Bello, Fitrakis and Wasserman write: "Will you cast your vote this fall on a faulty electronic machine that's partly owned by the Romney Family? Will that machine decide whether Romney will then inherit the White House?"
Companies with ties to the Romneys own a lot of voting machines. (photo: Getty Images)
Does Your E-Vote Now Belong to the Romney Family?
20 October 12
ill you cast your vote this fall on a faulty electronic machine that's partly owned by the Romney Family? Will that machine decide whether Romney will then inherit the White House?
Through a closely held equity fund called Solamere, Mitt Romney and his wife, son and brother are major investors in an investment firm called H.I.G. Capital. H.I.G. in turn holds a majority share and three out of five board members in Hart Intercivic, a company that owns the notoriously faulty electronic voting machines that will count the ballots in swing state Ohio November 7. Hart machines will also be used elsewhere in the United States.
In other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in the voting machines that could decide this fall's election. These machines cannot be monitored by the public. But they will help decide who "owns" the White House.
They are especially crucial in Ohio, without which no Republican candidate has ever won the White House. In 2004, in the dead of election night, an electronic swing of more than 300,000 votes switched Ohio from the John Kerry column to George W. Bush, giving him a second term. A virtual statistical impossibility, the 6-plus% shift occurred between 12:20 and 2am election night as votes were being tallied by a GOP-controlled information technology firm on servers in a basement in Chattanooga, Tennessee. In defiance of a federal injunction, 56 of Ohio's 88 counties destroyed all election records, making a recount impossible. Ohio's governor and secretary of state in 2004 were both Republicans, as are the governors and secretaries of state in nine key swing states this year.
As we have previously reported, H.I.G. Capital has on its board of directors at least three close associates of the Romney family. H.I.G. Capital directors John P. Bolduk and Douglas Berman are major Romney fundraisers. So is former Bain and H.I.G. manager Brian Shortsleeve. H.I.G. employees have contributed at least $338,000 to Romney's campaign. Fully a third of H.I.G.'s leadership previously worked at Romney's old Bain firm.
But new research now shows that the association doesn't stop with mere friendship and business associations. Mitt Romney, his wife Ann Romney, and their son Tagg Romney are also invested in H.I.G. Capital, as is Mitt's brother G. Scott Romney.
The investment comes in part through the privately held family equity firm called Solamere, which bears the name of the posh Utah ski community where the Romney family retreats to slide down the slopes.
Unlike other private equity firms, Solamere does not invest in companies directly. Instead, Solamere invests in other private equity funds, like H.I.G. Capital. Solamere calls them “partners.” These partners, like H.I.G., then invest in various enterprises, like Hart Intercivic, the nation's third-largest voting machine manufacturer.
As reported by Lee Fang of The Nation, Solamere was founded by Tagg Romney and Spencer Zwick, Papa Romney's campaign finance chair. Ann Romney and Mitt's brother G. Scott Romney are also invested. Mitt himself threw in $10 million "seed money" to get the fund going, and spoke personally to its first full investors conference. Solamere's public web presence has been reduced to a front page only, so a complete list of it's “partners” can not be found. But reportage by the New York Times, Boston Globe, Esquire and the Nation have slowly given us a partial picture of which funds are being funded by Solamere. Some $232 million has been raised so far, according to SEC filings and industry publications.
In addition to Romney's finance chair Spencer Zwick, Solamere has also provided the campaign with its finance director, Richard Morley, and a western regional finance coordinator, Kaitlin O'Reilly. O'Reilly is listed as an “executive assistant” at Solamere, and also at SJZ LLC, which was founded by her boss Spencer Zwick. The SJZ LLC campaign finance consulting firm has billed Mitt's campaign over $2 million this election cycle as well as doing another $9,687,582 in billing to various Congressional Campaigns. The host of the private fundraiser at which Romney made his infamous "47%" speech was Marc J. Leder, co-CEO of Sun Capital, another "partner" of the Solamere fund.
As in virtually every close presidential race, Ohio may well hold the key to the Electoral College decision as to who will become the nation's next chief executive. The presence of Hart Intercivic machines in Hamilton County, home to Cincinnati, means there is a high likelihood the votes that will decide the presidency will be cast on them. Major media like CBS have begun reporting that Cincinnati could be "ground zero" in this year's election.
But these Hart machines are deeply flawed and widely know to be open to a troubling variety of attacks and breakdowns. There is no legal or other means to definitively monitor and re-check a tally compiled on Hart or other electronic voting machines. Ohio's current governor and secretary of state are both Republicans.
Does this mean the Romney investment in Hart Intercivic through H.I.G. Capital and Solamere will yield it not only financial profits but the White House itself?
Tune in during the deep night of November 7, when the electronic votes in swing state Ohio are once again opaquely reported to the nation and the world, without meaningful public scrutiny or legal recourse.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
This whole criminal conspiracy has been in place since 2004 when the Sec'y of State of Ohio mentioned in the article was Ken Blackwell. The original machines were manufactured by Diebold, whose CEO said he'd do anything to see Bush win - and evidently he did. Having worked in and around the computer industry for many years, you can't tell me that you can't design and manufacture a voting machine with printer output - a ridiculous statement by the manufacturer.
I have several questions:
1. Why isn't this process under the control of the Federal Election Commission - i.e., the design, manufacture, production, and use of the machines?
2. How do you ever do a recount or a proof count without printers on each machine?
3. Why are private companies in control of the machine-related election process - especially companies controlled by a presidential candidate and his family?
4. The GOP has stolen 2 presidential elections (2000 and 2004). Why are the Dems and the Justice Dep't so quiet about this overt criminal enterprise?
5. Why are Ohio votes being tallied in Tennessee? And...
6. Pray tell me, WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON???
The only time the right wing demonstrates any kind of "creativity" is when they're doing something nefarious. From Nixon's "plumbers" to suspect voting machines made by Republican sympathizing companies, the right wing thinks of everything it can to get their way no matter what. As a result, the country is the poorer for it - and getting even poorer.
Question is, what can be done about it?
I agree that there are voter suppression issues, including the billboards posted in inner-city neighborhoods, curtailing early voting efforts, mislabeling legitimate voters as felons, and removing citizens mistaken for non-citizens. I think that those issues are important.
These voting machine conspiracies only make it harder for those other issues above to be taken seriously. No one is ever going to believe in these conspiracies and it makes progressives look crazy.
I agree with you, I hate conspiracy theories, and Democrats do lose quite normally . . . but the lack of transparency, validation, and extreme contradictory polling data, AND the business involvement produce a STRONG appearance of possible impropriety. Just as in the conduct of judges, the appearance is enough to invalidate the result, as democracy depends on the credibility of its voice.
I also believe the Democratic Party should take on the issues of Non-Partisan Redistricting, and Campaign Finance Reform, two other issues that cloud the sunshine of Democracy with the ugliness of power, money and manipulation, the hallmarks and apparent moral core of that other party . . . .
You have a point but.
Being Europen, does it ever occur to you that only in America would an incurious, dangerously ignorant and total failure at everything else he ever did (or a clapped out "B" Movie actor) be even taken seriously as a candidate?
THAT's the scary part, along with the medievalist Electoral College system, without which Gore (I don't care for him) would have won easily in 2000.
Now you have Citizens United to tilt the balance even farther from a level playing field.
Remember the intimidation of the recount staff in Talahassee? Remember Ohio's Secretary of state being Dimwit's 2004 campaign manager? Katherine Harris' voter purgings? And more.
No conspiracy, eh?
So, Rain17, as I said from the beginning, it never occurred to me, because I am not insane!
Very possibly, on the border of probably!
But, what do you expect from a country that elects its leaders with only half the eligible voters actually taking the time and effort to vote?
Churchill said that people get the government they deserve. If this wise leader was correct, then I truly hope that this time is the exception to the rule, and we get something better than we deserve, for we do indeed deserve better than what Romney and Company have to offer.
I will vote for Obama if it looks close, but would like to test the quality of the system with a write in for Sheila Bair, or the adviser (Paul Volcker) that Obama used in the campaign but listened to less, after he installed the Goldman-Sachs alumni Clinton used (maybe only slightly less dangerous than the Bush Goldman-Sachs alumni).
No matter what else Romney is, he is too dangerous with the rest of the team that comes with him, especially Ryan. That VP choice (and anti-PBS talk) has me unalterably opposed to the Romney/ALEC team.
Shredding ballots, preventing people from registering. Giving dates to Latinos 2 DAYS AFTER THE VOTING TOOK PLACE,
faulty machines, and too few machines. Ways almost too numerous to mention.
There MUST be a way we can check the votes that were cast, particularly in Ohio. WE CAN OT LET THEM STEAL THE VOTES AND ELECTION AGAIN.
VOTE STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC, our future is at stake.
The alternative is a snake in the grass.
I'd also like to eliminate the electoral college, require ranked ballots to reduce splitting tickets that allow disasters like the Le Page victory in Maine, and Australia's requirement that citizens vote (or pay a nominal fine if they fail to) to keep people from becoming avoiding the bother of voting.
Be sure to vote, but know that your vote will not be counted if your state vote outcome is going to Obama and especially if it's a key "swing" state that will decide the election.
America does not need a vulture capitalist as a president who would make the country more corporately controlled than it already is.
Romney's 47% comment alone should have removed him from all consideration for office.
Wake up, America! Government of, by, and for the people!
Absentee gives you plenty of time to look things over, less chance of your vote getting flipped and you don't have to wait in line for hours on end. It also makes for more voters and saves money.
I say do unto others what they would do to you...DEMOCRATS GO OUT AND HACK THOSE SWINE BACK!
Get your number when you sign in, ask for it to be proven what you voted. Demand your rights
Everyone was astounded.... But no one challenged it. The American sheeple do not question things. We all just go on with our lives. We are too busy with our ipods, iphones, and ipads to care.
So I am guessing this will happen again.
We Democrats are such WIMPS. We get what we deserve.
Now, as for the Romney's output-less voting machines -- imagine an entertainingly illuminated machine with a big handle ----. You got it. The house dials in the odds it wants and guess what? It gets 'em. Surprise! Voter suppression, gerrymandering and election misinformation in Spanish aside. The last line of fraud is the box itself. I was wondering why they didn't appear too worried about the actual vote when they declared war on women and the poor. Now we know -- they own it. Vote early and often. Maybe you'll pass the literacy test when it comes time to be counted. Maybe not. Might depend on the test -- just like the good-old-days.
The enormous wealth of the ultra rich now make it so the election process can and is being taken over by endless advertising money and ownership of media and yes voting machines used in key states to tilt elections. This has been occurring and will only increase as extreme money power takes over control of government. The Supreme Court is another victim if the right gets another judge, there will only be bias and no check or balance in the future. This is the most important election in our lives!
NOT ONLY THE PRESIDENCY, but EVERY SENATE AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION. We need to vote out every ultra right wing candidate.
Also, the problem in 2004 was not shortage of machines. People did stand in line in the rain until well past midnight at minority polling places (or gave up and went home). That was because the Secretary of State understaffed the polling places and they could not accommodate the voters timely. Every voter must show I.D. to a worker and sign the rolls. Then they are given a paper ballot and directed to an individual "booth" to fill it in. There might be only a half-dozen booths. So people must wait for them to become available. Then each voter feeds the ballot into a machine. That last part takes a second or two. It's waiting for the worker to find your name, check your I.D., have you sign then compare your signature to one on the roll, then waiting for a booth to open up that backs up the process. That's why Ohio enacted early voting-to avoid a repeat of 2004.
RSS feed for comments to this post