Borosage writes: "The young men and women who serve in our military return from fighting in the longest wars in American history to the worst jobs market in generations."
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., speaks about the veterans jobs bill killed by Republicans in the Senate. (photo: Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP)
Senate Republicans Shaft the Vets
20 September 12
he young men and women who serve in our military return from fighting in the longest wars in American history to the worst jobs market in generations. They suffer higher unemployment rates than the general population: More than one in 10 is officially counted as unemployed, and that does not include those who have stopped looking for work or are forced to work part-time.
So yesterday, in one final vile act before adjournment for the elections, Senate Republicans used a point of order to block passage of the Veteran's Jobs Act that would have provided a modest $1 billion to hire veterans to tend federal lands or gain priority in hiring at police and fire departments. The bill was crafted with bipartisan support. Fifty-eight senators supported the bill, but Republicans put together the 40 votes needed to block its passage.
Why shaft the very veterans whose service politicians sanctimoniously celebrate at every occasion?
Is it because unemployed veterans are part of Mitt Romney's scorned 47 percent? Unemployed, they pay no taxes. They may feel they are "entitled" to the health care benefits they are guaranteed. Many take advantage of training and education benefits. Perhaps Republican senators simply didn't want to help these "victims" feel entitled to a job in addition.
Or is it because Senate Republicans remain committed to block any action that will produce jobs in their monomaniacal effort to defeat Barack Obama? In the midst of the worst recession in generations, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell famously announced at the beginning of the term that "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." Republicans then launched a scorched-earth policy of obstruction, using the filibuster to block everything they could. They worked overtime to weaken the president's initial recovery act, cutting its size and larding it with ineffective tax cuts. Once Republicans took the House, they joined in blocking additional jobs measures, including most recently the president's American Jobs Act, while forcing cuts in spending that cost jobs. And then, of course, they denounce the president for failing to fix the economy.
Or perhaps Senate Republicans are simply fools, not knaves. Conservative Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma explained his vote against putting unemployed veterans to work by arguing that making progress on the nation's debt was the best way to help them in the long-term. "We ought to do nothing now that makes the problem worse for our kids and grandkids," he said. In the long-term, as John Maynard Keynes once said, we are all dead – a comment that gains grim import as the Defense Department reports that veterans are killing themselves at the rate of one every 80 minutes
These same Republicans squandered over $3 trillion on the unfunded "war of choice" in Iraq. And now spending a billion on veterans imposes too big a burden on our grandchildren. This is disgraceful politics.
Naturally, the two Republican senators in close re-election races - Scott Brown in Massachusetts and Dean Heller of Nevada - were given permission to vote for the bill. The rest either are in safe seats or assume that Americans will forget by the time they come up for re-election. They'll salute the troops, march in the parades, celebrate the returning heroes, and call for larding more billions into the Pentagon. But a small jobs programs for veterans in need of work? Not this year, not before the election.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
More seriously, how unpatriotic is this???
As long as stupid Americans continue to volunteer to serve as patriotic citizens, while the sons and daughters of the rich are not affected there will continue to be wars. As soon as there is a draft and ALL are vulnerable to be drafted the rich will find another way to make money instead of selling military hardware for wars. If several congressmen’s sons came home with legs and arms missing or in caskets things would change immediately. But as long as the stupid people continue to volunteer under the premise they are so dedicated to serving their country, nothing is going to change.
Think about it 100,000 in Afghanistan to change attitudes of totally uneducated idiots that have been that way for 1000 years is insane. However, several American companies are making the best profits they have made in many years, and the donations for the politicians just keep rolling in.
Remember when Libya got really stupid and took down an American airplane. What happened – Reagan ordered the bombing of the leader’s home and killed one of his daughters and others. Guess what - didn’t hear a peep out of Libya for 25 yrs and all it took was a very few airplanes and ONE bombing run. And how did WWII end? Again two bombs on two cities in Japan and it was all over. Truman was my hero, and I haven’t seen one politician since with his level of leadership.
It is all about the money.
1. Mittens evaded Vitnam by being a "missionary" in FRANCE! (DIDN'T KNOW YOU COULD BE EXEMPT FOR DECIDING TO PUSH YOUR PERSONAL FAITH ON OTHERS... that puts others who do not (e.g., Buddhists, Jews and Hindus) at a disadvantage.
2.Not ONE of his (5 ?) strapping sons chose to join any military organization not even at West Point or USNA level -- even the British royal family joins up, but Mitt's too-aristocrati c-to-be-part-of -the-nation family just spends its time making big buck$ and/or cheating others out of them (and in the case of GST Steel getting a US taxpayer 'bailout' to boot!!)
If you're a returning veteran, the Republicans will gladly let you go jobless if it means making the job numbers look worse, therefore (presumably) making Obama look worse.
If it makes returning veterans feel any better: you are not alone. The Republican Party doesn't care about any of us. They and their financial benefactors have US holdings and do business in the US -- taking advantage of US tax laws, other legistlation favorable to business, lax supervision, and tax loopholes -- but their customers are pretty much the entire world.
They don't care if you go jobless, hungry, and uncared for. They don't care if the whole country goes to hell. They only care about this quarter's bottom line.
Sorry, but it really is as simple as that.
American soldiers have been blown up, shot, decapitated, stop lossed, sent back again and again to the point that they are in significant measure profoundly altered, mentally, and their recompense is a one-fingered to salute to heaven.
This is what our elected representatives do to young men and women whom they have put through a meat grinder? Allegedly, address the debt?
Well then why are they asking for further tax cuts for the wealthy? The cuts will shift burden to those same children and grandchildren while those whom old men send to die are not entitled to the nation's respect and gratitude?
If you live long enough, everything comes around again. This was the way our soldiers were treated when they came back from Viet Nam while being blamed for executive and congressional military blunders.
I am revolted and shamed by the senators' venality, especially McCain.
From the House, I expect puerile behavior.
Because House seats are in play in November, elections every two years, the right's 6-year termed senators took over the task of stonewalling so as to deny Obama a second term, just as the senate minority leader promised to do.
Sick, sick, sick.
They'd rather that they die than have to deal with what's left of combat and support personnel if they survive conflict, including having to handle depleted uranium and other lethal materiél, PTSD, suicide, family violence even unto spousal murder, many foreclosures, no work and possibly turning against the culture that recruited and propagandized them.
And then there's the willingness to hugely finance all this BEFORE the fact to further their own ambitions but not to clean up the mess at home and abroad.
Cowards is too good a word!
Wrong!
Unemployed they pay no INCOME tax.
They still certainly pay for instance the sales tax, thank you very much.
Don't swallow the Rmoney bait, hook and sinker.
http://www.humortimes.com/12689/senators-who-vote-for-war-but-not-warriors/
RSS feed for comments to this post