RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Reich writes: "So much wealth and power have accumulated at the top of America that our economy and our democracy are seriously threatened. Romney not only represents this problem. He is the living embodiment of it."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


What Mitt Romney Really Represents

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

21 September 12

 

t's not just his giant income or the low tax rates he pays on it. And it's not just the videotape of him berating almost half of America, or his endless gaffes, or his regressive budget policies.

It's something that unites all of this, and connects it to the biggest underlying problem America faces - the unprecedented concentration of wealth and power at the very top that's undermining our economy and destroying our democracy.

Romney just released his 2011 tax returns, showing he paid $1.9 million in taxes on more than $13 million of income last year - for an effective tax rate of 14.1 percent. (He released his 2010 return in January, showing he paid an effective tax rate of 13.9 percent.)

American has had hugely wealthy presidents before - think of Teddy Roosevelt and his distant cousin, Franklin D. Roosevelt; or John F. Kennedy, beneficiary of father Joe's fortune.

But here's the difference. These men were champions of the working class and the poor, and were considered traitors to their own class. Teddy Roosevelt railed against the "malefactors of great wealth," and he busted up the oil and railroad trusts.

FDR thundered against the "economic royalists," raised taxes on the wealthy, and gave average working people the right to form unions - along with Social Security, unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, and a 40-hour workweek.

But Mitt Romney is not a traitor to his class. He is a sponsor of his class. He wants to cut their taxes by $3.7 trillion over the next decade, and hasn't even specified what "loopholes" he'd close to make up for this gigantic giveaway.

And he wants to cut benefits that almost everyone else relies on - Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, food stamps, unemployment insurance, and housing assistance.

He's even a warrior for his class, telling his wealthy followers his job isn't to worry about the "47 percent" of Americans who won't vote for him, whom he calls "victims" and he berates for not paying federal incomes taxes and taking federal handouts.

(He mangles these facts, of course. Almost all working Americans pay federal taxes - and the federal taxes that have been rising fastest for most people are Social Security payroll taxes, which aren't collected on a penny of income over $110,100. Moreover, most of the "47 percent" whom he accuses of taking handouts are on Medicare or Social Security - the biggest "entitlement" programs - which, not incidentally, they paid into during their working lives.)

Money means power. Concentrated wealth at the top means extraordinary power at the top. The reason Romney pays a rate of only 14 percent on $13 million of income in 2011 - a lower rate than many in the middle class - is because he exploits a loophole that allows private equity managers to treat their income as capital gains, taxed at only 15 percent.

And that loophole exists solely because private equity and hedge fund managers have so much political clout - as a result of their huge fortunes and the money they've donated to political candidates - that neither party will remove it.

In other words, everything America is learning about Mitt Romney - his tax returns, his years at Bain Capital, the video of his speech to high-end donors in which he belittles half of America, his gaffes, the budget policies he promotes - repeat and reenforce the same underlying reality.

So much wealth and power have accumulated at the top of America that our economy and our democracy are seriously threatened. Romney not only represents this problem. He is the living embodiment of it.



Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+44 # Gnome de Pluehm 2012-09-22 09:10
Democracy is over; we have a defacto plutocracy. The US is over; we have become hedonistic and have no self control. Hedonism is the final stage of a culture. The US started dying in the 60s and noting will stop it.
 
 
+5 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 11:02
All industrial nations fail at 400 years or so

Read history.
 
 
+11 # tahoevalleylines 2012-09-22 11:27
The industrial nations each developed methodologies to concentrate wealth, primarily by what we now call "hostile takeovers". Takeovers, smaller companies absorbed into larger consolidated corporate entities.

Every Mormon business student has read Senator Frank J. Cannon's primer on business planning as synthesized by Brigham Young over 100 years ago: "Under The Prophet In Utah" explains how an "Organized Religion" can be a worshipper of Mammon...
 
 
+46 # jlohman 2012-09-22 09:31
It is beyond me as to why pundits (Reich included) refuse to identify this nation's #1 problem, campaign payola. I simply wouldn't care what party got elected if I knew they did not pass laws based how much payola flowed to their campaign. Follow the money!!! Every issue is controlled by campaign bribes! Everything else is a small fire!
 
 
+64 # tclose 2012-09-22 10:29
Seems to me Reich did identify this as problem #1 - the whole point of his article is the influence of the wealth and power at the top on our political process.
 
 
+8 # jlohman 2012-09-22 11:14
Reich only said "and connects it to the biggest underlying problem America faces - the unprecedented concentration of wealth and power at the very top ... " But he failed to say (and usually does not say) that the "wealth" is being shared with the politicians that manipulate the rules to allow the public ripoffs to exist.

I like Reich but, sorry, political payola is this nation's #1 problem and all else are little fires. To let people remain distracted and not pointing to the real culprits is not doing us any good.

Political bribes is killing America, "wealth" is not.
 
 
+34 # jlohman 2012-09-22 11:31
Sorry, he does later say "And that loophole exists solely because private equity and hedge fund managers have so much political clout - as a result of their huge fortunes and the money they've donated to political candidates - that neither party will remove it."

But guys, it is NOT JUST the hedge fund managers, it is the defense industry and financial industry and prison industry and virtually EVERY INDUSTRY we care about. We had better wake up before the revolution hits America.
 
 
+42 # cherylpetro 2012-09-22 09:42
Wonder how long it took Romney's accountants to grind out that pack of TAX lies! Did it come straight from the IRS, or was it just a copy of what he might turn in? How can this evasive, insulting man ever be the leader of the country? He is supposed to care for the welfare of us ALL, not a select few! (anyone who forks over donations in the right amounts!) Romney's method of handling problems: Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, Avoidance! Our country DESERVES BETTER THAN THAT!
 
 
-38 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 11:00
Do you know the tax code?

Obviously not.
 
 
+54 # Barbara K 2012-09-22 09:47
Absolutely, Mr. Reisch, Romneyhood is the best example of all that is wrong with our country. The wealthy think they are privileged beyond belief and look down their noses at the rest of us. I believe they actually believe that he will be the KING if he wins the election. He is always saying what HE will do, like he won't have a Congress to deal with. He is not what we want for a President. We want someone who understands what we are going thru and Romneyhood has no clue as to what we go thru on a daily basis -- just so clueless.
 
 
+10 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 10:59
People don't sit around getting a net worth like his.

Americans are duped into thinking that putting money in a CD will beat inflation. Banks are half the problem with money lost and scam savings.
 
 
+37 # zonaman 2012-09-22 12:55
No most of them don't sit around, but that doesn't mean they are doing good work..... I was an Industrial Realtor for a good part of my working life, selling and leasing warehouses, industrial buildings and land.
I once listed for sale a moderate sized tool and die factory. The only individual still working there as general caretaker was a real good man, salt of the earth type. After getting to know him, he related the story of how this 60 plus year old company had been bought by a hedge fund, and put into bankruptcy soon afterwards, which stripped all of the former workers of their pensions. I was young and naive enough then to not fully grasp what he meant, but I could clearly see the pain in his eyes.

The idea of having a person who did this sort of thing for profit and maybe pleasure as POTUS just makes me sickl.
 
 
+1 # letsfixit 2012-09-23 07:30
and again, back to the tax code and ethic and honor and integrity...thi s nation has NONE of that in the leadership positions. If what happened to this is such a crime WHY DON'T WE STOP IT.... WHY?? Goodyear corporation almost went under due to same. Look at Rubbermaid...sa me equipment bought and shipped to china under pressure of walmart for a lower priced product..americ ans??? OUT OF WORK. Car production out of country...OUT OF WORK. What Frank Lorenzo started with Continental Airlines became a trend. Again, if this was such a travesty where was the congress in protection of business? NOW WHERE. The issue is whether we can now see that there are no good paying jobs as they have left the shores...that's why unemployment with true blue collar production oriented jobs, are not there.
 
 
+2 # doneasley 2012-09-24 18:40
Quoting Barbara K:
... We want someone who understands what we are going thru and Romneyhood has no clue as to what we go thru on a daily basis -- just so clueless.


Barb, it's not that Rmoney doesn't have a clue, he just doesn't care - about us anyway. He understands completely. If you listened to the speech before his wealthy buddies, in so many words he told them he's going to stuff as much money in their pockets as possible while he doesn't give a damn about the 47% of us shiftless no goods. If you look up the word "plutocrat" in the dictionary, sure enough Rmoney's picture would be there.

How can any average American with common sense vote for this WOLF in sheep's clothing to guard our chicken coop?
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 07:51
"How can any average American with common sense vote for this WOLF in sheep's clothing to guard our chicken coop?"
Because the once proud republican party has become a cult.
 
 
+35 # Jaysson Brae 2012-09-22 10:01
If you keep allowing disequalized campaign money to buy-off elections, the guaranteed result is rule-by-the-ric h or Plutocracy.

Why don't progressive critics, like Robert Reich and others, start using their journalistic high-visibility to lead a specific, national movement for public/equalize d financing of all federal election campaigns?
No reform could be more important to democracy than doing this!
What the hell are they waiting for?
Total Plutocracy?
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 07:52
Time to start protesting "Citizens United". Where's your sign?
 
 
+35 # MD426 2012-09-22 10:10
It's not Romney, or the wealthy and the corporations who control congress that are the problem. The vile and the greedy will always try to grab power. It's the astounding number of people who will vote for him and for a congress that is beholding to the plutocrats who pay for their campaigns. I am stunned that this is anywhere near a close race!
 
 
+17 # maddave 2012-09-22 10:11
Reich has defined the big problem well, albeit circuitously.

STAGNANT money in any economy is a liability. No economy can exist, much less grow.if its money is not moving. Currently a massive percentage of the money that once moved down to us workers and consumers is being syphoned off by the super-rich. And worse, it's being sent to foreign banks to avoid US taxation.

The primitive mantra "Tax bad! No tax, that good!" is heard from on high by the rich, and witless, worthless waifs below echo it back, even louder - as if it were their own. WTF? Why?

Here's one reason - you can easily extrapolate more on your own: Between 25% & 40% of all working class Americans have "serious" retirement plans whose core asset is their expectation of "winning the lottery". "When", not "if"! And of course, when they collect, they don't want to pay a lot of taxes.

For We The People, our economy is broken. Our vaunted middle class is vanishing & poverty is surging, Sufficient stagnant money exists to fix it, but something or someone must blast it loose - for ,instance a Congress that is not owned by re-election contributors. If not that, Beloved, then further down the path lurks a far more bitter choice - if we are given a choice at all. It will be between an enlightened dictatorship and full-blown, third-world-typ e plutocracy.

What do YOU suggest?
 
 
+3 # letsfixit 2012-09-23 07:33
I suggest we stop the bickering and find solutions that don't eviscerate the capital sources, don't allow people to possess multiple billions in worth. I suggest we change the tax code that allows the consumer to function again. I suggest we understand that professsional sports has taken the ability of the middle class man to go to a pro game and pay ten bucks for a beer and line the pockets of the ultra wealthy and corporate positions. I suggest that we stop giving money to people off shore in amounts that we have lost track of and can't balance the checkbook anymore. I suggest that instead of maintaining status quo that we realize in order for this nation to survive it will take suffering on ALL sides including people who slave 24 hours straight trying to make their businesses survive...not on handouts.
 
 
+20 # DPM 2012-09-22 10:12
Many people, at the top, are genetically predisposed to think as they do, according to some recent studies. Just as others are genetically predisposed to the way they think. Those at the top are there because of their wealth. Many are making a "grab" for everything, because they can and it is the only way, in their minds, they can "move forward". They will just "naturally" enslave everyone not as powerful. They live in a different world than the rest of us. They honestly believe their way is the "natural" progression of civilization. If you don't want to be a "slave", then their power (wealth) must be stripped away until they are more amenable to everyone having a decent life. It has happened before, in human history. It must happen again. It is up to us to do it. How? Well, unfortunately, they won't give up without a fight. A long and, I hate to say, bloody fight. Be prepared.
 
 
-70 # jtatu 2012-09-22 10:12
"Exploiting looholes" by having capital gains income. C'mon Reich you're just putting a negative spin on a decent person who pays his taxes in addition to making charitable contributions that total almost 30% of his income. Compare that to Joe Biden. The Demo leadership is narcissistic and simply wants to exploit other peoples' money to win favor with the masses. There has never been a more divisive, hate-filled administration in the White House. We need to get them out ASAP and get back to work.
 
 
-49 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 11:04
Amen amen amen!!!!
 
 
+24 # DFrenkel@changecatalyst.com 2012-09-22 11:09
Quoting jtatu:
"Exploiting looholes" by having capital gains income. C'mon Reich you're just putting a negative spin on a decent person who pays his taxes in addition to making charitable contributions that total almost 30% of his income. Compare that to Joe Biden. The Demo leadership is narcissistic and simply wants to exploit other peoples' money to win favor with the masses. There has never been a more divisive, hate-filled administration in the White House. We need to get them out ASAP and get back to work.
That charitable giving may well be to his own charitable trust fund, which is part of a complex trust scheme. Those complex trusts are just another tax evasion scheme. No wonder he does not show us his returns. We might see where those funds really go.
 
 
-43 # jtatu 2012-09-22 11:28
You have no idea of what you are talking about. Do you have any idea of the regulations that define and are imposed on charities to assure that they are charities. According to word-spinner Reich every one with a 401K is exploiting a tax loophole. So is anyone buying a home instead of renting. Reich also disingenuously mischaracterize s what Romney said. He clearly said that he could not get the 47% to vote for him so there was no need for him to try. That's a far cry from saying that it is not his job to worry about the 47%.
 
 
+20 # Syntara 2012-09-22 12:47
Romney said the 47% expect free health care...you name it. I resent that. I receive Social Security disability and I don't expect anything 'free.' I will pay for my health care, etc., and in case anyone isn't clear on this, the Social Security Admin keeps a portion of my Social Security benefits to pay in federal income taxes that ARE NOT for Medicare.
 
 
+27 # zonaman 2012-09-22 13:04
"And so my job is not to worry about those people."

Direct quote....Sounds pretty definitive to me
 
 
-33 # jtatu 2012-09-22 14:07
He was clearly speaking of campaigning and you know it.
 
 
+4 # overanddone 2012-09-23 02:20
Why hasn't he added the line to his stump speech, his bussed in supporters, could be given a peanut each time he says 47% when they cheer wildly and make it a huge applause line.
Fox could make a banner out of it, maybe give the name to a segment, the 47% hour.
 
 
+5 # Working Class 2012-09-23 16:03
Quoting DFrenkel@changecatalyst.com:
Quoting jtatu:
"Exploiting looholes" by having capital gains income. C'mon Reich you're just putting a negative spin on a decent person who pays his taxes in addition to making charitable contributions that total almost 30% of his income. Compare that to Joe Biden. The Demo leadership is narcissistic and simply wants to exploit other peoples' money to win favor with the masses. There has never been a more divisive, hate-filled administration in the White House. We need to get them out ASAP and get back to work.
That charitable giving may well be to his own charitable trust fund, which is part of a complex trust scheme. Those complex trusts are just another tax evasion scheme. No wonder he does not show us his returns. We might see where those funds really go.

In 2009, to avoid criminal charges over an illegal tax avoidance scheme, the Swiss bank UBS agreed to pay $780 million in fines and turn over account info on 4500 US citizes who were using the illegal tax dodge. The IRS announced an amnesty program for anyone who wanted to come clean and approximately 14,000 US customers of UBS paid their taxes and penalty owed to avoid criminal charges. The amount of money recovered was approximately $5 billion. A person's tax return would show they took advantage of the amnesty program. Obviously Romney realizes this would cause more harm to his election chances than the harm caused by not showing us his returns.
 
 
+19 # zonaman 2012-09-22 12:58
Romney  "looks like Richard Nixon" 

Peggy Noonan     Conservative columnist WallStreet Journal  9/21/12

He sure has that "cold-fish" look and “wooden” aura about him..... and I doubt he would pass “The Nixon Test”.......Wou ld you buy a used car from this man?.....
 
 
+24 # James Smith 2012-09-22 10:18
Not only will Romney complete the transformation into a plutocracy, it will also be totalitarian theocracy. Guess which church will then have the most control?
 
 
+7 # CC1951 2012-09-22 11:57
I Agree with you completely!!!
 
 
+22 # cordleycoit 2012-09-22 10:26
Of course the Rethugs worship the man and his money. What higher calling can a Republican have than making money off the sweat of labor. Imagine his joy at stealing pensions and health care from the workers he has broken.I would love to hear him giving the blessing at his table. Bless the Father for letting him steal from people of all and no faith. Thanking the Father for helping him steal the widows mite and the child's education. Romney thanking God for showing him new ways to impverish the weak.
 
 
+22 # tclose 2012-09-22 10:37
This is a concise and powerful summary of the current state of affairs. Dr. Reich is to be commended for the clarity of his argument.

Now if there was only some way that this commentary could be read by all Americans. The outcome would be a clear refutation of the policies of the wealth and power machine (by both Repubs and Democrats).
 
 
-42 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 11:06
Sounds like a communist argument to me

All Indians and no chiefs
 
 
+1 # Feral Dogz 2012-09-24 09:07
Quoting letsfixit:
Sounds like a communist argument to me

All Indians and no chiefs


Like that's a bad thing?
 
 
+19 # mdhome 2012-09-22 10:53
"the federal taxes that have been rising fastest for most people are Social Security payroll taxes, which aren't collected on a penny of income over $110,100. Moreover, most of the "47 percent" whom he accuses of taking handouts are on Medicare or Social Security - the biggest "entitlement" programs - which, not incidentally, they paid into during their working lives"

The payroll and medicare tax only applies to "earned" income, capital gains does NOT! RoMoney paid nothing into social security and medicare. WHY does he think the people who have paid into the system does NOT deserve their promised return on their investment in Social Security?
 
 
+1 # Syntara 2012-09-23 21:02
Oh, but starting either 2013 or 2014 under the ACA, Romney WOULD start paying 3.8% tax toward the use of the ACA. In other words, he'll have to pay for the Medicare benefits he will no doubt use should major illness strike him. Only now, under the as yet implemented provisions of the ACA, he'll have to pay for Medicare just like the rest of us -- right out of his capital gains (currently un-taxed) income.
 
 
-42 # letsfixit 2012-09-22 10:56
Sometimes this guy is nuts. He blames a man for the absolute inexcusable behaviors of congress. If Romney is so bad then Obama is off the chart. I'd like to compare writers lifetime of giving to romneys as a Mormon. We cannot help it if tax laws are bonkers.

We continuously charge one man with the faults of 535.
 
 
+13 # zonaman 2012-09-22 13:10
Peggy Noonan conservatine columnist WSJ 9/20/12

“It's time to admit the Romney campaign is an incompetent one. It's not big, it's not brave, it's not thoughtfully tackling great issues. It's always been too small for the moment. All the activists, party supporters and big donors should be pushing for change.”
 
 
+20 # Peace Anonymous 2012-09-22 10:57
Think about our gradual decent to where we are at today. Think about the change in values. At the center pf this has been the change from an economic ideology based on the philosophy of John Keynes to the philosophy of Friedman which was embraced by Reagan and almost every business school since.

If profit, at any cost, continues to be the goal of our society, and we are willing to kill to achieve that profit, which is exemplified by the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, then where do we end up? Ultimately there is a winner in a game of monopoly. Ultimately when it comes to the game of empire building we all end up enslaved to the system, regardless of whether that is a dictator or a board of directors.

Can we continue down the path we are on? Is this working?? Elizabeth Warren said it best at the DNC, "The game is rigged." And Romney wants to be the front man for the corporations that are in charge of spending your tax dollar. In whose best interest will they function?
 
 
-26 # jtatu 2012-09-22 11:41
No it is not working. One thing that did work, dramatically, was the 1996 welfare reform which HHS has gutted because the Obama insiders do not believe as do 90% of Americans that able-bodied people on welfare under TAFNF should be required to do anything in exchange for welfare payments. "Welfare as we know it" is a dismal failure at this point. It started in 1964 when only 7% of children were born out of wedlock. Today the number is 47%. I understand that the risk of poverty drops 80% for children born in a traditional marriage.
 
 
+6 # Working Class 2012-09-23 16:09
Quoting jtatu:
No it is not working. One thing that did work, dramatically, was the 1996 welfare reform which HHS has gutted because the Obama insiders do not believe as do 90% of Americans that able-bodied people on welfare under TAFNF should be required to do anything in exchange for welfare payments. "Welfare as we know it" is a dismal failure at this point. It started in 1964 when only 7% of children were born out of wedlock. Today the number is 47%. I understand that the risk of poverty drops 80% for children born in a traditional marriage.

Obama allowed, at Republican governors request, waives for the existing "work test" under TAFNA. This allowed the Governors to experiment with alternative idea to get people to work. The conditin for the waivers was that they have to show they acually work, or the waiver goes away. I know that isn't how FOX told the story, but then that's what they do....tell self-serving stories.
 
 
+4 # Syntara 2012-09-23 21:14
Are you saying that if welfare didn't exist, only in wed-lock births would occur? It's unrealistic to think that by removing welfare to families they will be encouraged to only have children in legally-married two-parent families. You aren't going to encourage men or women to stay in relationships for 'the sake of the children' and it's unrealistic to think forcing people to stay together IS 'for the sake of the children.' You can't fix human nature. If you take away welfare you're just going to end up with children born out of wed-lock who will have even less than they do now. In Mississippi, a recent statistic noted that there were more infants who died before reaching one year in age than there were abortions performed. Removing welfare is not going to fix people's position to match yours.
 
 
+3 # Syntara 2012-09-23 21:07
You got me thinking back to the upper-level under-grad business courses I took circa 1986 -- well into the Reagan presidency. What I most recall were the instructions of the professor when telling us how to gather information for our final course presentations: "find it any way you can...listen in to what others in the course are doing...look over their shoulders to find answers you can't find...steal their information for your own presentations.. .and what you can't find or get your hands on or outright steal...make it up. Just be so convincing I will never doubt you."
 
 
+23 # DFrenkel@changecatalyst.com 2012-09-22 11:06
My bet is that most of the charitable giving of Romney, the $4 million has been given to his own charitable trust. This is a scheme invented by the Mellons, called a complex trust. He will also have family trusts. The charitable trustvonly has to donate 5 pct per year to maintain its status and the rest can be lianed back to the family trusts.
I feel sure this is why he will not release the returns because it would reveal much of that detail which would then be traced to his own trust.

This scheme is used by many very wealth people and is legal but hardly honest charitable behavior. Companies specialize in setting these up as a way to shelter income, not be great philanthropists .
 
 
-3 # letsfixit 2012-09-23 07:37
you have to be kidding me. Romney does not NEED THIS JOB...and neither does Obama. They are rich...and you don't point at obama. You again, are pointing out the faults of the tax code. That's how CEO's of company's don't pay taxes at all....they set up a foundation with a living wage that allows them to drive a mercedes and other, and the rest is based on the foundation. This has been going on for years and we change nothing. You cannot find these solutions in Quicken or Turbotax...you must hire a tax attorney and accountant. Until congress, who supposedly works for us changes that code, nothing will change.
 
 
+13 # eyarden 2012-09-22 11:06
You have convinced me. I will not vote for Romney, Having heard Dr. Jill Stein in the debates for Governor of MA, twice, the first time against Romney (R) and the second time against Deval Partick (D), I am convinced that she is the only candidate who full understands your argument and will vote for her.
Elie Yarden
Cambridge
 
 
+17 # whisperindave 2012-09-22 11:17
I was posting exactly this message a week ago when the news hit, on my FB page. Of course no one reads my FB page...but Reich is correct. No one is pinning blame on Romney for being a plutocrat. Reich is sayin he REPRESENTS all the plutocrats who are destroying American Democracy. Money is NOT free speech. Corporations are NOT humans, they have no "rights" to vote, since every one of their members already has the right to vote. A corporation can now vote millions of times AGAINST the better interests of their members! But Romney continues to parrot all these manifestos of the wealthy. Because he wants their money. He is not presidential grade material by any means but he continues to symbolize American Corpocracy and the decline of the working class and the American Dream. We'll just see how badly e needs us "victims" come November.
 
 
+27 # Davethinks 2012-09-22 11:32
Like the Mitt-kins, I am unemployed. Unlike Mitt, I do not have nearly $14 million in income. I pay taxes all the time, but due to no income, I pay no income tax. My melting away retirement money and my Social Security (that I paid for when I was employed) let me eat, but my car has to take the stairs while Mitt's car uses a private elevator. Mr. Romney has no idea at all what real life is like. How dare he try to destroy my pitiable life style to aid his rich cohorts!
 
 
-13 # Sea Star RN 2012-09-22 11:48
Why are pundits like Robert Reich spending so much time going after Mitt Romney?
He's doing a good job of his own self-destruction.

Perhaps he on behalf of the DEM party machine are worried about the well-being of the DEM party and rightfully so.

In 2009, with the House, Senate and White House, they failed to give us good health care reform, even as far as keeping Medicare for All out of the discussion.
They are responsible for keeping us an indentured labor force, working to have health care as our real wages continue to drop off.

Nothing would have bolstered the economy, created jobs, increased government revenue and decreased government expense like HR 676.

Every single Progressive Caucus member in the House and Bernie Sanders abandoned the fight and voted instead for the Affordable Care Act.

Shame on them all and any pundit that covers for them!
 
 
+2 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-09-23 19:54
I tend to read mostly comments with the ratings in red, in search for new info or points of view, or as a way to challenge my understanding.

No such luck on this page so far...
 
 
+1 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 08:02
President Obama tried to give us a single payer Health Care Plan, but the tea-bags would disrupt any town-hall meeting that had someone trying to explain the plan to the American people (typical brown-shirt tactic). So, President Obama had to settle for whatever the republicans would give him.
 
 
+17 # fredboy 2012-09-22 11:49
Living proof that crap floats.
It's also evident that Mitt and his Igor hate their grandchildren, as they plan to eliminate their future.
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 08:04
"
It's also evident that Mitt and his Igor hate their grandchildren, as they plan to eliminate their future."

Oh my dear, where did you ever get that idea? Mitt has provided quite well for his off-spring. Think of all those off-shore accounts just accumulating more and more of our money.
 
 
+19 # Vardoz 2012-09-22 12:02
Do you know if you are getting Social Security which you were forced to pay into all your working lives, for many 50 yrs and you make more than $14,000 per yr. they will take out a 3rd of your Social Security! So if you make for example $20,000 per yr a poverty wage, they will withhold a 3rd. I would like to know who decided if one is making a pathetic $14,000 per yr, that they have a right to garnish your entitlement that you paid for,for 5 decades! And they do this as they are giving gigantic tax cuts to the top, subsidies, off shore accounts and loops holes to those at the top! Those who get Social Security spend it, those at the top don't. So people are being deprived of their Social Security which is already taxed by the way and someone decided to lower the bar to $14,000 per yr & anything over will lower your payments! This is an utter outrage! This is our money that we were foreced to pay out and is due to us at 62 + regardless of our current earnings. Even the poorest of the poor only make $14,000 per yr! This is what happens when corrupt entities write our laws and policies!
 
 
+5 # CC1951 2012-09-22 12:10
There is so much I agree with I'm these comments. I do feel like one of the things that has gone awry, is the fact that the general public is not aware of the tax codes; the loopholes; what large sums of money.
can do. I must I am not aware, partially because of my lack of interest, but perhaps because I'm part of the 47% that Romney HATES.
 
 
+7 # Syntara 2012-09-22 12:42
Mitt Romney will have to pay 3.8% of his capital gains income for Medicare starting in 2013, I believe. Or 2014. Either way, he'll have to share the burden for covering the cost of Medicare he will no doubt take advantage of should he ever need it. I can't see him turning down the use of Medicare on the grounds that, since he didn't have to put in his contribution for the service he won't utilize it should he incur medical bills. Far from it. Mr. Romney I hope you lose the election and become responsible for yourself by having to contribute to Medicare -- even on income you didn't earn. Responsibility to take care of yourself, Mr. Romney, is a fact even you cannot run away from with your wealth. NO FREE RIDES.
 
 
-28 # 2wmcg2 2012-09-22 13:23
So much vitriol - I'm supporting Romney.
 
 
+8 # Vardoz 2012-09-22 13:27
Romney and Ryan don't seem to think that a good job market or a good wage is important. This congress has been doing everything to prevent job growth. People need to survive, put food on their tables, pay their utilities, gas, clothes, child care, phone bills, bus fair you name it. People cannot survuve without money or with a poverty level wage. If these guys really gave a damn about jobs and good wages they would have made sure our job market was protected. How the hell do they think that tens of millions of students who are saddled with the highest college debt in the world can go out into a world of no jobs or low paying service jobs and still pay back their debt? Are they slouches too? They are our future, our seeds for the next generation. So what the hell are they supposed to do when we have an unregulated job outsourcing policy NAFTA that has no interest in making sure our job market is protected? A healthly job market is the backbone of a nation. If you take that away what is left? Tens of millions of poor, students and people of all ages and all walks of life who do not deserve to die in the gutter so that corporations can use slave labor over seas and so that people like Romney can stash their millions off shore!!!!!
 
 
-16 # seeuingoa 2012-09-22 14:07
Romney is of course a no go.
Obama too.

Does anyone really want four more years
with

Indefinite detention
kill list
civilians killed by drones
tar sand pipeline
arctic drilling
taxcut for the rich
violation of 1st amendment
corporate fascism

Vote green/third party/alternative.

Better to vote for a loser than against
your principles.
 
 
+9 # unitedwestand 2012-09-23 16:42
"Your principles" will get us a worse administration than GWBush. Didn't that have great results? With Romney/Ryan, lickety-split we will bomb Iran; they'll push for further on draconian women's issues; they'll waste a whole lot of time diminishing Obamacare; privatize Medicare, Social Security and destroy more social programs; educations could only be afforded by the rich. And to top it off with a big cherry on top, they could possibly place maybe three NeoCon Supreme Court Justices.

Yes I have my principles, but they are not to further destroy the great USA as we've know it and want to return to. So shame on you for promoting a protest vote.
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2012-09-25 08:07
Wrong......beca use if you throw your vote away, another gwbush will be back in the white house to finish the job started by good ol ronny.
 
 
+3 # Gnome de Pluehm 2012-09-22 14:10
@ Vardos;
"Do you know if you are getting Social Security which you were forced to pay into all your working lives, for many 50 yrs and you make more than $14,000 per yr. they will take out a 3rd of your Social Security! So if you make for example $20,000 per yr a poverty wage, they will withhold a 3rd."

This is misleading. Will it not be 1/3 of the amount over $14,000? Further, is that not tied to age or the retiree? Further than that, is this not tied to those still generating income in some form after retirement?
 
 
0 # Gnome de Pluehm 2012-09-22 14:17
Paul Fussell wrote in "Class" that there are 9 social classes in the US. Persons in any one of these classes have a meager understanding of the class immediately above or below and no understanding at all of the problems two or more classes above or below.

While you might denigrate the problems of those above, they would feel as dislocated, impoverished, and ruined if they were reduced to your level, remember that those in classes below you would have the same attitude toward you. You would have the same feelings, but to them it would not be unjust. We are all insulated.
 
 
+7 # Nell H 2012-09-22 14:56
Romney has no comprehension of the true nature of America. He knows only the elite world where he is served by others.

VOTE DEMOCRATIC !
 
 
-11 # egbegb 2012-09-22 17:19
Robert Reich:

In the past I listened to you and Mario Cuomo as thinking
progressives. You seem to have become an ideologue. Would that
be because you want to make a living based on your political
publications. Otherwise, why have you changed what you say
to the public and expanded it from explaining to the
public your analysis of the problems TO your 'views' of the
solutions? Can you explain, please?

Many political economists

("Economics" is not a science by any
metric; it is "Political Economics")

have excellent (profound!!) analysis skills - science
is necessary to do that and their scientific skills
grant them the insight to analyze and explain with
clarity and excellence. Very few of them can recommend
engineering (efficient and sustainable) solutions (Lord Keynes,
Krugman, Stieglitz and most other "economists"
who became "writers"). Their solutions (Federal Government
creates jobs, Social Security, Medicare, ...) are
simply not sustainable in any long term sense when initiated or
when 'revisited'. Any Engineer or Actuary recognizes the
long term fallacy of "progressive [political, vote buying, FDR]"
solutions.

Math is required!

Ed Bradford
Ph.D. Physics
Retired
 
 
-4 # letsfixit 2012-09-23 07:39
math IS required!! And as long as people continue to despise the very thing that this nation runs on and uses against the people who don't understand...no thing will change. Derivatives?? What did that??? MATH. We are in big trouble.

Statistics are killing us.
 
 
+1 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-09-23 19:56
I am living proof you are wrong.
 
 
+7 # giraffee2012 2012-09-22 21:18
IF one does not make big bucks, how can one even thnk of voting GOP/TP? I fail to understand how we can vote ourselves into a nation of a few have all and the 99 can eat dirt.

VOTE in 2012 - straight DEM/ Obama and get all ur unregistered DEM friends registered and to the polls. How many elections have DEMS lost bc they don't vote? Oh yeah, there are more now that cannot vote bc the GOP/TP suppress votes so YOUR vote is needed even more.

I hate Rove, "W" (& company) but Romney is stupider than "W" - yes, hard to believe but aren't those who will vot for him even dumber?

JUST VOTE - in CA we can even register online and mail-in ballots - so if you can - just do it
 
 
+5 # chrisconnolly 2012-09-23 07:41
Isn't the biggest entitlement program the one that gives big corporations subsidies and bailouts. Corporations who collect the payroll taxes from their employees then don't pay those taxes to the state are also the ones who are receiving the biggest entitlements. Corporate welfare is what's killing our economy not the social safety net.
 
 
+1 # fhunter 2012-09-23 13:26
In short, the superrich embarked on exchanging DEMOCRACY for PLUTOCRACY. Unfortunately Obama did not undewrstand this, because he had a clear chance to stop it for good. He did not do it! Incompetent advosors, bad advise. The trouble is that we and our children will have to suffer for it.
 
 
-1 # akonkawaproject@gmail.com 2012-09-23 15:25
Our BIGGEST underlying PROBLEM is ALREADY BEHIND US! -- It WAS the UNPRECEDENTED CONCENTRATION of WEALTH and POWER that BANKRUPTED our ECONOMY!... HIJACKING our DEMOCRACY FOREVER! -- AFTER Lyndon JOHNSON had BOTH KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATED!
 
 
0 # letsfixit 2012-09-24 08:58
Standby for the collapse of this nation.

Because - no one will work together. Only against each other just to soothe their egos.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN