RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Pierce writes: "First we have Ross Cardinal Douthat, Archbishop of Dorkylvania, rousing himself in 800 of the 1800-odd words he writes per week to warn us that we're all becoming lazy slobs who don't want to work as hard as he does."

New York Times columnist Ross Douthat. (photo: unknown)
New York Times columnist Ross Douthat. (photo: unknown)


Ross Cardinal Douthat, Archbishop of Dorkylvania

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

12 February 14

hings are lining up sweetly for conservatives in the 2014 midterm elections. The congressional strategy of throwing sand in the gears in working splendidly. The party's real owners have indicated that they will spend whatever it takes to make all their dreams come true. Then why in the same of Hephaestus's iron oysters are conservatives so outright hysterical about things? First we have Ross Cardinal Douthat, Archbishop of Dorkylvania, rousing himself in 800 of the 1800-odd words he writes per week to warn us that we're all becoming lazy slobs who don't want to work as hard as he does.

One of the studies used to model the consequences of Obamacare, for instance, found a strong work disincentive while looking at a population of childless, able-bodied, mostly working-class adults - a demographic that's already becoming more and more detached from steady, paying work.

The study in question came from the American Enterprise Institute, the wingnut intellectual talking-points factory, which His Eminence oddly declines to mention to us, probably because we all know that, if you asked the "scholars" at the AEI to study the effect of sunlight on a field of daisies they would conclude that Obamacare contained a strong work disincentive. But His Eminence's concern for our vanishing work ethic is nothing compared to Kevin D. Williamson at National Review, who is hearing the thumpety-thump of jackboots in the not-too-distant future. First, though, he would like you to know that he's had enough of what political correctness has done to Versailles, mom.

I was a bit taken back by the company's current billboard in Tribeca: "The French aristocracy never saw it coming either." Patting Manhattanites on the head for being good little Democratic doggies is one thing, but flippant cheerleading for what was, let's remember, mass murder is quite another. For those of you keeping score, the number of people slaughtered during the Terror included 16,594 killed in the guillotine alone, along with tens of thousands more victims of summary execution by other means.

The ad in question:

You have to be stupid or behaving like a complete charlatan to conclude that a storage company is "cheerleading" for the Terror because of a joke it made on a billboard in 20-fking-14. I have been on TV with Williamson. He is not stupid. Unfortunately, it all gets worse.

At a time in which the Left is rediscovering the joy of totalitarianism in the pages of Rolling Stone, when Occupy activists are attempting acts of terrorism, and the organs of the state are being turned against the president's political enemies, it is worth keeping in mind who and what the Left is at its heart. The Left gets good PR, but it is not really about the minimum wage or Head Start or bigger school budgets. Its agenda is control and domination, and it has been known to endorse and use political violence to achieve those ends. When part of the Left's corporate arm is happily contemplating the Terror, we should take note, and perhaps ask our progressive friends under which other circumstances execution without trial seems to them an admirable course of action.

This is sub-Glenn Beck bullshit, and working with Jonah Goldberg is no excuse for writing it -- especially in a week when a Republican member of Congress sat there like a bobblehead German Shepherd while one of his constituents argued that the president be hung. First of all, if Manhattan Mini-Storage is "the Left's corporate arm," then the Left is pretty well screwed, I'd say. I missed Rolling Stone's turn to Der Sturmer, but I'm willing to bet it had something to do with Daft Punk. The Occupy terrorists are those poor saps in Cleveland who told an undercover FBI agent that they'd like to blow up a bridge, all of whom are in the federal sneezer from now until the end of time. And, of course, you recognize the scary set decoration that Williamson has hung on the IRS dumbassery, which fell on Left and Right alike, and which, anyway, is a chicken that the Right has pretty much fked to death at this point. The rest of it is something Ann Coulter argued in that book where she pretended to be a Christian scholar. Frankly, if I wrote for National Review, I'd be less worried about summary executions, and more about what might happen in civil court, but that's just me.

If the Left ever gets the revolution it wants, the owners of multi-million-dollar downtown lofts surely will be among the first to the guillotine. Perhaps they will be comforted by the words of Robespierre: "Terror is only justice: prompt, severe and inflexible; it is then an emanation of virtue; it is less a distinct principle than a natural consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing wants of the country."

Jesus, man, have some warm milk and go to bed. If I got the revolution I want, we'd have single-payer health-care, no Keystone pipeline, and a top tax rate back where JFK left it. Then I'd be happy. If you're looking at the American Left now and seeing Robespierre, then, by all means, buy your mushrooms somewhere else. It used to be that people thought that allowing the base to live in the information bubble was all right because, sooner or later, the more serious conservative intellectuals would be there to rein in the wilder impulses of the tribe. At this point, I don't know who's outside the bubble any more.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
0 # Anagnorisis 2011-05-01 10:54
Live by the sword, die by the sword; live by deception, die by deception.
 
 
+5 # Activista 2011-05-01 11:46
mathaba.net/news/?x=626593
retrospective that "free World" propaganda is censoring.
NATO killed son and his 3 GRAND CHILDREN.
In 1986 Reagan killed his adopted baby daughter - Hana.
This is TERRORISM - Killing Gaddafis Grandchildren - NATO, OBAMA ... British royalty - sick "western civilization"
 
 
-1 # Activista 2011-05-01 12:45
"live by deception, die by deception" - NATO and Obama:
NATO (Obama) not targeting Gaddafi, just his grandchildren.. .Impeach Obama. ...
 
 
+5 # propsguy 2011-05-01 17:40
UN security council resolution, which authorised military actions to protect civilians.

so how is killing someone's son and three kids under age 12 protecting civilians exactly?

how does blowing up a house in a residential neighborhood constitute protecting civilians?

everyone is a war is a murderer, let's face it. they all think they're the good guys and they all think the other guys are the bad guys- they're all wrong
 
 
+4 # timp 2011-05-01 17:56
It is the beginning of a slippery moral slide when we justify the killing of children.
 
 
+1 # rf 2011-05-02 05:07
You might want to fool yourself that war can be fought without civilians getting killed, but the reality is they always do get killed, even if you don't see it on the TV news!
 
 
+5 # rm 2011-05-01 19:09
It is about time that the UN authorized bombing of London, Paris, Rome, and Washington, DC in order to save civilian lives. Clearly the greatest threat to Libyans and all people of the earth is the rogue militaries of the US and NATO. These warriors kill more civilians each year than all other government on earth combined. Maybe a good dose of bombing of US, British, French, and Italian capitals and a few dead children of the leaders there would teach them a valuable lesson.
 
 
+2 # Activista 2011-05-01 20:59
what made me really sick was celebration of "our democrats" - from anti Qaddafi tribe.
And this was 2nd targeted bombing of Qaddafi in 2 days.
NATO (Obama) IS not targeting Gaddafi, just his grandchildren ..
 
 
+2 # rm 2011-05-02 06:44
Activista -- if you were made sick by these celebrations, check out the WashPost's photos of the celebrations for Osama's murder.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nation-reacts-to-osama-bin-ladens-death/2011/05/02/AFEpl8VF_gallery.html?hpid=z3#photo=1

Since 9-11 America has developed a cult of death. Americans like the ignorant assholes in the Post photos seem ecstatic over the announcement that their president has personally order the murder of another human. The US is, indeed, a sick nation.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2011-05-02 09:16
Old sick man Osama was killed by Obama - and we USA is celebrating.
We live in celebrity symbols - far from reality. It is SICK.
I will celebrate when we will get out of Afghanistan. War got US bankrupt - think that it is too late anyway. Going way of SSSR.
 
 
-1 # mtnview 2011-05-02 08:10
Gaddafi knew he was a wanted man, in danger from his own people as well as NATO forces. He choose to be with his family for a celebration, putting them in danger-- an arrogant move.
Yes, it is sad when innocents die. Yes, it should be avoided whenever possible. But in this situation, Gaddafi once again placed himself above the rules, and the death of family members is the result.
Try to remember, this is a leader who has brutalized his own people, bombed his own people when they resisted oppression. Gaddafi has been a threat to freedom, ours and theirs, for more than 30 years.
As a liberal, I do recognize there are some people who are so evil they simply need to be removed. Assasination is a viable strategy, requires fewer deaths than a war, and does not inflict great devastation on civilians. The only regret here is that once again, Gaddafi survived.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2011-05-02 09:19
Please learn:
mathaba.net/news/?x=626593
facts that "free World" propaganda is censoring.
NATO killed son and his 3 GRAND CHILDREN.
In 1986 Reagan killed his adopted baby daughter - Hana.
"there are some people who are so evil they simply need to be removed. Assasination is a viable strategy ..."
 
 
+2 # BoBa 2011-05-04 16:50
NATO is "Killing the kids to protect kids". If they continue with this tempo, there will be no kids to protect.!

How is NATO making difference which kids should be on not to be killed ?

Imagine psychopath taking the gun in your neighborhood and killing three kids because he is "He is angry with something" and other people even government figures supporting his views. NO this is no way forward - Bomber pilot or the one who issued such an gruesome order should be shown in public and charged for crimes in same way as psychopath with the gun. Kids should play whatever they surname or religion is - they have nothing to do with anyone's political views.

This kids are dead now and they will never play again - Do you have children ?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN