| FOCUS | No, Obama Has Not Failed |
| Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a> |
| Tuesday, 22 July 2014 13:13 |
|
Pierce writes: "Almost everyone has had their whack at Thomas Frank's piece in Salon that argues that Barack Obama has been an incompetent, a sellout, or an incompetent sellout."
No, Obama Has Not Failed22 July 14
However, on the issue of the economy, and the people who wrecked it and then sold off the pieces, and then, by and large, got away clean, there were some things the president could have done, and didn't do, that lead me to believe that, on this issue, Frank is more right than he is wrong. For example, there was no reason to involve Bob Rubin in the transition team, much less to staff the Treasury Department with Rubin-esque clones. Hell, Tim Geithner didn't have to be Treasury Secretary. There was nothing stopping the president in 2008 from appointing a tough assistant U.S. Attorney to be an assistant secretary of the Treasury tasked with vigorously investigating the causes of the economic meltdown, and whatever crimes were involved therein. The Republicans would have raised hell, but they were going to do that anyway. It's hard to see a Democratic Congress defunding the Treasury Department, but I admit there's no telling what mischief Max Baucus might have concocted. The president faced unprecedented opposition employing unprecedented tactics. However, "looking forward, not back" on many issues was a conscious governing strategy. To say that the president did more than he's given credit for is not to say that he did everything that he could. |
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 12:18 |




lmost everyone has had their whack at