Igor Volsky gives his latest installment of lies told by Mitt Romney in the debates. Some are correctly called myths, others are just bold face lies.
Mitt Romney. (photo: Getty Images)
Romney Told 24 Myths in 41 Minutes
23 October 12
�
- "Syria is Iran's only ally in the Arab world. It's their route to the sea." Romney has his geography wrong. Syria doesn't share a border with Iran and Iran has 1,500 miles of coastline leading to the Arabian Sea. It is also able to reach the Mediterranean via the Suez Canal.
- "And what I'm afraid of is we've watched over the past year or so [in Syria], first the president saying, well we'll let the U.N. deal with it�. Then it went to the Russians and said, let's see if you can do something." While Russia and China have vetoed multiple resolutions at the U.N. Security Council on Syria, the United States has also been working through the Friends of Syria group and other allies in the region. Obama's approach "would essentially give U.S. nods of approval to arms transfers from Arab nations to some Syrian opposition fighters."
- "Former chief of the - Joint Chiefs of Staff said that - Admiral Mullen said that our debt is the biggest national security threat we face. This - we have weakened our economy. We need a strong economy. We need to have as well a strong military." If Romney is worried about the national debt, why does he want to increase military spending from 3.5 percent of GDP to 4 percent? This amounts to a $2.1 trillion increase over a ten year period that the military says it does not need and Romney has no plan to pay for it.
- "[W]hen - when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the people there protested, the Green Revolution occurred, for the president to be silent I thought was an enormous mistake." Obama spoke out about the Revolution on June 15, 2009, just two days after post-election demonstrations began in Iran, condemning the Iranian government's hard-handed crackdown on Iranian activists. He then reiterated his comments a day later in another press conference. Iranian activists have agreed with Obama's approach.
- "And when it comes to our economy here at home, I know what it takes to create 12 million new jobs and rising take-home pay." The Washington Post's in-house fact checker tore Romney's claim that he will create 12 million jobs to shreds. The Post wrote that the "�new math'" in Romney's plan "doesn't add up." In awarding the claim four Pinocchios - the most untrue possible rating, the Post expressed incredulity at the fact Romney would personally stand behind such a flawed, baseless claim.
- "[W]e are going to have North American energy independence. We're going to do it by taking full advantage of oil, coal, gas, nuclear and our renewables." Romney would actually eliminate the fuel efficiency standards that are moving the United States towards energy independence, even though his campaign plan relies on these rules to meet his goals.
- "[W]e're going to have to have training programs that work for our workers." Paul Ryan's budget, which Romney has fully endorsed, calls for spending 33 percent less on "Education, training, employment, and social services" than Obama's budget.
- "And I'll get us on track to a balanced budget." Romney's $5 trillion tax cut plan and his increases to military spending could explode the deficit.
- "Well, Republicans and Democrats came together on a bipartisan basis to put in place education principles that focused on having great teachers in the classroom." Education experts have faint praise for his proposals while he was governor. "His impact was inconsequential," said Glen Koocher, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees. "People viewed his proposals as political talking points, and no one took Romney seriously."
- "So I'd get rid of [Obamacare] from day one. To the extent humanly possible, we get that out." Romney cannot unilaterally eliminate a bill passed by Congress and his plan to grant states waivers may also be a non-starter.
- "Number two, we take some programs that we are doing to keep, like Medicaid, which is a program for the poor." Medicaid isn't just a program for the poor. While it provides health coverage for "millions of low-income children and families who lack access to the private health insurance system," it also offers "insurance to millions of people with chronic illnesses or disabilities" and is "the nation's largest source of coverage for long-term care, covering more than two-thirds of all nursing home residents." Medicaid is also a key source of coverage for pregnant women.
- "[W]e'll take [Medicaid] for the poor and we give it to the states to run because states run these programs more efficiently." A Congressional Budget Office analysis of Paul Ryan's proposal to block grant Medicaid found that if federal spending for Medicaid decreased, "states would face significant challenges in achieving sufficient cost savings through efficiencies to mitigate the loss of federal funding." As a result, enrollees could "face more limited access to care," higher out-of-pocket costs, and "providers could face more uncompensated care as beneficiaries lost coverage for certain benefits or lost coverage altogether."
- "Our Navy is old - excuse me, our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917�That, in my view, is making - is making our future less certain and less secure. The U.S. Navy is smaller than it was in 1917, but it is not making America less secure. The navy has actually grown in the sheer number of ships under Obama and Romney's plans to increase shipbuilding is unrealistic. As one historian told PolitiFact, counting the number of ships or aircraft "is not a good measurement of defense strength because their capabilities have increased dramatically in recent decades." Romney's comparison "doesn't pass �the giggle test,'" he said.
- "And then the president began what I have called an apology tour, of going to various nations in the Middle East and criticizing America. I think they looked at that and saw weakness." Obama never embarked on an "apology tour."
- And I think that when the president said he was going to create daylight between ourselves and Israel, that they noticed that as well." They haven't noticed because it's not true. Israeli Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister Ehud Barak told CNN, "President Obama is doing . . . more than anything that I can remember in the past [in regard to our security]." "When I look at the record of President Obama concerning the major issues, security, I think it's a highly satisfactory record, from an Israeli point of view," said Israeli President Shimon Peres.
- "And - and - we should not have wasted these four years to the extent they - they continue to be able to spin these centrifuges and get that much closer." Obama hasn't wasted time on Iran. In July 2012, Obama signed into law the most effective sanctions ever put into place against Iran, targeting the country's oil and financial sectors. These sanctions were imposed unilaterally by the U.S. and come in addition to the four rounds of sanctions the UN has enacted since 2006. Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak called the sanctions "very effective," and Romney has said he would continue them if elected.
- "I would tighten those sanctions. I would say that ships that carry Iranian oil, can't come into our ports. I imagine the E.U. would agree with us as well." Almost no Iranian oil has come into the United States since Ronald Reagan signed an executive order in 1987 banning all U.S. imports from Iran. The nation received a small amount of oil from Iran after the first Gulf War, in 1991.
- "I see jihadists continuing to spread, whether they're rising or just about the same level, hard to precisely measure, but it's clear they're there. They're very strong." Obama's policies appear to have gravely weakened al Qaeda Central, the lead arm of the organization in Pakistan and Afghanistan principally responsible for 9/11.
- "It's not government investments that makes businesses grow and hire people." The Romney campaign routinely touts government military spending as a way to create jobs and boost businesses.
- "My plan to get the [auto] industry on its feet when it was in real trouble was not to start writing checks. It was President Bush that wrote the first checks. I disagree with that. I said they need - these [auto] companies need to go through a managed bankruptcy." Romney's plan for the auto bailout would have ensured the collapse of the auto industry. In his editorial titled "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt," Romney advocated for letting the private sector finance the bankruptcy of General Motors and Chrysler. Auto insiders, however, have said that plan was "reckless" and "pure fantasy."
- "Research is great. Providing funding to universities and think tanks is great. But investing in companies? Absolutely not." Ryan's plan, which Romney has endorsed, "could cut spending on non-defence-related research and development by 5%, or $3.2 billion, below the fiscal-year 2012 budget, according to the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Over the long term, Ryan's small-government approach would shrink funding for research and development to historically small sizes."
- "One is a path represented by the president, which at the end of four years would mean we'd have $20 trillion in debt heading towards Greece." The U.S. is not headed down a path like that of Greece. Greece, contrary to popular belief, had a revenue problem rather than a spending problem. While its spending was high compared to US standards - 50.4 percent of GDP compared to 38 percent of GDP in the US - its spending was average among European nations. As CAP's Michael Linden and Sabina Dewan note, "Over the past 10 years, Greece has consistently spent less, as a share of GDP, than the European Union as a whole." However, it generated less that 40 percent of GDP from revenue - one of the lowest rates in the EU.
- "I was in a state where my legislature was 87 percent Democrat. I learned how to get along on the other side of the aisle." Given Romney's 844 vetoes as governor, Massachusetts legislators dispute this claim. As the New York Times has noted, "The big-ticket items that Mr. Romney proposed when he entered office in January 2003 went largely unrealized, and some that were achieved turned out to have a comparatively minor impact."
- "We should key our foreign aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should coordinate it to make sure that we - we push back and give them more economic development." Romney's website promises to "Reduce Foreign Aid - Savings: $100 Million." "Stop borrowing money from countries that oppose America's interests in order to give it back to them in the form of foreign aid," it says. In November of 2011, Romney said he would start foreign aid for every country "at zero" and call on them to make their case for U.S. financial assistance.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
In all of the cases I could find of cops being convicted and sent to prison for murder, the victim was white. But none of them were killed in prison.
Nobody will do any research on it, just keep on quoting Anderson Cooper and the grinning -- excuse me, GRIEVING -- parents about "Sandy Hook".
It's just sickening.
http://www.sandyhookjustice.com/
You can't rely on government officials or propaganda organs like CNN to be telling the truth since 9/11 and Saddam Hussein's WMDs. They have an agenda and it is not in the best interests of your liberty, truth, or justice to accept uncritically the version of events they are propagating.
My wife was a pediatric critical care nurse in Oakland, CA for almost 2 decades, and the thought of all those children, shot and bleeding out without any emergency medical professionals being permitted to try to save some is both heartbreaking and shocking.
Finally, more than an hour after police knew the shooter was dead, the Medical Examiner's Staff went in and simply declared each and every one of them dead.
The police knew the shooter was dead within 10 minutes of first arriving on the scene. The school was taken off lockdown and the children allegedly evacuated within a half hour. And yet, medical workers were not granted access.
That is troubling, especially to anyone who has experience in emergency medical care.
The police considered the scene secure enough to let hundreds of children walk down the halls, out of the building, through the parking lot and down the street, and yet refused to let medical staff in.
At the Aurora Theater scene, EMTs were allowed in even while the police were searching for the shooter's accomplice that many witness/survivo rs reported seeing.
For that matter, why are there no photos or videos of these hundreds of children walking to the Fire Station?
We all saw the one famous photo of a dozen or so kids in the parking lot, but that's all.
"Why do Americans always" believe whatever the corporate media tell them to believe?
Thank you!
I have another question. Why do so many of these comments sections have comment rating numbers that don't show how many pluses and minuses, but only the running total?
Totally ignoring the police gang murder of an innocent, unarmed man who was not breaking the law--and the fixed grand jury that refused to indict the killer cops.
And ignoring that raging injustice could set off extreme anger.
When the grand jury refused to act, I knew they were going to get cops hurt or killed. And they did.
Time to face the music. Bad cops have ignited national rage.
And NYPD and Giuliani, don't castigate the public or protestors as the enemy. You are just making the situation worse--and shredding any semblance of respect we once had for you.
fredboy, your posting is a good example of what our problem is in this country.In the 2nd paragraph you say he wasn't breaking te law but he had multiple priors for the same infraction...se lling loosies. And for the grand jury to act, they would had to find them at fault and they didn't.
Then you call it a raging injustice. Well if you start with that extreme anger, and the grand jury didn't, it follows that you would presume injustice and would only see what you wanted to see. And calling it racism stokes the flames even higher. I could ask why there isn't any uproar over Dillon Taylor, an unarmed white boy shot & killed by a black cop in Utah. That cop wasn't indicted either. The real problem isn't race but that we put guns in the hands of cops and depend on them to keep the law using their own judgement. You can mitigate this problem but it will not disappear because of the poor gun control in this country. And cops don't take chances. I remember a plumber being shot & killed by police when he crawled out from under a house where he was working. OOPS wrong guy.
My father fought against fascism in WWII. I'm sure as hell not going to start supporting it now.
Since there weren't, you're just hyping your fantasy.
These are not a "recent spate of killings." I find no evidence that the rate of police killing people (specifically black males) has increased this year. For some reason, the corporate media has made them "news" this year, and that is an interesting phenomena.
The Zimmerman case was not a police killing. Still, though many of us feel that the case was bungled, and justice was not served, there were not the types of protests you berate after the verdict.
I agree with your comments about actual trials but disagree that people would be satisfied with anything other than conviction. I brought up the Zimmerman case because protesters are still calling it no justice (as you just did). I'm not sure what you mean by "hyping my fantasy." All I said was that people are calling for justice but will not be satisfied with anything less than conviction and they should say what they mean.
That is hyping your fantasy.
They are trained to shot and kill. I think it is time to reevaluate that training along with teaching them not to draw their gun unnecessarily. If they are too scared to be in their assigned location without a gun in hand, they should not be cops.
The roots of the problems here go back generations, not months, and tracing those roots would take more time and space than is allowed here. It comes from the divisiveness inherent in the 'us versus them' that is the core of the issues at this time. And the disintegration of the application of the law even handedly to all citizens, regardless of color or economic status.
What most of the people are missing, who line up with the position that the police are justified in shooting blacks - or anyone, for that matter - when they are unarmed, is that they are afraid of the real possibility that if this 'us versus them' mentality continues, it will not neglect them, either. They won't be immune to such sanctioned violence. This is the potential end result of the degradation of our rights under the Constitution and Bill or Rights. These rights of citizens apply to all of us; white, black, anyone - or they can be abrogated at will by anyone who has been given the power to do so. As the police are who swore their oaths to 'defend and protect'; as the NSA, CIA, FBI, SCOTUS, Congress, and the Administration swore the same oaths.
This divisiveness enhanced by 'security' excuses that override the oaths, will destroy our democracy. Is doing so. Remember.
Wow. Ugly. But reality of history often looks that way when brought into the present.
And who was it that first said that those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it?
Any aliens who show up in invisible starships to assess humanity's suitability to be allowed out into the rest of the galaxy would most likely conclude that we should be contained on this one planet to see if we manage to avoid self-destructio n from sheer willful stupidity. That's assuming such aliens don't have a vested interest in helping us along to said self-destructio n. Who knows?
Also must cops are veterans taught to shoot first and think later in Basic Training video games