RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Kennedy writes: "The GOP's recent efforts to gin up presidential scandals in punitive hearings, media lynchings, and weekly calls for impeachment, evince a party-wide pathology that puts partisanship over patriotism. For Republicans who believe that patriotism ends with lapel pins and cowboy costumes, it might be useful to consider some historical examples of true patriotism by a political party."

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (photo: unknown)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (photo: unknown)


Benghazi v. Beirut

By Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Reader Supported News

25 May 14

 

y uncle, President John F. Kennedy's Pulitzer Prize winning best-seller Profiles in Courage recounted the stories of courageous U.S. Senators -- Republicans and Democrats -- who chose patriotism over partisanship and sacrificed personal ambition to national welfare. The GOP's recent efforts to gin up presidential scandals in punitive hearings, media lynchings, and weekly calls for impeachment, evince a party-wide pathology that puts partisanship over patriotism. For Republicans who believe that patriotism ends with lapel pins and cowboy costumes, it might be useful to consider some historical examples of true patriotism by a political party.

At 6:22 a.m. on Sunday, October 23, 1983, a suicide bomber drove a six-ton truckload of high explosives through a lightly fortified plywood fence, past two marine guards with no bullets in their rifles, and detonated his payload at the Beirut airport. The largest non-nuclear explosion ever recorded toppled the four story U.S. marine barracks from its foundation and killed 241 sleeping soldiers. It was the deadliest day for the Marine Corps since Iwo Jima.

Ignoring protests by Congressional Democrats and his own Secretary of Defense, Casper Weinberger, President Reagan had sent the marines to protect Beirut's airport during the bloody civil war that followed Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon to expel the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Citing the April 1983 U.S. embassy bombing in Beirut, where 63 people died including 17 Americans, Weinberger and Congressional Democrats had argued that Reagan's plans for deploying additional marines to Beirut would make the American soldiers "sitting ducks." Worse yet, because Reagan had labeled the marines "peacekeepers," he ordered them not to appear "warlike." Their orders forbade them from erecting fortifications or perimeter fences or loading their weapons. Weinberger had entreated Reagan to station the soldiers in a less vulnerable redoubt, instead of the highly exposed and indefensible airport barracks building. Weinberger later lamented.

I was not persuasive enough to persuade the president that the marines were there on an impossible mission. They had no mission but to sit at the airport which is just like sitting in a bull's-eye. I begged the President to put them back on their transports as a more defensible position.

The American press pilloried President Reagan for putting the marines and servicemen in harm's way without ammunition or any clear mission during a violent civil war in a country rife with sophisticated suicide bombers and a history of successful attacks against Americans. CBS Evening News reported,

the marines rely on the inexperienced Lebanese army to check vehicles. Today, all kinds of vehicles were being waved right through without the slightest verification... the question remains what are the marines doing in Beirut? They are here to prop up a government that still controls only a part of Beirut and none of the rest of the country, and are being told to sit at the Beirut airport where they became prime targets.

Richard Threlkead of ABC's World News Tonight invoked the bitter refrain from Alfred Lloyd Tennyson's Charge of the Light Brigade, the poet's rant against idiotic commanders and chicken-hawk politicians; "Tennyson would have understood it," he said angrily. "'Theirs is not to reason why, theirs but to do or die.'"

Reagan's response to press badgering about the absence of ammunition and protective barriers only stirred public anger about the president's lack of concern for troop safety. Reagan's explanation for the blunder seemed flippant, "Anyone who ever had a kitchen done over knows that it never gets done as soon as you wish it would be."

Late on the evening of the deadly attack, top Congressional leaders including House Speaker, Tip O'Neill became even more unsettled while attending a secret meeting with the president, his cabinet and Joint Chiefs of Staff in the White House residence where they had been spirited in separated cars and through secret corridors from the Old Executive Building.

Reagan began with a story of the Filipino people who supposedly greeted American marines with flowers and flags as they landed on Philippine beaches during World War II. A flummoxed Tip O'Neill considered that story to be apocryphal -- perhaps, a scene from an old movie. Reagan next pledged to the stunned Congressional leaders that he would never allow the terrorists to drive the marines from Beirut and promised that the U.S. would only abandon its watch when peace was assured. He predicted, "I can see the day, not too many weeks from now when the Lebanese people will be standing at the shore, waving and cheering our marines when they depart."

Impatient, O'Neill pounded the table, interrupting Reagan's sentimental flight of fancy. O'Neill demanded loudly, "Mr. President, you are going to have to tell Americans why Americans are in Lebanon?" O'Neill's forceful response shocked Reagan speechless. Majority Senate Leader Howard Baker, soothed Reagan gently, "Mr. President, he's not being critical. He's one of your strongest supporters... he's trying to give you the facts of life." As the meeting ended, O'Neill in a gesture of warmth and support, reached out and touched Reagan's sleeve, "Good luck." O'Neill had considered Reagan's Lebanon enterprise a fool's errand from the outset, and had predicted it would end tragically. But the following day, he made what Congressional Democrats called the most passionate appeal of his tenure as speaker. He told the closed Democratic caucus that "it was their duty, now, not to criticize but to support their President and to do nothing to undermine him no matter what the political advantage." O'Neill told them that it was time for "patriotism over partisanship."

The subsequent Defense Department investigation placed blame directly on the White House for the tragedy. Following the bombing, a bitter Weinberger refused a direct presidential order to launch retaliatory strikes against Shiite encampments in Beirut and summarily withdrew the remaining 1,600 marines from Lebanon.

Four years later, Reagan was caught illegally selling 2,000 missiles to the Iranian terror state in violation of American law and a U.S.-led international arms embargo. Reagan had used the proceeds of that criminal enterprise to illegally fund Nicaraguan terrorists in violation of American laws forbidding the president from financially supporting the Contras. Secretary of State George Shultz and Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger had opposed the Iran/Contra deal from the outset. Shultz warned the president during its planning stages that funding the Contras was "an impeachable offense." The fact that the White House traded some missiles for hostages, set off a brisk bout of new hostage taking across the Mid-East. Looking directly into the television camera Reagan publicly told the American people that he had known nothing about the caper. A week later, the press uncovered documents authorizing the arms for hostages deal -- signed and approved by Reagan in his own handwriting. Reagan was forced to publicly acknowledge his deceit. Instead of politically exploiting this impeccably documented spree of high crimes and felonies by the president and his henchmen, the Democratically controlled Congress instead pursued a deliberate path to avoid impeachment proceedings that might distract the country from urgent economic and foreign policy concerns. Tip O'Neill working side by side with Senate Republicans took impeachment off the table and then hammered out a quiet deal under which Reagan fired his high level staff and brought Senator Howard Baker in to supervise a house cleaning and allow Reagan to serve out his term in dignity.

That was an era when patriotic politicians put their country's interest above their narrow political agendas, a time when politics was an honorable profession and the men who wielded gavels loved their country more than they loved power.



Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+13 # Winston Smith II 2017-01-11 20:07
"Trump did convince working-class voters in the Rust Belt that he would bring back the factory jobs that bad trade deals drove out of the country. We have to win those voters back,"


This is of course just right. But it is both something that democrats don't understand very well and something that will be very hard to do. These voters were "turned" by the Reagan "revolution" which was first to bring out their latent racism, homophobia, and anti-communism. These are people who were once close to unions. Now that unions are mostly dead, there's no way to organize them.

The democrat party has become the party of wall street, hollywood, identity politics, intelligence agencies (esp. CIA), and mass media. These are all things that the voters Scott names hates.

The democrat party has some very deep soul searching to do. Sanders is the right leader for this. Why is Eliz. Warren so silent these days.
 
 
+1 # Depressionborn 2017-01-11 21:26
All sadly true, Winston. but many repubs are no better and Trump is likely to fail. Fascism appears unstoppable. The issues are fundamentally in conflict.
Progressives, good people, see gov as the instrument for good; as a problem solver, a servant of the people and provider of needs. Great! But to do good human nature being what it is progressives need a powerful and forceful gov. Others believe power corrupts and forceful good will become bad-darn old human nature getting in the way again. For them the purpose of government gov is simply do no harm
 
 
0 # warrior woman 2017-01-12 06:32
Why aren't we calling for the inauguration to be put on hold in light of the potential crimes being exposed? We should at least try even if it's a long shot.
 
 
+2 # Saberoff 2017-01-12 11:06
 
 
-5 # SenorN 2017-01-12 12:26
Thanks once again to those of you who thought Hillary was as bad as Trump and chose not to vote or to vote for a third party candidate. I thank you on behalf of the industrial-mili tary complex, global warming, anti-women's rights groups, and insurance companies.
 
 
+5 # RLS 2017-01-12 13:30
 
 
+1 # Jaax88 2017-01-12 17:54
As a Sanders supporter and voter I question some of the wisdom here. Sanders was and is a life long independent. I do not fault, but like him for that, but he hitched his star to the Demo party. It is not surprising the old guard DP unhitched his star. I think most party affiliated voters will vote is as the party leans.

Either progressives need to start organizing as a separate party or take over the DP and clean house and establish
a progressive hierarchy in the party. I see some merits to that as on the ground operations might not need to be reinvented and voter connections lost. Just a thought. I am sure there are more knowledgeable people than me who have different and better ideas.

One weakness progressives would appear to have as a group is promoting ideals, principle and ideas to get voters. Trump and the GOP settled on the gut feels of the left out people's need for jobs and money.
 
 
+1 # pro54 2017-01-12 19:12
We will be too busy peddling Russian conspiracy thories and hoping for a miracle to keep Trump out of the white house, that they will be no energy left to fight the real fight ahead. I am seeing trump and the republicans win over and over. McCain will join them or he will be relegated to inconsequential and the democrats who think they have his support will find themselves holding unto straws.
 
 
0 # John_Fisher 2017-01-13 18:28
Mr. Galindez is inspirational on the principle that All Lives Matter -- I wish I could believe in the Democratic Party's unequivocal support for such equity but I do not; recent events from the Presidential campaign through Mr. Trump's electoral victory underscore to me that for Dems as well as GOP'ers, poor lives matter considerably less, and public esteem for any politics other than the conservative-re actionary kind (in the Dem Party, it's mis-labelled "moderation" or "third-way")is too rare. And the helluvit is, the Democratic Party as a national political institution is making things worse, not better as the Dems pursue their campaign funding from giant for-profit corporations, to the utter marginalization of the interests of "little", financially-str uggling people. Why am I asked to align with a Democratic Party that has failed for decades in my state, whose officials have no interest in my experience as a low-income marginal being, but want my money to continue pursuing republican lite policies that continually sustain the overall drift [lurch] to the right -- oh yes, and they'd like me to vote for them too.

I don't see how such a party can ever be an instrument of anything approaching "political revolution"; and its recent poor candidate selection and corruption in weighting the scale in favor of its coronee leave me doubtful that this leopard (Dem. Party) can ever change its present spots, which are egregious.

They're not the enemy? How-so?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN