RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "President Obama should propose that the nation's biggest banks be broken up and their size capped, and that the Glass-Steagall Act be resurrected. It's good policy, and it would smoke out Mitt Romney as being of, by, and for Wall Street."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



How Obama Can Smoke Out Mitt

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

19 October 12

 

resident Obama should propose that the nation's biggest banks be broken up and their size capped, and that the Glass-Steagall Act be resurrected.

It's good policy, and it would smoke out Mitt Romney as being of, by, and for Wall Street - and not on the side of average Americans.

It would also remind America that five years ago Wall Street's excesses almost ruined the economy. Bankers, hedge-fund managers, and private-equity traders speculated on the upside, then shorted on the downside - in a vast zero-sum game that resulted in the largest transfer of wealth from average Americans to financial elites ever witnessed in this nation's history.

Most of us lost big - including over $7 trillion of home values, a $700-billion-dollar bailout of Wall Street, and continuing high unemployment.

But the top 1 percent have done just fine. In the first year of the recovery they reaped 93 percent of the gains. The latest data show them back with 20 to 25 percent of the nation's total income - just where they were in 2007.

The stock market has about caught up to where it was before the crash. The pay and bonuses on the Street are once again sky-high. So are the pay and perks of top corporate executives. The Forbes list of richest Americans contains more billionaires than ever.

And the tax rates of the top 1 percent are lower than ever - courtesy of their armies of lobbyists.

Mitt Romney, private equity manager and financier - well within the top one-tenth of 1 percent, collecting more than $20 million a year yet paying 14 percent in taxes because of tax preferences for capital gains and for private-equity - is the avatar for all that's happened.

Just like the rest of the Street, Romney used other peoples' money to make big bets, leveraging like mad, pumping and then dumping companies regardless of the human costs.

Worse, Romney wants to cut taxes even further on the top 1 percent - giving them them lion's share of a $4.7 trillion tax cut - while shredding safety nets the rest of us rely on.

And he wants to repeal the Dodd-Frank Act that goes some way to preventing the worst excesses of the Street.

And this man has an almost 50-50 chance of becoming president?

The President should counter Romney's extraordinary solicitude toward the Street with a proposal to cap the size of the nation's biggest banks so that no bank is ever again too big to fail. And to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act, which once separated commercial from investment banking.

In the 1980s the ten biggest banks had less than 30 percent of bank depositary assets. Now they have 54 percent. And the four biggest now dominate the Street almost completely. Because lenders and investors know they're too big to fail, the four biggest banks have a competitive advantage over smaller rivals that pose larger financial risks. That means they'll only get bigger.

Breaking up the biggest banks and capping the size of all banks is hardly a radical suggestion these days. The Dallas Federal Reserve Board, which has never been accused of excessive liberalism, has called for it. So has Sanford Weill, the creator of Citigroup, one of the biggest of the big. So has Daniel Tarullo, the Federal Reserve governor charged with bank regulation. So have conservative commentators such as George Will.

It's not too late for the President to advocate these measures. In fact, now may be the perfect time. Besides, it's not as if Wall Street is going to pour campaign contributions into Obama's coffers anyway; the Street is going with Mitt.

Calling for a breakup of the biggest banks and a resurrection of Glass Steagall would smoke out Mitt Romney - revealing clearly and decisively he's not on the side of most Americans.



Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+84 # mdhome 2012-10-19 08:19
resident Obama should propose that the nation's biggest banks be broken up and their size capped, and that the Glass-Steagall Act be resurrected.
Will we always be held hostage by the big banks? BREAK them up before they succeed in destroying the country (world?). Time for another Teddy Roosevelt. When they all agree to charge 25% interest on credit cards , something is WRONG
 
 
+7 # tahoevalleylines 2012-10-19 11:13
The financial arrangements are decided on formulas made at Breton Woods, and retuned since. Since Ike's freeways, America sinks if a Middle East meltdown is improperly managed. The background is seen in a 20 year old book "The Blood Of The Moon" by George Grant.

The deciding debate is on foreign policy, and the Prez must connect GOP refusal to fund State Dept. security with the Benghazi debacle. Admittedly a weak excuse, because Ms. Clinton lacked foresight to call in the Ambassador for consultation that fateful week. SOMEBODY should have looked at the calendar? Maybe Michelle should talk to Richard Heinberg and see how our economy is tied to energy policy and costs of Middle East entanglement if dad is too busy?

Foreign policy mavens would earn their salary by adding Lionel Badel's paper: "Peak Oil and Foreign Policy" to their reading list. The ex-Bush advisers hedged around the Great White Hope have their false flag attack wars lined up by the numbers...

Financial mumbo jumbo is part of the house of cards needed by an America hooked on oil/rubber tire transport and Chinese $$ to maintain same. Comments by Drs. Reich and Cole & Chomsky are absolutely off the mark without employing ways and means of separating western economies from Muslim Oil.

It's very largely a matter of transport policy & methodology, boys & girls. Parallel Bar Therapy.

Believe it or don't.
 
 
+13 # Virginia 2012-10-19 12:58
From your lips to God's ears! It certainly won't happen with the pals he has surrounding him now. Geithner Must Go! Goldman Sachs adviser off the payroll... Holder sent back to private sector. And a big dose of testicular fortitude.

Obama gave the banks 4 years to get their act together. Bottom-line: the banks wrote more loans than they can legally hold. Until we are willing to accept the fact that the foreclosures and evictions are not because the majority of people cannot afford the homes - because reducing the principal and interest rate on 84 million fraudulent loans would likely begin to stablize America. Right now, the foreclosures are putting people on the welfare lines and the American depression is horrific.

If Obama wants to "smoke" Romney - call for a moratorium at least through the holidays and 1st quarter next year - give Americans a break while new laws are passed, regulation is re-instated and the banks are taken apart.
 
 
-29 # Robert S. Becker 2012-10-19 08:41
Dream on, Prof. Reich:

That would involve Obama doing two things he avoids at all cost: 1) take a clear, strong stand that could change the system and 2) incite the reactionary banksters to switch from calling him a "socialist" to an outright commie. And calling for a restoration of Glass-Stiegal would violate a legacy "achievement" from his best cheerleader, Bubba Clinton.
 
 
-45 # jtatu 2012-10-19 09:56
I don't often agree with Reich, but I do agree that Glass Steagall should be restored and that banks should not be allowed to become "too big to fail." But I believe Dodd Frank was ill-advised overreaction and should be repealed. I also believe that means tested welfare as we know it will ultimately collapse our economy.
 
 
+54 # Texas Aggie 2012-10-19 10:40
Welfare for people who need it is only a small fraction of corporate welfare. We would do a lot more toward building up our economy if we put tax payer dollars back into circulation than if we let them stagnate in some corporate or stockholder off shore bank account. If you want to look at what will ultimately collapse our economy, look at corporate welfare and the MIC. Money spent on real people, by comparison, is like spitting in the ocean.
 
 
-37 # jtatu 2012-10-19 11:13
According to The Cato Institute "corporate welfare" will be $100 billion in 2012. Means tested welfare payments now exceed $1,000,000,000, 000 ( 1 Trillion)and is climbing
 
 
+35 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-10-19 12:36
You still listen to the Cato Institute?
There is also the American Enterprise Institute if you want a good laugh.
I suspect they are enriching uranium: they spin like crazy and the only output is toxic and radioactive.
 
 
+2 # Jim Young 2012-10-22 06:25
The Cato Institute has often conducted research I found more complete than anyone else, at least back when I first studied them. The problem I found was that their conclusion were illogical, and sometimes seemed totally disconnected from their in depth research, as if done to improve their propaganda, or find ways to make perhaps 3% of the facts seem like the 100% truth. Who is it that said, Trust, but verify"? What should you do when only 3% is verifiable?

I distrust their picture of the corporate welfare like the figures for the implied non-tax payers (who pay far higher percentages of other taxes). Less than half of the government revenue comes from income taxes that the upper quintiles do pay, though it seems the worst afflicted are the many small businesses stuck in the worst part of the tax codes. They are unable to offshore their profits, and are used as cover by the real skimmers that not only pay but 3/7ths of the rate the many of the small businesses may be paying for "earned" income, but get bailed out with taxpayer money that comes from you and me. How many of the otherwise promising small businesses get bailed out like the guys that sell such bad financial products that would be the ruin of any producers of such junk in other products?
 
 
+22 # Majikman 2012-10-19 10:41
"Means tested welfare" as in the biggest corporations get the most tax refunds? In that case you're absolutely correct.
 
 
+13 # noitall 2012-10-19 11:38
Quoting jtatu:
I don't often agree with Reich, but I do agree that Glass Steagall should be restored and that banks should not be allowed to become "too big to fail." But I believe Dodd Frank was ill-advised overreaction and should be repealed. I also believe that means tested welfare as we know it will ultimately collapse our economy.

Get real!
 
 
+6 # noitall 2012-10-19 11:37
to 'red markers', the truth hurts.
 
 
+17 # Craig Jones 2012-10-19 09:08
Is it long past time to get out the torches and pitchforks? The next generation saddled with the National Debt? Hey, my young brothers and sisters just Max out your credit cards, send the money to the US Treasury and then declare bankruptcy.
 
 
+49 # BradFromSalem 2012-10-19 09:10
I have thought that Prof. Reich has on occasion produced articles that may be trial balloons for the administration. I certainly hope so. I realize that there s probably about a 1% chance of such legislation passing, but for the President to make a public stance on an issue that may even recruit some tea baggers to vote for him would be the death of Romney's presidential hopes.

Mr. President; please put this proposal out on the table. The American people are ready for a dramatic fix to the economic ditch we are in. An idea that strikes against the concentration of wealth in the hands of the money people strikes all of us, Liberal and Conservative as wrong. This is an idea that would catapult you into a second term where change will bring hope. And I bet even Paul Krugman would agree that hope is the pixie dust that make the confidence fairy appear.

Go For It!
 
 
+9 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 10:55
The Glass- Steagall solution has already been addressed in Congress as H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act. This would restore Glass- Steagall but Obama and leaders in Congress have ignored it.

The bill was proposed by Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio and about a dozen or so have signed on to support the bill. Unfortunately, the majority of congress in both parties have ignored it and so has the president.

Heck, I have even written to my representatives and they write back saying they will "consider" the bill. Of course, they have failed to take a decision all of this year.
 
 
+1 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 22:26
And here is a petition you can fill out at Change Org
http://www.change.org/petitions/pass-the-return-to-prudent-banking-act-and-restore-glass-steagall
 
 
-100 # Robt Eagle 2012-10-19 09:11
Reich, you really need to start to look at things objectively and not through your left eye ONLY. Obam's policies are sending the US into disaster at an ever increasing rate of speed and you some how continue to defend this situation. How do you in good conscience do this?
 
 
+43 # BradFromSalem 2012-10-19 10:07
What policies has Obama implemented that were not diluted to garner what little Right Wing (bipartisan Right Wing at that) support he could? If Obama is such a failure, can you tell me which part of the Right Wing agenda he did actually use worked? Which piece of the wee bit of Left Wing agenda he got in place failed?

I bet you have no Freaking clue what failed and what worked.
 
 
-42 # jtatu 2012-10-19 12:05
Here's one. In 2009 the admin. eliminated the work requirement in the food stamp program. The number of people getting food stamps since then has doubled. The same thing happened to the work requirement in TANF. And his continued deficit spending will eventually collapse our economy and our money will be worthless.
 
 
+18 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-10-19 12:39
A recession would do that: do you want to only give food stamps to people who have not lost their jobs yet?
 
 
-21 # jtatu 2012-10-19 13:47
No, but I think able bodied people should be required to work or prepare for work .
 
 
+16 # Billy Bob 2012-10-19 15:44
Able bodied people just want jobs. Go look up "red herring" and get back to us.
 
 
+6 # BradFromSalem 2012-10-19 15:52
So, are you saying that in addition to food stamps you would pay for job training and child care. In addition you would also have to pay their salaries to work at a job. That is because there is no demand for additional labor?

Sounds good to me!
 
 
-7 # jtatu 2012-10-19 17:37
I know that sounds good to you. You summed it up.
 
 
+5 # BradFromSalem 2012-10-20 05:21
So thats your plan and you support stimulus? Or do you want people to resort to foraging in trash cans and hunting rodents for food?
 
 
+10 # soularddave 2012-10-19 21:47
For instance... Here in Missouri, there are several counties where more than half of the families are on food stamps. There are mostly poor residents and just a few jobs. The vast majority is too poor to move, though well enough to cut wood from the forests with which to heat and cook, They wash in tubs and dry in the line. They have no car, and cardboard or plastic in the broken windows.

They're on food stamps. What should these able bodied people do when the nearest jobs are 50 miles away? If I go get my friend who lives there, he'll work all day for $20 and eat all I will provide. At the end of the day he has to go back. I send him home with $100 and he thinks I'm a god. If I was god I'd change their whole situation.

At least they get food stamps.
 
 
+6 # Lolanne 2012-10-20 10:42
Quoting jtatu:
No, but I think able bodied people should be required to work or prepare for work .


Many of these people ARE working, maybe harder than you are. Searching for a job when you've lost the one you had, thanks to bushco's trashing of the economy, pounding the pavements day in and day out, often for years on end, is about the hardest work there is. It is utterly draining in every way: physically, emotionally, psychologically , materially.

Get over yourself.
 
 
+12 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 13:36
WRONG -
Obama did waive a work requirement for a small percentage of food stamp recipients — adults, age 18-49, without dependents. They are known as Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWDs) in U.S. Department of Agriculture parlance, and they made up an estimated 9.7 percent of SNAP recipients for fiscal 2010, according to a Congressional Research Service report.
In 2008, three times as many recipients were added to the SNAP rolls as was the case the year before. The recession began in December 2007. That’s before Obama took office and some indication of how the economy affected participation
 
 
+14 # Mannstein 2012-10-19 16:22
You want people who are out of work to die of starvation. Doesn't surprise one in the least coming from a right wing nut.
 
 
+2 # Eldon J. Bloedorn 2012-10-20 19:58
You are in the "Bubble." Don't let facts
interfere with your vision. Bush and Cheney bankrupted this country-put two wars and their Medicare imprevement on the U.S. crdit card. Started the subprime mortgage fraud to keep the economy going until the next election. Bankrupted and put U.S. citizens on food stamps-put them in the unemployment lines. The current depression started in the U.S. Spread world-wide. This country is hated by other countries for what Cheney and Bush did. Not to mentions hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis murdered, maimed as well as U.s. troops and allied troops.

But, please don't let Plutocrat fascism cause your ability to think go on vacation-Perman ent vacation. The Plutocrat vision for the world, especially for the Republicans, "keep 'm poor and stupid and we'll (the corporations) keep all the money. Canadian median household net worth now exceeds that of U.S. median household. Or as the Republicans say, "only in America." Sure! Right on!
 
 
+39 # Reductio Ad Absurdum 2012-10-19 10:17
Reich cited stats and facts. Where are yours?
 
 
+30 # Texas Aggie 2012-10-19 10:43
I went over the article several times and I see no where that Dr. Reich is defending the situation. I seems to me that he is actually criticizing the situation. Did you read a different article?
 
 
+26 # Jorge 2012-10-19 11:37
You must be saying you prefer the Vulture Capitalist Willard Romnesia (WMR seems to remember creating some jobs, but they were in China).
WMR is fighting hard to keep tax rates low for the bankster CEOs. Break up the "Too-Big-To-Fai l" Banks.
 
 
+3 # freeportguy 2012-10-20 00:11
I always keep reading your posts, hoping that ONE day, I will see a reasonable, thought out instead of some ludicrous and idiotic bs out of a donkey's a**.

Well, not today it seems...
 
 
+67 # Barbara K 2012-10-19 09:20
Mr. President, please do break up the banks and resurrect the Glass-Stiegal if it us in your ability to do so without the help of the NO Way Republicants in Congress. It would do much for the economy and for us.

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The alternative is disastrous.
 
 
+6 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 10:57
He could have resurrected it by supporting H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act. However, he continues to ignore it along with the majority of congress.
 
 
+58 # Dumbledorf 2012-10-19 09:25
Mr. Reich has made an excellent suggestion.
Not only would this pull Romney out of hiding, but would pull Obama's wall street backers out too. Would they try to kill him as they did Kennedy?

No where in our Constitution does it say that Big Banks, Hedge Funds or Wall Street is a branch of government! This strangle-hold over the American People must be ended.
 
 
+14 # JONN X 2012-10-19 09:30
Mr Reich,

This is a brilliant idea for a late game political strategy but it will NEVER EVER happen. Perhaps if Obama was losing and felt desperate it might be considered, but otherwise he hasn't even brought it up because it's not something his corporate bribers, I mean sponsors, sorry—i mean donors, actually want. He only works to serve them. We are just a group of people he must keep minimally satisfied while being CEO of the corporatacracy.

Obama is better than Romney, but we know he will only do the bare minimum to keep us from revolting.

Real change will not come from him. We need a viable 3rd, 4th, 5th Party.

DONE.
 
 
+14 # tclose 2012-10-19 11:24
"Obama is better than Romney, but we know he will only do the bare minimum to keep us from revolting."

Obama is better than Romney, and we know he will do the maximum he can with the Congress he is saddled with.

Give the guy a break.

Progressives need to understand that the US now has a right center (and sometimes just plain right) electorate and it will take a lot of work to change the mindset of the nation. We used to have a progressive mainstream, but that has been supplanted by a religious revival and Tea Party that have moved the GOP way to the right. We have our work cut out for us to change that - but if we believe in America's promise we must not tire, but work towards reversing this pendulum swing to the right. In the meantime, Obama is the best we have, so lets work to make him successful.
 
 
0 # Mannstein 2012-10-19 16:28
You mean the majority of the people are crypto Tea baggers? It's time to vote with one's feet and leave.
 
 
-2 # tclose 2012-10-19 11:38
I disagree with Prof. Reich - if Obama was going to do this, it should have been done months ago. Doing it right before the election makes him look desperate. And the average voter will not understand the intricacies of bank failure, etc., so it would have little impact on the election.

Better to have taken the Wall Street bankers to court for crimes and misdemeanors.
 
 
+22 # grouchy 2012-10-19 09:36
It would also show whether Obama is truly for us citizens or willing to give a lot of goodies to the Banksters which he has partially done already. I would LOVE it if he totally came over to our side because these crooks have already been given too much welfare on behalf of us.
 
 
-4 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 10:59
He could have shown that he is for the citizens of this country but failed at every turn. Look into H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act which has been sitting in congress all year and has been ignored by the media, the president and congress. Just goes to show that solutions to reinstate Glass- Steagall are out there but are ignored.
 
 
+2 # bmiluski 2012-10-19 13:39
Then start at the grass roots and EARN your votes.
 
 
+2 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 22:23
Here is a petition at Change Org
http://www.change.org/petitions/pass-the-return-to-prudent-banking-act-and-restore-glass-steagall
 
 
0 # Mr.Elum 2012-10-19 10:33
Song parody/video (original)
 
 
+16 # Texas Aggie 2012-10-19 10:34
I saw a study the other day on how people can lie and at the same time have a good opinion of themselves. The outcome was that the people who lie either didn't consider it a lie, or they felt the ends justified the means. In the case of the banksters, they felt that they had done nothing wrong. As my ex father-in-law would say, it was just good bidness.

If this proposal ever saw the light of day, the banksters can be counted on to raise a holy clamor that they are being unfairly singled out for punishment. To force Romney to take one side or the other, and you can bet which side he would take, by claiming that the banksters did nothing wrong, he will discredit himself even more than he is already. The person who said that corporations are people, my friend, would just drive another stake into his heart.
 
 
+2 # Billy Bob 2012-10-19 15:47
Your father-in-law sounds like mine. I hope our wife(or wives) isn't/aren't a bigomist.
 
 
-10 # DaveEwoldt 2012-10-19 10:34
Yep, and not doing so will smoke out Obama as being of, by, and for Wall Street... as if there is really any doubt.
 
 
-14 # Zagreus 2012-10-19 10:34
Never gonna happen.

Obama is a puppet of Wall Street. In any economic bail-out, he always takes care of the fat cats first. Interestingly enough, if you study Obama's policies, you will see that he actively believes in and practices trickle-down economics, like his self-admitted hero, Ronald Reagan.

The fat cats get baled out, so that they can stimulate the economy and thereby provide jobs for the working folk. If that isn't trickle down economics, what is?
 
 
+6 # noitall 2012-10-19 11:46
at least we can count on him to throw a carcass over the fort wall once in a while, more than we can expect from Mittens. That is the choice that we have and that is the world in which you now live. Welcome to ours.
 
 
+4 # Jack Radey 2012-10-19 10:46
being of, by, and for Wall Street - and not on the side of average Americans.

Well, that sure does describe Willard Romney. But, unfortunately, it also describes our current President. I would love it if he would follow this suggestion, but, even though the Street has stopped financing him like they did in the last election, he is still, pretty much, their guy too. He will take on the big banksters no more than he was willing to take on Big Pharma, or Monsanto, or the good old boys in the awl bidness, as Molly used to say.
 
 
+5 # in deo veritas 2012-10-19 10:50
We with Lyndon Larouche have been pushin for Glass-Steagall for years as the only salvation for the economy. The demand for this is increasing but we are running out of time.
 
 
0 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 11:06
Agree with you. Most readers here think that these solutions are either new or have yet to be proposed, but they have either been shot down or refused by the president and congress. All people have to do is look at H.R. 1489 and realize that it has been conveniently ignored.
 
 
+5 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 10:51
If Glass-Steagal was reinstated by Obama it would defintely be an automatic win for him. However, we can only dream on and wish that he would step up but he won't.

In fact, a call to restore Glass Steagall has been sitting in Congress all year and there hasn't been a peep from the Prez, the media or influential leaders in both parties.

H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act, has been proposed by Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio (Democrat) and about a dozen congress people have shown support for it. Yet, despite the limited support, nobody else has stepped up including the president.

The reality is that fixing our current economic situation would be a long process but not a difficult one if we have Glass Steagall and projects like NAWAPA. Instead what we get are band aid solutions like the American Recovery Act and the Jobs Bills which do not address or fix the problem. These are simply a waste.

The failure to look at and implement Glas- Steagall simply shows that both the Prez and Romney stand for the same thing on this issue.
 
 
+3 # Regina 2012-10-19 15:32
Boehner the Bane will not move that legislation to the floor. He is totally captive to the Grover Norquist/Tea Brats clique. Any time he shows a glimmer of comprehension they bash it out of him. The President can't just decree the restoration of Glass-Steagall. Congress is dysfunctional. There's far more than Obama on the slate for this election.
 
 
+1 # SMoonz 2012-10-19 22:12
True, although Obama can mobilize support for it the same way he pushed very hard for the Healthcare Act. In return Congress would soon follow. Or maybe not, as most of them are funded (Obama included)by the very people, corporations and banks who's interests and pocketbooks would be affected.
 
 
+7 # in deo veritas 2012-10-19 11:05
Someone on TV asked rhetorically "Who is the greatest enemy of America?" Easy answer-not a country but the oligarchs raping the 99%. We have met the enemy and he is amongst us. We the people have just been too stupid and preoccupied with trivial things (sports, clebs, reality shows, yapping on I phones, etc. ad nauseum) to see what is happening to us and has been for decades. If they get complete control of the government next month, living in this country will become untenable for those who haven't sold their souls-the only thing that is really ours.God will not bless a country that has collectively sold it soul. Are you ready?
 
 
-5 # jtatu 2012-10-19 12:09
Wouldn't the enemies of America include those who want to fundamentally change it?
 
 
0 # Billy Bob 2012-10-19 15:50
It depends on their motivations. If their motives are to fix it for the better of all of us, then no. If their motives are to further enrich the 1% and lead us into an endless war for oil profit, then yes.

Most people fit in between these two extremes. This includes politicians.
 
 
0 # jtatu 2012-10-19 17:45
that's a dodge. The question is yes or no. What is America except a set of values codified in the Constitution. If you want to impose a new Constitution on the good people of this country against their will, you are an enemy of America.
 
 
0 # Mannstein 2012-10-19 16:38
Exactly, the 1% are still not satisfied that the control all the wealth of this country. They claim they are also entitled to complete political power which would fundamentally change our form of government. Once they have it the only expenditure the US government will make is for the military. They want the government to do nothing else. Sounds like a military dictatorship.
 
 
+1 # barbaratodish 2012-10-20 16:43
Someone...asked ..."Who is the greatest enemy of America?" Easy.If they get complete control of the government next month, living in this country will become untenable for those who haven't sold their souls-the only thing that is really ours..."
President Obama needs to do a "show & tell" in the final debate, namely "show & tell" where Romney shows that he (Romney) has no soul, by getting Romney to reveal what takes the place of his (Romney's) soul:namely pure defensiveness.H owever, since Romney can do likewise with President Obama, it will be a matter of SLIPPERY SLOPE RELATIVITY. As a result, the best that can be done is if both President Obama & Mitt Romney do a kind of "Hunger Games" strategy & "fight" it out verbally to the VIRTUAL "death" with who has the most common sense & the coup de'etat: who has the ability to shock us out of our premature "death" apathy of hopelessness by communicating in the debate in a way that evokes laughing & crying SIMULTANEOUSLY from us all! Now that is multitasking! Then audiences will be sufficiently awakened enough TO comprehend what issues are fear based & what issues are life &/or death issues. In either case, both parties need to vet & recruit (no time left to groom anyone)comedian s, philosophers,et c., like me & Johnny T. Sollitto. Just go to youtube.com for Johnny T. Sollitto & for Barbara Todish to prepare OB&RR. It will be worth while, unless you all want to remain asleep & defensive even while asleep & missing out on humor.Up 2 U
 
 
+10 # Vardoz 2012-10-19 11:15
Rove, Romney and Ryan are the essence of the capitalist machine that wants to make us surfs and the top kings! Watch Michael Moore's CAPITALISM A LOVE STORY and refresh your memories. Now the GOP plans to hack the e machines because they want to take away the single most powerful right we have- The right to vote. How easy is it to hack those machines? And I have called the Obama hotline 202 456 1111 and emailed at whitehouse.gov and said the gop plans to hack the the Diebold voting machines and others- this is a national security issue and we cannot let Romney and his corporate gang of theives carry out a coup and steal the election!!! SO I SAY HACK BACK! If they want to play dirty - Obama should too. This is war against the people of our nation.
I emailed the following article to whitehouse.gov and you should too!!! To much is at stake.
US Lab Says Electronic Voting Machines Easy to Hack
 
 
+7 # fredboy 2012-10-19 11:34
We tired to get Obama to restore Glass-Steagall during his first year, when the issue was red hot and Wall Street and the big banks were on the ropes. Instead, he brought in Larry Summers and crew, the guys who helped destroy Glass-Steagall. Amazing political blunder. Now, when he knows it's too late, he wants to attempt it. Very, very, very poor political judgment. And impossible to pass after yielding the House to the GOP.
 
 
+4 # in deo veritas 2012-10-19 14:15
Just more reason we have to get the HR back from the teabaggers! Too much attention to the Pres race and it is distracting us from doing it.
 
 
+3 # fredboy 2012-10-19 11:37
Obama's sudden urge to restore Glass-Steagall is similar to my plan to go back in time and buy Apple at $7 a share. Not going to happen. But we both had a chance...
 
 
+8 # Corvette-Bob 2012-10-19 12:44
As I said before and I will say again. Give a man a gun and he can rob a party store. Give a man a bank and he can rob the whole community. Greed is rampant and that is why you must have safeguards and regulators or those who have access to money will steal it everytime. It is one reason why I am afraid to go to a financial advisor because I believe giving them half of a chance they will steal my money or at the very least work out a plan that is advantageous to them and not to me.
 
 
+8 # lollie 2012-10-19 12:47
A vote for Romney is a vote against yourself. Unless, you're one of the X-treme elite in which case you probably wouldn't be reading this. We are where we are.
 
 
+14 # MindDoc 2012-10-19 12:48
IMHO, Reich has really captured both the essence ("core"?) of Romney and the extreme danger for our country should he be selected as the leader of his 1% pac(k).

Want scares me most about the person - aside from an inability to hold a position or reconcile his constantly self-contradict ory "facts" which he cleverly and deceitfully presents to support *his* reality-- is his utter lack of "mindfulness" about his own actions, *and* his proclivity to bet big...

Quote:
Romney used other peoples' money to make big bets, leveraging like mad, pumping and then dumping companies regardless of the human costs.
This is history. This is fact. These are the spots which will not change if elected. Truth is, aside from relying on the "facts are whatever you want them to be" school (of Rove, Fox, et al), Romney seems unable to stop either bullying or gambling, in addition to lying. Character matters, as does reality. A liar in chief who does not know or care about his own words a day ago, and who dares to bet big as a first response (as in the primary debate), and with a wife into horses, and friends who own Nascar franchises.... Well, here is someone unrestrained by ego, facts, other people's lives, his own words, or money concern - why, he'd bet $10, 000 on the spot, that his facts are better than ours.

Do we want a master LIAR and professional outsourcer and US-ttax evader, to be the one to react to a crisis impulsively to place a bet on America? Danger....
 
 
+5 # Douglas Jack 2012-10-19 13:08
The reality is that both Obama & Romney are largely dictated to by monetary, media & military-indust rial-complex interests. In this house of cards, neither can take us as far as we might imagine. Mitt is taking us to WW3, unverifiable e-voting, total financial concentration at the top. Obama only less so. This is the last election where possibility of change is possible. Vote Obama & then the possibility remains. Check out this detailed report, 'Mormon Women & Mit Romney's Pregnancy Problem' for facts, figures, dates & people. The human race does not need Romney near a nuclear trigger or with any institutional assists to his bullying, racism or misogyny !
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/14059-mormon-women-and-mitt-romneys-pregnancy-problem
 
 
+2 # Regina 2012-10-19 15:38
I read that article -- its disclosures are a nightmare! Mitt would take women back to 1930. He's an unconscionable skunk, dregs of the earth for women. Ann is obviously obeisant to him. It's fortunate for humanity that she "produced" only sons.
 
 
+4 # m... 2012-10-19 13:12
Why stop with just the break up of Enormous Banks...??

If Obama actually sees the writing on the wall after his feeble first fours years, he will begin to LEAD America back to being AMERICA and not allow things to continue as they have been where Americans are kept on this flim flam road to Smaller and Smaller Government of, by and for ourselves for the sake of Big Global Corporate's effort to attain Dominion over EVERYTHING...!

I think the very few BIG, GIGANTIC, ENORMOUS Global Corporate Media Empires which own and exploit almost all American Media enterprises on behalf of their GLOBAL shareholders and which have FAR too much influence over our political, social, economic, cultural and consumption affairs should be broken up too, especially if Americans want to retain any semblance at all of a Democratic Republic with an actual FREE Press as envisioned by our Founders.
These self serving Media Fiefdoms should be broken up and sold off into a thousand bits and much more We the People useful pieces to separate, different and more diverse entities.
In fact, We should first do it here in America and then, much like we do in our campaign around the world on behalf of human rights, include the break up of vast media empires everywhere for the good of all mankind, animal kind and environmental kind..!
 
 
+4 # natalierosen 2012-10-19 14:22
The question during the second debate that I would have LOVED to ask Mitt Romney is the following: Mr. Romney, you were allegedly against the bank taxpayer bailout, certainly against the bailout of GM. You seem to advocate for a bankruptcy restructuring debt of corporate entities that go belly up and against the taxpayer or legislation such as TARP giving banks billions to avoid a colossal collapse and world economic catastrophe. Our form of economic capitalism has seen many many booms and busts over at least two centuries. Occasionally like the Great Depression the severity is unmatched The Great Recession of 2008 came close to that. What would YOU do IF yet again while you held the presidency an unregulated in extremis Wall Street was in imminent danger of collapse?

The question I really want to know is how much does this mendacious man truly believe in laissez faire capitalism and does he believe in the moral hazard as defined by Wiki "a situation where a party will have a tendency to take risks because the costs that could incur will not be felt by the party taking the risk. A moral hazard may occur where the actions of one party may change to the detriment of another after a transaction has taken place." How fervently is he against incurring this moral hazard by allowing Wall Street to be bailed out with taxpayer money. Would Mr. Romney let his Wall Street financiers of his campaign fall?
 
 
+3 # Mink 2012-10-20 09:42
Reich is right, but unfortunately, most people don't know anything about Glass-Steagall. Someone needs to explain it (using simple, common language) to the very large majority of voters who don't follow politics or economics the way most readers of this forum do. Educate us while making these recommendations . Otherwise, Reich is wasting his time.
 
 
+2 # Quonomo 2012-10-20 20:48
Bloomberg News puts the total cost of the bank bailouts and support programs at 12.5 trillion of tax payer money. The total of home mortgages in the country is at a high of 10 trillion, but many estimates put it about 1.2 to 3 trillion lower. You do the math.

The average monthly home mortgage in the U.S. $1687.00. Which begs the question....Why didn't they just pay off our home mortgages?

The banks get their money back without their obvious interest, our homes are not foreclosed on, and can you imagine how much cash would be flowing into this economy if we all had $1687.00 more a month to spend. Jobs?

Despite what you have told the number one reason business is not hiring is lack of customers. Business, in general, does not hire anyone until it can't keep up with demand.

All one has to do is look at productivity vs buying power in this country. All the money has gone to the top. Increased productivity has not meant increased wages. In fact, when all adjustments are made, wages have decreased.

On the Dylan Ratigan show a Rethugican mouthpiece said that the American workforce has out priced itself in the world Market place. Are they serious?

With $1687.00 more a month to spend I could buy Micro Brew Beer again. Alas this did not happen...I guess I'll take a Miller...Grumbl e grumble.
 
 
0 # mdhome 2012-10-24 19:57
Who is going to give them jobs? If there are no jobs (Congress failed to pass the American Jobs Act), The republicans were against anyone getting a job while OBAMA was in the white house.

Willard
Mitt
RoMoney =Weapons of
Mass
Recession
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN