Reich reports: "Anyone who thinks congressional Republicans will roll over on the debt ceiling or gun control or other pending hot-button issues hasn't been paying attention."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Debt Ceiling and Guns, Using Presidential Authority
10 January 13
nyone who thinks congressional Republicans will roll over on the debt ceiling or gun control or other pending hot-button issues hasn't been paying attention.
But the President can use certain tools that come with his office - responsibilities enshrined in the Constitution and in his capacity as the nation's chief law-enforcer — to achieve some of his objectives.
On the debt ceiling, for example, he might pay the nation's creditors regardless of any vote on the debt ceiling - based on the the Fourteenth Amendment's explicit directive (in Section 4) that “the validity of the public debt of the United States … shall not be questioned.”
Or, rather than issue more debt, the President might use a loophole in a law (31 USC, Section 5112) allowing the Treasury to issue commemorative coins - minting a $1 trillion coin and then depositing it with the Fed.
Both gambits would almost certainly end up in the Supreme Court, but not before they've been used to pay the nation's bills. (It's doubtful any federal court, including the Supremes, would enjoin a President from protecting the full faith and credit of the United States).
Or consider guns. As Vice President Joe Biden said Wednesday, “there are executive orders, executive action that can be taken” that don't require congressional approval.
The President probably needs new legislation to reinstate a ban on the sale of military-style assault weapons, stop the sale of high-capacity ammunition clips, and require background checks on all gun buyers.
But he has wide authority to use gun laws already on the books as the basis for regulations or executive orders strengthening gun enforcement.
There's ample precedent. After a mass school shooting in Stockton, California, in 1989, George H.W. Bush issued an executive order, pursuant to the 1968 Gun Control Act, that banned imports of certain assault weapons unless used for sporting purposes. Years later, Bill Clinton by executive order banned imports of almost five dozen different assault weapons that had been modified to get through that “sporting purposes” exemption. President Obama could go even further.
To take another example, the National Firearms Act of 1934 gives a president broad powers to oversee gun dealers. By executive order, the President could tighten that oversight.
Under his law-enforcement authority the President could also issue executive orders improving information sharing among state and local law enforcement authorities about illegal gun purchases, tracking gun buyers' history of mental illness, and maintaining data on gun sales for longer periods.
The Administration has already issued a regulation designed to prevent sales of semi-automatic rifles to Mexican drug cartels. It requires stores in states bordering Mexico to notify federal law enforcement officials when someone buys two or more of a particular type of high-caliber, semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine. That regulation, too, could be expanded upon.
No doubt such executive orders and regulations would be challenged in the federal courts (the regulation on semi-automatic rifles is now in a federal appeals court that's expected to rule on its legality within the next few months).
But it's a fair argument that when the nation is jeopardized - whether in danger of defaulting on its debts or succumbing to mass violence - a president is justified in using his authority to the fullest.
The mere threat of taking such actions - using the President's executive authority to pay the nation's bills or broadly interpret gun laws already on the books - could be useful in pending negotiations with congressional Republicans.
They have not shied away from using whatever means available to them to get their way. The President should not be reluctant to play hardball, either.
Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Executive orders can control certain executive branch functions, sometimes with great effect, such as Truman's desegregating the military, but they aren't going to mean a thing when it comes to the private use and possession of guns.
If another assault weapon were never manufactured or imported, if every gun dealer were made to comply punctiliously with the rules, if federal prosecutors worked exclusively on gun crimes, there will still be enough assault weapons (let alone Saturday night specials) in the domestic market to sustain the current rate of violence for generations to come.
No. Do what you think best, Mr. President, but this is between the NRA and the rest of us. Who will our representatives represent?
And then there are yard, garage and estate sales as well as 900 types of guns not covered by any Feinstein legislation pending.
What more do they want?
It's like a leaky barrel for Gawd's sake.
I have no comments on the Debt ceiling as an economic dim bulb but anything the current Rethug' "No" club wants must go down as economic blackmail.
The President is a killer, and a Constitutional Violator. The Congress are (mostly) Bickering Thieves, and they are proving it.
Wake up to The Charade our 'Government' has turned into
Here is a solution to both problems. Want less violence in the World and less debt then stop all the Wars on everything and reduce our Military budget to half of what it is now - Just Do it NOW!
All we can do to rid ourselves of these "traitors" who violated their "Oath of Office" is to vote them out. Yes, you could impeach the President but his accomplices in Congress can not be impeached-only voted out.
from WikiPedia:
Possible methods of bypassing the debt ceiling
* Fourteenth Amendment: Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution states that the validity of the public debt shall not be questioned...
* Minting coins in extremely high denominations: a US$5 trillion coin could be minted and deposited with the Federal Reserve and used to buy back debt, thus making funds available.
* Monetizing gold; The Secretary of the Treasury is still authorized to monetize 8,000 tons of gold, with a market value worth over $1,600 per ounce.
* Converting fractional reserve to full reserve banking: the debt could be eliminated by raising bank reserve requirements, converting from fractional reserve banking to full reserve banking.
Paul Krugman and Robert Reich have called attention to a couple of these possible methods of bypassing the debt ceiling.
From a Huffington Post article,"14th Amendment Debt Ceiling Option: House Democrats Support Obama's Use Of Power,"
"Rep. Peter] Welch...said he understood that the president might not want to embrace the 14th Amendment alternative at this point, when it might appear to be a power grab. But 'if there is the ultimate act of congressional irresponsibilit y by having the United States default on its obligations, we encourage the president to rescue the country.' He said ultimately the courts would have to decide what authority the amendment confers on the president."
Sounds good to me.
As for the gun regulations, do you really think he is going to do anything about that? Those tears were for show. The Democratic Party has no more interest in preserving the social safety net than the Republicans do. They just know how to do a better sales job and keep their mouths shut instead of telling the world what they are really doing. It's time for 3rd and 4th parties. And this from a guy who has voted Democratic in every election, local or national, since 1970.
These are the very weapons that need to be outlawed on the U.S. side of the border. F**k the NRA. Congress needs to serve the American people, not the gun nuts lobby.
RSS feed for comments to this post