Reich writes: "Congressional Republicans have gone directly from conservatism to fanaticism without any intervening period of sanity."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Republicans: From Conservatism to Fanaticism
22 September 13
ongressional Republicans have gone directly from conservatism to fanaticism without any intervening period of sanity.
First, John Boehner, bowing to Republican extremists, ushers a bill through the House that continues to fund the government after September 30 but doesn't fund the Affordable Care Act. Anyone with half a brain knows Senate Democrats and the President won't accept this - which means, if House Republicans stick to their guns, a government shut-down.
A shutdown would be crippling. Soldiers would get IOUs instead of paychecks. Hundreds of thousands of federal employees would be furloughed without pay. National parks would close. Millions of Americans would feel the effects.
And who will get blamed?
House Republicans think the public hates the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) so much they'll support their tactics. But the fact is, regardless of Americans' attitudes toward that Act - which, not incidentally, passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law by the President, who was re-elected with over 50 percent of the vote, and constitutionality was upheld by the Supreme Court - Americans hate even more one party using the United States government as a pawn in their power games.
According to a recent CNN poll, 51 percent of Americans say they'd blame the Republicans for a shutdown; 33 percent would blame the President. They blamed Republicans for the last shutdown at the end of 1995 and start of 1996 - contributing to Republican losses of seven out of 11 gubernatorial races in 1996, 53 state legislative seats, 3 House seats, and the presidency.
So what are Senate Republicans doing about this impending train wreck for the country and the GOP?
Senator Ted Cruz is now trying to round up 40 Senate Republicans to vote against - not for, but against - the House bill when it comes to the Senate floor next week. Why? Because Cruz and company don't want the Senate to enact any funding bill at all. That's because once any bill is enacted, Senate Democrats can then amend it with only 51 votes - striking out the measure that de-funds Obamacare, and even possibly increasing funds in the continuing resolution to keep the government running.
So if Ted Cruz gets his way and the Senate doesn't vote out any funding bill at all, what happens? The government runs out of money September 30. That spells shutdown.
The only difference between the Cruz and Boehner scenarios is that under Boehner we get a government shutdown and the public blames the GOP. Under Cruz, we get a shutdown and the public blames the GOP even more, because Republicans wouldn't even allow a spending bill to come to the Senate floor.
In truth, the fanatics now calling the shots in the Republican Party don't really care what the public thinks because they're too busy worrying about even more extremist right-wing challengers in their next primary - courtesy of gerrymandering by Republican state legislators, and big-spending right-wing gonzo groups like the Club for Growth.
The Republican Party is no longer capable of governing the nation. It's now a fanatical group run out of right-wing states by a cadre of nihilists, Know-nothings, and a handful of billionaires.
But America needs two parties both capable of governing the nation. We cannot do with just one. The upcoming shutdowns and possible defaults are just symptoms of this deeper malady.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
I don't want to take 8 years of war with Iran, ending Social Security and making public education punishable by death to say, "SEE!?" "We told ya so! Twit REALLY WAS lying!"
Meanwhile, listening to 5th and 6th party liberals complaining that the left doesn't have enough Presidential candidates to dissipate our vote effectively, and the repug party unveils its newest robotic threat to the environment, human civilization and the American way of life IS GETTING OLD!
This predictable routine is getting O - L - D!!!!!!!!
VOTE -- USE IT OR LOSE IT !
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The alternative is a catastrophe.
Elminate National Health care states would provide health care by uninsured going to ER
Medicaid funding would be reduced.
Vouchers for Medicare for those under 55 yrs would be made mandatory.
Conservative Supreme Court Justce would be appointed and Roe -vs- Wade would be reversed
War with Iran would be conducted.
Military expenditures would be expanded by $ 2 trillion
20% flat tax and deductions would be eliminated. Bottom 1/3 would pay at higher rate than to 1/3.
Inheritance taxes would be eliminated and wealth would be concentrated with the top 1/3
Alternative energy subsidies would be eliminated
EPA scrubbers for coal power plants to eliminate mercury would be reversed
Regulations to reduce CO2 in atmosphere would be eliminated as Romney says science re: global warming no proved
NPR, PBS and Arts for Humanities would be eliminated
Dream Act not passed and make life measerable for illegals so they would self deport
To reduce deficit caused by tax cuts, military expenditures and war all social programs and entitlements would be decreased
Federal deficit would balloon
Thanks
Gallup's daily tracking poll tells different story - plus look at the debate results.
And Pew Research center:
www.pollingreport.com/wh12gen.htm
puts Romney ahead 49% to Obama 45% of likely voters nationwide.
Gallup is right leaning poll (look at the sources cited in the article).
Sad that Americans are treating the election as another football game - blinded to the reality.
www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57528936/romney-takes-slight-lead-in-new-gallup-poll/
RSN please update:
Obama Regains 5-Point Lead Over Romney
is obsolete
http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/13868-as-the-rich-get-richer-two-who-were-once-desperately-poor-inspire