RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Borosage writes: "The young men and women who serve in our military return from fighting in the longest wars in American history to the worst jobs market in generations."

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., speaks about the veterans jobs bill killed by Republicans in the Senate. (photo: Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP)
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., speaks about the veterans jobs bill killed by Republicans in the Senate. (photo: Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP)


Senate Republicans Shaft the Vets

By Robert Borosage, Campaign for America's Future

20 September 12

 

he young men and women who serve in our military return from fighting in the longest wars in American history to the worst jobs market in generations. They suffer higher unemployment rates than the general population: More than one in 10 is officially counted as unemployed, and that does not include those who have stopped looking for work or are forced to work part-time.

So yesterday, in one final vile act before adjournment for the elections, Senate Republicans used a point of order to block passage of the Veteran's Jobs Act that would have provided a modest $1 billion to hire veterans to tend federal lands or gain priority in hiring at police and fire departments. The bill was crafted with bipartisan support. Fifty-eight senators supported the bill, but Republicans put together the 40 votes needed to block its passage.

Why shaft the very veterans whose service politicians sanctimoniously celebrate at every occasion?

Is it because unemployed veterans are part of Mitt Romney's scorned 47 percent? Unemployed, they pay no taxes. They may feel they are "entitled" to the health care benefits they are guaranteed. Many take advantage of training and education benefits. Perhaps Republican senators simply didn't want to help these "victims" feel entitled to a job in addition.

Or is it because Senate Republicans remain committed to block any action that will produce jobs in their monomaniacal effort to defeat Barack Obama? In the midst of the worst recession in generations, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell famously announced at the beginning of the term that "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." Republicans then launched a scorched-earth policy of obstruction, using the filibuster to block everything they could. They worked overtime to weaken the president's initial recovery act, cutting its size and larding it with ineffective tax cuts. Once Republicans took the House, they joined in blocking additional jobs measures, including most recently the president's American Jobs Act, while forcing cuts in spending that cost jobs. And then, of course, they denounce the president for failing to fix the economy.

Or perhaps Senate Republicans are simply fools, not knaves. Conservative Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma explained his vote against putting unemployed veterans to work by arguing that making progress on the nation's debt was the best way to help them in the long-term. "We ought to do nothing now that makes the problem worse for our kids and grandkids," he said. In the long-term, as John Maynard Keynes once said, we are all dead – a comment that gains grim import as the Defense Department reports that veterans are killing themselves at the rate of one every 80 minutes

These same Republicans squandered over $3 trillion on the unfunded "war of choice" in Iraq. And now spending a billion on veterans imposes too big a burden on our grandchildren. This is disgraceful politics.

Naturally, the two Republican senators in close re-election races - Scott Brown in Massachusetts and Dean Heller of Nevada - were given permission to vote for the bill. The rest either are in safe seats or assume that Americans will forget by the time they come up for re-election. They'll salute the troops, march in the parades, celebrate the returning heroes, and call for larding more billions into the Pentagon. But a small jobs programs for veterans in need of work? Not this year, not before the election.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+30 # freeportguy 2012-09-21 19:05
To republicans, military people are like babies: they only care for them when they are still in. Once they are out,mthey are on their own...

More seriously, how unpatriotic is this???
 
 
+11 # angelfish 2012-09-21 23:14
You're right freeportguy, you took the words right out of my mouth! Fellow citizens, Register, help Family, Friends and Acquaintances to do the same, Get appropriate I.D. for your State, and GET to the Polls on November 6th and never, EVER vote for one of these simple, sorry Ultra-Partisan excuses for humanity! They are NOT Americans they are FAILURES, refusing to do their job! Exactly what IS their job, you may ask? To HELP Americans, ESPECIALLY those who have put their Lives on the Line for those SAME sorry a**es who deny them aid and comfort! Shame on them!
 
 
+3 # HowardMH 2012-09-22 07:38
It is all about the money.
As long as stupid Americans continue to volunteer to serve as patriotic citizens, while the sons and daughters of the rich are not affected there will continue to be wars. As soon as there is a draft and ALL are vulnerable to be drafted the rich will find another way to make money instead of selling military hardware for wars. If several congressmen’s sons came home with legs and arms missing or in caskets things would change immediately. But as long as the stupid people continue to volunteer under the premise they are so dedicated to serving their country, nothing is going to change.
Think about it 100,000 in Afghanistan to change attitudes of totally uneducated idiots that have been that way for 1000 years is insane. However, several American companies are making the best profits they have made in many years, and the donations for the politicians just keep rolling in.
Remember when Libya got really stupid and took down an American airplane. What happened – Reagan ordered the bombing of the leader’s home and killed one of his daughters and others. Guess what - didn’t hear a peep out of Libya for 25 yrs and all it took was a very few airplanes and ONE bombing run. And how did WWII end? Again two bombs on two cities in Japan and it was all over. Truman was my hero, and I haven’t seen one politician since with his level of leadership.
It is all about the money.
 
 
0 # Cassandra2012 2012-09-24 12:18
2nd try! my long comment was just wiped out with some sort of hokey ad.....
1. Mittens evaded Vitnam by being a "missionary" in FRANCE! (DIDN'T KNOW YOU COULD BE EXEMPT FOR DECIDING TO PUSH YOUR PERSONAL FAITH ON OTHERS... that puts others who do not (e.g., Buddhists, Jews and Hindus) at a disadvantage.
2.Not ONE of his (5 ?) strapping sons chose to join any military organization not even at West Point or USNA level -- even the British royal family joins up, but Mitt's too-aristocrati c-to-be-part-of -the-nation family just spends its time making big buck$ and/or cheating others out of them (and in the case of GST Steel getting a US taxpayer 'bailout' to boot!!)
 
 
+32 # Maxwell 2012-09-21 19:44
No, America, the Republican Party doesn't care about you, not even a little bit.

If you're a returning veteran, the Republicans will gladly let you go jobless if it means making the job numbers look worse, therefore (presumably) making Obama look worse.

If it makes returning veterans feel any better: you are not alone. The Republican Party doesn't care about any of us. They and their financial benefactors have US holdings and do business in the US -- taking advantage of US tax laws, other legistlation favorable to business, lax supervision, and tax loopholes -- but their customers are pretty much the entire world.

They don't care if you go jobless, hungry, and uncared for. They don't care if the whole country goes to hell. They only care about this quarter's bottom line.

Sorry, but it really is as simple as that.
 
 
+3 # Regina 2012-09-22 10:16
But don't forget -- the wars our current vets fought in were the adventurisms of Dubyas gang of pols -- Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the "neocons" in the Republican Mafia. And their congressional stooges have the gall to dump an essentially bipartisan bill to aid vets of those wars. How patriotic!!!!
 
 
+18 # ghostperson 2012-09-21 20:55
Cruel, heartless and venal.

American soldiers have been blown up, shot, decapitated, stop lossed, sent back again and again to the point that they are in significant measure profoundly altered, mentally, and their recompense is a one-fingered to salute to heaven.

This is what our elected representatives do to young men and women whom they have put through a meat grinder? Allegedly, address the debt?

Well then why are they asking for further tax cuts for the wealthy? The cuts will shift burden to those same children and grandchildren while those whom old men send to die are not entitled to the nation's respect and gratitude?

If you live long enough, everything comes around again. This was the way our soldiers were treated when they came back from Viet Nam while being blamed for executive and congressional military blunders.

I am revolted and shamed by the senators' venality, especially McCain.
From the House, I expect puerile behavior.

Because House seats are in play in November, elections every two years, the right's 6-year termed senators took over the task of stonewalling so as to deny Obama a second term, just as the senate minority leader promised to do.

Sick, sick, sick.
 
 
+3 # HowardMH 2012-09-22 07:44
Until there are two hundred thousand really, really pissed off people on Capital Hill (all at the same time) raising some serious hell absolutely nothing is ever, ever going to happen to these totally bought and paid for by the richest 50 people in the world that are becoming more and more powerful with each passing rigged election thanks to the stupid people.
 
 
+14 # epcraig 2012-09-21 22:16
Romney expects us to forget that Republicans started our longest war yet, we offer our veterans the least support ever and veterans do vote.
 
 
+12 # Merschrod 2012-09-22 03:22
This was another golden opportunity for the Democrats - the lack of 40 means a filibuster can begin. Why did they Democrats make the Repubs stand and explain, hour after hour, right through the end of the session before the elections, and explain why they were not voting for veterans? It would be a fitting, final display of do-nothing obstructionism republicans. C-Span and the rest of the media could have carried it. Priceless!
 
 
+6 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-09-22 05:56
It’s just sound economics: they’re willing to die for the USA, in battle, so why bother keeping them around when their military usefulness is ended?
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2012-09-22 07:52
Just a confirmation that the Death Culture, as seen by the Rethugs, is comprised of Legislators and an Upper Military Heirachy, who's jobs are to manufacture the "Bad Guys" but who otherwise view the lower ranks as disposable cannon-fodder but have no wish to put themselves or their own spawn on the line.
They'd rather that they die than have to deal with what's left of combat and support personnel if they survive conflict, including having to handle depleted uranium and other lethal materiél, PTSD, suicide, family violence even unto spousal murder, many foreclosures, no work and possibly turning against the culture that recruited and propagandized them.
And then there's the willingness to hugely finance all this BEFORE the fact to further their own ambitions but not to clean up the mess at home and abroad.
Cowards is too good a word!
 
 
+6 # Granny Weatherwax 2012-09-22 09:20
"Unemployed they pay no tax"

Wrong!
Unemployed they pay no INCOME tax.
They still certainly pay for instance the sales tax, thank you very much.

Don't swallow the Rmoney bait, hook and sinker.
 
 
0 # jamminjames 2012-09-22 09:41
Editorial on the subject:
http://www.humortimes.com/12689/senators-who-vote-for-war-but-not-warriors/
 
 
+1 # popeye47 2012-09-23 06:24
So if 2 Republicans crossed over and voted for the Act, there must have been a few Democrats that crossed over to the other side. That is the ones I would be pissed at. No way to help our vets. Everyone that vote against the Act, send those bums over there. If they don't return, no loss.
 
 
+2 # ABen 2012-09-23 12:19
The act of denying returning vets this much needed and well deserved piece of legislation just to 'poke Obama in the eye,' is nothing short of despicable! This current iteration of the GOP absolutely disgusts me. How can any thoughtful, rational person support this group of political *!#@*s?
 
 
-1 # brami06 2012-09-24 11:44
You know what disgusts me? Election year legislation that is completely meaningless. By the VA's own estimate there are 1 million unemployed vets. 1 billion over 5 years for 1 million vets provides $200 per vet per year. This does not include the cost to setup and administer a program like this. This is the most despicable form of political gamesmanship, using the Vet to make political gains. The republicans got this one right. It's is a joke and nothing more that politics that feed the frenzy it causes with those that don't bother to think or use common sense.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN