RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "The Supreme Court justice tosses judicial restraint - or any sort of restraint - out the window when he weighs in on sodomy, abortion, immigrants, and other controversial topics."

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)



Scalia On Sodomy, Abortion and Immigrants

By Nina Strochlic, The Daily Beast

07 October 12

 

he Supreme Court's rulings, often in complex, difficult cases, have historically redefined racial and gender rights. So it's more than a little disconcerting to hear Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dub decisions on the most debated issues of the century as "easy." Scalia is known to be the ruling court's most extreme right-wing "literalist" or "textualist," meaning he casts his vote in accordance to a bare-bones definition of the Constitution. On Monday he aired his views on a number of hot-button topics, from homosexuality to abortion.

Here's a look at some of the quotes that have secured his notoriety as the most outspoken justice sitting on the nation's most powerful court.

"Easy"

Justice Scalia made his views abundantly clear earlier this week at a Washington, D.C., book signing hosted by the American Enterprise Institute. "The death penalty? Give me a break. It's easy. Abortion? Absolutely easy. Nobody ever thought the Constitution prevented restrictions on abortion," he said. "Homosexual sodomy? Come on. For 200 years, it was criminal in every state."

"Vaffanculo"

Scalia didn't appreciate a reporter from the Boston Herald asking him in 2006 how he responds to critics who say his religion impairs his fairness in rulings. "To my critics, I say, 'Vaffanculo,'" Scalia reportedly said, flicking his right hand from under his chin. In Italian, this not-so subtle phrase means "f--k off" and the accompanying hand flick is equally rude. "You're not going to print that are you?" he apparently asked in an interaction that occurred, it's worth noting, inside the Cathedral of the Holy Cross at Sunday mass.

"Unwanted Immigrants"

When President Obama passed the DREAM Act, allowing young immigrants to obtain legal citizenship, Arizona created its own immigration law, contradicting some of the newly minted federal mandates. The state law was struck down by the Supreme Court—a decision with which Scalia did not agree, going so far as to suggest that the state should secede. "If securing its territory in this fashion is not within the power of Arizona, we should cease referring to it as a sovereign State," he wrote. But he also used 19th-century restrictions on freed slaves as backup for his decision, saying that, back in the day, "State laws not only provided for the removal of unwanted immigrants but also imposed penalties on unlawfully present aliens and those who aided their immigration."

"60 hours in a bakery"

You might say sodomy is one of Scalia's "easiest" decisions. Justice Scalia dissented on the case that outlawed anti-sodomy laws in Texas, and compared the act to a very strange, and mostly offensive, array of things. "[The Texas anti-sodomy statute] undoubtedly imposes constraints on liberty," he wrote in his support of the state's laws. "So do laws prohibiting prostitution, recreational use of heroin, and, for that matter, working more than 60 hours per week in a bakery." But he didn't stop there, saying, "State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity," along with any other law "based on moral choices," are now "called into question" by the court's decision.

"Hand-held rocket launchers"

Justice Scalia sat down with Fox News's Chris Wallace to discuss the recent massacre in Aurora, Colo. An ardent proponent of the right to bear arms, Scalia upheld the right of Americans to arm themselves with anything that can be "hand-carried," which apparently could go way past what the Founding Fathers could have ever imagined. "It doesn't apply to cannons—but I suppose there are hand-held rocket launchers that can bring down airplanes, that will have to be decided," he said.

"Troposphere, whatever"

Scalia is known for his unbridled outspokenness, which he occasionally shows off even in the nation's highest courtroom. In 2006, the Supreme Court heard a case involving global warming. When discussing the pollutants in the environment, Scalia mistakenly referred to the troposphere as the stratosphere and was corrected by the plaintiff's representation. Snapping back, he made clear his views on the matter: "Troposphere, whatever. I told you before I'm not a scientist. That's why I don't want to have to deal with global warming, to tell you the truth."

"A cross, a star of David and a Muslim half moon"

In oral arguments over erecting a cross in honor of all of America's war dead, Justice Scalia offered a comeback to those who thought the cross only represented Christianity. "What would you have them erect?" Scalia asked. "A cross–some conglomerate of a cross, a star of David, and you know, a Muslim half moon [sic] and star?" The lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union got some laughs from the audience with his response to the fumbling solution offered by the justice. "Well, Justice Scalia, if I may go to your first point. The cross is the most common symbol of the resting place of Christians. I have been in Jewish cemeteries. There is never a cross on a tombstone of a Jew."

"Display their genitals"

Justice Scalia might want to keep some ideas to himself lest anyone think it wise to take him up on it. Arguing that barring fully nude dancers in Indiana doesn't violate freedom of expression, Scalia let his imagination run wild. "The purpose of Indiana's nudity law would be violated, I think, if 60,000 fully consenting adults crowded into the Hoosier Dome to display their genitals to one another, even if there were not an offended innocent in the crowd."

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+87 # DaveM 2012-10-07 09:04
Military headstones display Stars of David and other religious symbols, depending on the faith (or lack thereof) of the person commemorated. Evidently Justice Scalia is unaware of this.

Sodomy laws, which were still in force in 14 states in 2003, were nullified by Supreme Court action in which, as noted, Justice Scalia dissented. Odd that he still regards it as an issue. His comments on homosexuality make it obvious that his understanding of the basis of American law ("everything that is not forbidden is permitted") is somewhat awry.

As to hand-held rocket launchers....I suppose they could make for an interesting Fourth Of July. Justice Scalia is apparently unaware that cannons are not only legal, but completely unrestricted by the government provided they are muzzle loaded black powder cannons. Modern versions can also be purchased with the right paperwork.
 
 
+77 # Pancho 2012-10-07 11:21
Scalia gave us Bush II and Citizens United. He and Thomas are particulary close to the Koch brothers and neither believe that their close relationship (sometimes by blood) to parties to cases are causes for disqualification.

Years ago I sparred with a very bright guy in my union who was always on the wrong side of issues. I described him at the time as being "...like Scalia. He can always find a good reason for doing the wrong thing."

His P.R. guy dismissed that gesture as being open to various interpretations , including innocuous ones. I had no idea it had been accompanied by the verbal comment that left little doubt what he meant. (It's flipping the downturned hand from under the chin out toward the person being insulted.) The gesture is more obscene than just "f**k off."
 
 
+22 # Eldon J. Bloedorn 2012-10-07 18:05
Scalia reminds me of the meaning of a comment made by one of my most cherished philosophers-Ea rl Nightengale. "women are always right except for the wrong resons." Scalia is already dead. It is just that he has not yet been informed of this glorious event by his mortician.
 
 
+167 # Buddha 2012-10-07 09:19
This is why in my opinion, an Obama win is so critical. The next President may be appointing 1 or 2 SCOTUS judges, and we need sane jurists to counter lunatics like Scalia.
 
 
+103 # Vardoz 2012-10-07 10:44
This guy is a certified whack job and man are we in trouble just with him! It would be an unimaginable nightmare if Romney got in and appointed more like him to the court! We aleady are being drowned with attack ads by corporate money now the billions that is pouring into propaganda ads. One has to ask themselves why - And the answer Romeny is a corporate guys and they want him so bad it hurts.If they are willing to spend this much BEWARE. Vote for Obama - not perfect but so much more for the people!!!!
 
 
+44 # Cassandra2012 2012-10-07 13:43
'This guy' (and the inept Thomas as well) are Opus Dei ... with an agenda (not unlike Mitt's ...) to win at any cost.
 
 
+38 # Pancho 2012-10-07 11:09
In fact, that may be the ONLY reason an Obama win is critical.
 
 
+82 # maddave 2012-10-07 13:07
It's worse than that Buddha! The President for the next four years may appoint as many as four (4) Supreme Court Justices (one of whom may be the aging Scalia, which is a plus by any standard); a handful of Appellate Court Justices; and fully two-hundred (200) lower Court Judges!

This has been the Right Wing's Holy Grail for over half-a- century . . . ever since Abington v. Schempp; Brown v, Board & Roe v. Wade.

And NEVER forget that Romney's official " Judicial Advisor" is Robert Bork! Yes, THAT Robert Bork!,

Do we need any other readon to re-elect Obama?
 
 
-22 # RLF 2012-10-08 03:59
Obama will install some spineless centrist like he already has. The right wing guys can't be forced to drop out of an argument but Kagen does at the drop of a hat.
 
 
+12 # ispeakup 2012-10-08 08:58
You're absolutely right! The SCOTUS appointments rank #1 in a long list of reasons to reelect Obama, including women's health, separation of church and state, and maintaining a nation with a conscience. Citizens United would never have been sanctioned if the majority of the justices had acted with a conscience. It's all about establishing a PERMANENT REPUBLICAN DOMINANCE and it has been surreptitiously in the process for decades! Re-read 'THE FAMILY' and recall the 'C Street connection'. It is all coming to fruition. Has Romney been designated to carry out The White Horse Prophesy of the Mormon Church to "SAVE the Constitution"? Read 'UNDER THE BANNER OF HEAVEN'. You'll be stunned by their interpretation of 'reality'!
 
 
+118 # chrisconnolly 2012-10-07 09:38
It is disheartening at best to have a buffoon sitting on the highest court in the land. What happened to jurisprudence? How can such a highly education person not realize that if he doesn't know about something then he shouldn't just dismiss it out of hand when so many that do know about it are making such dire warnings? I guess it goes back to the gorilla suited interloper walking through the ball game that only only half the people in the audience see. Scalia is half blinded by his own ignorance and the other half blinded by his own cruelty.
 
 
+93 # tuandon 2012-10-07 09:59
He's about as Catholic as Josef Stalin. The church has taken a stand against the death penalty that he dismisses, and the church has criticised the budge promulgate by that other pseudo-Catholic and Ayn-Rand-lover, Paul Ryan. The two of them are what my Italian mother would refer to as "disgraziati." Ask Just Vafanculo what that means.
 
 
+126 # thekidde 2012-10-07 10:03
Antonin Scalia and his religio-nutcase beliefs belong under a rock, not on the Supreme Court of the United States. His beliefs are racist, misogynist and anti-American Constitution.
 
 
0 # robniel 2012-10-14 21:35
Please add that he is scientifically illiterate. He should be flipping burgers in Mississippi.
 
 
+93 # Glen 2012-10-07 10:19
Scalia has long been held in contempt by many people, including decent lawyers, and not just because of his flip comments and conflicts of interest, which are bad enough.

Scalia has provided an indecent amount of entertainment on the periphery of his responsibilitie s as a judge, and shown that not only is the government at large crumbling, so is the supreme court.

Ideally there should be total objectivity and dignity in the court, not to mention no POLITICS. Alas, never was and never will be.
 
 
+31 # ghostperson 2012-10-07 11:05
Adjudication is politics clothed differently.
 
 
+61 # Old Man 2012-10-07 10:20
I wonder what Scalia does in his spare time?
This guy is delusional, he lives in his own little world and thinks of himself as the all mighty.
 
 
-14 # jtatu 2012-10-09 10:58
Old Man, your description of Scalia is perfect for Obama. Fits Obama to a tee.
 
 
+85 # James Smith 2012-10-07 10:22
THis offensive fool is a disgrace to America. Let's hope he retires or dies in time for Obama to replace hi with someone that can think, respects freedom and the law.
 
 
+96 # Cliff 2012-10-07 10:27
What a lunatic. I once had faith in the Supreme Court, but since Citizens United, I am leery. How did someone as nutty as this get past the vetting process? Something really wrong there.
 
 
+60 # ghostperson 2012-10-07 11:15
They were selected for ideology and the more recent ones for youth to make sure that the soupreme kort was tied up for 30-40 years following the Federalist Society agenda which includes violating the separation of powers in government which means the kort legislates from the bench.

It's time for the old farts: to go and I say this lovingly because I am an old fart.
 
 
+40 # lexy677 2012-10-07 14:33
He was appointed by "saint" Reagan.
 
 
+67 # in deo veritas 2012-10-07 10:29
Poster boy for the Supremely Corrupt Court. Thomas is undoubtedly a tax evader and amoral person but this clown is in the same category as Feminazi Bachmann but far more dangerous because of his position on the court.
 
 
+34 # Greenery 2012-10-07 10:56
How did this guy even get his degree?
 
 
+6 # LeftyIAdmit 2012-10-09 12:37
Scalia is not stupid; he's just evil.
 
 
+47 # ghostperson 2012-10-07 11:12
Who would you want to decide your case, Larry, Curly and Moe or the 4 horsemen of the Apocalypse: Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts? Problem is: How could you tell the difference?
 
 
+61 # kelly 2012-10-07 12:15
It's easy. Larry, Curly and Moe usually make stupid decisions that end up hurting themselves. Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts make stupid decisions that will destroy the nation.
 
 
+4 # LeftyIAdmit 2012-10-09 12:39
As I pointed out earlier, these people are not stupid, but rather they are truly evil. Never underestimate the enemy.
 
 
0 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 19:42
Fantastic reply!!
 
 
+54 # Jaysson Brae 2012-10-07 11:31
Scalia has the unmistakeable character structure of a clinical paranoid -- styled in his case as a rage-filled religious absolutist with equally absolutist political views.
Especially in his public interviews and speeches, he unfailingly comes across as a severely disturbed person.

What a disaster he's on the Supreme Court.
 
 
+34 # crinvegas 2012-10-07 12:01
SCalia is so openly opinionated, I should think he will have to recuse himself on many cases that will come before the Supreme Court - gay rights, abortion rights, immigration, to name a few. He has already let us know how he will rule on these and other issues.
 
 
+3 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 19:48
Hell he went duck hunting with Cheney while a Halliburton case was pending before the high court. Which incidently was the only "action" the 5-deferrment stunt "Dick" saw--shooting his friend in the face. Had he gone to war like the rest of his age cohorts he would have known how to use a gun. Scalia doesn't recuse because he is perfect. In fact, he is outraged that people are still outraged by Bush v. Gore (2003). His attitude is "get over it." I will get over it when he and his kind are off the bench. We need term limits for the S. Court. Life tenure was all right when people did not routinely live past their 60s. There is nothing in the Constitution that requires life tenured judges.
 
 
+79 # JCM 2012-10-07 12:21
For those who think Obama is the wrong choice.
If Romney wins and the Republicans take over Congress they will: pass the Ryan budget destroying Medicare as we know it and probably will crash Social Security as well, will decrease regulation on the petroleum and financial industries, leading to more catastrophe, add another two conservative judges on the Supreme Court and then repeal Roe v Wade and countless other beneficial rulings for the working class, will repeal health care so that people could still be denied insurance when they get sick and the people with pre existing conditions will be out of luck, will continue to lower taxes for the rich and create larger deficits, will reduce funding for food stamps, for clean energy, for science, for global warming, for Pell Grants, will try to destroy unions, and will probably come up with some excuse to go to war. The list of destructive Republican policies goes on a long time but I can guarantee that they favor the very wealthiest. Their platform is now,” Donate to my campaign and I will make you wealthier.” Their Idology is the “Ideology of Greed”.
Some of you hate Obama but anything he has done will pale in comparison to what the Republicans will do.
 
 
+41 # Corvette-Bob 2012-10-07 12:25
Please do not permit Romney from being elected and appointing more Supreme Court Judges like Scalia who is truly corrupt and is willing to rule in favor of the powerful and rich in this country and leave the poor, weak, old and infirm to fend for themselves. If Romney is elected we will have more right winged nutjobs appointed to the Court.
 
 
+37 # dick 2012-10-07 12:26
"Mommy, one of the leaders of elite class warfare isn't very nice."

"I know, honey. He wants MILLIONS of PEOPLE LIKE US DEAD. We have to WAKE UP!"
 
 
+42 # madams12 2012-10-07 12:35
He brings to mind the arrogance of Mussolini.
 
 
+23 # kelly 2012-10-07 12:52
With the money of the Czar.
 
 
-11 # jtatu 2012-10-09 11:03
You must be smart enough to recognize that Obama defines "arrogant." Mussolini was long ago. Today you could just say, "He brings to mind the arrogance of Barack Obama."
 
 
+2 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 19:50
Your evidence? Especially vis-a-vis a man who wants and expects us to accept that he will do right by us on faith but refuses to show us his tax returns and who hides his money in multiple locations off shore? I would be interested in how you define "arrogant" if it doesn't include the latter.
 
 
+30 # Big Jake 2012-10-07 13:01
JCM is spot on. The Barbarians are inside the wire. We have been lulled to sleep as to what the real agenda is.
We should just rename the Supreme Court as the Law firm for the 1%.
Scalia is rather hard to figure out until you discover that we is just nuts. The others are just corrupt like Roberts and Alito with Thomas just wanting to change his color with no success. It has taken us a long time to get to here and the Democrats still look like the deer in the headlights. If they don't stop looking for votes and began to take a stand, we might just as well turn the country over to the Koch boys and quit fooling around.
 
 
+14 # sapereaudeprime 2012-10-07 13:05
And how many ancestors can this Ellis Island cowbird count who were in this country for the heavy lifting between 1608 and 1892, when Ellis Island opened? This papist mole barely belongs at all in a country that 9 and 11 generations of my ancestors built with their sweat and blood, and NOT ONE OF THEM was a Papist. He has no more business on our Supreme Court than I, a 10th and 12th generation WASP, have on the Supreme Court of Italy.
 
 
+28 # sapereaudeprime 2012-10-07 13:07
I would not endorse terminating Scalia with prejudice, but if he ended up hanging from a filling station sign by his heels, like Mussolini, I wouldn't shed any tears.
 
 
+16 # HooverBush 2012-10-07 13:37
Using abbreviations:

Of all the justices on the SCOTUS, Scalia is the Biggest POS !!!
 
 
+19 # nancyw 2012-10-07 13:41
I think the authorities need to catch Scalia in child pornography or fornicating with a minor or prostitute, which is probable with this kind of angst he has. 'Thou protesteth too loud..." or something like that.
 
 
-19 # MidwestTom 2012-10-07 13:48
When you look at Scalia, you get what you see. This is much better than dealing with politicans who make you believe one thing, and then do the opposite once elected.
 
 
+20 # Hank 2012-10-07 13:49
Justice Scalia has been senile for some time.
 
 
+24 # phoebehelen 2012-10-07 13:52
How About a Sanity review for all Supreme Court Judges every 10 years and also one for those under consideration for a position?
 
 
0 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 19:53
Good thought. I'd settle for a physical or test and eye exam. After all, after a certain age people have to do a version of that to keep a driver's license.
 
 
+39 # ganymede 2012-10-07 14:11
I'll say this once again. My wish is for all left, progressive, liberal people to get off their holier than thou dislike of Obama. Only a completely nihilistic person would stop supporting Obama and let the Teapublicans regain the presidency. Our lives and the future of our planet is at stake in this election. Rightwingers have a death wish to destroy their own lives and take us with them. I'm not going and will do everything to insure Obama's re-election.
 
 
-39 # MidwestTom 2012-10-07 15:15
Destroy the whole Planet? It has received very little press, but CO2 levels in the atmosphere are down to the levels of 1992. Also, we have all heard about the melting ice in the Arctic, but the ice in Antarctica is at record size.
 
 
+14 # Onterryo 2012-10-08 07:55
The melting ice is due to global warming. As the ice melts the rate of which the earth will warm will increase as methane trapped in the tundra will be released further accelerating the process. As far the Antarctic increasing in size you have been reading the Deniers' talking points. In June, during the southern winter, Antarctic sea ice was more than 2 percent above average, ranking as the tenth-largest extent on record since 1979. Research indicates these small increases are a result of changes in weather patterns produced by the ozone hole over the Antarctic. You may also wish to see the following article about Richard Muller, a professor of physics at University of California, Berkley and a former skeptic. ""He has become convinced that "the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct" and that humans are "almost entirely the cause" of that warming"".

www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/2722-global-warming-skeptic-turnaround.html
 
 
+12 # reiverpacific 2012-10-08 08:11
Quoting MidwestTom:
Destroy the whole Planet? It has received very little press, but CO2 levels in the atmosphere are down to the levels of 1992. Also, we have all heard about the melting ice in the Arctic, but the ice in Antarctica is at record size.


Where DID you get that nonsense about the Arctic Ice in the face of the recent reports of more than anticipated record melting and possible no summer ice at all by 2020? Do you have the same information channels as Il Duce Scalia and Fox?
[quote name="MidwestTo m"]When you look at Scalia, you get what you see.
I certainly GET what I SEE and HEAR, which is that Scalia resembles nobody more than Roland Freisler, Hitler's ruthless "Hanging Judge" who not only swiftly passed sentences that were foregone conclusions, mostly immediate death by Guillotine or life, but who bullied and abused the prisoner before him, often screaming and whose views were dictated by fanatically and without deviation, upholding and enforcing the Fuhrer's views and death-centered regime.
In the case of the subject injustice, his views are outdated, reactionary, heavily biased and in spite of his rude and smug response to the reporter's question, upholding the secretive, elite and exclusive Catholic club Opus Dei. His main bookend Thomas is just as bad and even more of hypocrite and criminal who, with his handlers, pretty much did a Freisler act on Anita Hill.
That's what I see.
That's good, is it?
 
 
+1 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 19:59
Get a grip. People are entitled to express their opinions without being called names by those who are intolerant of views different than theirs. I am certainly disappointed in Obama because he has behaved for 4 years like what used to be a moderate Republican (a now extinct specifies) and I was in the slough of despond about his "performance" or lack thereof at what could only laughingly be called a "debate." Romney speed talked lies and eye blinked like he was on something without a semblance of opposition. I want someone with balls to go toe-to-toe not make nice with a bull shit artist.
 
 
+14 # jerryball 2012-10-07 14:15
Send this skanky old Wop admirer of the fascist El Duce back to the vatican where his views are looked upon with pride. He has no place in a Democracy where citizens are free.
 
 
+15 # Fight Back 2012-10-07 22:56
Jerryball - Using ethnic slurs reflects back unfavorably upon the user.

I do not respect the opinions of Scalia, but neither do I respect the opinions of bigots.
 
 
+20 # geronimo 2012-10-07 14:21
Capo di capo Fat Tony, like his predecesors in the Mafia, seeks to disrupt social tranquility in order to divert attention from his nefarious schemes to sabotage our Constitution.
 
 
+23 # angelfish 2012-10-07 14:43
Scalia is a Troglogyte who clearly doesn't deserve a seat on the highest Court in the land. If he is not impeached for his blatantly biased opinions we are stuck with him until he is called back to the cave out of which he crawled. Even so, come quickly.
 
 
+17 # cordleycoit 2012-10-07 15:42
This goes to show that people suffering from extreme personality defects can rise to great heights. If the justice was alone in this matter it would be quaint. Unfortunately there are many of these sick people in government and many on the conservative side of the bench. Their minds freeze in the the sophomore year in high school and they coast into law school the last refuge for their over acting minds. There is help available but they will never seek help.
 
 
+18 # rcossebo 2012-10-07 15:58
He's proof that there should be a term limits on all Political Posts, Supreme Court is NO EXCEPTION! God knows we could wait long enough and the forces of evil would change by their own momentum. Seriously EVERYONE should be locked into TWO TERMS MAX!!! I think we'd get a lot more accomplished than what we have so far, especially since the Reagan era! Good Lord, talk about opening the Hen House and letting in the Wolf! Corporations as people? REALLY? They can DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY? A few of them along with their CEO's ... I WISH!
 
 
+16 # Texan 4 Peace 2012-10-07 16:15
Ms. Strochlic, Obama certainly did NOT pass the DREAM Act. What he did was establish (by decree) a policy of prosecutorial discretion resulting in "deferred action" against those who would be eligible for the DREAM Act, were it to be passed. The DREAM Act has been introduced (numerous times) in Congress, and only Congress can pass it. Obama's action, while welcome, will last only as long as his presidency.
This is a pretty egregious factual error for a journalist to make.
 
 
+21 # Vardoz 2012-10-07 16:37
Our Hidden History of Corporations in the United States

When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country’s founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society. Citizens United ignores this part completely.
 
 
+13 # m... 2012-10-07 17:01
''Scalia is known to be the ruling court's most extreme right-wing "literalist" or "textualist," meaning he casts his vote in accordance to a bare-bones definition of the Constitution...''

Hmmmm.

If Scalia is such a bare bones 'literalist' and perhaps proud of it, maybe he would also be proud enough one day to explain where and/or how, when he looks at the bare bones Constitution, he sees the equation:

Big Business + Global Corporations + Global Shareholders + (Money x Infinity) = (Speech x Infinity) x US Election Process

............... ....?.......... ..........
 
 
0 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 20:02
Scalia is a literalist all right of a Constitution that he has first ideologically massaged to support his revisionist legislating from the bench and usurpation of the constitutional authority of congress.
 
 
+19 # Big Jake 2012-10-07 17:32
I am offended when somebody attempts to compare Scalia with the Mafia. They had more brains and ethics than this throwback to the middle ages and should be kept in the bowels of the Vatican and only let out on Holidays. Just how in the hell did we arrive at this sorry state?
 
 
+19 # DrEvel1 2012-10-07 17:54
It would be marvelous to have a time machine capable of transporting Scalia (and Thomas, for that matter) back to the latter part of the 18th century and see how well they would fare under the government and social arrangements of the period. Scalia, as a poor but plucky Italian lad, would be lucky to be shining shoes on the street in lower Manhattan; Thomas - well, we know what he would have been doing. And they would both know that was what they would be doing for the rest of their lives. Constitutional literalists consistently forget that a document of any sort has meaning only within the context of its preparation; if you want an 18th century interpretation of the Constitution, then you have to accept the 18th century culture and mindset as well. Jefferson said it well in words written on the wall of his monument; laws and constitutions must change with growth over time, like a person leaving behind old clothes, Imagine the hilarity in 23rd century Earth as their constitutional scholars argue that the laws relating to technology passed in the first decade of the 21st century ought to be applied literally to interstellar and time travel, genetics and immortality treatments, and the personal rights of the highly intelligent cacti of Omicron Persei 8!
 
 
+22 # Eldon J. Bloedorn 2012-10-07 18:19
Yet, with "all due respect." If Obama loses the election, both houses are lost, it is because Democrats show up at a street fight with a water pistol. Well, I'm 71 years old. Sometime in the not too soon future, I can say, "America, love it or leave it." "That slogan is B.S." I wanted to improve it. So did a lot of us. But, we have to improve it beforwe we die.
 
 
+30 # JFS48 2012-10-07 18:37
Anyone who deems the most complex and divisive issues of our time "easy" is too arrogant to be a judge. A judge is someone who is supposed to sit, hear the evidence and arguments, weigh them carefully, and reach the fairest conclusion possible. But Scalia isn't listening; he is using his position to lecture us and bully us into his narrow way of thinking. The first time I saw the Supreme Court building I got tears of emotion over what I believed it stood for. But Scalia and his mouthpiece Thomas now make me weep with sorrow for what our nation has become.
 
 
+2 # ghostperson 2012-10-10 20:07
Nino the Terrible is a facile, glib asshole whose contempt for others is unbridled. On his personal planet there is only one entitled to the label "intelligent life," him. That folks is what is know as a "malignant narcissist" which Dr. Scott Peck calls "evil" (not in the biblical sense but in the abuse of power sense. Peck says such evil should be studied as a psychiatric disorder.
 
 
-17 # isafakir 2012-10-07 19:10
thomas's and scalia's thoughts considered outside the range of human decency 50 years ago have now become main stream legal orthodoxy. thanks democrats.
 
 
+13 # brux 2012-10-07 23:12
uh ... republicans i think you mean ... was that a typo or are you just crazy?
 
 
+12 # engelbach 2012-10-08 03:34
The Supreme Court has come a long way down with clowns like this -- especially when contrasted with truly great jurists who presided during my lifetime, like William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, and Earl Warren.
 
 
+18 # sharsand 2012-10-08 05:53
He's such a moral man that he blatantly meets with Republicans, breaking a decent code of ethics of non-partisanshi p. you'd think our highest judges in the land on the Supreme Court whould show impartiality, particularly in their social dealings. We know he's a mouthpiece in his votes for the extreme right-wing of his party and he makes no bones about it. Disgusting
 
 
+12 # Sweet Pea 2012-10-08 09:52
It sounds to me that Antonin Scalia is allowing his personal religious beliefs to interfere with his abilty to act as a fair and "unpartial" judge. Perhaps it is time for him to step down and allow someone with the ability to judge in the best interest of "all" people - - not just the older religion-driven generation. It doesn't take religion for a person to know right from wrong.
 
 
+7 # David Starr 2012-10-08 10:52
Quoting: "Scalia is known to be the ruling court's most extreme right-wing "literalist" or "textualist," meaning he casts his vote in accordance to a bare-bones definition of the Constitution." Yeah, definately. The ignorance, shall I say stupidity, in taking a document as etched literally in stone; as though conditions around 1776, are literally the same as today. Don't forget the "right-wing Uncle Tom," Clarence Thomas, whose as Right as a Rightie can get. I, again, sense no evolvement among the Right.
 
 
-3 # BrightLight 2012-10-08 11:05
I am astonished to find that Sapereaudeprime 's 10 generations of ancestors alone built this country.
Great Work! But you may want to give some small applause to that Italian papist who discovered it. That other papist, Vespucci who's name it bears. The bicameral form of government, the design of the capitol building, the roman alphabet, the Latin that comprises 60% of the English language. Marconi's radio, Meucci's telephone, the splitting of the atom. I could go on and on and on, for we have innovated and excelled in every form of human endeavor but let me leave you with this final thought first annunciated by the Italian patriot Giuseppe Mazzini in 1851,but borrowed by Lincoln 10 years later: "That a government of the people by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth" And we are forever part of the American people. Get used to it.
 
 
+5 # reiverpacific 2012-10-08 15:20
Quoting BrightLight:

Great Work! But you may want to give some small applause to that Italian papist who discovered it. That other papist, Vespucci who's name it bears.

"Allegedly discovered" it!
Remember the Vikings (my ancestors) much earlier? And they left it as they found it. They might have a a few confrontations with the "Indians" -you might credit Chrissie C' with that ill-advised title while you are at it, but there was no evidence of plunder, forced Christianizatio n (they weren't), attempted genocide and wanton murder, or rape of the lands coast-to-coast.
O'aye, and you forgot the contributions to the national story of Capone and the many tentacled Mob, whom Scalia closely resembles in his judicial, arrogant thuggishness from on high, along with my aforementioned similarity to Roland Freisler. Proud of that lot are ya?
Scalia is all about ABOLISHING the seemingly failed "Government or and by the people----"; Citizens United is the living proof of THAT.
Get used to it!
 
 
-10 # BrightLight 2012-10-08 18:28
Yes they did leave it as they found it that is the trouble with their so called discovery, nothing came of it. From the first month of Columbus's second voyage there has been an unending stream of traffic from Europe and then the world. That is a discovery and the one that brought your ancestors to these shores. About the mob you will note that they were not alone in the creation of organized crime but only the strongest, smartest and most effective of the many Irish, Jewish and Anglo-Saxon crime syndicates that crowded American cities during prohibition-do I detect a note of sour grapes here? You will further note that Boss Tweed that most corrupt of American politicians was a full Wasp. If anything, Scalia resembles him both in girth and narrowness of vision. From what I gather Scandinavians have added little to our national well being or prestige. But Keep trying your day will come, however you must first stop hating that is a prerequisite to accomplishment.
 
 
+1 # reiverpacific 2012-10-09 08:16
Quoting BrightLight:
Yes they did leave it as they found it that is the trouble with their so called discovery, nothing came of it. "-------do I detect a note of sour grapes here? If anything, Scalia resembles him both in girth and narrowness of vision. From what I gather Scandinavians have added little to our national well being or prestige. But Keep trying your day will come, however you must first stop hating that is a prerequisite to accomplishment.

Sour grapes -never (I'm from S.E. Scotland, thus connected to the Vikings) -and Where did you get that "Hate" thing.
Who is "Boss Tweed"? Your English is a bit dodgy mate, so you might quit using inference, metaphor and presumption in the name of clarity. Reactionaries have a tendency to run on assumptions and declaim rather than discuss, whilst being the masters of hate and fear-mongering, Quod erat demonstratum (as you are in a Latin-Italianat e mode of breast-beating) the present state of the nation reflected by Ducé Scalia.
And as for "Nothing came of it" -so you think genocide, murder, rape of the lands was salutary?
Italians came long afterwards, lending their own layers of burgeoning distrust and divisiveness which characterized all the arrivals at Ellis Island from the Irish, Croatians, and so many others landing in the same dish of human salad.
Anyhoo, I'm not sure I see the point of all this and how it relates even peripherally to the subject, so 'nuff from me.
 
 
+5 # Nell H 2012-10-08 13:31
It's arrogance -- pure arrogance.
 
 
+3 # terrison 2012-10-08 22:06
"Scandinavians have added little to our national well being..." From what you gather, "Bright" Light?

My goodness, that sure sounds a lot like Mitt's quote about the 47%. How many American citizens have Scandinavian blood running through their veins, do you think?
 
 
0 # BrightLight 2012-10-09 20:05
Terrison, I want to apologize that was uncalled for and really a violation of my own principles. Sorry
 
 
+3 # darryl 2012-10-08 23:40
Whoever commented about Roland freisler was incorrect about the guillotine.
Those found (declared?) guilty were hanged with piano wire. Left to die slowly twisting.
But, let's not give Benito Scalia ideas.
With his comments, Scalia certainly violates Canon One, but why isn't he challenged more and in Congress?
I think Bernie Sanders is the only person in Congress with a spine.
Nixon got rid of his arch-enemy, Earl Warren, within months of his taking office.
If Obama had a spine, he would get rid of Scalia and his illegimate son, Clarence thomas.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN