Nader writes: "Don't most Americans believe and want strong law enforcement against corporate crime and fraud and abuses against consumers, taxpayers, the environment and workers?"
Ralph Nader being interviewed during his 2008 presidential campaign, 08/01/08. (photo: Scrape TV)
17 Solutions for a Better America in 2013
29 December 12
�
t's easier than you think. That's the way I start discussions and interviews about my new book titled, "Seventeen Solutions."
The "solutions" were selected for their long-overdue practicality, fairness, efficiency, safety, employment potential and respect for future generations. A majority of the people, sometimes a large majority, support such redirections. The effects of many of the "solutions" start being seen immediately.
Don't most Americans believe and want strong law enforcement against corporate crime and fraud and abuses against consumers, taxpayers, the environment and workers? The first step is telling your member of Congress to toughen the weak laws and beef up the law enforcement budgets which will pay for themselves many, many times over in deterrence, damage prevention to innocent people, and fines.
It has been taken off the table by both Democrats and Republicans, but a majority of people (including physicians and nurses) want full Medicare for all with free choice of doctor and hospital. Better outcomes, simpler to use, far less expensive per capita, timely diagnoses and treatment, and tens of thousands of American lives saved a year, are the fruits.
Who in your communities doesn't want public facilities (public works) repaired and expanded to meet needs? Ending the vast disrepair in our water and sewage systems, schools, clinics, libraries, public transit, highways and bridges creates well-paying jobs that cannot be exported to China.
Reducing the well-documented, bloated military budget, can release monies for repairing America. Demilitarizing our foreign policy will save the horrendous costs and after costs of these boomeranging wars of aggressive choice.
Get Congress to have "skin in the game," such as no health and other benefits for them, unless all people have them. There would be no taking our country into war without all able-bodied and age-qualified children of the Senators and Representatives being drafted into the armed forces. This duty will encourage Congress to attend to its deliberative, constitutional obligations and not heave them over to a lawless, out-of-control presidency.
Build family and community resistance and engage in alternatives to the commercial exploitation of children by non-stop big corporate marketers. These tricksters undermine and bypass parental authority to sell children junk food, violent programming and other things corrosive of their minds and bodies. Want to poll parent's reactions to those tricks among beleaguered parents who have lost much control of their children to corporatism?
Getting corporations off welfare, making them pay their fair share of taxes (GE is a profitable tax escapee that even gets checks from the Treasury Department due to the rigged tax code), taxing dividends and capital gains the same as ordinary income of working people, and imposing a tiny sales tax on massive Wall Street speculation are changes an overwhelming number of people support.
These advances, along with restoring our civil liberties, using regular government purchasing specifications for better goods and services to stimulate innovation and safety with our tax dollars, are easier than you think. The engine for these changes is organizing Congressional watchdog groups in every Congressional District around these and other solutions. Taking democratic control of the 535 members of Congress, with its ample constitutional authorities, is a lot easier than you think.
Moving our consumer dollars away from global corporations to local community banks, credit unions, farmer markets, renewable energy, and community health clinics, with emphasis on prevention, is a lot easier than you think. Stronger local economies are more self-reliant, they won't be shut down and shipped away or abroad by absentee owners making life-altering unaccountable decisions in their skyscrapers.
Local democracy is, like most ventures in life, a learning process of civic skills and experience. Starting in elementary and high schools, youngsters can shed their apathy or despair by working on real problems in the communities as part of their school-to-community courses. Look at all those high school physics, biology, and chemistry labs that, for example, can be testing air, water, soil samples and electromagnetic levels, and reporting the results to their community.
Studying books such as the newly released Slow Democracy (Chelsea Press, 2012) will give you many examples and tools to demonstrate that it's easier than you think.
Last September, prominent Cornell Economics Professor, Robert Frank wrote a column for The New York Times with the headline "Nation's Choices Needn't Be Painful." He wrote of infrastructure capital improvement programs, new tax policies, reducing highway congestion, curbing carbon emissions and other remedial actions that pay off.
Professor Frank, who told me he's going to write "a small book" on his assertions, says "the endless hand-wringing about painful economic choices is misguided. With a few simple policy changes, we could restore full employment, rebuild crumbling infrastructure and pay down the national debt without requiring real sacrifices from anyone."
Making all this and more happen needs some three million Americans (the other one percent) organized and focused on Congress and state legislatures in ways that reflect the "public sentiment." We have to stop being so discouraged and solution-averse, especially since we have so many solutions already on the shelf, but not on the ground, because we've let the few make so many centralized, top-down decisions for us � "we the people."
No one can stop us from taking these initiatives, except, that is, ourselves. To send us your "solutions" and to order an autographed copy of Seventeen Solutions, visit: http://www.seventeensolutions.com/
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author. His most recent book - and first novel - is "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us." His most recent work of non-fiction is "The Seventeen Traditions."
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
John Boanerges pain in the ass Redman
This droning, people and Mother Earth destroying country of ours is exceptional in only one way - our need to maintain greed and total power over all. With both the first prime minister in the U.K., Sir Robert Walpole, and a Dem. Pres., Andrew Jackson, hanging in both my family trees, I, today sadly proclaim:
ASHAMED TO BE AN AMERCAN !!!
I thought Mitt Romney brought Obamacare into the world.
I see ..... so anyone who is not with you is against you ..... seems I've heard that before.
Therefore, Obama is carrying on with an agenda set long ago. He was going to do it regardless and began it all his first day in office. He is definitely liable, but yes, "this crap has been around much longer than he has".
Well, I bet she doesn't know how to get the most out of her iPhone !
Take THAT, 3rd world!
I appreciate the fact that you are joking, of course, and I gotta say I'm not certain that *I'd* take that bet ! A 16-yr-old as brilliant as this one - who has now been living in England for two years ago, not able to "spank" her own i-phone ? I dunno ! ;-))
This young lady is astonishing. She addressed the United Nations a short while back.
Damn ! When I was 16-yrs.-old, I had to struggle to get up and address my High School speech class, and they all spoke my native language. I am likewise certain that I would have "choked" in addressing POTUS at that age
Malala is still years away from being in possession of an adult judgement center (prefrontal cortex engaged) which arrives, for the human female as late as age 22, and for the male, as late as age 24. This is the brain center for higher reasoning.
So given what this incredible person is accomplishing so far - I would just advise the world - Watch Out ! ;-))
I was right behind Jon Stewart when he interviewed Malala on his show and commented " .... I know your Dad is here with you, back in the Green Room ..... but can I adopt you ?"
My only concern for Malala is her choice as a role model, of the beautiful and highly intelligent Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, whose star burned brightly until she herself was assassinated.
Thanks, man.
Of course. That's their purpose. To keep conflict going. That's what sells more weapons and weapons systems.
Seriously, "Satan worshippers"?
I know hyperbole is fun, but just because you're not a Muslim doesn't give you the right to say 1 billion people are "Satan worshippers".
Lying and bearing false witness are both against the Ten Commandments.
Great post, and I'm certain you meant to note that Malala is from Pakistan, rather than India. She speaks Urdu as a native.
Malala is right about education, it is the key to freeing people but Obama will continue to use his drones while the rest of the world watches in growing disgust.
Or Elizabeth Warren's secretary of State
Exactly. And this is the important thing in the article. Once again, the multitude of posts is off-track.
I have seen you advance this canard in the past. This time I have opted against letting it pass unanswered.
First, the commenters have no cause to comment on what was *NOT* in the article, (Obama's response) because the absence of info in the article makes comment on it, *by definition* "off-track".
This is true, even though I know that many of us were also curious about that same question.
Second, the fact that the comment string is *not* custom tailored to *your* specific line of thought is NOT evidence that said posts are all "off-track", a position that you have often maintained in the past.
I hate to be the one to break this to you, but the comment section is really *not* all about you. Sorry if that sounds rude.
Humbug. You're absolutely right that I'm an egomaniac if that makes you feel better. But you should continue to feel disengaged for pouncing on something so small. Of course people can discuss anything they want, any time. But when the main subject is more important, they should stick with it, and if they don't they are SCHMUCKS. Or if I don't make myself clear, then "You are trying to be Nero while Rome burns."
So, by that logic, Miss Yousafzai is a "teabagger", I guess...
I don't accept all the glib cynicism in this although it approaches Orwellian intelligence. George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama simply are and were uninformed men and very stupid on the drone point brought up by Malala.
If either Bush or Obama were students of early World War II, they would know that drones did more than anything to galvanize the British people from Winston Churchill and Mrs. Miniver on down.
Drones are horror movie stuff interspersing silence and characteristic sound with a deadly-- now? when? now?-- boom.
As such, they are fodder for paranoia, but in this as in certain other things, if you aren't paranoid you don't know what's going on.
If Obama hadn't spent so much time studying law while Bush studied the torture of horseflies, either of these guys might have taken a psychology course through which he could have begun to approach the emotional maturity of Malala.
Yes, drones create new terrorists. That may be obvious to educated persons but not to these last two presidents, and neither has proved an enlightened and decisive leader on Malala's huge point despite whatever else redeems them.
Well, let me revise that...to whatever partially redeems Barack Obama. But his redeeming traits don't fully compensate for his decisions on war, torture and drones.