Intro: "President Obama should propose that the nation's biggest banks be broken up and their size capped, and that the Glass-Steagall Act be resurrected. It's good policy, and it would smoke out Mitt Romney as being of, by, and for Wall Street."
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
How Obama Can Smoke Out Mitt
19 October 12
resident Obama should propose that the nation's biggest banks be broken up and their size capped, and that the Glass-Steagall Act be resurrected.
It's good policy, and it would smoke out Mitt Romney as being of, by, and for Wall Street - and not on the side of average Americans.
It would also remind America that five years ago Wall Street's excesses almost ruined the economy. Bankers, hedge-fund managers, and private-equity traders speculated on the upside, then shorted on the downside - in a vast zero-sum game that resulted in the largest transfer of wealth from average Americans to financial elites ever witnessed in this nation's history.
Most of us lost big - including over $7 trillion of home values, a $700-billion-dollar bailout of Wall Street, and continuing high unemployment.
But the top 1 percent have done just fine. In the first year of the recovery they reaped 93 percent of the gains. The latest data show them back with 20 to 25 percent of the nation's total income - just where they were in 2007.
The stock market has about caught up to where it was before the crash. The pay and bonuses on the Street are once again sky-high. So are the pay and perks of top corporate executives. The Forbes list of richest Americans contains more billionaires than ever.
And the tax rates of the top 1 percent are lower than ever - courtesy of their armies of lobbyists.
Mitt Romney, private equity manager and financier - well within the top one-tenth of 1 percent, collecting more than $20 million a year yet paying 14 percent in taxes because of tax preferences for capital gains and for private-equity - is the avatar for all that's happened.
Just like the rest of the Street, Romney used other peoples' money to make big bets, leveraging like mad, pumping and then dumping companies regardless of the human costs.
Worse, Romney wants to cut taxes even further on the top 1 percent - giving them them lion's share of a $4.7 trillion tax cut - while shredding safety nets the rest of us rely on.
And he wants to repeal the Dodd-Frank Act that goes some way to preventing the worst excesses of the Street.
And this man has an almost 50-50 chance of becoming president?
The President should counter Romney's extraordinary solicitude toward the Street with a proposal to cap the size of the nation's biggest banks so that no bank is ever again too big to fail. And to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act, which once separated commercial from investment banking.
In the 1980s the ten biggest banks had less than 30 percent of bank depositary assets. Now they have 54 percent. And the four biggest now dominate the Street almost completely. Because lenders and investors know they're too big to fail, the four biggest banks have a competitive advantage over smaller rivals that pose larger financial risks. That means they'll only get bigger.
Breaking up the biggest banks and capping the size of all banks is hardly a radical suggestion these days. The Dallas Federal Reserve Board, which has never been accused of excessive liberalism, has called for it. So has Sanford Weill, the creator of Citigroup, one of the biggest of the big. So has Daniel Tarullo, the Federal Reserve governor charged with bank regulation. So have conservative commentators such as George Will.
It's not too late for the President to advocate these measures. In fact, now may be the perfect time. Besides, it's not as if Wall Street is going to pour campaign contributions into Obama's coffers anyway; the Street is going with Mitt.
Calling for a breakup of the biggest banks and a resurrection of Glass Steagall would smoke out Mitt Romney - revealing clearly and decisively he's not on the side of most Americans.
Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Will we always be held hostage by the big banks? BREAK them up before they succeed in destroying the country (world?). Time for another Teddy Roosevelt. When they all agree to charge 25% interest on credit cards , something is WRONG
The deciding debate is on foreign policy, and the Prez must connect GOP refusal to fund State Dept. security with the Benghazi debacle. Admittedly a weak excuse, because Ms. Clinton lacked foresight to call in the Ambassador for consultation that fateful week. SOMEBODY should have looked at the calendar? Maybe Michelle should talk to Richard Heinberg and see how our economy is tied to energy policy and costs of Middle East entanglement if dad is too busy?
Foreign policy mavens would earn their salary by adding Lionel Badel's paper: "Peak Oil and Foreign Policy" to their reading list. The ex-Bush advisers hedged around the Great White Hope have their false flag attack wars lined up by the numbers...
Financial mumbo jumbo is part of the house of cards needed by an America hooked on oil/rubber tire transport and Chinese $$ to maintain same. Comments by Drs. Reich and Cole & Chomsky are absolutely off the mark without employing ways and means of separating western economies from Muslim Oil.
It's very largely a matter of transport policy & methodology, boys & girls. Parallel Bar Therapy.
Believe it or don't.
Obama gave the banks 4 years to get their act together. Bottom-line: the banks wrote more loans than they can legally hold. Until we are willing to accept the fact that the foreclosures and evictions are not because the majority of people cannot afford the homes - because reducing the principal and interest rate on 84 million fraudulent loans would likely begin to stablize America. Right now, the foreclosures are putting people on the welfare lines and the American depression is horrific.
If Obama wants to "smoke" Romney - call for a moratorium at least through the holidays and 1st quarter next year - give Americans a break while new laws are passed, regulation is re-instated and the banks are taken apart.
That would involve Obama doing two things he avoids at all cost: 1) take a clear, strong stand that could change the system and 2) incite the reactionary banksters to switch from calling him a "socialist" to an outright commie. And calling for a restoration of Glass-Stiegal would violate a legacy "achievement" from his best cheerleader, Bubba Clinton.
There is also the American Enterprise Institute if you want a good laugh.
I suspect they are enriching uranium: they spin like crazy and the only output is toxic and radioactive.
I distrust their picture of the corporate welfare like the figures for the implied non-tax payers (who pay far higher percentages of other taxes). Less than half of the government revenue comes from income taxes that the upper quintiles do pay, though it seems the worst afflicted are the many small businesses stuck in the worst part of the tax codes. They are unable to offshore their profits, and are used as cover by the real skimmers that not only pay but 3/7ths of the rate the many of the small businesses may be paying for "earned" income, but get bailed out with taxpayer money that comes from you and me. How many of the otherwise promising small businesses get bailed out like the guys that sell such bad financial products that would be the ruin of any producers of such junk in other products?
Get real!
Mr. President; please put this proposal out on the table. The American people are ready for a dramatic fix to the economic ditch we are in. An idea that strikes against the concentration of wealth in the hands of the money people strikes all of us, Liberal and Conservative as wrong. This is an idea that would catapult you into a second term where change will bring hope. And I bet even Paul Krugman would agree that hope is the pixie dust that make the confidence fairy appear.
Go For It!
The bill was proposed by Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio and about a dozen or so have signed on to support the bill. Unfortunately, the majority of congress in both parties have ignored it and so has the president.
Heck, I have even written to my representatives and they write back saying they will "consider" the bill. Of course, they have failed to take a decision all of this year.
http://www.change.org/petitions/pass-the-return-to-prudent-banking-act-and-restore-glass-steagall
I bet you have no Freaking clue what failed and what worked.
Sounds good to me!
They're on food stamps. What should these able bodied people do when the nearest jobs are 50 miles away? If I go get my friend who lives there, he'll work all day for $20 and eat all I will provide. At the end of the day he has to go back. I send him home with $100 and he thinks I'm a god. If I was god I'd change their whole situation.
At least they get food stamps.
Many of these people ARE working, maybe harder than you are. Searching for a job when you've lost the one you had, thanks to bushco's trashing of the economy, pounding the pavements day in and day out, often for years on end, is about the hardest work there is. It is utterly draining in every way: physically, emotionally, psychologically , materially.
Get over yourself.
Obama did waive a work requirement for a small percentage of food stamp recipients — adults, age 18-49, without dependents. They are known as Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWDs) in U.S. Department of Agriculture parlance, and they made up an estimated 9.7 percent of SNAP recipients for fiscal 2010, according to a Congressional Research Service report.
In 2008, three times as many recipients were added to the SNAP rolls as was the case the year before. The recession began in December 2007. That’s before Obama took office and some indication of how the economy affected participation
interfere with your vision. Bush and Cheney bankrupted this country-put two wars and their Medicare imprevement on the U.S. crdit card. Started the subprime mortgage fraud to keep the economy going until the next election. Bankrupted and put U.S. citizens on food stamps-put them in the unemployment lines. The current depression started in the U.S. Spread world-wide. This country is hated by other countries for what Cheney and Bush did. Not to mentions hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis murdered, maimed as well as U.s. troops and allied troops.
But, please don't let Plutocrat fascism cause your ability to think go on vacation-Perman ent vacation. The Plutocrat vision for the world, especially for the Republicans, "keep 'm poor and stupid and we'll (the corporations) keep all the money. Canadian median household net worth now exceeds that of U.S. median household. Or as the Republicans say, "only in America." Sure! Right on!
WMR is fighting hard to keep tax rates low for the bankster CEOs. Break up the "Too-Big-To-Fai l" Banks.
Well, not today it seems...
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The alternative is disastrous.
Not only would this pull Romney out of hiding, but would pull Obama's wall street backers out too. Would they try to kill him as they did Kennedy?
No where in our Constitution does it say that Big Banks, Hedge Funds or Wall Street is a branch of government! This strangle-hold over the American People must be ended.
This is a brilliant idea for a late game political strategy but it will NEVER EVER happen. Perhaps if Obama was losing and felt desperate it might be considered, but otherwise he hasn't even brought it up because it's not something his corporate bribers, I mean sponsors, sorry—i mean donors, actually want. He only works to serve them. We are just a group of people he must keep minimally satisfied while being CEO of the corporatacracy.
Obama is better than Romney, but we know he will only do the bare minimum to keep us from revolting.
Real change will not come from him. We need a viable 3rd, 4th, 5th Party.
DONE.
Obama is better than Romney, and we know he will do the maximum he can with the Congress he is saddled with.
Give the guy a break.
Progressives need to understand that the US now has a right center (and sometimes just plain right) electorate and it will take a lot of work to change the mindset of the nation. We used to have a progressive mainstream, but that has been supplanted by a religious revival and Tea Party that have moved the GOP way to the right. We have our work cut out for us to change that - but if we believe in America's promise we must not tire, but work towards reversing this pendulum swing to the right. In the meantime, Obama is the best we have, so lets work to make him successful.
Better to have taken the Wall Street bankers to court for crimes and misdemeanors.
http://www.change.org/petitions/pass-the-return-to-prudent-banking-act-and-restore-glass-steagall
If this proposal ever saw the light of day, the banksters can be counted on to raise a holy clamor that they are being unfairly singled out for punishment. To force Romney to take one side or the other, and you can bet which side he would take, by claiming that the banksters did nothing wrong, he will discredit himself even more than he is already. The person who said that corporations are people, my friend, would just drive another stake into his heart.
Obama is a puppet of Wall Street. In any economic bail-out, he always takes care of the fat cats first. Interestingly enough, if you study Obama's policies, you will see that he actively believes in and practices trickle-down economics, like his self-admitted hero, Ronald Reagan.
The fat cats get baled out, so that they can stimulate the economy and thereby provide jobs for the working folk. If that isn't trickle down economics, what is?
Well, that sure does describe Willard Romney. But, unfortunately, it also describes our current President. I would love it if he would follow this suggestion, but, even though the Street has stopped financing him like they did in the last election, he is still, pretty much, their guy too. He will take on the big banksters no more than he was willing to take on Big Pharma, or Monsanto, or the good old boys in the awl bidness, as Molly used to say.
In fact, a call to restore Glass Steagall has been sitting in Congress all year and there hasn't been a peep from the Prez, the media or influential leaders in both parties.
H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act, has been proposed by Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio (Democrat) and about a dozen congress people have shown support for it. Yet, despite the limited support, nobody else has stepped up including the president.
The reality is that fixing our current economic situation would be a long process but not a difficult one if we have Glass Steagall and projects like NAWAPA. Instead what we get are band aid solutions like the American Recovery Act and the Jobs Bills which do not address or fix the problem. These are simply a waste.
The failure to look at and implement Glas- Steagall simply shows that both the Prez and Romney stand for the same thing on this issue.
Most people fit in between these two extremes. This includes politicians.
President Obama needs to do a "show & tell" in the final debate, namely "show & tell" where Romney shows that he (Romney) has no soul, by getting Romney to reveal what takes the place of his (Romney's) soul:namely pure defensiveness.H owever, since Romney can do likewise with President Obama, it will be a matter of SLIPPERY SLOPE RELATIVITY. As a result, the best that can be done is if both President Obama & Mitt Romney do a kind of "Hunger Games" strategy & "fight" it out verbally to the VIRTUAL "death" with who has the most common sense & the coup de'etat: who has the ability to shock us out of our premature "death" apathy of hopelessness by communicating in the debate in a way that evokes laughing & crying SIMULTANEOUSLY from us all! Now that is multitasking! Then audiences will be sufficiently awakened enough TO comprehend what issues are fear based & what issues are life &/or death issues. In either case, both parties need to vet & recruit (no time left to groom anyone)comedian s, philosophers,et c., like me & Johnny T. Sollitto. Just go to youtube.com for Johnny T. Sollitto & for Barbara Todish to prepare OB&RR. It will be worth while, unless you all want to remain asleep & defensive even while asleep & missing out on humor.Up 2 U
I emailed the following article to whitehouse.gov and you should too!!! To much is at stake.
US Lab Says Electronic Voting Machines Easy to Hack
Want scares me most about the person - aside from an inability to hold a position or reconcile his constantly self-contradict ory "facts" which he cleverly and deceitfully presents to support *his* reality-- is his utter lack of "mindfulness" about his own actions, *and* his proclivity to bet big...
Quote:This is history. This is fact. These are the spots which will not change if elected. Truth is, aside from relying on the "facts are whatever you want them to be" school (of Rove, Fox, et al), Romney seems unable to stop either bullying or gambling, in addition to lying. Character matters, as does reality. A liar in chief who does not know or care about his own words a day ago, and who dares to bet big as a first response (as in the primary debate), and with a wife into horses, and friends who own Nascar franchises.... Well, here is someone unrestrained by ego, facts, other people's lives, his own words, or money concern - why, he'd bet $10, 000 on the spot, that his facts are better than ours.
Do we want a master LIAR and professional outsourcer and US-ttax evader, to be the one to react to a crisis impulsively to place a bet on America? Danger....
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/14059-mormon-women-and-mitt-romneys-pregnancy-problem
If Obama actually sees the writing on the wall after his feeble first fours years, he will begin to LEAD America back to being AMERICA and not allow things to continue as they have been where Americans are kept on this flim flam road to Smaller and Smaller Government of, by and for ourselves for the sake of Big Global Corporate's effort to attain Dominion over EVERYTHING...!
I think the very few BIG, GIGANTIC, ENORMOUS Global Corporate Media Empires which own and exploit almost all American Media enterprises on behalf of their GLOBAL shareholders and which have FAR too much influence over our political, social, economic, cultural and consumption affairs should be broken up too, especially if Americans want to retain any semblance at all of a Democratic Republic with an actual FREE Press as envisioned by our Founders.
These self serving Media Fiefdoms should be broken up and sold off into a thousand bits and much more We the People useful pieces to separate, different and more diverse entities.
In fact, We should first do it here in America and then, much like we do in our campaign around the world on behalf of human rights, include the break up of vast media empires everywhere for the good of all mankind, animal kind and environmental kind..!
The question I really want to know is how much does this mendacious man truly believe in laissez faire capitalism and does he believe in the moral hazard as defined by Wiki "a situation where a party will have a tendency to take risks because the costs that could incur will not be felt by the party taking the risk. A moral hazard may occur where the actions of one party may change to the detriment of another after a transaction has taken place." How fervently is he against incurring this moral hazard by allowing Wall Street to be bailed out with taxpayer money. Would Mr. Romney let his Wall Street financiers of his campaign fall?
The average monthly home mortgage in the U.S. $1687.00. Which begs the question....Why didn't they just pay off our home mortgages?
The banks get their money back without their obvious interest, our homes are not foreclosed on, and can you imagine how much cash would be flowing into this economy if we all had $1687.00 more a month to spend. Jobs?
Despite what you have told the number one reason business is not hiring is lack of customers. Business, in general, does not hire anyone until it can't keep up with demand.
All one has to do is look at productivity vs buying power in this country. All the money has gone to the top. Increased productivity has not meant increased wages. In fact, when all adjustments are made, wages have decreased.
On the Dylan Ratigan show a Rethugican mouthpiece said that the American workforce has out priced itself in the world Market place. Are they serious?
With $1687.00 more a month to spend I could buy Micro Brew Beer again. Alas this did not happen...I guess I'll take a Miller...Grumbl e grumble.
Willard
Mitt
RoMoney =Weapons of
Mass
Recession
RSS feed for comments to this post