RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Gibson reports: "We're all familiar with the golden rule, right? I'm not talking about the "do unto others" bit from The Bible, but the "He who has the gold makes the rules" one."

The poor end up in jail. (photo: i-stock)
The poor end up in jail. (photo: i-stock)


Our Fraudulent Two-Tiered Justice System

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

28 May 14

e�re all familiar with the golden rule, right? I�m not talking about the �do unto others� bit from The Bible, but the �He who has the gold makes the rules� one. Nowhere is this golden rule more evident than in the American justice system. And it won�t change until we collectively refuse to acknowledge its legitimacy. Matt Taibbi also makes this point eloquently in his book �The Divide.�

The most glaring evidence of our fraudulent judicial branch is shown in the treatment of Credit Suisse�s admission that it helped up to 22,000 wealthy Americans hide approximately $12 billion in assets from the IRS. Attorney General Eric Holder got everyone worked up into a frenzy when he made a statement that big banks who engaged in criminal activity were �no longer too big to jail.� But that turned out to be false when Credit Suisse, who enabled tax dodging on a massive scale, was allowed to slide back into good graces by paying a $2.6 billion fine, which amounts to 10% of its annual $26.2 billion in revenues. That's a lesser rate than lawful Americans pay in taxes. The penalty assessed by the US Department of Justice is essentially a �cost of doing business.� Disgust over such lax treatment is likely why the US's top tax enforcer stepped down after negotiating the settlement after originally saying she would favor prosecution of the bank.

When you combine Credit Suisse�s kid-gloves treatment with similar lax settlements for HSBC � who helped launder money for violent Mexican drug cartels � and the pittance of a settlement JPMorgan Chase had to pay for swindling millions of Americans out of their homes in fraudulent foreclosure schemes, the golden rule is clearly the guiding principle for the US Justice Department. We need not even mention all of the fraud and deception from Bank of America, Citigroup, and other big banks that created the subprime housing bubble, got bailed out after it burst, and never faced any jail time. Even the chief of the International Monetary Fund has said that the biggest banks haven�t changed a bit since the financial crisis.

However, a much different brand of justice is saved for those without the gold to make the rules. Cecily McMillan, a grad student, while trying to lawfully leave the scene at a protest, had her breast grabbed from behind by a plainclothes police officer who never identified himself as a cop. Reacting reflexively, she inadvertently struck the officer with her elbow. McMillan was then beaten in the street until she had a seizure, was never given medical attention, and was arrested on the charge of assaulting a police officer. At the trial, Judge Ronald Zweibel allowed no discussion of the violent past of her attacker, Grantley Bovell, who had a history of unprovoked attacks on civilians. Zweibel also didn�t allow discussion of the NYPD�s violent crackdown on nonviolent protesters in the Occupy Wall Street encampment. While McMillan got only 3 months out of what could have been a 7-year sentence, it�s still an injustice that a sexual assault victim was the one to do time, not her attacker.

Another sexual assault victim that won�t ever see justice served to her attacker is the 3-year-old daughter of Robert H. Richards IV. Richards is the great-grandson of Ir�n�e DuPont, of the DuPont chemical dynasty. He lives off of trust fund money in a $1.8 million, 5800-square-foot mansion. Richards� daughter told her grandmother that she didn�t �want my daddy touching me anymore,� detailing her father�s history of sexual assault throughout her young life. Richards faced two charges of second-degree rape of a child, which is normally a mandatory 20-year prison sentence. However, his judge allowed him to skate on a probation rap, saying he �wouldn�t fare well� in prison.

Richards fared much better than Gregory Taylor, a homeless man who was victimized by California�s draconian �three strikes� law. Since 1994, the state of California has had a policy stating that anyone who commits an offense after having previously been convicted of the same offense gets double the jail time. Anyone who commits that same offense again is automatically sentenced to 25 years to life. For most �three strikes� offenders, the harsh punishments they face are simply the result of crimes committed out of economic necessity. In Gregory Taylor�s case, he had broken into a church kitchen to steal bread, because he was hungry and had no money. Taylor was sentenced to 25 years, but was mercifully released from prison after 8 years behind bars.

On the other hand, one California man who should have definitely been behind bars for at least 25 years is Gurbaksh Chahal, CEO of RadiumOne. Chahal was caught on video beating and kicking his girlfriend 117 times during a 30-minute attack, and faced 43 felony counts. But Chahal�s money and status as a tech CEO in the San Francisco Bay Area got him a lawyer who negotiated his punishment down to probation, attendance at a domestic violence class, and 25 hours of community service. Chahal�s attorney is James Lassart, a former federal prosecutor who is also defending state senator Leland Yee, who faces multiple corruption charges. San Francisco Superior Court judge Brendan Conroy didn�t allow the surveillance video showing the 30-minute attack to be used as evidence, on the grounds that police obtained the video illegally, while prosecutors argued the video would have been erased if police filed for a warrant.

We as a nation can see these gross injustices in the judicial sphere, but there are only two options � either we allow the fraudulent two-tiered justice system to continue, or we refuse to accept its legitimacy, by voting out justices who are electable, voting out the politicians who appoint unelected justices, and simply not respecting the decisions made by the Supreme Court. While judges can�t state their political opinions when running for elections, it�s completely acceptable to ask candidates for judicial posts about whether or not they will uphold the law regardless of a person�s privileged status, either in race, gender, or class. What we allow is what will continue.



Carl Gibson, 27, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nonviolent grassroots movement that mobilized thousands to protest corporate tax dodging and budget cuts in the months leading up to Occupy Wall Street. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary We're Not Broke, which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. Carl is also the author of How to Oust a Congressman, an instructional manual on getting rid of corrupt members of Congress and state legislatures based on his experience in the 2012 elections in New Hampshire. He lives in Sacramento, California.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+52 # Kumari 2012-10-12 13:55
why does the richest nation in the world need to spend anything on food stamps? why cant americans afford to buy food?
it might be a rich country but as far as i'm concerned it's morally bankrupt
 
 
+8 # jlohman 2012-10-13 19:21
Of course free education makes sense, but there's no money in it for the politicians. They'd rather spend our tax dollars on things that draw campaign bribes (like defense weapons).

see http://MoneyedPoliticians.net
 
 
-7 # Luis Emilio 2012-10-12 14:23
In which states is the Green Party running? Maryland? Will e vote for the Green Party endanger Obama?
 
 
+5 # Muzzi 2012-10-13 11:14
Yes, it will split the vote. Obama is closer to the Green Party than the Republicans. Remember that jerk that Ronald Reagan appointed, and how he sold the environment and the animals down the polluted river?
 
 
+16 # dick 2012-10-12 14:40
ABC, NBC, CNN, & CBS do more damage than FAUX. They relentlessly portray an insane status quo as wonderful, natural.
 
 
+28 # bmiluski 2012-10-12 14:40
Is that a type (Ihope)....Pres ident Obama is pulling our troops out in 2014 NOT 2024.
 
 
+29 # cordleycoit 2012-10-12 14:53
We are scalping the children's education and heath to feed the war on terror-Drugs-an d protest to make our Masters rich.The election is a sham the winners will be the Wall Street bankers no matter who you vote for.
 
 
+11 # Muzzi 2012-10-13 00:06
Right. We should legalize a lot of the drugs to take the profit out of them. When you do that, you will lower the crime rates. One of the Mayors in Baltimore said that years ago and everyone laughed at him. They should have listened. What did prohibition do, except make money for the Mafia?
 
 
+37 # James Smith 2012-10-12 15:15
America only rates number one in military spending. That's because too many companies are making huge profits from it. Even with the billions wasted on the military budget our people are not always the best-equipped. That is a national scandal, too. Does anyone thing that the military-indust rial complex care about the lives wasted?
 
 
+6 # Regina 2012-10-13 17:57
Endless war is the Republican mantra for population control. Killing adults in battle is OK -- just don't get in the way of a fertilized human cell, or even an as-yet unfertilized one, two weeks early. They scream against contraception and enact crazy invasive laws against women's control of their own bodies. They join forces with religious interests in violation of the Constitution. The real driving fact underlying their malarkey is the profits they rake in from their military adventures -- they're so obsessed that they pass funding provisions for equipment that the military says they don't need or want. That's how they generate deficits that they then proceed to rant against. Who else demands support for two totally directly opposing sets of policies????
 
 
+2 # independentmind 2012-10-14 14:07
You notice too that not one of Mitt Romney's five sons is in the services, most of the kids that are in there came from less wealthy homes and do it to have their education paid for.
 
 
+20 # nancyw 2012-10-12 15:38
The age old dilemma of wanting to vote for what we believe in and is best for the country, but having to vote for a major party so the worse of possibilties can be prevented.

Just not right. But I don't want more destruction from a revolution... We need to think out of the box to fix this country.
 
 
+19 # worldviewer 2012-10-12 15:50
HOSTAGE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Does Obama really want US In Afghanistan until 2024? Or is he the hostage in the White House?
It's clear transnational business is trying to take over our government and our nation. They control the news and advertising that shapes how people think. And they would like to divide people--and the votes.
Remember what Gandhi and Martin Luther King understood--tha t each of us holds a bit of power. And if we the people join our power together we are more powerful than the 1%.
 
 
+8 # GGmaw 2012-10-13 06:10
Considering the transnational business interests working against him, Obama has done a very good job. People are fed a line of propoganda by the main media. Everything that has happened in our economy was carefully planned - read the Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein - she predicted the recession years ago.
 
 
+19 # Linwood 2012-10-12 15:55
The fundamental question is why Americans accept the status quo.
People in other western democracies would not put up with the status of working Americans. What happened to that revolutionary spirit?
 
 
+33 # Gordon K 2012-10-12 16:06
 
 
+22 # socrates2 2012-10-12 19:33
Gordon K, hear, hear!
I, too, happen to like the sly paragraph in Part 2, Chapter 9, from "THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF OLIGARCHICAL COLLECTIVISM by Emmanuel Goldstein," to wit, "And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival. War, it will be seen, accomplishes the necessary destruction, but accomplishes it in a psychologically acceptable way."
Nothing like a little fear to block critical thinking and to "persuade" majorities to surrender every shred of freedom and dignity.
Viva, Orwell!
 
 
-10 # mangel 2012-10-12 16:57
I agree with you but you do not provide enough support for exiting Afghanistan. The fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons makes it a good idea the avoid having them under the control of a pro-Taliban government. This is an issue you need to address. You don't even address the possible consequences of leaving the area. It makes me wonder if you have even thought about it.
 
 
+12 # Nell H 2012-10-12 18:04
The future of America depends on graduating more scientists in mathematical fields -- mathematicians, engineers, biologists, computer scientists. If states would support these students (who are citizens) at their top state-supported universities with full tuition, room and board as long as they make satisfactory progress we would graduate the people we need to move our great country forward.
 
 
+15 # Bev 2012-10-12 20:08
Fundamental to all these issues is true education, not schooling. We have been dumbed down! We are not taught (by design) to think outside the box. Uneducated citizens are fearful of change and under duress, look back to the past (as in Tea Partiers) instead of looking to the future and with confidence to embrace innovation.
 
 
+15 # tazia@aol.com 2012-10-12 21:49
Quoting Bev:
Fundamental to all these issues is true education, not schooling. We have been dumbed down! We are not taught (by design) to think outside the box. Uneducated citizens are fearful of change and under duress, look back to the past (as in Tea Partiers) instead of looking to the future and with confidence to embrace innovation.

I have to agree..since "no child left behend", kids are taught to take the test rather than think what the lesson is about.
 
 
+7 # ladypyrates 2012-10-12 21:01
The comments here are dead on right but it's disheartening that so many Americans have no clue as to the economic heritage given us by the founders. If nothing else, go to normeconomics@att.net and try to get an idea of the economic structure that was the basis for our incredible prosperity. When one understands how unique the American system is, it's quite easy to identify how it's been dismantled and who the culprits are that have been working for it's demise.
 
 
+2 # 4yourinformation 2012-10-13 12:49
LIKE LIKE LIKE this article!

This is what the debates should be about. Joe Biden kicked Ryan's ass but he did it inside the parameters of established and allowable topics and information.

We need a REAL genuine debate about the entire menu of important concepts and facts.

Jill Stein would make those arguments.
 
 
0 # seefeellove 2012-10-14 11:53
What is one of the dumbest and most inhumane practices? That health and education, education being part of our health, are inaccessible for many.

In a world that is smart and compassionate, education and health care would be integrated systems and free for all. Also, every single person would have the best health care and education, accommodating everyone's needs. Privatization of this single system would be illegal, forever.

Who will pay for it? The people who believe they can never have enough money.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN