RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Bloomberg editors write: "Mitt Romney sets an ambitious goal with his pledge to achieve US energy independence by 2020. It's just too bad his plan relies almost entirely on fossil fuels and largely ignores the solid promise of clean energy."

Mitt Romney pumps gas into a staff member's vehicle during a stop at Hillsborough Gas and Repair in Manchester, New Hampshire, last year. (photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)
Mitt Romney pumps gas into a staff member's vehicle during a stop at Hillsborough Gas and Repair in Manchester, New Hampshire, last year. (photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)



Romney's Drill Baby Drill Plan Ignores Solar and Wind

By Bloomberg | Editorial

25 August 12

 

itt Romney sets an ambitious goal with his pledge to achieve U.S. energy independence by 2020. It's just too bad his plan relies almost entirely on fossil fuels and largely ignores the solid promise of clean energy.

Romney's plan, rolled out Thursday in solar-friendly New Mexico, focuses heavily on oil, gas and, most unnecessarily, coal. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee promises to expand drilling on federal lands and to roll back environmental rules his campaign adviser Ed Gillespie says are "destroying the coal industry."

When it comes to renewable sources such as solar and wind, Romney's plan says more about what he won't do - namely, provide any more of the subsidies and loan guarantees that have allowed those technologies to gain a foothold. Instead, he offers to relax barriers he says are stymying clean energy and expand government funding of research. We also favor supporting clean-energy research, but question Romney's assertion that simply "streamlining" regulations and permitting will somehow catapult clean-energy projects.

Romney's white paper includes a few other worthwhile ideas, such as allowing drilling off the coast of Virginia, which has bipartisan support from that state's senators.

On balance, though, his plan threatens to upend the progress that has been made toward enabling the U.S. to meet much of its energy needs with less reliance on dirtier fuels like coal.

The U.S. is now closer to energy independence than anyone who waited in 1970s gas lines could have imagined. As Bloomberg News reports, oil imports fell to about 45 percent of U.S. demand last year and are expected to fall to about 42 percent this year, down from a peak of 60 percent in 2005. More than 80 percent of the country's demand for power is now met by domestic sources, a phenomenon largely attributable to new horizontal- drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies that enable energy companies to tap vast but once-inaccessible underground reserves of natural gas and oil.

All that cheap natural gas has slowly been pushing coal off its perch as the dominant American power source. As of April, natural gas has been producing just as much energy as coal, for the first time since the government began collecting data in 1973. Electricity generated from natural gas - which can be 45 percent cleaner than coal, if done properly - is expected to increase 23 percent this year, as coal-fueled power falls 12 percent, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. By 2035, coal is projected to supply just 39 percent of electricity, down from about 45 percent today, according to EIA.

Power primarily from wind, solar, biomass and geothermal sources, meanwhile, is projected to grow 33 percent from 2010 to 2035. By 2020, 10 percent of power is expected to come from renewables, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Much of this uptick can be credited to $90 billion in government assistance that's helped the industry get off the ground: Electricity generated from renewable sources such as wind and solar has increased 73 percent since President Barack Obama took office, according to a Bloomberg Government analysis.

The very real potential of greener fuel has also spawned thousands of companies and tens of thousands of jobs, according to industry and White House estimates. It's still a nascent business, in need of support to compete with an entrenched - and heavily government-subsidized - fossil fuel industry. Given how far clean energy has come, why stop it in its tracks now?

If Romney is looking for ideas, free-market strategies are the way to go. One that is gaining traction in many states is to require utilities to use a certain percentage of electricity generated by renewable power and then let the markets sort out the most efficient way to meet that target.

Even more helpful would be to support a carbon tax - something that two of Romney's top economic advisers have already called for. This would let the markets decide how much it's worth to them to send greenhouse gases aloft.

"I like wind and solar like the next person," Romney said in his speech Thursday. Listeners would be forgiven for thinking that the next person doesn't like them much at all.

Read more opinion online from Bloomberg View. Subscribe to receive a daily e-mail highlighting new View editorials, columns and op-ed articles.

Today's highlights: the editors on the SEC's dropping the ball on money market mutual funds and on the case for a smaller Afghan army; Stephen L. Carter on when the U.S. cared about chess; William Pesek on the Bo Xilai show trial in China; Thomas Geoghegan on why Obama is lucky that entitlements are out of control.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # Regina 2012-08-25 21:40
Romney & Co. are making a big deal out of spiting science. They really think they have a choice and can vote on a scientific issue. Unfortunately, if they're physically proven wrong it will be too late for the planet and its life forms. That's just one of the biggest reasons to defeat them now.
 
 
+3 # angelfish 2012-08-25 23:35
His "Handlers" are Oil Men, for the most part, and don't give a damn about Clean Energy! They will have him do what is in THEIR best interests, and to Hell with ANYONE or ANYTHING that stands in their way. It should be CLEAR to anyone with half a brain cell that Mr. Romney will do as his Mentor before him, G.W.Bush, did, and that is, exactly WHAT he is TOLD to do by the Money Men who will OWN him body and soul!
 
 
+4 # Mrcead 2012-08-26 03:07
Big coal is blasting mountain tops apart to sell coal to support an outdated technology. God isn't making any new coal enriched mountains that I am aware of.
 
 
+2 # James Smith 2012-08-26 03:31
It does not ignore that fossil fuel companies can be major contributors to his campaign. Romney, being the greedy hypocrite he is, certainly doesn't want to pay for his own election. It's always OPM (Other People's Money).
 
 
0 # ABen 2012-08-26 12:31
This is just more Romney puffing and pandering with very little insight or foresight. The energy sources of this century are "green" and renewable. The country with the most robust solar and wind tech and that has the best systems for controlling and integrating these sources will be truly energy independent and will be able to sell systems based on this tech to the rest of the world.
 
 
0 # MidwestTom 2012-08-26 14:00
How much oil and gas si burned determines how much CO2 goes to the atmosphere. Where oil and gas is produced determines the financial condition of our country. If we could somehow stop importing oil, our economic problems are greatly reduced. If the world stopped consuming oil the CO2 levels would drop. Talk to India and China, they produce 3 to 4 times the CO2 that we do, and their production is rising.
 
 
0 # Mannstein 2012-08-26 18:45
Not a word about improving energy efficiency inspite of the fact that about half of all US oil consumption is used for transportation.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN