece of superficial crap! This is soo funny! See this is what all liberals do, now pay attention because I'm only going to say it once. Liberals-First they laugh at you, then they try to discret you, then they try to fight you....and FINALLY......TH EY LOSE!!! And that's exactly whats going to happen to Osama #2.
 
 
+4 # chick 2011-09-02 21:24
wewinyoulose: And the Republicans they throw rocks at you, knock you down and steal your money.

Wait until until 2012 you will be surprised what will happen.
 
 
+1 # RenK 2011-09-04 14:10
I believe "pork" has Southernvorigin s when it comes to politics. Add the large manufacturing base of the Blue states and this fiscal skewering makes complete sense to me. As to Obama, some commenters should remember he was elected President, not dictator. When voters elect a Congress dedicated to blocking his every move, they need to blame themselves and not Obama for failures to move on issues this country needs handled.
 
 
0 # VSweet 2011-09-06 07:27
Everyone is not on the mental instability that Rick Perry is trying to feed the nation with.
Division as a Nation is not a good idea. Why allow history to repeat itself? Countless loss of lives, families devestated, etc. when North and South fought against one another.
United we stand because we are the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Do not be deceived citizens of this nation.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN